Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would have to be the Coach.
Or the coach's estate? Say....if the coach is no longer alive?
Estates cannot sue for defamation.
Estates cannot sue for defamation.
A dead person (or his estate) can't sue for defamation.
The living coaches won't sue. Why not? That's the million dollar question. A cynic might think they have something to hide, and a lawsuit could uncover all sorts of damaging information which those coaches prefer to keep quiet.
Their strategy was to issue a precisely worded statement of denial, then move on. Let sleeping dogs lie.
Or why would Bradley or greggy want to be drug thru the mud while jeprodizing their current gigs??? Would ucla or OSU really want to put up with that??A dead person (or his estate) can't sue for defamation. In Estate of Paterno v NCAA they are not suing for defamation but rather a tortious interference with business relationships. A different road but gets you to the same destination.
The living coaches won't sue. Why not? That's the million dollar question. A cynic might think they have something to hide, and a lawsuit could uncover all sorts of damaging information which those coaches prefer to keep quiet.
Their strategy was to issue a precisely worded statement of denial, then move on. Let sleeping dogs lie. If they're willing to live with the consequences who's to say its wrong?
bingo......coveydidnt's rightEstates cannot sue for defamation.
"You need to pull your head out of your backside."
Lets count all the defamation lawsuits brought by assistant coaches....hmmmm.... I count ZERO. What's your tally?
Unless you can point to a single one, its seems its you whose tongue is chomping the chocolate factory.
A dead person (or his estate) can't sue for defamation. In Estate of Paterno v NCAA they are not suing for defamation but rather a tortious interference with business relationships. A different road but gets you to the same destination.
The living coaches won't sue. Why not? That's the million dollar question. A cynic might think they have something to hide, and a lawsuit could uncover all sorts of damaging information which those coaches prefer to keep quiet.
Their strategy was to issue a precisely worded statement of denial, then move on. Let sleeping dogs lie. If they're willing to live with the consequences who's to say its wrong?
Interesting, it pisses me off that accusers can lie about their experiences w/JerBer implicating others and their no recourse of action for the "others".For contrived lies they can.
Do you know the meaning of "can" jackass?
Sure I do. I will use it in a sentence.
"Jubaaltman CAN take a flying leap off the Empire State Building." Unfortunately, he won't.
"You need to pull your head out of your backside."
Lets count all the defamation lawsuits brought by assistant coaches....hmmmm.... I count ZERO. What's your tally?
Unless you can point to a single one, its seems its you whose tongue is chomping the chocolate factory.
Last time I checked lawyers aren't free. And suing for defamation of character is extremely difficult case to win and the even harder to get real damages. But it appears you are too stupid to figure that out.
The real stupid people never heard of a contingency fee.
The real stupid people never heard of a contingency fee.
Those coaches aren't suing ever. Questioning and deposing goes two ways .
I dont know who Stan is but if he's a co-conspirator I hope he's brought to justice.Who the hell are Don and Stan??
The real stupid people never heard of a contingency fee.
A dead person (or his estate) can't sue for defamation. In Estate of Paterno v NCAA they are not suing for defamation but rather a tortious interference with business relationships. A different road but gets you to the same destination.
The living coaches won't sue. Why not? That's the million dollar question. A cynic might think they have something to hide, and a lawsuit could uncover all sorts of damaging information which those coaches prefer to keep quiet.
Their strategy was to issue a precisely worded statement of denial, then move on. Let sleeping dogs lie. If they're willing to live with the consequences who's to say its wrong?
Could be either, theoreticallyIt would have to be the Coach.
Do you know the meaning of "can" jackass?
Do you know the meaning of "can" jackass?
How about suing MM? Didn't he claim that Bradley and Schiavo knew? Or did he change that story? "I slammed the locker door. That's when Vince Lombardi and Amos Alonzo Stagg came around the corner. It was then that I saw the Loch Ness monster in the mirror..."If they wrongfully named/accused a Coach, they are fair game.
This 'Ignore' feature has saved me both time and brain cells by not reading idiotic posts!Black Elmo can be anything other than a Pitt clown, but he isn't.
False ... elvis63 has proof. Just waiting for him to come forward with it.There's no way to prove or disprove the allegations against these coaches by the claimants. It is one person's word against another.
The living coaches won't sue. Why not? That's the million dollar question. ?
Again they're not suing anyone. Spoiler alert , certain coaches knew.
There's no way to prove or disprove the allegations against these coaches by the claimants. It is one person's word against another.