Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He hit 2 FGs over 50 and if they make that XP it changes everything. KC doesn't kick the FG to tie it at 16 and they probably win in regulation. Weird attack on a kicker here.blows the super bowl.
I have no love for Michigan, but the OP is way off base. The missed PAT changed the trajectory of the game, but certainly didn’t decide it. Without his two long FGs, Niners aren’t in the game.He hit 2 FGs over 50 and if they make that XP it changes everything. KC doesn't kick the FG to tie it at 16 and they probably win in regulation. Weird attack on a kicker here.
Not to mention the punt TO that bounced off the foot of a 49er. Special teams play cost the 49ers last nights game.I have no love for Michigan, but the OP is way off base. The missed PAT changed the trajectory of the game, but certainly didn’t decide it. Without his two long FGs, Niners aren’t in the game.
Yeah I don't understand that. It's basically not understanding the new rules.…and electing to take first possession in overtime after winning the toss. Crazy.
I thought that was the right move at first instinct, though hasn’t been much analysis of it yet since it’s the first time it applied.…and electing to take first possession in overtime after winning the toss. Crazy.
well, since 9ers got a FG, the Chiefs knew they needed a FG to tie and a TD to win. So the decision to go for it on 4th down was easy, no-brainer. The 9ers were fighting the unknown. Had they deferred, and KC scored a TD, 9ers would have gone for it on 4th down instead of kicking a FG. Just like college OT, you NEVER go on offense first.I thought that was the right move at first instinct, though hasn’t been much analysis of it yet since it’s the first time it applied.
Not like sportswriters did either. USAToday saying Mahomes threw the TD with 3 seconds left.Yeah I don't understand that. It's basically not understanding the new rules.
I heard a talking head suggest today that the Niners wanted the 3rd possession in OT. The reasoning was that if they matched scores on their respective first (Niners)/second (Chiefs) possession, the 3rd would be sudden death. Plausible, yes; but, man that is really overthinking it if true.…and electing to take first possession in overtime after winning the toss. Crazy.
Agreed. I OT, there is no tomorrow. I know it wasn't sudden death, but they screwed themselves when it came down to 4th and 4 and had no choice but to kick a FG. They really let the Chiefs win that game.I heard a talking head suggest today that the Niners wanted the 3rd possession in OT. The reasoning was that if they matched scores on their respective first (Niners)/second (Chiefs) possession, the 3rd would be sudden death. Plausible, yes; but, man that is really overthinking it if true.
Isn't he the same guy who missed the kick in college playoff game, thus losing the game to TCU.blows the super bowl.
But the format is very different than college, with it continuing on…they trade FGs or Punts, and SF is then in the drivers seat again with the ball.well, since 9ers got a FG, the Chiefs knew they needed a FG to tie and a TD to win. So the decision to go for it on 4th down was easy, no-brainer. The 9ers were fighting the unknown. Had they deferred, and KC scored a TD, 9ers would have gone for it on 4th down instead of kicking a FG. Just like college OT, you NEVER go on offense first.
True.I have no love for Michigan, but the OP is way off base. The missed PAT changed the trajectory of the game, but certainly didn’t decide it. Without his two long FGs, Niners aren’t in the game.
I simply cannot disagree with you more. First, college is the same thing. If you trade FGs, play goes on. But you simply cannot count on getting another possession. By deferring, the staff gets to make decisions based on the outcome of the opposing team's first drive.But the format is very different than college, with it continuing on…they trade FGs or Punts, and SF is then in the drivers seat again with the ball.
Yeah, that was a head scratcher - no one that I was watching the game with understood it at all…and electing to take first possession in overtime after winning the toss. Crazy.
I heard a talking head suggest today that the Niners wanted the 3rd possession in OT. The reasoning was that if they matched scores on their respective first (Niners)/second (Chiefs) possession, the 3rd would be sudden death. Plausible, yes; but, man that is really overthinking it if true.
Why? There should never be a third possession. If SF scores a TD then KC goes for 2. The only way for a possible 3rd possession is if both teams score a TD and convert the 2. You can't kick a FG in the new format and think you'll get another shot.It isn't overthinking. It is the conventional logic that all teams use.
Third possession is what everyone wants.
that's right. Ostensibly, the 49ers had to run their first offensive series blind. Conversely, the Chiefs knew exactly what they needed to do and it gave them a lot more options.Why? There should never be a third possession. If SF scores a TD then KC goes for 2. The only way for a possible 3rd possession is if both teams score a TD and convert the 2. You can't kick a FG in the new format and think you'll get another shot.
College is very different because if you trade scores, then both teams again get to possess the ball. With the NFL rules, that team getting the ball first would have a huge advantage if the teams matched results on the first possessions. Play goes on after you trade FGs, but you'd be in a very preferable position.I simply cannot disagree with you more. First, college is the same thing. If you trade FGs, play goes on.
Yeah...but you can't play for the future in OT in the Super Bowl.College is very different because if you trade scores, then both teams again get to possess the ball. With the NFL rules, that team getting the ball first would have a huge advantage if the teams matched results on the first possessions. Play goes on after you trade FGs, but you'd be in a very preferable position.
Romo said it was to give the SF defense more time to rest. I still disagree with the decision. What if KC got the ball first and they scored a TD? SF would have known to go for the TD on 4th down.I thought that was the right move at first instinct, though hasn’t been much analysis of it yet since it’s the first time it applied.
right, and again, the defense rested while the Chiefs kicked off after tying the game. When their offense took the field and ran a play to end the game. After the teams gathered on the sideline. After the teams flipped coins. And during the opening kickoff of OT. Plus the endless commercials during those events. Short of their mom's giving them oranges, I am not sure how much more rest they needed.Romo said it was to give the SF defense more time to rest. I still disagree with the decision. What if KC got the ball first and they scored a TD? SF would have known to go for the TD on 4th down.
With new rules, true…and electing to take first possession in overtime after winning the toss. Crazy.
The rules provide that if the game is tied after each team gets a possession, the next score wins. Absolutely no obligation for KC to go for 2 had Niners scored a TD and kicked the extra point.Why? There should never be a third possession. If SF scores a TD then KC goes for 2. The only way for a possible 3rd possession is if both teams score a TD and convert the 2. You can't kick a FG in the new format and think you'll get another shot.
right. The change is, and different than regular season, both teams get an opportunity. So in the regular season, if the first team scored a TD, the game is over. If they kick a FG, the second team has a chance to match or win with a TD. In the Super Bowl, no matter what, the second team gets a chance.The rules provide that if the game is tied after each team gets a possession, the next score wins. Absolutely no obligation for KC to go for 2 had Niners scored a TD and kicked the extra point.
Don't remember if he blew a kick vs TCU- but I've always appreciated how good he was at UM- ESPECIALLY because as a Walk On he beat out "Private Jet Video Commitment Boy/Harbaugh Sleepover Playmate" Quinn Nordin.Isn't he the same guy who missed the kick in college playoff game, thus losing the game to TCU.
He is then one who missed the TCU FG to win it.Don't remember if he blew a kick vs TCU- but I've always appreciated how good he was at UM- ESPECIALLY because as a Walk On he beat out "Private Jet Video Commitment Boy/Harbaugh Sleepover Playmate" Quinn Nordin.
After Quinn missed a PAT in Beaver Stadium to raucous booing and cat calls (of which I was one- I rarely have ever booed a college player) the door opened up and Moody never took a seat.
Lotsa things coulda made the difference for SF- but converting that PAT seems like it should've been the easiest. Better team earned the win- as much as I was rooting against them. The Chiefs made more plays.....
Reid said he planned to go for two. No coach is going to play for the tie and hope the defense holds on with Mahomes at QBThe rules provide that if the game is tied after each team gets a possession, the next score wins. Absolutely no obligation for KC to go for 2 had Niners scored a TD and kicked the extra point.
Rule #1 - anything Romo says is stupid - man that Dude never shut's up but I have a Romo filters and he becomes background noise after 5 minutes - Olsen was/is 1000 times better than Romo.Romo said it was to give the SF defense more time to rest. I still disagree with the decision. What if KC got the ball first and they scored a TD? SF would have known to go for the TD on 4th down.
missed a big opportunityRule #1 - anything Romo says is stupid - man that Dude never shut's up but I have a Romo filters and he becomes background noise after 5 minutes - Olsen was/is 1000 times better than Romo.
Romo isn't that bad. I feel like everyone hates every color analyst other than Blackledge here. See Herbie being bashed constantly. Romo is better at this than he was a QB.Rule #1 - anything Romo says is stupid - man that Dude never shut's up but I have a Romo filters and he becomes background noise after 5 minutes - Olsen was/is 1000 times better than Romo.
Which is exactly what the fullback others on the 49ers said. I think the 49ers have more talent and probably should have won, but Andy and his coaches are better.Yeah I don't understand that. It's basically not understanding the new rules.
Mahomes said that they were going for two to end it one way or the other. No obligation to, but the Chiefs were going to be aggressive if the situation presented itself.The rules provide that if the game is tied after each team gets a possession, the next score wins. Absolutely no obligation for KC to go for 2 had Niners scored a TD and kicked the extra point.
And it makes sense to go for two by the Chiefs there if it happened, otherwise with kickers being good for 50-60 yards it doesn't take a big drive for the 49ers to end it on that third possession of OT with a FG. You (Chiefs) go for two to prevent the 2:1 possession ratio not in your favor. You take the ball first (49ers) for the 2:1 possession possibility in your favor.Mahomes said that they were going for two to end it one way or the other. No obligation to, but the Chiefs were going to be aggressive if the situation presented itself.
its pretty clear that the Chiefs better game planned for OT and I completely agree with their strategy.And it makes sense to go for two by the Chiefs there if it happened, otherwise with kickers being good for 50-60 yards it doesn't take a big drive for the 49ers to end it on that third possession of OT with a FG. You (Chiefs) go for two to prevent the 2:1 possession ratio not in your favor. You take the ball first (49ers) for the 2:1 possession possibility in your favor.
Whether the 49ers players or coaches or both we're prepared or not, I think both teams' strategies are the correct ones.
Well, Buffalo knows that Mahomes needs less than 17 seconds. 😂its pretty clear that the Chiefs better game planned for OT and I completely agree with their strategy.
I'd like to see a stat to see who is better off in the NFL: to be up by 1 or 2 kicking off with less than two minutes left and the other team having all their timeouts or to be receiving the kickoff losing by 1 or 2 with less than two minutes left.
Right now, with all of the great QBs, there is Mahomes and there is everybody else.Well, Buffalo knows that Mahomes needs less than 17 seconds. 😂