As usual, you skip parts. It’s not just Jerry’s inexcusable showering habits, but the accusations by the victims as well. You like to focus on the victims (lying people I suppose you would say) and ignoring what is slapping you in the face. Non-pedophilic grown men do not shower with underage boys and have physical contact with them. Not your average non-pedophilic grown man, and certainly not a non-pedophilic grown man who works with at-risk youth. You are stuck on the idea that Jerry Sandusky must be the one in the world that fits that bill. It defies all logic. Again, I cannot prove to you that Jerry Sandusky is guilty of sexually abusing any of these children and more than you can prove to me that he has not. But if I could build a profile of a child sexual abuser, it would be Jerry Sandusky and his bizarre showering/raspberry blowing/hiding behind wrestling mats with boys behavior.
As I have said and I believe you have agreed with many times, these behaviors are inappropriate. That must lead you to the question of why would one engage in so many seemingly pedophilic behaviors if one isn’t a pedophile? Most people come up with the answer that, “Well, because he’s a pedophile.” You come up with the answer that, “Jerry couldn’t have abused them because he has hypogonadism.” or, “These boys maintained long relationships with him”, or one of many other options.
Assuming you are not a pedophile, I would be shocked if you would ever purposely put yourself in the position of showering alone with a boy you were working with. Nor would I. Nor would any other rational, non-pedophilic man. There is no reasonable excuse for him to have been in the shower once, certainly not twice after being investigated by police, and certainly no reason for him to be blowing raspberries on an unrelated boy’s belly or to be behind wrestling mats with another underage boy in an otherwise empty gym.