Or the team got better as the season went on and would have with Clary as well. Again, the first half of the game they played where he got hurt (in the second half) was one of the best halves they played all year. When no one else can make a shot, the guy who can has to shoot more. As the others got their shot going, he was shooting less.
Do you play in the Mountain West? No? Then the answer is no (to getting an at-large bid)…
Benefit of playing in a conference that had a lot of good non-conference wins (and why it's dumb when people root against teams in their own conference...them winning helps out your profile).Do you play in the Mountain West? No? Then the answer is no (to getting an at-large bid)…
This is a clever play. You were able to stay on point by changing your argument from "the team isn't better without their best offensive player" to " the rest of the team finally got better and they now no longer need him". This is almost comical how you were able to do it so seamlessly.
That’s not what I was saying at all…he was the best offensive player on the team and we wouldn’t have won squat without him for most of the season. They played a couple good games while he was hurt, but that doesn’t mean they’re better without him. It just means they played a couple of good games without him.
Funny that we
funny how we can still be as high as 6, and as low as 11
I was wrong…. I just created a scenario with psu at 13. That’s a wide range with two games left
