Maybe I haven't been paying as close attention to each of these as I should so I appreciate if anyone can enlighten me.
It sounds to me that in each instance from what I can ascertain, is that the culture of each of these institutions was such that some players were found to involved in sexual crimes against women and the local police and/or other football players/coaches and administration would find ways to delay, not report, and to not investigate or prosecute and/or discourage the female victims into not pursuing the matter with the local authorities.
So the difference on why Baylor is having to suffer the consequences is because ESPN Outside the Lines did a report about what's been going on at Baylor and not at FSU and Tennessee?
It sounds to me that in each instance from what I can ascertain, is that the culture of each of these institutions was such that some players were found to involved in sexual crimes against women and the local police and/or other football players/coaches and administration would find ways to delay, not report, and to not investigate or prosecute and/or discourage the female victims into not pursuing the matter with the local authorities.
So the difference on why Baylor is having to suffer the consequences is because ESPN Outside the Lines did a report about what's been going on at Baylor and not at FSU and Tennessee?