That may your personal wish list, but it's not PSU's wish list. DDS is a strong side DE, whereas White is either a weak side DE or an OLB. PSU would like both.
2022 Recruiting Class Thread
- Thread starter bmw199
- Start date
That may your personal wish list, but it's not PSU's wish list. DDS is a strong side DE, whereas White is either a weak side DE or an OLB. PSU would like both.
A great get at DE, and a DE that looks to have the frame to be a terror against the run as well as the pass. Which is what the front 4 needs to be able to stop the run games of the best teams PSU plays.
Dohn with a CB for Kwan Williams, DT from the same H.S. as Dennis-Sutton, both at a "7" / High confidence level.....
Maybe they come out with their picks on the same day....
Maybe they come out with their picks on the same day....
Last edited:
Dohn with a CB for Kwan Williams, DT from the same H.S. as Dennis-Sutton, both at a "7" / High confidence level.....
Maybe the come out with the picks on the same day....
2022 offers board according to VBR's.
victorybellrings.com
Penn State Football Recruiting: First 2022 Big Board
With the early signing period for the 2021 recruiting class in progress, Penn State Football will begin to look forward to the 2022 recruiting class Penn S...
victorybellrings.com
I don't think PSU is as confident in Singleton as we once were, but this was pretty creative from the staff nonetheless:
Dohn put his CB in for Dennis-Sutton at a "7" / High confidence level.....
A
anon_xdc8rmuek44eq
Guest
Same way you embed tweets. Rivals treats their database entries for each player as Media (same as the tweet and the HUDL video in my post). The software that Rivals uses also has built-in filters that recognize the type of media, so you can just enter the URL for the respective media items, and the filers will identify the type and display them appropriately without you having to use any menu to manually enter the items.
I’ve never really understood the ranking for recruiting, but this make zero sense to me.
LSU #2 , Penn State #3
LSU - 8 recruits - 3.75. Ave star rating
0 - 5 star
6 - 4 star
2 - 3 star
PSU - 8 recruits - 4.0 Ave star rating
0 - 5 star
8 - 4 star
0 - 3 star
LSU #2 , Penn State #3
LSU - 8 recruits - 3.75. Ave star rating
0 - 5 star
6 - 4 star
2 - 3 star
PSU - 8 recruits - 4.0 Ave star rating
0 - 5 star
8 - 4 star
0 - 3 star
Sec teams get an automatic jump over any non sec team other than osu/ClemsonI’ve never really understood the ranking for recruiting, but this make zero sense to me.
LSU #2 , Penn State #3
LSU - 8 recruits - 3.75. Ave star rating
0 - 5 star
6 - 4 star
2 - 3 star
PSU - 8 recruits - 4.0 Ave star rating
0 - 5 star
8 - 4 star
0 - 3 star
My guess is it’s because two of their prospects are top 50 nationally and none of Penn State’s are in the top 100.
In the first place who ever said it had to make sense? Secondly unless you have a PHD degree from MIT you will never understand it. And even then it’s subject to daily changes based on the whims of the recently hired site manager who is a French Literature graduate and actually a Real Madrid soccer fan. Thirdly you are on a need to know basis, and you don’t need to know. Finally rest assured you are not alone, you are never alone when trying to make any sense out of this subjectively objective riddle.I’ve never really understood the ranking for recruiting, but this make zero sense to me.
LSU #2 , Penn State #3
LSU - 8 recruits - 3.75. Ave star rating
0 - 5 star
6 - 4 star
2 - 3 star
PSU - 8 recruits - 4.0 Ave star rating
0 - 5 star
8 - 4 star
0 - 3 star
Last edited:
Prospects can be a 4* and have a rating of 5.8, 5.9 or 6.0. Most of PSU recruits are 5.8. I assume LSU’s are higher.I’ve never really understood the ranking for recruiting, but this make zero sense to me.
LSU #2 , Penn State #3
LSU - 8 recruits - 3.75. Ave star rating
0 - 5 star
6 - 4 star
2 - 3 star
PSU - 8 recruits - 4.0 Ave star rating
0 - 5 star
8 - 4 star
0 - 3 star
When adding the ratings together for each class of 8, PSU is 46.6 and LSU is 46.5.
You would think the PSU class would be rated higher then the LSU class then. They both round up to 47 and L dose come before P.
Last edited:
I don't know how Rivals does it, but TOS uses a system in which they factor in what positions recruits play, how balanced the recruiting class is, and so forth.
It's not merely a matter of adding the total score.
I'm not saying it's the right approach, but I suspect Rivals does something similar.
For instance, if Team A has 5 commits -- and they're all offensive linemen -- but Team B has a QB, a RB, an OL, a DL, and a CB, Team B will probably be ranked higher even if the total scores are the same.
Not that any of this really matters this early in the class, anyway.
Here's the Rivals scoring system, it's more complex than just adding up the ratings. There's bonus points for where the recruit Ranks in the top 250
Rivals Team Recruiting Rankings Formula
Or even later in the class.
Last edited:
Yep, it really does not make much sense to penalize a team for loading up on a particular position, or ignoring a position, if the class addresses the priorities of the coaching staff, which the recruiting services would not know.
Even if the "services" analyzed the roster of the teams, which they likely do not, and took that into account, the rosters are in such a state of flux in the current Portal environment that such bias would be useless. And every coach is free to address his recruiting needs as he sees it will make his team better, so any math that the recruiting services do to add favor for splitting up scholarships or distributing scholarships between different positons is B.S. as I see it.
Last edited:
A
anon_xdc8rmuek44eq
Guest
FC: QB to keep an eye on with Yurcich on board; supposedly 'fits the mold' for his type of QB and is from the same HS as Drew Brees, Sam Ehlinger, and Nick Foles. He was mentioned as a guy who could get a PSU offer from the 247 folks.
Similar threads
