The loss to Iowa was bad coaching (I'm NOT blaming Joe alone- but somebody- a real QB coach, for example, should have acted)- Robinson had his bell rung- badly- and never should have gone back in to the game. Devlin was every bit as good as a healthy Robinson and would have won that game. Hell, Robinson shouldn't have played the next week, either.wasn't convenient at all... i even mentioned that we sucked in those years.. and that this old man and this old staff figured it out and rebounded to become strong again.
now, as to your question... unfortunately, we have to remove one of our wins and one of um's BS big schmuck "wins"... so 2005 is off the table. from 06-11, we're 3-2. so imo, we're 4-2. they know it, we know it. end of story. but 3-2 is the fair number.
we went 2-3 versus iowa. those losses hurt the most.
we went 2-4 versus osu... and we do not get to count the 2011 win to make us 3-4.. joe was gone.
that said, the loss to iowa in 09 was the worst REAL loss. the WIN over osu in 2005 the best WIN. and the (lmao) loss to um in 2005 was the biggest pile of shit the B10 rained down on us (in their effort to make up for us having the temerity to dare to beat osu on national tv at night). had the game been refed fairly, we go into the bowl season undefeated and a legitimate contended for the big game.
do i think we beat either texas or usc that particular year? no. but it would have been a fair game and worth watching. we belonged.
now, as to your, um, question... i was very clear.. i was specifying the years 2005 until joe was cut loose for a reason. that we had a terrible 4 seasons isn't at issue.. that the coaches and the teams responded to all the negativity and wringing of hands by returning to its glory days says much about the people and their character.
Complaining about the refs is weak. If the game is so close that one bad call changes the outcome then either team will have some calls they can point to.