Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While Howard Johnson was the first ever National Champion, I feel Gabby Johnson deserves honorable mention.
Ruth? Taylor?Nolf by a hair over Zain. Bo third. By request, currently holding beers for Starocci and Brooks.
what we really need is 1a,1b,1c,1d,1e.... ,)How do you take into account a guy who wins a world title and almost all his losses in college were to another guy who went on to win a world title. Taylor may not have 3 title like Zain, Nolf, and Bo, but it is hard to rank him below those guys.
It has to be DT for me. He paved the way and was the original bonus machine.. not to mention what he did after college and his continued impact on PSU wrestling.Zain went undefeated for three straight seasons, which none of the others did. Who, besides Cael, went undefeated for three straight seasons? Jason obviously would have had it not been for the injury default to Van Brill. Absent that injury default, Jason would lead Penn State in career win percentage. Choosing a top five for me is almost impossible. Zain was a relentless punisher. He was one of the very few college wrestlers I just couldn't wait to see in the top position. David's technical prowess, top game and offensive output were a thing of beauty. As far as Ed, I have never seen anyone make wrestling look so effortless. It was like he could just switch to another gear whenever he needed. Jason's wrestling IQ, relentless pace, offensive output and calmness on the mat were such a rare combination. Bo's variety of attacks, his ability to wrestle both upper body and traditional leg attacks, his high level of proprioception and his ability to be at his best in the biggest of moments made his college career so special. All I can say is that all of us college wrestling fans have been blessed to watch all of these guys wrestle!
Since Zain was insanely dominant on top most folks just consider him one dimensional but he was just as good on his feet as any of these guys. No one cleared out a weight class like Zain Train, he’s my #1.Nolf was so unique in trying to score from any position. Bo was always looking for the big move to the back. Zain was a meat grinder.
Taylor was just technically superior than his opponents with one slip up against Bubba. Ruth was just blessed with a unique physic that created leverage and torque that most guys didn't have at his weight.
If they all weighed the same I think I bet on Taylor to win most decisions in a round robin.
It will depends on how and who he beat too imo… he would had an extra year.. bo, Zain, nolf, Ruth prolly all be 4x wit extra year.. and if no Dake then DT prolly 4xer tooIf Carter wins out he will be one of a kind.
2 losses, 5 titles, that‘s GOAT territory and easily PSUGOAT.
Just had a knee appointment with him in February. He could still make weight and pass for 35 as far as age goes.Jimmy Martin, teammate, friend, all around good guy. Glad he still gets the recognition.
uhhh…Bubba?It will depends on how and who he beat too imo… he would had an extra year.. bo, Zain, nolf, Ruth prolly all be 4x wit extra year.. and if no Dake then DT prolly 4xer too
Quentin had to promise Ed's mother that Q would help Ed and keep an eye on him for Ed's mother to AOK the Penn State adventure.No love for Quentin and Nick Lee? I saw Quentin beat Ed Ruth twice in high school.
Uhhh…I already accounted for Bubba.. hence why I said if no dake DT woulda most likely be a 4xer w/ extra year.. if no dake and bubba then probable 5xer..uhhh…Bubba?
Not everyone. Look at the “likes” your post received.I am always amazed that everyone puts Taylor over Ruth without much discussion. Ed Ruth was as good as anyone that ever wore a blue singlet with a white belt.
i think your kid's dagger went thru your brainUhhh…I already accounted for Bubba.. hence why I said if no dake DT woulda most likely be a 4xer w/ extra year.. if no dake and bubba then probable 5xer..
Have to take into account that ZR wrestled as a true freshman. Also let’s look at results of Zain vs Pantaleo and Nolf vs Pantaleo ….Nolf by a hair over Zain. Bo third. By request, currently holding beers for Starocci and Brooks.
Quentin also wrestled as a true freshman. That makes a big difference when comparing them to the guys that took a redshirt in their 1st year. Does anybody have the numbers of the top ten or so who scored the most team points at NCAA?Have to take into account that ZR wrestled as a true freshman. Also let’s look at results of Zain vs Pantaleo and Nolf vs Pantaleo ….
StieberWhy not O$U and maybe Wis. Striebler was 21 when he won his first title. As a comparison Lee Kemp was 18 when he started as a true freshman was out of college winning a world title at 21. When I think about greatest of all time the margin is razor thin so for me a guy like Kemp with 4 finals 3 titles beats out old man Steibler.
I would have a few PSU wrestlers above Old Man Streibler.
I like your thinking but with this thinking where do you put Dake on GOAT list, isnt he the only 4x who didnt RS?Why not O$U and maybe Wis. Striebler was 21 when he won his first title. As a comparison Lee Kemp was 18 when he started as a true freshman was out of college winning a world title at 21. When I think about greatest of all time the margin is razor thin so for me a guy like Kemp with 4 finals 3 titles beats out old man Steibler.
I would have a few PSU wrestlers above Old Man Streibler.
If only they had faced each other, so we could compare.I am always amazed that everyone puts Taylor over Ruth without much discussion. Ed Ruth was as good as anyone that ever wore a blue singlet with a white belt.
I don’t know about anyone else, but I found that match super unsatisfying though. The subjectivity of some freestyle calls remains the style’s biggest weakness, and an 8 pt swing on one is just nuts. I don’t think there’s any question that DT has ascended to the highest level of ability of all our guys. But I just can’t rank these guys, just can’t do it.If only they had faced each other, so we could compare.
The top 10 list does have Q.No love for Quentin and Nick Lee? I saw Quentin beat Ed Ruth twice in high school.
Quentin had to promise Ed's mother that Q would help Ed and keep an eye on him for Ed's mother to AOK the Penn State adventure.
Here is an interesting thought. Would anyone being discussed be considered the greatest wrestler in the history of:
Iowa - possibly
Iowa St - No
Oklahoma St - No
Ohio St - No
Cornell - No
Oklahoma - No
Wisconsin - Maybe
We still have work to do!
Snyder based upon his college career only, would not be above several PSU champs. He lost during his SR year.Where else would he have gone?
Iowa - Banach, Brands, McIlravy and whoever PSU puts in there would all be up for discussion. When Spencer wins his 4th argument will be over.
Iowa St - yeah.
OSU - Pat Smith is the first 4xer. A class above any PSU
tOSU - Stieber and Snyder ahead of any PSUer
Cornell - Dake
Oklahoma - Hodge
Wisconsin - Any of the PSU 3xers ahead of Lee Kemp. He was never dominant.
He won World and Olympic Titles while still in college. That should absolutely count.Snyder based upon his college career only, would not be above several PSU champs. He lost during his SR year.
The ultimate metric for me is losses, thats why its so easy for me to have Cael #1, and its not like he only had 83 wins either, 159 MATCHES,let alone WINS will never be reached again (maybe by guys with 5 years) What Cael did doesnt get enough credit in the sports world IMO.I think it is poetic justice that we can neither determine a clear cut order, nor the top slot. I am pleased with just the list.
A couple of interesting items:
Bo was just a fraction away from being our only 4x'er, where an unfortuitous roll-through not only cost him at least 4 points, but resulted in I believe a 10 point swing in the match, which also cost him his first title. Go back and watch that match and see who really dominated.
Now we have both Carter and Aaron as potential 4x'ers or more. I love them both, but without finishing their careers with a significant increase in bonus % one could argue against either topping the list in 2 more years.
Most will agree, National titles is the ultimate metric; however, in terms of greatness it is hard to ignore a near equal weighting being given to total pins and/or overall bonus %, either of which is a much more consistent measure of 'domination'.