I hope Oklahoma gets embarrassed again. I'm tired of them getting the benefit of the doubt for winning the Little 12(10).Clemson is definitely fresher.
Hope Oklahoma wins the whole thing. Meh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope Oklahoma gets embarrassed again. I'm tired of them getting the benefit of the doubt for winning the Little 12(10).Clemson is definitely fresher.
Hope Oklahoma wins the whole thing. Meh.
I hope Oklahoma gets embarrassed again. I'm tired of them getting the benefit of the doubt for winning the Little 12(10).
Unlike Clemson who had 12 layup wins; they’re great right?
I do think it’s relevant. The last month has been a theme that PSU is almost there and absent OSU being one of best teams ever we’d have won and be in the playoff. If the premise is wrong then how close are we really? OSU winning the NC or losing close means we are really close, if not though then what?
What does that say about where PSU and the conference is? OSU went undefeated by double digits and it’s easy to chalk our losses up as OSU “being one of greatest teams ever” but what if not? Are we the baddies then?
Nothing. It will say that Clemson is better than Ohio State.
I see this all the time down here in SEC Country. The SEC as a conference takes full credit for Alabama winning 5 National Championships the last 10 years. NO.... the SEC did not win 5 National Championships... Alabama won them.
To flip your logic.... What if OU beats LSU. Does that say that the Big12 is better than the SEC? Does that say that a team that blew thru the SEC... beat Florida... beat Auburn... beat bama in Tuscaloosa... beat Georgia... a team that blew thru the SEC.... could not beat a Big12 team.. so therefore the Big12 is better than the SEC?
Or, would it say that on that particular night OU was better and beat LSU.
Why do you think that is? Maybe because it’s getting harder to tell the PSU “fans” from the Pitt trolls.
The SEC and Alabama and Saban all take too much credit. The BCS and Sports Media owns a bunch of it. The BCS and current system awards prettiness and eye test more than anything. When it was two team the hammering love fest about the SEC created a self fulfilling prophecy. If you keep putting an SEC team in a national title game that only two teams (and sometimes one league) can play...they have a chance to keep winning. I assure you, if there had actually been a playoff of champions, Saban would not be the GOAT per today’s media. He would not have won that many championships. He would still sit behind great coaches like Bear, Woody and Joe (and his 5 undefeated teams and 409 wins).Nothing. It will say that Clemson is better than Ohio State.
I see this all the time down here in SEC Country. The SEC as a conference takes full credit for Alabama winning 5 National Championships the last 10 years. NO.... the SEC did not win 5 National Championships... Alabama won them.
To flip your logic.... What if OU beats LSU. Does that say that the Big12 is better than the SEC? Does that say that a team that blew thru the SEC... beat Florida... beat Auburn... beat bama in Tuscaloosa... beat Georgia... a team that blew thru the SEC.... could not beat a Big12 team.. so therefore the Big12 is better than the SEC?
Or, would it say that on that particular night OU was better and beat LSU.
The SEC and Alabama and Saban all take too much credit. The BCS and Sports Media owns a bunch of it. The BCS and current system awards prettiness and eye test more than anything. When it was two team the hammering love fest about the SEC created a self fulfilling prophecy. If you keep putting an SEC team in a national title game that only two teams (and sometimes one league) can play...they have a chance to keep winning. I assure you, if there had actually been a playoff of champions, Saban would not be the GOAT per today’s media. He would not have won that many championships. He would still sit behind great coaches like Bear, Woody and Joe (and his 5 undefeated teams and 409 wins).
Seems so very similar to PSU’s 31 game undefeated streak that extended over parts of four seasons (1967-1970). They never “beat anybody”, they had a couple close calls, so they couldn’t have been any good.....
(NOTE: MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF SARCASM!)
I'd never take anything away from Saban & Bama. They are a great program, on a great run, and he's a great Coach. I'm just saying that down here in ATL, when you begin debating with SEC fans about strength of Conference they will eventually say how the "SEC has won 5 national championships recently". No. Alabama did.
I heard it a few years ago when Kentucky was the best BB program. The SEC would claim to be the best basketball conference because "THEY" won the NCAA Tourny... No, the SEC did not win the NCAA Tourny, Kentucky did.
If Ohio State wins the National Championship this year, The B1G did not win the National Championship. Not sure about you, but I am not going to go around claiming the B1G is the best conference because WE won the national championship.... No, WE did not win the national championship, it would be Ohio State
Differing opinions is not the problem, it’s the posters who post nothing but negative shit about Penn State and find the bad in everything about the team. If someone’s a fan, by definition they like the team so there should be at least some things they feel are positive. Complaining, griping, bitching, and finding something wrong with everything is not being a fan...sorry, it just isn’t.Perhaps if you (referring to those who call out posters for expressing a differing opinion) took off the blue and white colored glasses and laid aside the "polly anna" mantle it wouldn't be so difficult to see that PSU fans can legitimately have differing views and opinions and should be allowed to express them without name calling and being labeled with degrading verbiage.
It’s not like they have anything to prove. there is the fact they have won umpteen games straight, two of the last three NCs, and are defending champions. You might be overlooking a few things?
No Dave, you are the one talking out of both sides of your mouth, not me. You want to diss Franklin’s record because PSU has 6 lay ups each year, but ignore the fact that Clemson’s entire schedule this year was lay ups. Clemson has won National Championships after making the playoffs and congrats to them. However, their path to the playoffs has been decidedly easier playing in the ACC.
If QB Fabio gets hurt, OSU wins for sure.
If OSU is going to win, the greatest defensive player in the history of mankind (or so some seem to think) needs to at least show up unlike what he’s done the last two games.You think Clemson is beating OSU? Based on what? Who has Clemson played or beaten this year?
I don’t see how you get there. If you’re trying to gauge national championship caliber and you get blown out in the playoffs, that says a lot. And this wouldn’t be a one off event - it’s happened before.It means nothing. OSU demonstrated over 13 games that they are a very good team. If they should happen to lose big to Clemson, that only means that Clemson was better than them that day. It doesn't invalidate their entire season or where their program is.
Our program has gone sideways since the B1G championship 3 years ago. No playoffs. 4-5 record vs our primary foes in the B1G East. 1-2 in bowl games, for what that’s worth. We are no closer or further away than we were at this time in 2016.
I will be loving ever minute of it just like last time 31-0 never forget.What does that say about where PSU and the conference is? OSU went undefeated by double digits and it’s easy to chalk our losses up as OSU “being one of greatest teams ever” but what if not? Are we the baddies then?
I hope Oklahoma gets embarrassed again. I'm tired of them getting the benefit of the doubt for winning the Little 12(10).
sounds like some people at my workOklahoma constantly gets the benefit of the doubt for doing NOTHING
I would not be surprised to see clemson win big. It is true clemson has played a cupcake schedule but they are deep, talented and have speed at every position. They are the new Alabama program.What does that say about where PSU and the conference is? OSU went undefeated by double digits and it’s easy to chalk our losses up as OSU “being one of greatest teams ever” but what if not? Are we the baddies then?
Clemson played 12th ranked Texas A&M when they met.I guess reading comprehension isn’t one of your strong suits, huh? Never said Clemson wasn’t any good and in fact I specifically said they may well win the National Championship again. What I said was (1) I don’t think Clemson would have won 28 straight games playing in the Big Ten East; (2) Clemson didn’t play a ranked team this year until it played UVA (24) last Saturday night: and (3) given No 2, this talk about none of the other playoff teams wanting to play Clemson was media BS.
The game will be close unless Fields does not play. O$U will put up points against them.I would not be surprised to see clemson win big. It is true clemson has played a cupcake schedule but they are deep, talented and have speed at every position. They are the new Alabama program.
I’ll have what he is having.... pass that over here!What does that say about where PSU and the conference is? OSU went undefeated by double digits and it’s easy to chalk our losses up as OSU “being one of greatest teams ever” but what if not? Are we the baddies then?