Hi Tikk! I disagree that USAW should in any way discourage 'longshots' or try to limit OlyRS qualifiers in anyway. If we're seriously discussing change, I'd like to see fans rethink the association commonly made between:
1. Taking an OlyRS and;
2. Making an Olympic team
I'd love to see fans separate that association into two separate things that don't have much to do with each other. If we look at the OlyRS solely through the lens (photog reference for ya) of extending a wrestler's college career, it's much more fun. Imo.
I love Olympic years of College Wrestling! For a bunch of reasons, but the biggest one is that Oly Redshirts can stretch out the college careers of the studs who take them. That mixes up the fields better, and increases the chances we see matchups between college Oldheads and YoungGuns. That diversifying of fields provides fans better content. In that wild group of 174 pounders a few years ago (Matt Brown, Kokesh, Storley, Evans), only Andrew Howe managed to make Chris Perry actually wrestle--and look how good he was in that 2014 Final!
Flip that same question to what-if scenarios: if Dieringer had taken the 2016 OlyRS he was qualified for, came back and was in the mix with IMar & Cenzo at 165 in 2017. McKenna could be wrestling again this year, if he had taken one in 2016. If Thomas Gilman had taken both his NCAA & OlyRS, would Spencer Lee have even gone to Iowa? How about all the elite HSJRs or SRs who we won't get to see battle Mark Hall in 2021 or 2022, because he's going straight through like Gilman? Next year we get to watch Eiermann slide into a dope Hawkeye lineup. It goes on...
All I'm saying is that we can have a much more fun discussion of possible college folkstyle matchups, when we expand our vision of the OlyRS from 'harrumph, can he even MAKE an oly team' to 'whoa, look at all the
cool new toys we have in college now!'