197 Seeding @ NCAAs

[caliPSUfan]

let me know if I'm leaving something out...

1 - Morgan (Undefeated highest returning placer)
2 - Cox (1 loss by DQ)
3 - Burak (loss to Morgan and 1-1 with Pfarr)
4 - Pfarr (1-1 with Burak)
5 - Hartmann (1 loss to Pfarr)

Thoughts? Corrections?

 

[21Guns]

I got Hartmann 6, rather than 5.

 

[caliPSUfan]

Ok, so who's at 5?

 

[21Guns]

Ok, so who's at 5?

Haught.

 

[caliPSUfan]

Nope...Hartmann beat Haught twice.

 

[21Guns]

Nope...Hartmann beat Haught twice.

You're right, I'm wrong. Hartmann at 5.

 

[mrh1645]

Pfarr has 3 losses (Cox, McIntosh, Burak) and finished 3rd B10. Hartmann has 1 loss (Pfarr) and won ACC. While I agree Pfarr is better based on H-2-H win, I could see the seeding committee place Hartmann at 4.

 

[caliPSUfan]

Pfarr has 3 losses (Cox, McIntosh, Burak) and finished 3rd B10. Hartmann has 1 loss (Pfarr) and won ACC. While I agree Pfarr is better based on H-2-H win, I could see the seeding committee place Hartmann at 4.

I see what you're saying but my hope is that a tougher schedule is weighted heavily in these situations...If Pfarr owns the h2h and has losses only to those above him then Conner should need at least 1 win over one of those guys to jump Pfarr, JMO

Not that the 4&5 are much different, more the principal of rewarding a tougher schedule.