OSU dropped from 2 to 6 after losing to number 3 on the road by a score. bama just lost to #8. Dropping 4 spots isnt crazy or unprecedented even if someone wants to act like it is.
Who gets in Bama or Texas?
- Thread starter PSUWrestlingFanSince2011
- Start date
Well this guy is silly. The Committee has consistently shown that CCG winner go up, often significantly, and losers go down especially below CCG winners with the same or fewer losses.
No, it does make the most sense. Georgia is the team the committee felt was "considerably better" than everyone else. Why drop them far for losing by 3 in an "extra game"
USC dropped 6 last year.
Would you like me to go further because that's not the only time.
The beat #9 and #11 which is far better than anything FSU has
Texas only has 1 comparable win
Fair--and TCU fell one spot so because they were previously undefeated which I should have incluided.
Give an example of a CCG loser who is ranked ahead of a CCG winner with the same or fewer losses.
Michigan should not be in the CFP. Don't cheat and expect to be included.
Haha! Funny stuff.
Michigan and Washington are 1 and 2, so he's got that right.
FSU is probably 4.
Georgia is out.
3 is between Alabama and Texas...as per the title of the thread.
How can the Tide get the nod when the Horns beat them?
On the other hand, if the sacred SEC is left out, there may be another mass secession of southern states from the Union.
It's really not chaotic. It's only chaotic to those who think #sec means something.
You have three 13-0 P5 Champs.
You have two 12-1 P5 Champs.
One of those 12-1 Champs beat the other by 10 points on the road.
Simple.
We'll see if the committee has the balls to put Bama and Georgia at 5/6
I'm all for it. That will end college football as we know it which is a good thing.
Anyone that believe the SEC and the networks will tolerate that is crazy.
Find me an example of a 12-0 team ranked 1 that lost a CCG and fell more than 3 spots
We all can come up with scenarios
This is year is unlike any other so we'll see what the committee does and who's really in control
As long as people’s opinions play a major role in who gets in, nothing will be fixed.
That's not a fix. The SEC doesn't need the ACC or Big XII. Neither does the Big Ten.
Why stay in this league and leave it up to "a committee" when you can form something far better?
We all know the NCAA is dying when it comes to football. It's just how fast.
A 12-0 team has never lost a conference championship game in a season where all of the p5 champs were 13-0 or 12-1.
With expansion next year the Big Ten/SEC could have held a 12 team playoff of featuring...
Michigan, Washington, Ohio State, Oregon, Penn State and Iowa
Georgia, Texas, Bama, Missouri, Ole Miss and Oklahoma
Hell even do 8--that's a better playoff and more money.
Michigan, Washington, Ohio State, Oregon, Penn State and Iowa
Georgia, Texas, Bama, Missouri, Ole Miss and Oklahoma
Hell even do 8--that's a better playoff and more money.
Ohio State over Bama and Texas, two conference champs? You have no clue. Just leave Georgia #1 and don't play any of the games. Gilmore is a clown, doing that just says none of the games matter.
You give way more value to a title than you should. Ohio State has one loss to #1. They fact their not in the mix is a joke.
None of the games matter except the sec title game and that one only matters for the winner. Worst sport ever.
You'd probably have to leave Ohio State at 5 for that to work. It's why I think Georgia at 3 makes sense.
Texas Alabama isn’t the only h2h win the committee needs to deal with… I think you’re forgetting another one….
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Football Adisa Isaac finds perfect landing spot in Baltimore- Latest: Dylan Callaghan-Croley