Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Love this post from an ok State guy on the mat re: parity
ionel
Posted 32 minutes ago
It was not the same. We had parity before Cael went to PSU and bent the rules. We still have parity amongst those not PSU, look at the scores. Gable era, yes he bent some rules, he came in when it had been almost always OSU. OSU, ISU and OU were almost always top 3-5 before Iowa and Gable and the b10 wasn't in the conversation. Those top 3 programs could always beat anyone else nit top 3 in a dual. Gable era it was pretty much always Iowa 1st & OSU 2nd. Its why Seay was brought in tired of 2nd. Not the same now, quite different.
The other factor is the rules NCAA put in place to increase parity (scholarship limits, walk on etc) we threw out the window after Cael went to PSU. “
A fan of a team with 34 titles - many of them complete whitewashings - longing for the “parity” of yesteryear that never was.
OKSTATE also thinks starocci is transferring.
Proving for the 50 billionth time that idiots can be taught to type.Love this post from an ok State guy on the mat re: parity
ionel
Posted 32 minutes ago
It was not the same. We had parity before Cael went to PSU and bent the rules. We still have parity amongst those not PSU, look at the scores. Gable era, yes he bent some rules, he came in when it had been almost always OSU. OSU, ISU and OU were almost always top 3-5 before Iowa and Gable and the b10 wasn't in the conversation. Those top 3 programs could always beat anyone else nit top 3 in a dual. Gable era it was pretty much always Iowa 1st & OSU 2nd. Its why Seay was brought in tired of 2nd. Not the same now, quite different.
The other factor is the rules NCAA put in place to increase parity (scholarship limits, walk on etc) we threw out the window after Cael went to PSU. “
A fan of a team with 34 titles - many of them complete whitewashings - longing for the “parity” of yesteryear that never was.
LOL.....what rules did Cael bend? Talk about sour grapes and fans from waning programs longing for the past.Love this post from an ok State guy on the mat re: parity
ionel
Posted 32 minutes ago
It was not the same. We had parity before Cael went to PSU and bent the rules. We still have parity amongst those not PSU, look at the scores. Gable era, yes he bent some rules, he came in when it had been almost always OSU. OSU, ISU and OU were almost always top 3-5 before Iowa and Gable and the b10 wasn't in the conversation. Those top 3 programs could always beat anyone else nit top 3 in a dual. Gable era it was pretty much always Iowa 1st & OSU 2nd. Its why Seay was brought in tired of 2nd. Not the same now, quite different.
The other factor is the rules NCAA put in place to increase parity (scholarship limits, walk on etc) we threw out the window after Cael went to PSU. “
A fan of a team wit
Cael is always so called bending rules and always zero proof~LOLLove this post from an ok State guy on the mat re: parity
ionel
Posted 32 minutes ago
It was not the same. We had parity before Cael went to PSU and bent the rules. We still have parity amongst those not PSU, look at the scores. Gable era, yes he bent some rules, he came in when it had been almost always OSU. OSU, ISU and OU were almost always top 3-5 before Iowa and Gable and the b10 wasn't in the conversation. Those top 3 programs could always beat anyone else nit top 3 in a dual. Gable era it was pretty much always Iowa 1st & OSU 2nd. Its why Seay was brought in tired of 2nd. Not the same now, quite different.
The other factor is the rules NCAA put in place to increase parity (scholarship limits, walk on etc) we threw out the window after Cael went to PSU. “
A fan of a team with 34 titles - many of them complete whitewashings - longing for the “parity” of yesteryear that never was.
LOL iowa fans always forget they get 3 for a TD as well then Tom says what's 3 points??bUt ThA tHrEe pOiNt tAkEdOwN 😂
Exactly. They apparently feel like a 3 point takedown only applies to Penn State. When they get a takedown it's only worth 2. 😂How about largest margin of victory which is more likely to fall? We get an asterisk there? Isn’t everyone wrestling with a 3pt takedown or just PSU?
Just stop, let us be the victims for a little bit please...Go read the thread. A few are defending the old record. Most are stating you give credit where credit is due.
You guys need it with that subpar performance your team put up the last 2 days. 😂😂Just stop, let us be the victims for a little bit please...
Ok it's over please continue.
Now that’s comedy. Though I thought you were going down the Covid path.They want an asterisk?
They already have one.
For years Gable cheated the scholy limit. And don't think the string of championships that occurred while they were violating the limit didn't affect those years after they got busted, even the success of a tainted dynasty carrys forward.
Yeah but In a two point td world the iowa style of wearing the opponent down reflects greater dominance. You know, like messenbrink calliendo.Exactly. They apparently feel like a 3 point takedown only applies to Penn State. When they get a takedown it's only worth 2. 😂
Stop.tom will slink back to iowa after losing by 80 points SHAME SHAME
Lol. Half are in denial and the other half are already replacing the entire roster with transfers.Stop.
They like their guys...
Love this post from an ok State guy on the mat re: parity
ionel
Posted 32 minutes ago
It was not the same. We had parity before Cael went to PSU and bent the rules. We still have parity amongst those not PSU, look at the scores. Gable era, yes he bent some rules, he came in when it had been almost always OSU. OSU, ISU and OU were almost always top 3-5 before Iowa and Gable and the b10 wasn't in the conversation. Those top 3 programs could always beat anyone else nit top 3 in a dual. Gable era it was pretty much always Iowa 1st & OSU 2nd. Its why Seay was brought in tired of 2nd. Not the same now, quite different.
The other factor is the rules NCAA put in place to increase parity (scholarship limits, walk on etc) we threw out the window after Cael went to PSU. “
A fan of a team with 34 titles - many of them complete whitewashings - longing for the “parity” of yesteryear that never was.
Want another guess?tom will slink back to iowa after losing by 80 points SHAME SHAME
well earlier I did say they would lose by 100 but I didn't think that was possible!MY BADWant another guess?
Yup - and there were a lot of years of consecutive huge victory margins of 30+ points. They act as if all those titles were scraps - like a lot of ours to be honest in the 2010sDoes Oklahoma State still have a wrestling team? (I’m kidding cowboy fans ).
I find it funny, (and highly hypocritical), when Oklahoma State and Iowa fans start whining that Penn St is winning and taking away the “parity”. What they really mean is ‘they are beating us and we can’t have that’.
Between 1954- 2011, (when PSU started their run), there were 57 years. Iowa and Oklahoma state won 41 of the 57 titles. 41/57. Where was this “parity”?
During that time Oklahoma St won 10 titles in 15 years. Iowa had runs of 9 titles in 10 years and 11 titles in 12 years.
Penn State is now in a run of 11 titles in 14 years.
The only difference is there’s a new kid on the block and the 2 old guard teams don’t like it.
You guys need it with that subpar performance your team put up the last 2 days. 😂😂
I say sign him for at least ten more yearswell if tom doesn't get fired after this fiasco he never will!