ADVERTISEMENT

2021 Olympic Wrestling Match Thread and USA Wrestlers.

I totally hear what you are saying, but I think the argument is if you are taking shots (therefore engaging and stepping forward) how can you be passive. In Taylor’s match he shot, got a restart, then took a step or 2 back got warned. Casey yelled something like he just shot (while opponent hadn’t shot yet). It may be the rules, but it’s sort of ridiculous.

Again, most of the shot clock calls came as a result of the mandatory call (i.e., 2 minutes elapse with neither wrestler scoring offensive points). Shots and resulting scramble will count as offensive action, but moving backwards in a tie position will be counted as passive.... The Official will make the call based on which wrestler has spent more of 2 minutes elapsed time in the passive position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggerpup
I totally hear what you are saying, but I think the argument is if you are taking shots (therefore engaging and stepping forward) how can you be passive. In Taylor’s match he shot, got a restart, then took a step or 2 back got warned. Casey yelled something like he just shot (while opponent hadn’t shot yet). It may be the rules, but it’s sort of ridiculous.
Separating from the Taylor match, talking more generally:

Wrestling fans often fall into the trap of "my guy didn't stall, he took more shots." Stalling can happen at any moment in the match. As if taking 3 shots in a period is license to coast for 10 sec. The sport is better when the wrestlers are held accountable for action throughout. (Whether that's applied consistently is another story.)

As far as passivity goes: when NC State beat Iowa at CHA a few years ago. Max Rohskopf tweeted that Hawk fans didn't care if any wrestling occurred as long as they saw lots of hand fighting. That is the perfect description of UWW refs.
 
It just came to mind of this teams success. I thought of the movie Apollo 13, where they had an issue of being under weight due to no moon rocks on board. I hope the team's pilot takes account of the extra medal weight they are bringing back.

If only David Taylor III knew someone who could do the calculation. (AGAIN).
 
  • Like
Reactions: creamery freak
@js8793 @tikk10
Wtf, odd takes on Smith.
For the record, I enjoyed him on the mic. But he definitely had a heavy "American" interpretation of the rules that was contrary to how it was actually called. But overall a joy to listen to. I would have loved to see him and JB together for these big matches.

For the Snyder match, it's important to remember that the passivity call is mandatory in a scoreless match so they have to pick somebody. It was pretty even, but Snyder broke contact a little more often and Sadulaev was standing a little taller in his stance with his head up. That's another quirk that Americans get punished for. Our lower stance is often considered defensive in posture.

With the Hildebrandt match, my suspicion is that she was punished for tying up hands. That's also typically frowned upon. She took the only attack, but she also spent the first 1:30 tying up the wrists from neutral. Again, it's not like she was overwhelmingly aggressive to that point.
 
I totally hear what you are saying, but I think the argument is if you are taking shots (therefore engaging and stepping forward) how can you be passive. In Taylor’s match he shot, got a restart, then took a step or 2 back got warned. Casey yelled something like he just shot (while opponent hadn’t shot yet). It may be the rules, but it’s sort of ridiculous.
I 100% agree that this is how it should be, but it unfortunately isn't usually.
 
Dmm, I understand your point, Wrestling did amazing, but I'm not a fan of comparing sports as to medal count. Swimming and track have so many more opportunities than Wrestling. 50 meters then 100 meters swimming/track 100 then 200.

Give Wrestlers a medal for the first 3:00 minutes then the second 3:00 then one for combined scores. A Medal for most takedowns.

US Wrestling would clean up if we had a 4 man relay. Dake Nolf Burroughs as part of a relay. David and Bo as half a relay! Wow.

As for track and field my opinion is different when you have a sprinter like Carl Lewis getting a sprint medal then a long jump one.

Finally as a very old former high school distant runner I have the same love of the marathon.

I'm old, I'm pulling for Frank Shorter.

DMM I appreciated your posts this whole tournament. Good stuff.

Yea, the best test of domination is medals won within a specific sport as a percentage of total medals awarded within the specific sport. The US does usually dominate Track & Field, but really shit the bed this year, especially in track. Believe US dominated the pool (i.e., swimming) as they usually do.
 
For the record, I enjoyed him on the mic. But he definitely had a heavy "American" interpretation of the rules that was contrary to how it was actually called. But overall a joy to listen to. I would have loved to see him and JB together for these big matches.

For the Snyder match, it's important to remember that the passivity call is mandatory in a scoreless match so they have to pick somebody. It was pretty even, but Snyder broke contact a little more often and Sadulaev was standing a little taller in his stance with his head up. That's another quirk that Americans get punished for. Our lower stance is often considered defensive in posture.

With the Hildebrandt match, my suspicion is that she was punished for tying up hands. That's also typically frowned upon. She took the only attack, but she also spent the first 1:30 tying up the wrists from neutral. Again, it's not like she was overwhelmingly aggressive to that point.

I appreciate the added explanation.
 
Separating from the Taylor match, talking more generally:

Wrestling fans often fall into the trap of "my guy didn't stall, he took more shots." Stalling can happen at any moment in the match. As if taking 3 shots in a period is license to coast for 10 sec. The sport is better when the wrestlers are held accountable for action throughout. (Whether that's applied consistently is another story.)

As far as passivity goes: when NC State beat Iowa at CHA a few years ago. Max Rohskopf tweeted that Hawk fans didn't care if any wrestling occurred as long as they saw lots of hand fighting. That is the perfect description of UWW refs.
I like the rules with FS and passivity more so than stalling in college (to me stalling in college vs HS is a huge difference). I think college tried to do something similar with the change of rule regarding stepping out and it blew up the system and needed adjusted. This just points to your comment about people’s understanding of stall calls. It now has went to more referee decisions and I think that’s fine. It creates inconsistencies (see RBY vs. Fix), but it pushes kids to be more aggressive. I like it when refs bang kids for stalling aggressively. It flushes out who the better kid is. However, I don’t like that DT is put on the clock when his opponent hasn’t take a shot in 6 minutes. There has to be some adjustment to that.
 
Again, most of the shot clock calls came as a result of the mandatory call (i.e., 2 minutes elapse with neither wrestler scoring offensive points). Shots and resulting scramble will count as offensive action, but moving backwards in a tie position will be counted as passive.... The Official will make the call based on which wrestler has spent more of 2 minutes elapsed time in the passive position.
Yeah man I get the rule. I’m not arguing it by definition, I’m trying to explain why to a fan it creates disconnect. I’ll take JS and Casey as making comments that are very similar and know I am in good company.
 
Yeah man I get the rule. I’m not arguing it by definition, I’m trying to explain why to a fan it creates disconnect. I’ll take JS and Casey as making comments that are very similar and know I am in good company.

I'm not disagreeing with you - I'm not saying Free Officials can't be, and are often, wrong in regards to their calculation of who spent more time in the "passive" position (after all, it is based on what they believe or feel in their head, which can be affected by the flow of a match - i.e., more recent action will effect most people more heavily.). It isn't like the on-mat Official has a stop-watch or something. Truth-be-told, they should probably have a second official at the table, or mat-side, who does nothing but calculate passivity for either wrestler (other wrestler will be mirror opposite such that after 2 minutes only one can have net-positive passivity) - given the percentage of time the 2-minute mandatory call comes into play - which is a high percentage of time in many elite matchups. IOW, it is too important of a call to leave to guessing in real close situations - they should just have an Official measure it and when the mat-official blows his whistle after 2 minutes, the official measuring it, can just tell him who is to be put on the clock.

Anyway, again I'm not disagreeing with you, just pointing out that passivity can be registered in more situations than just defending a shot.
 
You guys railing on stupid sports are not watching the ratings. Same with the comments regarding John. If you want to see the sport grow, you need new fans. Exactly why John made the comments about warnings. Over and over, refs were stopping matches for really no reason, and it's very inconsistent. John's point was he didn't even know why they were being stopped. John knows what he's talking about. The fans need to understand why for the sport to grow.
 
Olympics are based on ratings which generate money through advertising. Wrestling needs fans to generate more money. Look at the commercials during gymnastics, track and field, basketball, and even volleyball. Equestrian has major sponsors like Rolex, IBM, and many others. Wrestling doesn't have that. The other thing is women. Women watch all the gymnastics. Want to grow Wrestling, grow the women's side. I wish Penn State would start a female team. I guarantee, Tamrya is far more widely known than any of our male wrestlers.
 
This board would be easier to read if you stapled this information to a few posters’ foreheads.

Some people here are dense to this topic by choice, refuse to grasp the rules, yet keep complaining.

I agree. I used to get butt hurt when I first started watching freestyle, but now that I understand what passivity is my butt hurts less.
 
Last edited:
I'm not disagreeing with you - I'm not saying Free Officials can't be, and are often, wrong in regards to their calculation of who spent more time in the "passive" position (after all, it is based on what they believe or feel in their head, which can be affected by the flow of a match - i.e., more recent action will effect most people more heavily.). It isn't like the on-mat Official has a stop-watch or something. Truth-be-told, they should probably have a second official at the table, or mat-side, who does nothing but calculate passivity for either wrestler (other wrestler will be mirror opposite such that after 2 minutes only one can have net-positive passivity) - given the percentage of time the 2-minute mandatory call comes into play - which is a high percentage of time in many elite matchups. IOW, it is too important of a call to leave to guessing in real close situations - they should just have an Official measure it and when the mat-official blows his whistle after 2 minutes, the official measuring it, can just tell him who is to be put on the clock.

Anyway, again I'm not disagreeing with you, just pointing out that passivity can be registered in more situations than just defending a shot.

IOW, I like the Free rules regarding passivity and the mandatory shot-clock (really mislabeled... should be "mandatory score clock"). However, I do agree with you that the determination of the "more passive" wrestler is way too subjective - and unnecessarily so. Would be easy to set up a procedure to make it much more objective. You only need to measure the "net passivity" of one wrestler (if you deem both wrestlers to be equally passive at points during the 2 minutes, you simply reflect nothing to the net passivity of wrestler you are measuring) - if at the end of 2 minutes, the wrestler you're measuring has positive "net passivity", that's the wrestler put on clock. If the measured wrestler reflects net negative passivity, his opponent is put on clock. It really doesn't matter which wrestler is measured as the other wrestler will be mirror opposite - i.e., they will net each other out to zero.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatmarc
"Over and over, refs were stopping matches for really no reason, and it's very inconsistent. John's point was he didn't even know why they were being stopped. John knows what he's talking about. The fans need to understand why for the sport to grow."

hotshoe is right, let the action unfold.

it would not be hard to do all 10 weights. have the next competitors ready to go....wrestling doesn't need the pageantry.

somebody write a check so Cael can hire a GR coach. PSU needs a womens team. Sandy is missing a huge opportunity here. You have the best program.......on the planet.....yet nothing.

typing with your arm in a sling sucks
 
Olympics are based on ratings which generate money through advertising. Wrestling needs fans to generate more money. Look at the commercials during gymnastics, track and field, basketball, and even volleyball. Equestrian has major sponsors like Rolex, IBM, and many others. Wrestling doesn't have that. The other thing is women. Women watch all the gymnastics. Want to grow Wrestling, grow the women's side. I wish Penn State would start a female team. I guarantee, Tamrya is far more widely known than any of our male wrestlers.
^^ This -- and it's not enough to just watch Olympic wrestling more.

Every new sport gets introduced because some empty suit at NBC ran a focus group that shows it might draw an audience, or at least an audience in some target demographic. The IOC doesn't know a sport from a root vegetable. They know what their masters at NBC tell them.

Same with slot allocations -- entirely based upon actual or projected ratings.

So we need to watch more of it in whatever form -- Rokfin, Flo, ESPN, FS1, in-person, Facebook Live, local streaming, YouTube, whatever. And USA Wrestling needs to figure out how to compile all of that data, to show NBC what ratings the sport can generate.

Wrestling will likely never generate the ratings of basketball, gymnastics, and track. But it can get the best slots of the remaining time, and be something more than filler to NBC.
 
All this arguing about passivity, but passivity didn’t cause Snyder to lose the match, and the passivity calls did exactly what they are supposed to do (create action).

You see in folk, stalling is supposed to be much more of a earned thing. In Free passivity is far less about who earned it, rather than we need to give someone a point so these guys start wrestling. And it works almost every time.

It’s also why you never see stalling called in folk. Both guys do nothing and it’s splitting hairs who is and isn’t stalling, so the refs just sit on the whistle.
 
All this arguing about passivity, but passivity didn’t cause Snyder to lose the match, and the passivity calls did exactly what they are supposed to do (create action).

You see in folk, stalling is supposed to be much more of a earned thing. In Free passivity is far less about who earned it, rather than we need to give someone a point so these guys start wrestling. And it works almost every time.

It’s also why you never see stalling called in folk. Both guys do nothing and it’s splitting hairs who is and isn’t stalling, so the refs just sit on the whistle.
This is so hard for our folk-centric system to understand because we have this obsession with “perceived-meritocracy” in regards to activity during a match.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggerpup
It just came to mind of this teams success. I thought of the movie Apollo 13, where they had an issue of being under weight due to no moon rocks on board. I hope the team's pilot takes account of the extra medal weight they are bringing back.

If only David Taylor III knew someone who could do the calculation. (AGAIN).
Do you know that David Taylor's dad is a Delta airlines pilot? I'm sure he has had to do weight calculations a lot.

About 4-5 years ago, I took a Delta flight from Florida into Atlanta for a change over. Atlanta is Delta's home base. I was wearing a Penn State sweatshirt, and when we got into the main terminal, I saw a Delta pilot sitting down and looking right at me pretty intently. Unfortunately, I was in a pretty big hurry to catch my connecting flight or I would have stopped to chat. I'm pretty sure it was Dave Taylor Sr.
 
  • Like
Reactions: creamery freak
"Over and over, refs were stopping matches for really no reason, and it's very inconsistent. John's point was he didn't even know why they were being stopped. John knows what he's talking about. The fans need to understand why for the sport to grow."

I wonder how many of the masses of people that watch gymnastics really understand the nuanced intricacies of scoring in gymnastics? Same for ice skating. Like wrestling, I’m sure that former competitors and parents of competitors know the rules, but I’m guessing that most of the rest of the fans have the same understanding that most of us here have about passivity. Or that Steveson probably should not have been stopped so quickly after that first, last minute takedow.

Understanding the rules is only one, small part of the equation.
 
Last edited:
And Kyle would still have silver after that …

Yea, I think KD was very negatively effected by the weight cut to 74 (both strength- & energy-wise). He was completely spent and just hanging on at the end of his Bronze Medal Match. He dominated in the 1st Period but was unable to finish-off and tech an opponent he was just mauling - very Un-Dake like.... He just ran out of gas and settled for a 6-0 shutout, but man did he look utterly gassed directly after match.
 
One thing to remember about freestyle wrestling…. It’s a sport that at one time in the very recent past, had its competitors pick a ball out of a small pouch and if it was their color, they could start OT on their opponent’s leg.

I mean who in Gods name could come up with such a rule lol
Ball don't lie.
 
"Over and over, refs were stopping matches for really no reason, and it's very inconsistent. John's point was he didn't even know why they were being stopped. John knows what he's talking about. The fans need to understand why ....

I have my list of beefs with freestyle and it's format for sure, but by far at the top of my list of gripes is the refs.

Their influence is far from invisible to nearly every match, which is what they should be. Too many matches have a head scratcher moment if not an outrageous one.

It's hard to become a populist sport when fans, coaches, contestants all get pissed off or frustrated so frequently at the match to match inconsistency of the officials.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski
I feel like I've made this comment a few dozen times but shooting in FS is not what determines passivity calls, it's about holding the center and engaging more. If there's no real action the guy who'll get hit with passivity is the guy who backed up more, regardless of whether that guy took a shot. Shots in FS don't count for much, unless you initiate a lot of action off those shots. Folk fans may disagree that that's how it should be, but that's definitely how it is, and it's called consistently.
The US seems to get put on the clock a lot more than their opponents. And I don't think it's a bias, but exactly how you describe it being called. Maybe it's an adjustment they need to make going forward. On the other hand, it almost seems like they don't care too much about it and have the philosophy of we're going to shoot and score and 1 point isn't going to beat us. It almost beat DT though until his heroics.
As for those exposures by Sadulaev. There's a difference between not understanding it and just thinking it's lame. It doesn't really demonstrate any kind of superiority in the position (or control for that matter). But as somebody said, those are the rules and we're certainly aware of them.
 
The US seems to get put on the clock a lot more than their opponents. And I don't think it's a bias, but exactly how you describe it being called. Maybe it's an adjustment they need to make going forward. On the other hand, it almost seems like they don't care too much about it and have the philosophy of we're going to shoot and score and 1 point isn't going to beat us. It almost beat DT though until his heroics.
As for those exposures by Sadulaev. There's a difference between not understanding it and just thinking it's lame. It doesn't really demonstrate any kind of superiority in the position (or control for that matter). But as somebody said, those are the rules and we're certainly aware of them.
Agree to disagree on those exposures. Can you imagine how hard it is to move Kyle Snyder somewhere against his will?

Pretty crafty way to do it as that was not the normal chest wrap we see from him. He went for the big 4 and had Kyle floating in mid air for a couple seconds (which was insane) and then made the adjustment to go for more of a hip tip/belly whizzer motion straight to the side. I'll have to rewatch, but I think he used his free leg to hook Kyle under the armpit to get those last few inches to 90.
 
… Free is the seminal sport from which Folk was carved - if either style "basterdized" the rules … In fact, Folk's bastardization of this very rule is what … quite literally pinned twice under the seminal rules of wrestling … these moves, which violate the most fundamental of the seminal wrestling rules, as he was awarded massive amounts of "riding time" … insane (relative to the fundamental seminal rules of wrestling) … Folk's love and infatuation with "riding time" is another complete bastardization of the seminal rules of wrestling … relative to the most fundamental and seminal rules of wrestling … long since been "stalemated" in a wrestling match … Riding for the sake of riding with no other goal in mind than to accumulate "riding time", is REWARDED in Folk … an insane bastardization of the seminal rules of wrestling … bastardizes the outcomes and results of Folk matches.
“He said ‘semen’ ” — Beavis and Butthead :)

MV5BMjdkMDNkYjMtNTU0YS00YzVjLTk1NmItYWVjOWNmMWFhMTRlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMzM4NjcxOTc%2540._V1_.jpg
 
^^ This -- and it's not enough to just watch Olympic wrestling more.

Every new sport gets introduced because some empty suit at NBC ran a focus group that shows it might draw an audience, or at least an audience in some target demographic. The IOC doesn't know a sport from a root vegetable. They know what their masters at NBC tell them.

Same with slot allocations -- entirely based upon actual or projected ratings.

So we need to watch more of it in whatever form -- Rokfin, Flo, ESPN, FS1, in-person, Facebook Live, local streaming, YouTube, whatever. And USA Wrestling needs to figure out how to compile all of that data, to show NBC what ratings the sport can generate.

Wrestling will likely never generate the ratings of basketball, gymnastics, and track. But it can get the best slots of the remaining time, and be something more than filler to NBC.
I know absolutely nothing about swimming, but I watch it religiously every 4 years. It’s not all Michael Phelps either, I enjoyed this year just as much. I hope wrestling can figure it out. JB, J’Den, the stars need to be there competing for medals.

Cael’s next step is women. He’s already taken over the world with men’s FS. Having Helen is a start, just wait for those pieces to fall. That should be the easiest pitch to get University support from Sandy. How it looks I’m not sure. It may just be NLWC and Freestyle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grass and Ski
I feel like I've made this comment a few dozen times but shooting in FS is not what determines passivity calls, it's about holding the center and engaging more. If there's no real action the guy who'll get hit with passivity is the guy who backed up more, regardless of whether that guy took a shot. Shots in FS don't count for much, unless you initiate a lot of action off those shots. Folk fans may disagree that that's how it should be, but that's definitely how it is, and it's called consistently.

The consistency I saw from this Olympics was that if a US wrestler was in a match and there was a passivity call then the US wrestler was almost always hit with it. We should just have our guys and gals start their matches at 0-1 and get rid of the pretense of fairness.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT