Fair comments...thank you.The events you mentioned are much older than the LIV Tour. The Ryder Cup started in '27; the President's Cup started in '94, and the Fed Ex Cup in 2007. The PGA Tour isn't "putting them together"; they've been together. The reason for the later two was draw additional fan interest apart from the majors with the claimed intent of "growing the game." Ironically, the President's Cup and Fed Ex Cup were two things some of the LIV Tour players complained about.
I don't particularly care if players want to move to LIV; it's their call. If it's better for them - fewer tournaments, fewer rounds, and good pay, go for it. At the same time, I don't mind if the other tours don't welcome them. They support a competitor, why would any organization treat them like they didn't?
PGA has been using them as tools to keep players on the US Tour and to "qualify" for those events. That is what the LIV players complained about. Being a 40 year old guy with 20 years on the tour having to play a ton of events to get the points to qualify.
You may agree or disagree with that policy but I can't fault a player for wanting to get paid more for less work. As DJ said in the Netflix show "it was a simple decision, I could make twice as much with half the work. Who wouldn't take that offer?"
I also agree, if the tours don't welcome them, that is their business. But I feel that this is really short-term thinking. the world is getting smaller and is now a world economy. This is going to happen, be it LIV or somebody else. People can complain about LIV but it can also be described as greed on the part of the PGA.
Bottom line is the competition makes everybody better.
Last edited: