ADVERTISEMENT

Update on Malcolm Gladwell's book "Talking to Strangers"

Naked child molester with naked boy, late at night, in a building he assumed was unoccupied.
Do you think 9pm in a college town is "late at night?" MM never testified the building was empty. The prosecution only asked him if he saw anyone else. They've always been very careful in the manner they asked that question.

The S&C coaches and their support staff also used that same locker room. Do you think those guys only work out on a 9-5 schedule? Were the janitors at their annual gala the night of the incident?
 
Do you think 9pm in a college town is "late at night?" MM never testified the building was empty. The prosecution only asked him if he saw anyone else. They've always been very careful in the manner they asked that question.

The S&C coaches and their support staff also used that same locker room. Do you think those guys only work out on a 9-5 schedule? Were the janitors at their annual gala the night of the incident?

This moron probably still has it in his head the incident happened “The Friday before Spring Break”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris92
This case is simple. A convicted child molester was naked, late at night with a young boy in what he thought was an empty building. He was caught doing something "sexual" by someone who had no motive to lie. This person who should have called the police chose to wait and tell his family and the higher ups in the administration. They gave the molester a slap on the wrist and moved on. Nothing about Raykovitz, his wife, the governor, the Second Mile, the BOT, the media or any other extraneous BS you choose to bring up is going to change the facts that I have stated.

This case is simple. A pillar of the community who had helped many children was taking a shower after a workout in a non-private building where he could run in to anyone at anytime. He was seen doing something "I don't know what you would call it" by someone who had much motivation (gambling, cell phone pics) to lie. The person didn't call the police because there was no crime to report, so he chose to wait anywhere from hours to weeks until a high profile coaching position opened up, to tell his family and the higher ups in the administration. The administration took the vague report way more seriously than they needed to, revoking access to facilities and informing his employer... who was responsible for JS and the teen in the shower. His employer dropped the ball and moved on. That teen from the shower, who had no motive to lie, eventually went on the record saying no abuse occurred. Nothing about Paterno, Curley, Schultz, Spanier, or any other extraneous BS you choose to bring up is going to change the facts that I have stated.

It's sad that you keep wanting to blame the wrong people, instead of those who actually failed. Does it help you sleep better at night to know that the system is still broken? Who cleared JS to adopt multiple times? Who cleared JS in 1998? Which employer and head of the second mile didn't take the 2001 report seriously?
 
"The reported assault allegedly happened sometime between June 1, 2000 and September 30, 2010"
It's good they narrowed that down. SMFH.
Also if you think about these dates a little bit more, since the allegation is that the accuser was a minor, that means that the accuser cannot say if they were 8 years old or 17 years old at the time of the assault. WTF?
 
They were in a shower and soapy water acts very much like a lubricant.

Hopefully Jerry didn't get any soap in his dickhole. If he did, he's already been punished to the maximum extent for his crimes and should be let out of prison immediately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colt21
Does Allen Myers confession make you want to rethink that?

"The grand jury report says Coach McQueary said he observed Jerry and I engaged in sexual activity. That is not the truth and McQueary is not telling the truth. Nothing occurred that night in the shower."
Whoa, interesting.
Maybe.
Ray Gricar, a district attorney known for being tough on Penn State, decides not to press charges and Jerry receives a notice that the allegation was “unfounded” (Gricar will go missing seven years later, which makes it totally illogical for that event to be at all related, but it still somehow shows just how nefarious this whole scandal really was). We know this was the wrong call because a doctor who never spoke to Sandusky wrote a report saying she thought this was quite possibly the act of a pedophile, while another analyst wrote one saying that it was not.

According to Jerry, Joe Paterno never even mentions the episode to him, which he is convinced would be highly unusual for Joe if the hands-on head coach thought that there is any sort of a problem, or had even remote knowledge of the matter. Clearly Joe must have had no need to speak to Jerry because it was clear Sandusky was a pedophile and that a cover-up must immediately commence to protect the football program from negative publicity.

Jerry then maintains a 13-year incident-free relationship with the boy (later known as Victim 6), evidently because he is trying to make sure that he covers his tracks for the grooming episode that the DA thought wasn’t even worthy of a charge.

It turns out that Jerry is extremely good at covering his tracks with Victim 6. The very next year, when on the way to his last home game in 1999, the mother flags Jerry down in a parking lot and begs him to get her son into Beaver Stadium. Jerry was out of tickets but finagles a deal to get him on the sideline. The sexual tension/frustration Jerry must feel that day with Victim 6 so close to him has to have been very distracting and obviously helps lead to a loss to Michigan.

Twelve years later, Victim 6 is still sending Jerry very loving text messages on Father’s Day and Thanksgiving, but this is obviously because of “victim compliance” and the remarkable power of the “pixie dust” which Jerry sprinkled on him during that ten-second noncriminal episode in the shower back in 1998.

After the 1998 incident, Penn State now, according to Louis Freeh and the NCAA, knows that Jerry is a pedophile (even though the authorities do not). Graham Spanier is overseas while he is cc’d on two very innocuous emails (in the pre-smart phone era) regarding the conclusion of that investigation. He never responds to these emails, but he is now obviously aware that Jerry is a pedophile.

Despite this, Spanier does nothing, though he later meets with Sandusky, for the first and only time, to discuss, and decline, starting a football program on one of PSU’s satellite campuses (Spanier clearly took the meeting because of all the leverage the pedophile had over him).

Even though Joe Paterno has made written notes prior to the Victim 6 episode indicating that Jerry’s retirement is in the works, Paterno is so unmoved by the seemingly startling revelation that Jerry is a pedophile that he has him coach the 1998 season. Not only does he let him coach that season, he then has him coach again during the 1999 season, after which Jerry finally retires after somehow negotiating a sweet retirement package (signed by the same person who would sign the NCAA consent decree). Sandusky pulls this off even though his employers know he is a pedophile and therefore hold all the cards. His retirement is greeted with much acclaim and praise in the completely duped news media.

During Jerry’s last two years at Penn State, obviously because he just can’t control himself any more (despite his advanced age and medically low testosterone levels), he begins to suddenly get extremely reckless in his pedophilic behaviors.

Completely undeterred by the reality he was recently almost charged, Jerry all of a sudden decides to miss dozens of practices (according to the 2012 testimony of the boy later known as Victim 4, the first accuser to take the stand against Sandusky at trial) which, somehow, not one person in the Penn State football program notices or remembers ever having happened, even after the “cover-up” is blown. At the same time, Jerry finally concludes, after all of these years, that bowl trips are a great opportunity to molest kids.

After all, only everyone in the program knows that the kid is on a bowl trip and staying with Jerry and Dottie. As for Dottie, her presence with them in the same room (and, according to Victim 4, her witnessing of his molestation) is no big deal. Obviously she is in on all of this because: she hates children (thus the many adopted and foster children she takes into her home), the life of the wife of an assistant football coach is too glamorous to jeopardize, and, even though her nickname is “Sarge,” she is obviously so intimidated by Jerry that she lets him get away with raping boys.

The boy in this case never says anything about this for twelve years and doesn’t claim “sex” until after, according to an accidental recording, his lawyer conspires with investigators to lie to him. This hesitation to tell the “truth” was clearly because of “victim compliance,” a force so strong that over a decade after suffering horrendous abuse at the hands of Jerry (and with Dottie having witnessed it) he brought his now former girlfriend and son to Jerry’s house for a dinner so friendly that an non-family observer thought Victim 4 wanted Jerry to be the grandfather for his child.

Clearly emboldened by having been able to rape a boy on a bowl trip with his wife in the room, and now with lots of free time because of his retirement, in late November of 2000 (actual dates are so inconvenient for the prosecution to have to come up with as these types of cases are so hard to prove!) Jerry then takes a still unidentified boy into the Penn State lockers and molests him. He is witnessed doing this by a janitor.

The fact that no one reports this contemporaneously (because obviously they were fearful of the horrible Penn State football culture protecting a former coach by firing whistleblowers, even though nothing like that had never previously happened), the witness never testifies due to dementia, and the victim somehow never comes forward to testify or to collect his money, should all be considered irrelevant details obsessed over only by football-crazed “JoeBots” who don’t care about children.

Just a month after this incredibly reckless and horrific act, Jerry receives a contract to be the head coach at the University of Virginia at the very end of 2000. The job offer is never technically rescinded, but just one day after Jerry’s highly publicized second interview, Virginia suddenly hires UVA Alum and current New York Jets head coach Al Groh.

Obviously Jerry was ditched at the last moment because there were rumors about him being a pedophile. Jay Paterno was a former UVA graduate assistant who married a UVA Alum. So either (very strangely) Jay really had it out for UVA by not telling them of this impending disaster which they mysteriously avoided on their own (perhaps the PSU janitors warned them after seeing the story of his job offer in the paper so soon after what they "witnessed," but just never mentioned that), or he was somehow the source of this “information.” This of course would mean that the son of Joe Paterno is both truly evil and a pathological liar with a death wish, which, given what we now know about his father, seems totally reasonable.
 
It might not be probably, but it's certainly possible. The point is that just because the kid didn't show signs of discomfort doesn't mean that the assault didn't happen. They were in a shower and soapy water acts very much like a lubricant.

I don't think you understand. Our system of jurisprudence exists as it does today because you can not prove a negative.

In this situation, you have Sandusky, understandably, saying there was no assault. You also have the boy on the record saying there was no assault.....for free, I might add. There is no physical evidence of a crime. The established date of the crime is over a year off. No victim ever came forward. And the witness told seven people, all of which claim they were not told of an assault. And finally, you have a jury acquitting Sandusky on that particular charge. Yet you still want to cling to what, exactly? Extrapolating Mike's 3 seconds of hearing slapping sounds into anal rape? You're acting like the jury had a choice here!
 
I don't think you understand. Our system of jurisprudence exists as it does today because you can not prove a negative.

In this situation, you have Sandusky, understandably, saying there was no assault. You also have the boy on the record saying there was no assault.....for free, I might add. There is no physical evidence of a crime. The established date of the crime is over a year off. No victim ever came forward. And the witness told seven people, all of which claim they were not told of an assault. And finally, you have a jury acquitting Sandusky on that particular charge. Yet you still want to cling to what, exactly? Extrapolating Mike's 3 seconds of hearing slapping sounds into anal rape? You're acting like the jury had a choice here!
I wouldn't want anyone serving on a jury who believes soap is a lubricant.
 
Does Allen Myers confession make you want to rethink that?

"The grand jury report says Coach McQueary said he observed Jerry and I engaged in sexual activity. That is not the truth and McQueary is not telling the truth. Nothing occurred that night in the shower."

How much of the sworn statement do you NOT understand?????"...Nothing occurred that night in the shower...." Can it be any more direct and factual that that from the reported "victim" of this crime???? THE TROLL AGENDA CONTINUES.

Truth should never get in the way of the OAG construction of a "Crime at Penn State". WHY? Because without this linkage - based upon a KNOWN LIE - a lie validated by several sworn testimonies - the corrupt PA Courts could not achieve Tom Corbett's vendetta against Penn State and the $250M of Public PSU money would not be available to compensate those who constructed and participated in this farce!

Osprey Lyin'.....Keep supporting the PURE CRIMINAL ABUSE OF THE POWER OF THE STATE!
 
Did anyone else notice the sentencing hearing being delayed so the OAG and defense can "submit arguments about whether Sandusky should be designated a sexually violent predator." Wouldn't this be a moot point if he's going to spend the rest of his life behind bars? I hope there's not a chance he's released unless he's cleared thru a new trial or the feds overturn the original trial.
 
The fact that no one reports this contemporaneously (because obviously they were fearful of the horrible Penn State football culture protecting a former coach by firing whistleblowers, even though nothing like that had never previously happened), the witness never testifies due to dementia, and the victim somehow never comes forward to testify or to collect his money, should all be considered irrelevant details obsessed over only by football-crazed “JoeBots” who don’t care about children.

Just a month after this incredibly reckless and horrific act, Jerry receives a contract to be the head coach at the University of Virginia at the very end of 2000. The job offer is never technically rescinded, but just one day after Jerry’s highly publicized second interview, Virginia suddenly hires UVA Alum and current New York Jets head coach Al Groh.

Obviously Jerry was ditched at the last moment because there were rumors about him being a pedophile. Jay Paterno was a former UVA graduate assistant who married a UVA Alum. So either (very strangely) Jay really had it out for UVA by not telling them of this impending disaster which they mysteriously avoided on their own (perhaps the PSU janitors warned them after seeing the story of his job offer in the paper so soon after what they "witnessed," but just never mentioned that), or he was somehow the source of this “information.” This of course would mean that the son of Joe Paterno is both truly evil and a pathological liar with a death wish, which, given what we now know about his father, seems totally reasonable.

There is no truth in any of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChiTownLion
Did anyone else notice the sentencing hearing being delayed so the OAG and defense can "submit arguments about whether Sandusky should be designated a sexually violent predator." Wouldn't this be a moot point if he's going to spend the rest of his life behind bars? I hope there's not a chance he's released unless he's cleared thru a new trial or the feds overturn the original trial.

I do wonder if they are considered letting Sandusky out on the fact that he “served enough time” as a way for the PA judicial establishment to cover their asses because they really fear a federal judge will soon make them look like fools?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nits74
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT