Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right I forgot Franklin and his stupid rigid systemDotson is starting at a different WR position.
Which three WR’s should start ?Right I forgot Franklin and his stupid rigid system
He's gotta get more aggressive in going after the ball when it is in the air. Guys like Hamilton, Godwin, even Blacknall would have never let that first INT happen. They would have gone up and won that ball.
Yeah but to be fair, the first INT was basically a good punt in the 1st quarter and shorter’s drop in the end zone didn’t really matter, as we scored a TD a few plays later. The George PI was killer, but seemed like a questionable call. Point being, as bad as the “X” was, other things cost us the game today - terrible pass rush and secondary play, Rahne playcalling, and Clifford missing wide open receivers in the 1st half chief among themToday, this is what we got out of the WR “ X “ position : five drops, an interception on a contested catch, a dropped TD and a PI penalty that ended the winning TD drive.
On the positive side, we got one catch for eight yards and one catch for twenty yards. Blocking wasn’t tracked, so maybe there were some contributions.
This should not be lost on JF, Rahne and Parker. This position has produced almost nothing for our offense all season long and actually hurt us badly today. I suppose there was an anticipated problem this year with the efforts to bring in transfers to play this position and granting Chisena a scholarship.
I just hope JF is looking to the portal for next season at WR, because if Hamler leaves, our passing offense is really screwed.
The X problem has been all season and even last year. The stats for that position are dreadful. Defenses aren’t paying much mind to whoever we line up there and for good reason.Yeah but to be fair, the first INT was basically a good punt in the 1st quarter and shorter’s drop in the end zone didn’t really matter, as we scored a TD a few plays later. The George PI was killer, but seemed like a questionable call. Point being, as bad as the “X” was, other things cost us the game today - terrible pass rush and secondary play, Rahne playcalling, and Clifford missing wide open receivers in the 1st half chief among them
Ehh, I mean there’s no arguing the production out of the X has been awful going back to last year, but pinning this game on it is a bit much. The defense was responsible for giving up that first touchdown - Minnesota got the ball at their own 5. The interception shouldn’t have had made a big difference.The X problem has been all season and even last year. The stats for that position are dreadful. Defenses aren’t paying much mind to whoever we line up there and for good reason.
If Shorter makes that contested catch, we score a TD in all likelihood. Instead, MN gets the pick and it fires them up for a TD drive. It set the tone for the first half. In many ways, this game reminded me of the Pitt game from 2016.
This was sloppy game by us. Lots of unforced errors, poor fundamentals and bad decisions to go around. We have gotten away with this sort of play against inferior teams all season. The only team we can beat playing like that from here on out is Rutgers.
It was one game, and the first that he was actually targeted...not an excuse...but there is no reason that he couldn’t clean it up, especially considering the fact that PSU’s best, most targeted receiver has had drops that didn’t impact his play thereafter.
He did not play well today, but today's performance is NOT conclusive "evidence" of why he hasn't been targeted. It is just as likely to be QB growth, that maybe (despite the fact that he didn't play well today either) that 14 saw more of the field / more progressions than he has in previous games.Come on guys. All this bitching about not using Shorter and they come out and target him and he doesn’t break up an interception and has 2 terrible drops one of which was right in his hands for a TD. I’d like to see the kid turn it around, but today was Exhibit A on why he hasn’t played or been targeted more this year.
In all fairness, he's a redshirt freshman, correct? How many times before 2012 did guys with his experience start? Not only here, but across the country.
I don’t know how anybody could look at what Shorter has done on the field and conclude he is good enough to start. Maybe if Cam Sullivan Brown was available, he would be the starter now and we would have another passing option. George is a little better, but not much. You put either of these guys on the 2016 or 2017 roster and they would only see the field in garbage time.He did not play well today, but today's performance is NOT conclusive "evidence" of why he hasn't been targeted. It is just as likely to be QB growth, that maybe (despite the fact that he didn't play well today either) that 14 saw more of the field / more progressions than he has in previous games.
Must be the new WR coach.In all fairness, it isn’t pre 2012 anymore.
Oh my is he horrible!!!!!!
Football is team sport coaches included. Everybody is doing their best. Too many mistakes today but victory was still possible.
Maybe that's why we have 5 WR recruits in the next classWell I don't know about that but we should not be remiss should he hit the transfer portal. Next man up!
Not so sure about Parsons. For a leader on defense to sit out the first series because of needing a behavioral adjustment is not good. ABC actually had a graphic at the start of the game that said he would not be playing until the 2nd quarter. Windsor and Mustipher seemed to disappear the whole game today as we got absolutely no pressure on the QB up the middle. Also Culpepper looked lost and slow on the one long TD play. The offensive line did pass block well today, but so frustrating how many times late in the game we ran up the middle with little result.Guys he is a five star recruit. He is not even an average football player right now. Parsons is our only 5 star recruit that has played up to the hype. The 5 stars are huge disappointments.
If Hamler is gone next season, here’s hoping we see a lot of new faces at WR.Maybe that's why we have 5 WR recruits in the next class
I don’t know how anybody could look at what Shorter has done on the field and conclude he is good enough to start. Maybe if Cam Sullivan Brown was available, he would be the starter now and we would have another passing option. George is a little better, but not much. You put either of these guys on the 2016 or 2017 roster and they would only see the field in garbage time.
I can only assume we have a real talent deficiency at WR on our roster.
Correct. The conclusive evidence of why he should never play, is his performance on the field in every game of his career, not just today. Sit the kid and let him watch and then either get him a sports psychologist or let him drop passes somewhere else.He did not play well today, but today's performance is NOT conclusive "evidence" of why he hasn't been targeted. It is just as likely to be QB growth, that maybe (despite the fact that he didn't play well today either) that 14 saw more of the field / more progressions than he has in previous games.
Got nothing from it last year either and yet now Johnson is killing it out west. Is it the players?Today, this is what we got out of the WR “ X “ position : five drops, an interception on a contested catch, a dropped TD and a PI penalty that ended the winning TD drive.
On the positive side, we got one catch for eight yards and one catch for twenty yards. Blocking wasn’t tracked, so maybe there were some contributions.
This should not be lost on JF, Rahne and Parker. This position has produced almost nothing for our offense all season long and actually hurt us badly today. I suppose there was an anticipated problem this year with the efforts to bring in transfers to play this position and granting Chisena a scholarship.
I just hope JF is looking to the portal for next season at WR, because if Hamler leaves, our passing offense is really screwed.
We could say same against Kentucky, USC, Ohio St twice, Sparty twice, Maryland few years back. The list goes on. Tiring act.^^^ This. Despite the lack of execution and incompetent back judge we still almost snatched victory from the jaws of defeat. Think about it! And then gear up for IU because it won't be easy for our secondary.
Guys he is a five star recruit. He is not even an average football player right now. Parsons is our only 5 star recruit that has played up to the hype. The 5 stars are huge disappointments.
I think this says a lot. Then you look at the efforts before the season to get transfers and it is hard not to conclude the staff knew there were going to be deficiencies at WR this year. Combine that with the fact that the true freshman wideouts haven’t played a meaningful down this year. I have no idea why Weston Carr hasn’t been seeing the field.Maybe that's why we have 5 WR recruits in the next class
It was a terrible throw, way behind him if he leads him just a bit he might have a chance, He had Winfield boxed out-ball has to be in front of him to give him a chance.This X10000. Shorter is 6’4” 230 pounds. He just drifted away from the ball and let it come to him. He had plenty of time to adjust and attack that ball. That was a gimmie catch for the receivers you mentioned.
In 2014, he had 82 receptions. Over six a game. I’m thinking he was playing better than anyone expected.Looks like Shorter's had nine receptions this year. How well was Hamilton playing after his first nine receptions? Still remember how hard he took that Pitt drop, seemed to really motivate him.
Got nothing from it last year either and yet now Johnson is killing it out west. Is it the players?
Yeah but to be fair, the first INT was basically a good punt in the 1st quarter and shorter’s drop in the end zone didn’t really matter, as we scored a TD a few plays later. The George PI was killer, but seemed like a questionable call. Point being, as bad as the “X” was, other things cost us the game today
He did not play well today, but today's performance is NOT conclusive "evidence" of why he hasn't been targeted. It is just as likely to be QB growth, that maybe (despite the fact that he didn't play well today either) that 14 saw more of the field / more progressions than he has in previous games.
Killing it? One game is now "killing it"??
I'd say our scheme defensively contributed most. Waiting on teams to mess up, disguising delayed blitz's to the point that a CB is left on an island with two WRs and his safety help is in the middle of the field, our inability to play tight coverage and contest more throws...
Keaton Ellis might have gotten beat on the TD, but I'd rather have our guys covering like that and get beat than the flat footed off the ball coverage we saw yesterday. We finally adjusted in the 4th quarter, but after they had 31.
OL did great pass blocking. Considering Minnesota knew we would be passing as they had the lead and had been working clock, they were ineffective getting to Clifford. On one of the sacks, Brown slipped out of the back field and wasn't picked up. On another, Clifford could have stepped up and thrown it away.
They only scored 7 points in the second half.
No doubt he needs to be better there, but Clifford underthrew that ball by 7 yards. Good pass is an easy TD.
#5 did NOT adjust to anything.
Several things in play:Oh my is he horrible!!!!!!
Cliff’s a solid QB and continues to grow, but had an off game. Off days happen. Hope the kids aren’t too disappointed and bounce back quickly.No doubt he needs to be better there, but Clifford underthrew that ball by 7 yards. Good pass is an easy TD.
Yeah but to be fair, the first INT was basically a good punt in the 1st quarter and shorter’s drop in the end zone didn’t really matter, as we scored a TD a few plays later. The George PI was killer, but seemed like a questionable call. Point being, as bad as the “X” was, other things cost us the game today - terrible pass rush and secondary play, Rahne playcalling, and Clifford missing wide open receivers in the 1st half chief among them