ADVERTISEMENT

Michigan asks victims of sexual assault to come forward day after criminal investigation ended

"In the 1980s, Schembechler was concerned about the rise of steroids and other drugs in college football. He began bringing in a local FBI agent to talk to his players."

That's the FBI profiler I was looking for earlier. Greg Stejskal.

He wrote this scathing column about Joe Paterno in 2012.

Ex-FBI Agent: Bo Schembechler Would Have Handled Penn State Sex Scandal Differently
July 15, 2012, 10:10 AM

Greg Stejskal served as an FBI agent for 31 years and retired as resident agent in charge of the Ann Arbor office. He is an occasional contributor to Deadline Detroit.

By Greg Stejskal

The results of an independent investigation by ex-FBI Director Louie Freeh has been released about the Penn State scandal and it’s quite damning.

Apparently Penn State football coach Joe Paterno knew of allegations of Sandusky’s sexual child abuse as early as 1998. He apparently forced Sandusky to “retire” from the PSU coaching staff (after the 1999 season), but gave him a unique severance package including $168,000 and the designation Assistant Professor Emeritus – thus, allowing Sandusky continued, unrestricted access to Penn State athletic facilities.

This makes Paterno’s actions and inaction in 2002 all the more indefensible. When confronted with an eyewitness account of Sandusky sexually abusing a child in a shower at the PSU football facility, Paterno passed the report to his superiors. But rather than actively pursue it, Paterno counseled that the allegations not be reported to law enforcement or child welfare services.

Paterno was an active participate in the cover-up. Then he lied about it under oath.

That being said, it made me think that Bo Schembechler, who I got to know while I headed up the FBI’s Ann Arbor office, would have handled it differently from the beginning, and it would not have ended like this.

He used to say: “ Do the Right Thing –Always.”

Bo was a legendary football coach at Michigan from 1969-1989 and a peer of Paterno.

To the best of my knowledge, Bo never had to deal with any of his staff being alleged child molesters. He did have situations that required staff and players having to take responsibility for their acts even if it might reflect badly on Michigan, a place he loved and revered.

In 1987, the FBI was investigating two sports agents, Norby Walters and Lloyd Bloom, who had ties to organized crime. Walters and Bloom had worked up a scam where they bribed blue-chip college football players to sign post-dated, secret, agency contracts while they were still eligible to play college football - a clear violation of NCAA rules. Ultimately some of the players balked, threats were made by Walters and Bloom, and the whole thing fell apart. Players who had signed the contracts were identified. They were all star players on prominent college teams. Two of the players were on Bo’s 1986 Michigan team.

When Bo found out, he was livid. He called one of the players, Garland Rivers, an All-American DB, into the office and had Rivers tell him the whole story. Then Bo called me.

When I got to Bo’s office, Bo told Rivers “Tell this FBI agent everything about your relationship with Norby Walters.” Bo could have distanced himself and Michigan from the investigation. Michigan would have been just one of many major football programs victimized by Walters and Bloom. But that wasn’t Bo. Damage control doesn’t mean hiding from the truth. It means taking responsibility for your actions and trying to rectify the mistakes.

Walters and Bloom had enticed his players to break the rules. They had besmirched Michigan. Bo knew he had to take a stand and do what he could to protect future players from illicit agents. Later when Walters and Bloom went on trial in Federal Court for racketeering and fraud, Bo testified. He was the star witness. His testimony was so strong, the defense declined to cross exam him. Walters and Bloom were convicted. What had been a dark moment in Michigan football history was a comeback win as important as any that had occurred on the field.

So what would Bo have done if faced with an assistant coach who was suspected of molesting young boys. We’ll never know for sure, but I’m certain that he wouldn’t have just reported the allegations to his boss and done nothing else. Bo would have made sure the police were aware of the allegations. And that assistant coach would not have any further connection with the University and wouldn't be emeritus anything.

We may never know why Paterno failed to pursue the Sandusky matter further. Perhaps Paterno didn’t do more out of a misguided effort to protect the reputation of Penn State, but if that was the motive, far more damage has been done to Penn State’s reputation than would have been done had this matter been fully confronted in 1998 or 2002.

Bo did not see various degrees or shades of honor and integrity. You either did the right thing or you didn’t – half way was unacceptable.
 
Last edited:
Boom. Class-action lawsuit filed against the University of Michigan AND its Board of Regents.

Lawsuit seeking class-action status filed over alleged UM doctor abuse
Kim Kozlowski, The Detroit News
Published 3:21 p.m. ET March 9, 2020

A lawsuit seeking to be certified as class action was filed Monday against the University of Michigan in connection with sexual abuse allegations against the late Dr. Robert E. Anderson.

The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Detroit, was filed against UM and the Board of Regents for allowing Anderson to sexually abuse students while employed by the university from 1968 until 2003, according to the lawsuit filed by the Miller Law Firm; Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein; and Sauder Schelkopf.

Annika K. Martin, a spokeswoman for Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, said it's not clear yet how many plaintiffs will be represented in the suit. “Given the length of his tenure, we estimate it is going to be thousands,” Martin said.

Anderson was for the former head of University Health Service and team physician for the UM Athletic Department from 1968-2003. He died in 2008.

"UM had and has a duty to protect the health and safety of its students, and this duty includes protecting them from sexual assaults by UM employees, and responding properly if a sexual assault does occur," the lawsuit said.

"UM violated this duty by failing to implement and enforce appropriate policies and procedures to prevent, and properly respond to, sexual assaults of its students; by ignoring and concealing complaints of sexual assaults by Anderson; by retaliating against those who did report misconduct by Anderson; and by failing to properly supervise Anderson and terminate him."

UM officials did not immediately comment Monday.

The lawsuit is the latest filed against UM since allegations emerged last month that Anderson allegedly assaulted male patients. Former Attorney General Mike Cox and Southfield-based lawyer David Shea filed the first lawsuits last week and over the weekend, including one that alleged a UM track runner told two of his coaches about Anderson.

The lawsuit that seeks to become class action was brought on behalf of former student-patients who allege Anderson used his position to "repeatedly and regularly sexually assault" students under the guise of medical care, according to the lawsuit.

Named as the lead plaintiff is John Doe, a former UM football player who attended the university on an academic scholarship from 1989 to 1993. He was required to see Anderson approximately six times for physicals and medical ailments while playing football and was assaulted during every visit, according to the suit.

"At each visit, Anderson ordered plaintiff to remove his pants or shorts and underwear," according to the suit. "Then, with no explanation given — or consent offered — Anderson examined, handled, and fondled plaintiff’s penis and testicles. Anderson next instructed plaintiff to turn around, after which Anderson digitally penetrated plaintiff’s anus and probed his interior, causing plaintiff shock, pain and shame."

The suit said the man trusted Anderson.

"Despite his shock, pain and trauma, he rationalized Anderson’s abuse as part of normal medical protocol," said the lawsuit. "Plaintiff believed that UM’s prestigious football team would provide the best possible doctors to care for its players. Plaintiff thus believed Anderson must have had a legitimate medical purpose for his examinations."

The suit said the former football player still suffers from repercussions of the alleged abuse.

"He has difficulty trusting people," the suit said. "Doctor visits remain anxiety inducing, often causing him to postpone appointments repeatedly. His abuse by Anderson continues to cause him numerous emotional and psychological trauma. Plaintiff suffers from generalized anxiety disorder, for which he sees a therapist and psychiatrist."

The lawsuit notes that UM heard complaints about Anderson after his hiring in 1968 during medical exams.

“The patient-physician relationship involves a solemn commitment and trust." the lawsuit said.“For decades, the University of Michigan (“UM”) allowed and enabled a physician in its employ, Dr. Robert E. Anderson (“Anderson”) to continuously violate that solemn trust. In so doing, UM itself violated the trust of thousands of young male students."
 
How on earth are there ZERO responses to a class-action lawsuit vs Michigan and its Board of Regents on behalf of what should be THOUSANDS of UM student athletes who were molested for decades by Robert E Anderson? Time to spend more time on the MSU boards.

I read it. It’s going to get worse for michigan before it gets better (if it ever does). Still, the media and general public won’t care.
 
I'm gonna get nasty during football season. These people, the ones who ran their mouths, they will learn the folly of their ways.

AND WHERE THE **** IS OUR MONEY!?!?!??!?! IT OBVIOUSLY WASN'T PUT TO GOOD USE.
 
I'm gonna get nasty during football season. These people, the ones who ran their mouths, they will learn the folly of their ways.

AND WHERE THE **** IS OUR MONEY!?!?!??!?! IT OBVIOUSLY WASN'T PUT TO GOOD USE.

Yeah, what in the EFF ever happened to this??

Big Ten schools to again use bowl revenues to support children

Last year, Penn State worked with the Centre County United Way (CCUW) to determine where these funds were most needed. The donation was then equally distributed between the Stewards of Children education and prevention program and the Children’s Advocacy Center, a victim services agency. Both programs will split Penn State’s portion of funds again this year to further promote their missions.

“The Stewards of Children program is an important resource in the fight against child sexual abuse,” Tammy Gentzel, CCUW executive director, said. “Under the leadership of the YMCA of Centre County, Centre County Women’s Resource Center and Centre County Youth Service Bureau, thousands of adults have been provided with the information they need to keep our children safe. This significant funding will ensure that Stewards of Children training continues in Centre County.”

The Children’s Advocacy Center of Centre County, under the umbrella of Mount Nittany Health and located in Bellefonte, Pa., provides a centralized location for child abuse victims to receive necessary services including medical care. While the current investigatory process requires a child to participate in multiple interviews with different people at different locations, the Children’s Advocacy Center provides a safe space for multiple service representatives to collaborate in a single location.

“As a growing organization, this generous donation will aid our mission of providing a compassionate approach to the prevention, identification, intervention and treatment of child abuse or neglect, and help us offer more services to victims and their families,” Kristina Taylor-Porter, Children’s Advocacy Center executive director, said. “Meeting the needs of children and their families is our primary concern. Penn State’s contribution will go far in our region’s fight against child abuse.”

In 2013, the 12 Big Ten schools divided $2.3 million of bowl revenues among a host of organizations serving and protecting children.

https://news.psu.edu/story/317257/2...ools-again-use-bowl-revenues-support-children
 

Cox asked if WilmerHale will "really focus on the corrupt leadership" at UM that allegedly allowed this to happen including past university presidents who "knew about Anderson's preying on hundreds of young men for the past year and only reacted when the press broke the story."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TheGLOV
Why can't espn blow this up for ratings for a week? There's nothing else going on. Humiliate all of them like we were humiliated. Lie, sensationalize, and lie some more. The ratings are sitting there waiting to be picked up.

F*CK michigan and michigan fans and alumni. Fry them up like calamari.

Lying, cheating, smug shitstains.
 
Unfortunately with the forest fire presently burning in the country with C19, this is the equivalent of a match landing on already burning ground.
My bad, maybe this post will get deleted just like my post this morning that generated good imput on the article from Marc Thiessen titled ' Time to practice economic distancing from China'.
 
I was just playing a free version of Spider Solitaire on my iPad when the following ad appeared at the bottom of the screen:

“WERE YOU A VICTIM OF DR. ANDERSON AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN?

THE MIKE COX LAW FIRM CAN HELP.

CLICK HERE”

The now-famous old, creepy black-and-white photo of a younger handerson in the middle of the ad drew my attention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChiTownLion
Article in full:

Michigan's Warde Manuel mishandled Dr. Robert Anderson complaint by sending it to lawyers
David Jesse, Detroit Free Press

University of Michigan Athletic Director Warde Manuel did not follow university policy when he forwarded a letter alleging sexual assault by a former football team doctor to the university's lawyers instead of the school's Title IX investigators.

Because lawyers got to see the letter before any investigator, they got an early warning of potential liability to the school.

There are about 40 lawsuits pending in federal court against U-M alleging the university covered up Robert Anderson's sexual assaults of student athletes for decades. There could be many more lawsuits to come — at least three other prominent lawyers have said they each have dozens of potential victims, none of whom have filed suit yet.

"The University of Michigan not following their own policies indicates they were covering something up," said Parker Stinar, the attorney for the man who sent the letter. "Certainly it shows they wanted to approach the Anderson case differently than other cases. The letter was not the first time the current administration had been warned about Anderson. They were warned during the Nassar case, after the Nassar case and during the Ohio State cases. They understood the magnitude of the financial liability they could face."

Recent history says any settlement with Anderson's victims could get pricey — Michigan State University paid $500 million to Larry Nassar survivors, the University of Southern California paid $215 million to George Tyndall survivors and Penn State University paid $109 million to Jerry Sandusky survivors. Ohio State University recently reached settlement terms with about half of the Richard Strauss survivors, but terms were not released. Nassar, Tyndall, Strauss and Anderson were all doctors who were accused of sexually assaulting students, including athletes.


U-M would not comment on Manuel's actions. Spokesman Rick Fitzgerald said the letter containing allegations against Anderson was sent from the university's lawyers to its investigative office the same day it was receivedand even some plaintiff's lawyers acknowledged that may have ameliorated the issue.

Still, experts say the handling of the complaint may go to institutional resistance that persists at universities despite a number of high-profile cases that have been mishandled in recent years.


On July 18, 2018, Manuel's mail contained a bombshell of a letter. In it, a former U-M wrestler named Tad Deluca detailed how he was sexually assaulted by a former U-M doctor named Robert Anderson. Anderson was the head of student health services when Deluca was in school and a team doctor for the football squad.

Anderson had worked with then-Athletic Director Don Canham to make sure all athletes were getting physicals from Anderson, specifically calling out the wrestling team as a group that needed to be ordered to do so.

Deluca's letter to Manuel detailed how he had written to his wrestling coach about the abuse in 1975 and was later forced off the team. The letter detailed how Anderson had assaulted him by inappropriately touching his penis and giving him an unnecessary rectal exam.

"I am fully aware that it was the 1970s and it was an entirely different world then," the letter to Manuel concludes. "I am also aware that 40 plus years is an extremely long time ago. I expect nothing. I want nothing. I just feel the need to report this."

Once he got the letter, Manuel's responsibility was to report it. He did — but not to the right people.

"Manuel then forwarded this letter to representatives at the University of Michigan General Counsel Office, who forwarded the letter to (the Office of Institutional Equity)," a police report obtained by the Free Press under a Freedom of Information Act shows.

The version told to police is different than the version told to Deluca.

On Aug. 6, Pamela Heatlie, the Title IX investigator in the Office of Institutional Equity, emailed Deluca, but left out any mention of the general counsel.

"Athletic Director Warde Manuel received your letter to him dated July 18, 2018, and he shared it with me, since I am the University's Title IX Coordinator," according to an email sharedby Stinar with the Free Press. "I hope you do not mind that I am responding in his stead, but generally any concerns about sexual misconduct are shared with me so that I can respond and gather more information, as appropriate."

The U-M police department then was informed months later on Oct. 3, 2018, and launched an investigation. The police told OIE to put a hold on the internal investigation until a criminal investigation was completed. No criminal charges were filed, largely because Anderson died in 2008.

Manuel's actions were not the correct procedure, according to U-M's policy.

U-M's policy on where reports of sexual misconduct should go is simple and straightforward.

"Responsible employees must immediately report any information they learn about suspected Prohibited Conduct to OIE or the Title IX Coordinator," the policy says. "Failure by a responsible employee to timely report a suspected Prohibited Conduct may subject them to appropriate discipline, up to and including removal from their position."

Manuel is a "responsible employee," according to the policy.

There is no exception listed in the policy for an employee to report misconduct to the lawyers instead of the Title IX offices.

The Free Press asked U-M if it was misinterpreting the policy or missing an exemption. The university did not answer that question, instead saying the letter was passed on promptly to the OIE.

"The very day that Warde Manuel received it, he shared it with the Office of the General Counsel and it was shared with OIE," U-M spokesman Rick Fitzgerald told the Free Press. "The fact that there was no delay whatsoever getting the letter to OIE is the most important point we want to make.

"An OIE and U-M Police investigation was launched and police investigators were able to identify additional former patients who believe they were subjected to sexual misconduct. ...

"The university has engaged the WilmerHale law firm to conduct an independent investigation regarding how this matter was handled. Through April 8, there have been 199 unique complaints regarding Dr. Anderson, most received through the hotline."


In 2015, the federal Department of Education sent a "Dear Colleague" letter reminding institutions of the need for a Title IX coordinator at each place. In the letter outlining the responsibilities of the coordinator, the government also says who shouldn't be the Title IX coordinator. Included in that list are general counsels, because they could have a conflict of interest.

The conflict of interest is simple — a general counsel's job is to protect the university, including limiting legal liability.

So sending a complaint to the general counsel first raises questions, multiple attorneys involved in Title IX cases told the Free Press.

"The first thought of (a general counsel's) is, 'Oh crap, we've got liability problems,' " said John Manly, an attorney who represented victims at MSU, USC and the Catholic Church. He is also representing dozens of Anderson victims, but has yet to file a suit against U-M.

Getting the general counsel involved early also gives a university a chance to talk through issues in conversations protected by attorney-client privilege.

"Without litigation discovery we will never know what (administrators) knew about Anderson," Stinar said. "With discovery we might not know either. I can depose Manuel and ask him why he sent it to the general counsel. I can depose Heatlie and ask about her handling of the case. I can't depose (U-M general counsel Timothy Lynch) and ask about how conversations he was involved in went."



"The fact that the AD reported to the OGC shows that even the highest level university officials do not know what they are supposed to report to," attorney Deborah Gordon, who has sued U-M on behalf of students accused of sexual assault and students accusing others of sexual misconduct, said in an email to the Free Press. "Moreover, why do they list people as “responsible employees” or “appropriate persons” when they are not? The OGC sending this to the OIE ameliorated the error by the AD. From the time it got to the OIE, UM had 'actual notice,' which then makes them responsible."

Manuel's decision points out a larger issue, said attorney Mike Cox, who represents more than 35 alleged Anderson victims who have sued the school.

"I don’t think it matters because he appears to have forwarded right away," he told the Free Press. "But if you read (the police report) it appears that Ms. Heatlie does nothing for months, until October when (a detective) is assigned.

The issue for Cox is that the university didn't publicly acknowledge the Anderson investigation until one of Anderson's accusers, Roger Stone, went to the Detroit News this February with his account.

"Here is what I think is more disturbing: The GC and President (Mark) Schlissel sat on this, read covered it up," he said,adding U-M acknowledged it only

"because Mr. Stone goes to the paper."


Manly, the attorney, said his clients want to see U-M prosper and want the university to be known for doing what is right, but items like sending the letter to the attorney put doubt into the mind.

"It's disappointing to see this and the delay in acting," Manly said. "They still have this window where they can make it right, but it's not a big window."

Contact David Jesse: 313-222-8851 or djesse@freepress.com. Follow him on Twitter: @reporterdavidj
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT