But that may not be the one that they want. I understand what your saying that if they think that all the QBs are the same then you take Barkley at 1 and whichever QB is there at 4 you take. But if they feel that 1 or 2 of the QBs in their evaluations are the best then do you take that gamble?
We all love Barkley, but as we all know there are no guarantees in the NFL draft look at Kijana Carter. Also if you are the Browns you have to look at value of the picks and career life of the positions and the depth of the positions.
Again the Browns can take their favorite QB at 1 and then take the DE Chubb at 4 and then take arguably the 2nd to 4th best RB at the top of the second round. If they get Guice, Chubb, Or Sony Micheal at the top of the second they are still getting a really good RB.
Agree...Browns with take a QB at 1. However, they are nuts if they pass on Barkley at 4, IMHO. There is a HUGE drop off from Barkley to the consensus #2, Guice (and the rest). I've not seen a back like Barkley since the "west coast" offense came into vogue. In addition, probably the only are not of need for the Browns, is DE. Not only do they have Garret, they've got a darn good DE on the other side (Ogbah).