Freeh responds to Spanier's defamation complaint; Wants Spanier to stick to the facts
- Thread starter ChiTownLion
- Start date
In my opinion freeh would not know a fact from a fat ass.
Freeh couldn't spot a spy in his own church when he had 2 eyes.
It is a FACT, a well known FACT that Freeh used opinions to write his Fact-free report.
I do like the words he uses. Admixture is a great term.
He of all people can't dare to lecture people on the difference between fact and fiction. I suspect Dr. Spanier's lawyers will remind him of that in no uncertain terms. Apparently Mr. Freeh's lawyers haven't actually read Mr. Freeh's report, which makes them no different than anybody else.
He of all people can't dare to lecture people on the difference between fact and fiction. I suspect Dr. Spanier's lawyers will remind him of that in no uncertain terms. Apparently Mr. Freeh's lawyers haven't actually read Mr. Freeh's report, which makes them no different than anybody else.
Maybe had freeh bothered speaking with Spanier prior to writing his report, he'd have a little better grasp of the facts.
Louis Freeh wouldn't care about facts if they were nailed to a tree in Vermont and he drove into it after having a few too many.
Not that he would ever do that, or get it covered up if he did.
Not that he would ever do that, or get it covered up if he did.
Yep, as @demlion likes to point out PSU will amazingly be paying out $$ based on the FR being both correct and incorrect. That's what happens when you try to have it both ways, there's a logical contradiction that is pretty glaring.
Last edited:
Iirc they did speak, but it was like the last day, and Louie had already written his report
Exactly my point - that conversation took place well after Louie's "facts" were established.
