FC: CSS Failure To Report charge thrown out by judge
- Thread starter Zenophile
- Start date
Technically speaking, and people will say I am trolling, but this is what it is...
We don't know who the boy in the shower was (v2). Actually, most of us do but some claim not to.
As long as that's uncertain, the boy could have been a Penn State student. After all, there are kids as young as 14 admitted some years.
If he was, then PSU and CSS clearly had educational and administrative control & responsibilities.
I don't know how OAG woul'd prove that, because it isn't true, but based on all evidence to date it can be considered a possibility. (It isnt).
I hope not. After all of this mess, I think everyone should know the truth.
I understand. But Spanier was indeed a target at that time ("no comment" was the OAG's response about this).
And here's a post that's overqualified for the "feigned stupidity" thing.
Stufftodo: Some may find your posts annoying, but I find them highly interesting. As comic entertainment. You seem to have assumed Cruisin's role here quite seamlessly. Keep up the good work.
Welcome to BWI. Put up or shut up. Your call.
Since your wife works for the team responsible for much of this mess, methinks you protest too too much, my friend.
I can tell you that the defense has no fear of this. None.
And, these are good lawyers with good connections. They know the score.
No one here cares what you think about anything frankly. If this was a bar and not a message board, someone would have shown you the parking lot/dumpster area in detail by now. Keep running your mouth.
The state has offered CSS at least 3 different plea deals so far. They have almost begged them to take one of them. They were sure they would. But they didn't. And they won't.
Remember, the initial date was given as 2002. At the time I chalked that up to mistake or carelessness. Now I chalk it up to an intentional attempt to mislead the court to fall within the SOL. I'm betting the latest ruling here regarding the SOL will be appealed now and we'll see the charges thrown out.The SOL for the "failure to report" was a laughable situation from the start.
The FTR was all based on the 2001 situation - - - - which was already past the SOL on the initial filing
The AG made the (insanely ridiculous) argument that the failure to report was an "ongoing act" - since they "failed to report" the 2001 incident , and continued to FTR every day since .......... Doesn't take a legal scholar to LOL at that (and yet it took 5 years to toss it)
The EWC IS being pursued, as best I can tell, as a "ongoing act".......beginning in 2001 (or before - well have to see what if any evidence is presented if things go to trial) and the EWC continued on .........basically, a "conspiracy" to EWC
That is a 1000 X more reasonable argument than the one wrt FTR, but still a tough hurdle to overcome, I would think
If you had a brain, you'd take it out and play with it.
Good! I really, really hope that there will be some malicious prosecution type charges against these OAG pieces of shit (Fina, Eschbach, Corbett) before it's all said and done.
I wonder how Fina's private practice is going? Eshbach should be destroyed in her bid for public office. They are at the minimum a disgrace to the profession. I submit they should be disbarred.
Four to five years ago this was probably rehashed a thousand times over on this board. But, this is worth commenting on again. It is stunning - absolutely stunning - that this air tight case and Grand Jury against Sandusky et al could not even get the right YEAR. Right there there should have been floodlights flashing that this entire set of allegations was a farce and a precursor of every thing that has happened since.
How was JS supposed to provide an alibi for an alleged incident when he didn't know when it occurred? I think one exact date was mentioned the entire trial.
Too bad we can't drag in Tommy Boy and hook him up to a polygraph. How many heads would roll?
Ziegler spoke to Spanier after the mcqueary verdict and told Spanier that based on the insanity of the mcqueary verdict CSS are screwed if they go to trial - the public has been permanently poisoned. Spanier agreed with Ziegler. I think CSS are screwed if this goes to trial and if they are found guilty it doesn't matter what the bullshit is behind the verdict- it is over and so is any chance at redeeming Paterno's legacy. The worst thing that could happen is for this case to go to trial even though I believe this case has always been a joke.
I believe the thinking has changed on that, if in fact Graham ever said that. It's not consistent with their approach.
If a corrupt OAG, a lapdog judge, and a clueless jury can convict JS on the janitor story, then all bets are off. Sorry.
My question: isn't all evidence subject to discovery? STD refers to something he thinks will be enough. We're not talking about some Perry Mason surprise. The Defense would know what this key piece of evidence is. No?
Another thing about this out of control OAG. Funny nothing ever leaked out about C/S/S. The "leak" is their go to play, and yet....nothing.
I'd be curious to get Lubrano's thoughts on today's news.
The rules are different this time. They have competent counsel and a different judge. They are not fearful of anything.
Was their go to play. Then he went to work for Seth.
Depends on the jury. CSA cases generate highly-pitched emotions that can obscure evidence. And this is McQ's word against C/S/S word. McQ has held up in 2 cases now, JS and his civil suit.
I'm a hell of a lot less confident of an acquittal than most of the guys here.
mcqueary is a moron and basically irrelevant when compared to what the media firestorm and freeh report did to bias the entire public against PSU in this case.
This is no newbie. It is on oldie with a new screen name.
^^^ This.
The OAG first argued that the statute of limitations tolled for 8 yrs, then commenced for 2 yrs and was timely. This was in a 3/30/2012 filing while the McQueary incident was still thought to be in 2002. The OAG had to completely change their argument after the McQ incident date was corrected to 2001.
