NoneSo tell me, of the NCAA cases that you followed, which ones specifically were the victims of a cram down and threatened with the death penalty, and then given a scant twenty four hours to make a decision?
Because they would have just said no
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NoneSo tell me, of the NCAA cases that you followed, which ones specifically were the victims of a cram down and threatened with the death penalty, and then given a scant twenty four hours to make a decision?
The "NCAA threatening the Death Penalty should discussions leak" - while quite possibly true - is about as impactful as Moldavia threatening the old Soviet Union with nuclear annihilationThe NCAA threatened PSU with the Death Penalty should the discussions leak.
.
No mention of NCAA or Big 12 in that article. I thought I read somewhere that Baylor informed the NCAA.
In the video posted by Wendy, Peetz harkens back to her undergrad days and recalls how important football was to the university and bringing people together.I wonder what peetz would say about the football program now that she helped fix everything. They play in the same stadium with huge crowds, you still have high-profile recruiting, lucrative TV deals, bowl games. What's changed exactly since 2011? Oh, I know. The coach now makes more than four times what Joe did.
Yeah, there was a real culture problem, and peetz et al. fixed it.
Also, the points about confidentiality over governance and the ncaa threatening the death penalty can't be broadcast enough. Those are storylines that the media should run with.
The discussions between PSU and the NCAA that resulted in the Consent Decree were largely limited to Erickson, Peetz Masser, Marsh, Dunham and Guadagnino. The Executive Committee was not immediately informed.
The Legal Subcommittee, Chaired by Ira Lubert, played no role in the CD. They were not involved at all.
The NCAA threatened PSU with the Death Penalty should the discussions leak.
Erickson and Masser both chose confidentiality over governance.
Peetz believed PSU had a culture problem dating back to her days as a field hockey player.
Once all of your "mates" have deserted you - are you still the CIRCLE-Jerk King? Or, just the DOT-Jerk King?Agree 100% that Penn State should have secured counsel upon receipt of the letter from the NCAA.
Marsh stated "I don't think anyone in May 2016 thinks the NCAA's involvement in that [case] was wise or necessary," ---"In issues where there are so many other avenues of redress -- criminal, civil, Department of Education -- the NCAA does not need to be the policeman of the world in matters that involve athletics," Marsh said. "Organizations can learn from their mistakes. Just because it happened one time doesn't mean they're bound to bumble forth again."
I think that reflects more on the NCAA course of action in retrospect with Penn State than the reaction of Penn State. If you review Marsh's deposition it's pretty clear that at that time he felt Penn State did the correct thing and he so advised Penn State. It's equally clear that the NCAA stepped in it once and doesn't want that stink a second time around.
Had the litigation with Penn State not occurred then Baylor would be in the same cross hairs today IMO.
In the video posted by Wendy, Peetz harkens back to her undergrad days and recalls how important football was to the university and bringing people together.
^^^. Bing-Freaking-O. ^^^The consent decree was merely the culmination of the bot's strategy. I dare say its almost irrelevant compared to the damage the entire bot had been doing, the final product of which was the freeh debacle. Without all the groundwork the other parties had done, the consent decree never happens. Who sent Lanny Davis to a funeral to speak ill of the dead? Who was telling Freeh what to attack? Who was telling Freeh to do the NCAA's bidding? Who was boasting about Freeh's work? Who was throwing money around without proper vetting procedures? Etc. Etc. I've never seen such malicious and idiotic tactics by people supposedly out to protect the university. Just because a few individuals didn't officially help craft the consent decree doesn't mean they did not have a substantial role in it. I might add they didn't just stop after the consent decree, they continued to attack the university, continued to do the NCAA's dirty work, and convinced all of you to vote for a second consent decree with Corman when total victory was in sight. Sigh, any root cause analysis would show the original consent decree was relatively minor in the grand scheme of things, and that more than just a select few were responsible for it. I don't mean to rant at your info, even though I just did, but I think everyone responsible for this debacle deserves to have their role(s) highlighted.
The consent decree was merely the culmination of the bot's strategy. I dare say its almost irrelevant compared to the damage the entire bot had been doing, the final product of which was the freeh debacle. Without all the groundwork the other parties had done, the consent decree never happens. Who sent Lanny Davis to a funeral to speak ill of the dead? Who was telling Freeh what to attack? Who was telling Freeh to do the NCAA's bidding? Who was boasting about Freeh's work? Who was throwing money around without proper vetting procedures? Etc. Etc. I've never seen such malicious and idiotic tactics by people supposedly out to protect the university. Just because a few individuals didn't officially help craft the consent decree doesn't mean they did not have a substantial role in it. I might add they didn't just stop after the consent decree, they continued to attack the university, continued to do the NCAA's dirty work, and convinced all of you to vote for a second consent decree with Corman when total victory was in sight. Sigh, any root cause analysis would show the original consent decree was relatively minor in the grand scheme of things, and that more than just a select few were responsible for it. I don't mean to rant at your info, even though I just did, but I think everyone responsible for this debacle deserves to have their role(s) highlighted.
Who paid for the shredder?Who rented the plane?
Nice synopsis. Those responsible deserve FAR more than having their roles highlighted but, it is a good start!The consent decree was merely the culmination of the bot's strategy. I dare say its almost irrelevant compared to the damage the entire bot had been doing, the final product of which was the freeh debacle. Without all the groundwork the other parties had done, the consent decree never happens. Who sent Lanny Davis to a funeral to speak ill of the dead? Who was telling Freeh what to attack? Who was telling Freeh to do the NCAA's bidding? Who was boasting about Freeh's work? Who was throwing money around without proper vetting procedures? Etc. Etc. I've never seen such malicious and idiotic tactics by people supposedly out to protect the university. Just because a few individuals didn't officially help craft the consent decree doesn't mean they did not have a substantial role in it. I might add they didn't just stop after the consent decree, they continued to attack the university, continued to do the NCAA's dirty work, and convinced all of you to vote for a second consent decree with Corman when total victory was in sight. Sigh, any root cause analysis would show the original consent decree was relatively minor in the grand scheme of things, and that more than just a select few were responsible for it. I don't mean to rant at your info, even though I just did, but I think everyone responsible for this debacle deserves to have their role(s) highlighted.
"Feckless". I'm gonna' have to steal that one - for those days when I want to be nice......... I may not use it for a while.I have so much material with which to work thanks to all of you.
No question that the BOT needed Freeh to affirm for them their decisions in Nov, 2011. Freeh understood this. He also understood the needs of the NCAA and the Big10. Consequently, the outcome of his "Report" was a foregone conclusion.
Lanny Davis orchestrated the PR initially. Damn the four. They've already been tarred and feathered by the media and cannot be saved. So let's save ourselves.
In the end, Louie Freeh was a money grabbing, PR hungry person.
And Penn State's "leaders" were feckless.
So when the Penn State case landed in Mr. Corbett’s lap in 2009, he did not hesitate, colleagues say, pressing forward on the investigation even as he ran for governor. Clinton County high school officials had reported charges to the local district attorney that Mr. Sandusky had molested a boy there, but, citing a conflict of interest, the prosecutor passed it on to the attorney general’s office to investigate.
I have to admit, I was surprised to read some article about her that had a family picture with offspring. They didn't look like they were purchased from an orphanage in Africa or Asia either.Make her pick her specific restroom and stick to it.
Or some distant planet?I have to admit, I was surprised to read some article about her that had a family picture with offspring. They didn't look like they were purchased from an orphanage in Africa or Asia either.
The revenue from the football program made it possible for her to play field hockey.The discussions between PSU and the NCAA that resulted in the Consent Decree were largely limited to Erickson, Peetz Masser, Marsh, Dunham and Guadagnino. The Executive Committee was not immediately informed.
The Legal Subcommittee, Chaired by Ira Lubert, played no role in the CD. They were not involved at all.
The NCAA threatened PSU with the Death Penalty should the discussions leak.
Erickson and Masser both chose confidentiality over governance.
Peetz believed PSU had a culture problem dating back to her days as a field hockey player.
When you have an ego the size ad a Manhattan skyscraper, you probably feel that your field hockey team was the centerpiece of the entire athletics program.The revenue from the football program made it possible for her to play field hockey.
Spanier probably knows where a lot of skeletons are decomposing then. His lawsuit could get very interesting once the paperwork portion is finalized.Prez Spanier loaded up the B&I trustee group with very wealthy people whose sole purpose was to give money and to be rewarded for it by the perks of a board seat. This strategy would have worked well if a major crisis had not hit. Once a crisis did hit, they had no interest in protecting Penn State, they simply wanted to make sure none of the ensuing stink rubbed off on them or their companies.
First of all, V1 - Aaron Fisher, and his mother BOTH say that Central Mountain High School refused to take his CSA Report or call police in violation of School Policy and the law....Aaron Fisher and him Mother then went directly to Clinton County CYS Office to make their report.
And Penn State's "leaders" were feckless.
Prez Spanier loaded up the B&I trustee group with very wealthy people whose sole purpose was to give money and to be rewarded for it by the perks of a board seat. This strategy would have worked well if a major crisis had not hit. Once a crisis did hit, they had no interest in protecting Penn State, they simply wanted to make sure none of the ensuing stink rubbed off on them or their companies.
I didn't see that in the Girl Scout Video. Unless you mean the vine that was snipped out of the full Johns Hopkins video that I posted.In the video posted by Wendy, Peetz harkens back to her undergrad days and recalls how important football was to the university and bringing people together.
Was it Spanier or PMA? Seems to me that once the B&I crew completed the takeover of what used to be the engineering society seats, they were awful good at handpicking their own successors. If any of their companies, e.g., BNY-Mellon, actually did donate to the University, they more than made it back in the no-bid contracts they received.
Ironically, Cynthia Baldwin Chaired an Ad Hoc Committee that recommended the Bylaws be amended to provide for the Trustees previously controlled by PMA (and Fred Anton) be elected by a Subcommittee of the Board.
She undertook this effort at the direction of Ted Junker and with the support of Dr Spanier.
In the end, this new group of Trustees from Business and Industry, the "Giants" of industry, turned on Dr Spanier ( thank you John Surma, Ed Hintz, Karen Peetz, Ken Frazier, Jim Broadhurst, and Linda Strumpf). They were worried more about their self-preservation that the University's reputation.
As an aside, Dr Spanier served as Karen Peetz advisor when she was an undergraduate.
She Paterno was asked to introduce Peetz when she was made a Distinguished Alumna in 2010. They apparently could find no one else.
Go figure.
Ironically, Cynthia Baldwin Chaired an Ad Hoc Committee that recommended the Bylaws be amended to provide for the Trustees previously controlled by PMA (and Fred Anton) be elected by a Subcommittee of the Board.
She undertook this effort at the direction of Ted Junker and with the support of Dr Spanier.
In the end, this new group of Trustees from Business and Industry, the "Giants" of industry, turned on Dr Spanier ( thank you John Surma, Ed Hintz, Karen Peetz, Ken Frazier, Jim Broadhurst, and Linda Strumpf). They were worried more about their self-preservation that the University's reputation.
As an aside, Dr Spanier served as Karen Peetz advisor when she was an undergraduate.
She Paterno was asked to introduce Peetz when she was made a Distinguished Alumna in 2010. They apparently could find no one else.
Go figure.
Sorry Nellie. I thought it was Wendy. It was in the 48 or 49 minute long video on leadership. Near the beginning. She was talking about how Penn State is more than football, a la academics, but football is part of social fabric.I didn't see that in the Girl Scout Video. Unless you mean the vine that was snipped out of the full Johns Hopkins video that I posted.
I didn't see that in the Girl Scout Video.
I was messing with you. As long as it was seen. All those women on here, they're all alike, LOL!Sorry Nellie. I thought it was Wendy. It was in the 48 or 49 video on leadership.
With the benefit of hindsight........Ironically, Cynthia Baldwin Chaired an Ad Hoc Committee that recommended the Bylaws be amended to provide for the Trustees previously controlled by PMA (and Fred Anton) be elected by a Subcommittee of the Board.
She undertook this effort at the direction of Ted Junker and with the support of Dr Spanier.
In the end, this new group of Trustees from Business and Industry, the "Giants" of industry, turned on Dr Spanier ( thank you John Surma, Ed Hintz, Karen Peetz, Ken Frazier, Jim Broadhurst, and Linda Strumpf). They were worried more about their self-preservation that the University's reputation.
As an aside, Dr Spanier served as Karen Peetz advisor when she was an undergraduate.
She Paterno was asked to introduce Peetz when she was made a Distinguished Alumna in 2010. They apparently could find no one else.
Go figure.
Except the school did make the call....and I'm not sure anyone should trust the judgment of a woman who let her kids spend the whole weekend at a grown man's house so she could go drink
Except the school did make the call....and I'm not sure anyone should trust the judgment of a woman who let her kids spend the whole weekend at a grown man's house so she could go drink
“What I find troubling here about these subpoenas is the prosecutor’s zeal to get as long a sentence as possible. The attorney general did not care if victims were unmasked. There was a complete insensitivity to people’s constitutional rights,” said ACLU legal director Vic Walczak.
Walczak said the ACLU intends to send a letter to the attorney general asking him to reform his practice of using the grand jury for investigating anything except a crime.
This is a Frank Sheeran-esque post!EXACTLY. Not one school in the cases I followed waited until the barn door was closed to hire competent representation with complete knowledge of NCAA charter, bylaws, and prior experience with their tactics. They did it immediately upon receipt of the NCAA LOI.
Gene Marsh gets a call about 2 weeks prior (and 7-8 months too late) and he's in a remote cabin in Maine trying to undo the damage once the OGBOT hubris-laden "We know how to handle everything ourselves" figured out they didn't know how.
I have a song for the whole fiasco too, but "coveydidn't" might not approve, (oh shucky darns).
It's called "Down on Junior's Farm" and is based on the Corman V NCAA case and other Open Records -obtained emails.
Marsh is the Eskimo, and Emmert is the Sea Lion.
Junior's farm is Masser, with Suhey begging him to get his tractor and drag the statue there. (As if that's going to solve the problem).
Houses of Parliament is the OGBOT. (Think public comment period)
You know who "We all chipped in" are, all the normal, educated people watching this unfold in real time and going what in the world are these people doing ( and NOT doing) and why?
I started my Twitter shout about why NCAA should not be even thinking about inserting themselves into a children's welfare case way back when they first started making statements about it, (which is what gained me a bunch of PSU followers, about 250 or so before the impersonator started in with their FAILED dirty work)
The President is Erickson, and his inability to realize a bluff in the high-stakes poker game with Emmert telling him one thing, and Remy telling PSU counsel another, with both Exec Cmtes completely in the dark.
"The price is higher than the time before " is the fine increase from $30M to $60M , you get the idea.
Pete Curkendall, former Penn State defensive tackle, posted this on Facebook: “Karen Peetz (sic) son (in front of her and her husband) told a former teammate of mine that JoePa had to be involved with the disappearance of DA Gricar. She and her cronies are not only delusional but have lived off the integrity of others for years. They are nothing more than parasites. This was stated right before they took the statue down.” (facebook.com, 10/18/13)