More snippets .
Quick question: what exactly did The Beatles do
differently as musicians?
The short answer?
Absolutely nothing.
The Beatles early recordings might as well be
admitted plagiarizations of countless American artists, from Carl Perkins to the Supremes to Roy Orbison to
especially Buddy Holly. . .in fact, the name of the group is a direct
nod to the name of Holly’s band,
The Crickets. And that’s not even counting the groups’ countrymen, including the Dave Clark Five, whom the Beatles “
borrowed” tons of inspiration from for their post-“Rubber Soul” albums.
Think “Helter Skelter” was the first
heavy metal song ever recorded? Too bad
Arthur Brown,
Budgie and
Blue Cheer were already established acts by the time the song was released, and completely ignore the fact that the first
Jimi Hendrix album came out a full
year before the “The White Album.
Think
“Revolution 9” was the first instance of a musical group getting all “industrial” on our asses? Well, it would be, if not for the fact that tons of bands like
Cromagnon,
The Monks,
The Fugs and
The Godz had already begun exploring fuzz and distortion
years earlier.
Even
The New York Times called the group out on their lifting of other bands’ sounds, which prompted John Lennon to write a nasty reply in 1971 in which he said that
the Beatles’ music wasn’t a rip-off, but a love-in.
And in case you were wondering, the Beatles were successfully sued for
those love-ins on THREE separate occasions, as
Chuck Berry, Joe Garlandand the Chiffons all filed – and won –suits against the band for ripping off their music.