Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe Grant G can explain it. I have no idea why the spread is that high.
Their defense is as big a problem as our offense. Something's gotta give.
Maryland is a much different team at home than on the road. If this game were away, I would expect a PSU loss.
If this were at MD, we lose by a TD. I'm thinking we come from behind to win next weekend.
Agree, but Canada's offense gives us fits. He'll attack out DTs and LBers with a vengeance. He's the best at mixing in Jet sweeps and misdirection plays that are designed to go up the gut. And that is our weakness.Stop McFarland and we win the game. Simple as that!
And can we survive early with Koa getting his senior start. I'm sure Koa's a great kid but when he's in the game the defense is not good, especially against the run.Agree, but Canada's offense gives us fits. He'll attack out DTs and LBers with a vengeance. He's the best at mixing in Jet sweeps and misdirection plays that are designed to go up the gut. And that is our weakness.
There is also the "senior day" distraction.
This is no walk over game, IMHO. This MD team beat TX and MN while they should have beaten tOSU. They are spotty, with some glaring losses (shut out vs Iowa and Indiana). Pegrim is a horrible passer but is a great runner. To your point, stop the run game and we win. But that has been the message against UM, Sparty, Wiscy and Iowa.
hopefully, but we scored 26 on tOSU. I don't feel like we "lit it up" on them.PSU will probably win this game by 20
Everyone complains about Rutgers but there's a few things to that (and personally why I never thought we'd cover the spread against Rutgers -- more than 13 but still) ... in the last 4 games Rutgers has played and it's not like they've played cupcakes (Michigan, Northwestern, Wisconsin, Penn State), you know how many of those teams covered the spread? Zero. Rutgers is atrocious but will do things to keep things closer than it should be. In addition, lets be real, the staff (and the players) knew they'd win that game no matter what they did. They treated it at a scrimmage to try to correct some of the problems. Our problem on offense isn't rushing, it's passing. So we tried to work on passing and then it looks worse since in a glorified scrimmage we looked terrible airing it out. It seemed like Franklin knew he could always fall back on the running game if needed, which is how the game ended over the last 10 minutes.
Maryland isn't good. I understand they torched OSU's defense but at this point ... who hasn't? Hell everyone complains about our offense but we lit up the OSU defense. So has Purdue. So has Maryland. You get my point. Senior day at Maryland and OSU being not the usual OSU team caused that result. Maryland blew their load on Saturday and on the road is not the same team as they are at home (and that's not saying much). At home they're 4-3 this year, with a win over Texas, an OT loss to OSU, and two blowout losses to Temple and MSU. On the road, they're 1-3.with 2 20+ point losses, and a loss to Indiana.
I expect Trace to press a bit early next week in his final home game. He'll settle down by mid 2nd quarter and PSU will probably roll 38-17.
^^This^^LOL, at MD? Their fan base doesn't show for regular games let alone ones over Thanksgiving.
Having home "fans" isn't the only issue giving a home field advantage. The real advantage is having the resources and routine in the run up to the game. Fans are great but unless you have a very vocal home crowd, doesn't make a whole lot of difference.^^This^^
They played us at home last year and we dropped 70 on them. I know it's a different season but I would expect UMd to perform as well (or as badly) at the Beav as they would at home.
i agree. We should win and am confident we will, but it isn't a given if we don't play our A- game, at least. will be interesting to see if the OT loss to tOSU helps or hurts the TerpsMaryland is not an easy game. In fact, a win is not a sure thing. Penn State Coaches must devise a solid and careful strategy to contain McFarland kid. Once he gets on edge, it is a touchdown. Penn State has not defended the edge against Mich., and Mich. State. If this game becomes a scoring contest, we lose. With McS. not 100%, our scoring has gone down. We must put on long drives to keep D on bench. Watch Maryland vs. OSU highlights on YouTube to see it for yourself. Tackling McF. is next to impossible, so you must push him out of bound by surrounding him. Keep safeties behind, do not over pursue.
PSU will probably win this game by 20
Everyone complains about Rutgers but there's a few things to that (and personally why I never thought we'd cover the spread against Rutgers -- more than 13 but still) ... in the last 4 games Rutgers has played and it's not like they've played cupcakes (Michigan, Northwestern, Wisconsin, Penn State), you know how many of those teams covered the spread? Zero. Rutgers is atrocious but will do things to keep things closer than it should be. In addition, lets be real, the staff (and the players) knew they'd win that game no matter what they did. They treated it at a scrimmage to try to correct some of the problems. Our problem on offense isn't rushing, it's passing. So we tried to work on passing and then it looks worse since in a glorified scrimmage we looked terrible airing it out. It seemed like Franklin knew he could always fall back on the running game if needed, which is how the game ended over the last 10 minutes.
Maryland isn't good. I understand they torched OSU's defense but at this point ... who hasn't? Hell everyone complains about our offense but we lit up the OSU defense. So has Purdue. So has Maryland. You get my point. Senior day at Maryland and OSU being not the usual OSU team caused that result. Maryland blew their load on Saturday and on the road is not the same team as they are at home (and that's not saying much). At home they're 4-3 this year, with a win over Texas, an OT loss to OSU, and two blowout losses to Temple and MSU. On the road, they're 1-3.with 2 20+ point losses, and a loss to Indiana.
I expect Trace to press a bit early next week in his final home game. He'll settle down by mid 2nd quarter and PSU will probably roll 38-17.
Win by 20+???
Can this offense even score 20??
Win by 20+???
Can this offense even score 20??
They just did, granted it probably should have been at least 27-7 but yea they can.
rutgres should have scored 14.
First, the spread is 13.5, not 14. Definitely a difference.Maybe Grant G can explain it. I have no idea why the spread is that high.
Maryland is not an easy game. In fact, a win is not a sure thing. Penn State Coaches must devise a solid and careful strategy to contain McFarland kid. Once he gets on edge, it is a touchdown. Penn State has not defended the edge against Mich., and Mich. State. If this game becomes a scoring contest, we lose. With McS. not 100%, our scoring has gone down. We must put on long drives to keep D on bench. Watch Maryland vs. OSU highlights on YouTube to see it for yourself. Tackling McF. is next to impossible, so you must push him out of bound by surrounding him. Keep safeties behind, do not over pursue.
How so? I'm pretty sure PSU is something like 5-1 in games where Canada is OC.Agree, but Canada's offense gives us fits. .
How so? I'm pretty sure PSU is something like 5-1 in games where Canada is OC.
Pitt had one good half in 2016. Indiana scored 31 in 2007, but other Canada teams scored 7, 20, 24, 21. Keep McFarland from making explosive plays and Maryland won't do much.
How so? I'm pretty sure PSU is something like 5-1 in games where Canada is OC.
Pitt had one good half in 2016. Indiana scored 31 in 2007, but other Canada teams scored 7, 20, 24, 21. Keep McFarland from making explosive plays and Maryland won't do much.
Canada was always coaching for lesser teams. Pitt, Wisconsin, Indiana. But fair enough. I should have said a Matt Canada coached offense will give this team fits. Canada's heaving backfield action, misdirection and attack the entire LOS with the ground game will wear down our thin DT and inexperienced LBers Saturday. HIs Pitt offense was really well done in 2016 and the offense they brought to HV in 2017 based on that offense really made our LBers dizzy.
Agree about his offense in 2016 but it also helped that he had 2 NFL talent OL, and NFL starting RB and an NFL (ok stop laughing) QB, plus a couple of good WR's.