I have followed this scandal for a number of years and I have wanted to ask some of the Penn State faithful in a more complete format what they think the BOT should have done regarding the Sandusky scandal.
Now I know some of what you think (not signing the consent decree) but I was interested in a comprehensive list starting with the first decision that the BOT made to today. I did read a link some time back written by one of your own about how PSU lost the PR battle but I think it kind of stopped (the story) right after the scandal broke IIRC.
Here are some questions I am interested in knowing your opinion on. Also, I would like to know what you think the outcome or reaction from the state, NCAA, media etc. would have been had the BOT done things differently.
I am genuinely interested in your opinions and am not trolling. As I said this whole affair is pretty fascinating to me but I know it has been painful to you.
Here are some preliminary questions (please try to base your answers on what was known at the time):
Should the BOT have fired/forced out Spanier? I presume if he had been indicted later of course he would have stepped down.
Who should have taken his place in the interim?
Should the press conference with Joe have been held that November?
Should he have answered any and all questions?
Do you think he would have handled it well?
What should the BOT have done with Joe?
Should they have asked him to resign?
Should they have suspended him?
Should he have been allowed to continue to coach thru the bowl game and then retire?
Should the BOT have commissioned a review like what Freeh did or just let the justice system play out.
Who should have been the ones to do that review (if done)and what should their marching orders have been?
How should PSU have answered the NCAA letter?
Bugger off or we'll get back to you or what?
If bugger off what do you think the NCAA would have done?
If PSU had adopted the "fight back/exoneration" strategy how well do you think that would have gone and how would that have been orchestrated?
Curious as to your answers.
Now I know some of what you think (not signing the consent decree) but I was interested in a comprehensive list starting with the first decision that the BOT made to today. I did read a link some time back written by one of your own about how PSU lost the PR battle but I think it kind of stopped (the story) right after the scandal broke IIRC.
Here are some questions I am interested in knowing your opinion on. Also, I would like to know what you think the outcome or reaction from the state, NCAA, media etc. would have been had the BOT done things differently.
I am genuinely interested in your opinions and am not trolling. As I said this whole affair is pretty fascinating to me but I know it has been painful to you.
Here are some preliminary questions (please try to base your answers on what was known at the time):
Should the BOT have fired/forced out Spanier? I presume if he had been indicted later of course he would have stepped down.
Who should have taken his place in the interim?
Should the press conference with Joe have been held that November?
Should he have answered any and all questions?
Do you think he would have handled it well?
What should the BOT have done with Joe?
Should they have asked him to resign?
Should they have suspended him?
Should he have been allowed to continue to coach thru the bowl game and then retire?
Should the BOT have commissioned a review like what Freeh did or just let the justice system play out.
Who should have been the ones to do that review (if done)and what should their marching orders have been?
How should PSU have answered the NCAA letter?
Bugger off or we'll get back to you or what?
If bugger off what do you think the NCAA would have done?
If PSU had adopted the "fight back/exoneration" strategy how well do you think that would have gone and how would that have been orchestrated?
Curious as to your answers.