I have no problem with the top guy doing either of those things. Pushing to go out of bounds is an approximation of the push out rule, which I like anyway. And it’s incumbent upon the bottom guy to get out anyway so if the top is breaking him down, who cares?I can think of a lot of other exceptions. Top man pushes forward to eventually move the action out of bounds. Top man breaks him down and basically does nothing so eventually a stallmate, etc. The idea sounds good but lots of ways the top man can get away with not giving up a point.