If JS was obviously guilty, the commonwealth would not have had to break the law in order to enforce it.
Seven Years Ago Today
- Thread starter francofan
- Start date
If JS was obviously guilty, the commonwealth would not have had to break the law in order to enforce it.
PA Court Corruption - Too Big to Fail !!
You prove that you troll this board only to continue a deception started in 2011 by a criminally corrupt group of PA Politicos. In 7+ years, this case has only been out of the PA courts for ONE - REPEAT ONE - issue (Spainer's "conviction" on a law that did not exist at the time of the accusation). RESULT - one crime by the State of PA exposed!!
What will happen if the FED Courts get FULLY involved ??? After all, plenty of crimes have hAD TO BE committed so that you can promote a proof of this "obvious guilt" statement . All possible because they are based on certifiable LEGAL FRAUD and ABUSE.
This litany of legal abuse by the State OAG/Governor/OGBOT created and promoted the Sandusky-PSU "Crimes". This crime creation by the State OAG was only possible because of evidence suppression, criminal collusion, jury tampering, bogus "Retired Judge" selections - untried perjury charges - convictions obtained on multiple laws and statutes that are patently NOT applicable, promoting as evidence KNOWN falsehoods and mis-statements by the PA OAG (A/K/A obstruction of Justice) - the list of illegal acts involved here goes on and on!!!!
As long as you can stay within your OBVIOUSLY corrupted PA Courts, you can continue to have your "laugh" at justice and promote messaged of the conviction of an "...obviously guilty serial pedophile...".
But - SANDUSKY is not the issue here - IT is the crime of unpunished corruption and legal abuse!!
You are able to feebly state anything you want ONLY because PA crimes have allowed a public illusion of "Guilt" - "Guilt created in a TOTALLY corrupted court system...... but....what if the time is up on this illusion? What if the FEDS finally become FULLY involved???
If they do, MANY high-powered people will be jailed as a result of this deception. Hijacking an entire STATE's court and justice system is a MANY times greater crime than anything you want others to believe is accused Sandusky's crimes.
If Sandusky is so obviously a guilty pedophile, please identify the single individual victim that you are certain that he sexually abused. I am guessing that you will not respond to this request because you can’t. None of the 36 claimants that Penn State made settlements have stories that are credible and clearly convincing imho.
Take a stab at it pinkhippo if you can. The only problem is there aren’t any credible, convincing victims among the 36 claimants. They just don’t exist.
But there aren't any credible convincing guilty people either, least of not Jerry or Dottie.
Why is Dottie not credible? I was not aware that she owned a rap sheet.
Alamo bowl.
Didn't hear a peep from basement.
5x sex per week.
Never saw v10.
Jerry is innocent.
LoL. Whatever they pay you is too much. So you believe Jerry was anally raping a boy in his family room....with the victim screaming for help? And kept stopping by, week after week.Even those who believe JS guilty know this isn't true... as it would be counter to his alleged MO. Every time you post, you weaken the position of those who profess Sandusky's guilt. At least one can respect Connor's intellect and line of reasoning. He may very well be correct. You are just impotent intellectually.
He was also found guilty of crimes with no known victims....let me know of similar convictions. Perhaps you can speak to the crying janitor. LOL
He’s obviously guilty because he was convicted, he was convicted because he’s obviously guilty.
They were all abused and probably just the tip of the iceberg. There are probably hundreds more that Jerry had his way with in his very long reign as king of the child molesters.
Just as I suspected, you can’t name a specific claimant that you are virtually certain that was sexually abused by Sandusky.
Osprey Lion said:
Surely there are hundreds more... considering PSU opened their wallet to victims of TSM scandal, and more didn't come out of the woodwork. I guess they did that out of love for the second mile? Meanwhile at MSU and OSU, with less opportunity for financial gain, hundreds of victims have come forward. Funny that you still think that the Second Mile's Sandusky is the "king", simply because he once worked for a school you hate, despite there obviously being much worse offenders out there. (How much of your day do you spend comparing these sort of offenders?) As for his "very long reign", I realize you are just trying to paint PSU in the worst light possible... but what dates did the trial accusers allege abuse occurred? What do you consider a long reign? (You can even use testimony of the trial accusers that are known only to god.)
The ironic thing is that if you believe Jerry Sandusky is guilty, you MUST believe Dottie is a more credible witness than one of the key accusers.
V9 claimed he stayed at the Sandusky house every weekend from 2005-2008. V1 claimed he stayed with the Sandusky’s most weekends during that exact same time period. However, I believe V1 claimed he only met V9 only once and V9 couldn’t identify V1 when shown a picture at him at trial. It’s very clear of these guys has to be lying.
Now if V1 is the guy lying, there’s no way Sandusky could be guilty. Considering V1 was the only accuser for two years and the investigators used V1s story in order to get all the other accusers to flip on Sandusky.
When Dottie was asked how often V9 stayed at the house, she stated it was “certainly less than once per month”. This scenario is actually consistent with V1s testimony.
Last edited:
Yes. Even V9 himself knew it would be absurd to claim Dottie ignored his screams. That’s why he felt the need to make up a story about “soundproof walls”. It is unbelievably pathetic that when it was proved on the Today’s show that the walls were not soundproof, they concluded Dottie must have ignored screams (something V9 didn’t even claim) rather than the clear fact that V9 was caught in an obvious lie.
Why is stating facts "unhinged". Oh, I forgot you are a TROLL and only interested in promoting "Stories". CERTIFIABLE Legal abuse is nothing!
You are the one who needs adjustment into reality!.
Ironic how those who question the actual degree of- or guilt of JS are labeled "cultists," yet it is actually those who swallow the narrative without question who exhibit cult like blind faith.
If Dottie is willing is lie about not knowing an accuser, why only V10, why not say the same for others?
Also regarding your comment about the Alamo Bowl, why exactly do you find her claim not credible? That being the argument between Jerry and V4 happened when they were fully clothed and was the result of V4 not wanting to attend a banquet in which Jerry had already paid $50 for his ticket.
The Alamo Bowl and the "soundproof gameroom", the Litany According to a Penn Live shitforbrains.
Do you believe the Sandusky victims who refused to speak up after becoming adults and even enabled him to meet more boys by volunteering at his camps are also “complicit”?
LIES are the cornerstone of this entire case for 7+ years.
It is no longer possible to successfully argue that ANY PSU-related court action was legal and unbiased. The "Story" that drove the PSU scandal at all levels can TODAY ONLY be supported by the lies, the criminally suspicious legal actions and collusive benefactors in this case. In fact, it is no longer the illusion of FACTUAL EVIDENCE that is being used to support all of the legal actions taken by the State of PA, but the very legal abuses that are at the heart of this illegal fantasy . Illegal imposed laws, certifiable PERJURY statements accepted as "evidence", lies and behind the scenes legal blackmail is what still remains in this case and it is this tainted legal group of "evidence" that has been argued for the past 7+ years. It is simply a group of Crimes being used to support another Crime - No Less than that!!!
EVERY case presented by the OAG and PA has CONSISTENTLY had constitutionally abused components. These involve the State ALONE allowing AND PROMOTING knowingly inaccurate, modified and legally prohibited "evidence" to create nothing less than a "deception of a trial"
The entire battery of "Crimes" the State promoted was contrived ONLY to CONVICT PSU associates, not under any laws - but under a personal directive of "...convict AT ALL COSTS..." The methods used by the State of PA and its criminal judges is now certifiably visible - the methods consisted of collusion, intimidation, selective legal enforcement of laws and general prosecution malfeasance.
What this creates the LARGEST ABUSE OF STATE LEGAL POWER IN US HISTORY involving a public institution. NO OTHER CONCLUSION CAN BE SUPPORTED based upon evidence known today!
Last edited:
These are facts?
You can’t argue with someone who has made up his mind and doesn’t mind using sorta truths as absolute facts. Especially when he completely ignores every counter to his claim brushing them off as the Jerry cult.
At any rate, I’m not sure Jerry is innocent or guilty (for real, not what the jury said), but I’m totally disillusioned by our criminal justice system getting away with all sorts of actually proven shenanigans in order to get convictions. And a big reason they get away with it? People like osprey lion who only care that they put people he thinks are guilty away regardless of the rules they break to make it happen.
Stop! That's ridiculous!
I’ll have to take your word. Have family in town through the weekend and don’t have that much time to watch the video.
Every single one he was found guilty of touching, others that did not get their day in court, then the others who would not come forward combined with those that we don't kn ow about.
Non-responsive. You did not identify an individual victim that you find credible and convincing.
And you’ve yet to identify a single, reasonable excuse for him to be touching underage boys in a shower. It’s a stalemate.
The single, reasonable excuse is that the boy was wound up and began horsing around.
Your turn!
Then I guess he should have avoided being in the shower with an underage boy after promising a police officer never to do it again, huh?
It's nowhere near, it's a severely deluded individual and then me.
I'll bet you a dollar that the cop was trying to protect JS when offering that advice. He wasn't worried that any boys might be in danger. If he was, he would have followed the law and reported the '98 shower incident to TSM.
Depends on who tells the story. The one I heard had the officer advising JS not to shower with that one boy. He never did again. He did remain close to that boy for a decade. I believe he not only maintained a close relationship with the young man but with the family....including various favors Mom would ask of him.
Similar threads
