Right and where do you think they got that information from?A reporter indicated 12:30. Not the Big 10.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right and where do you think they got that information from?A reporter indicated 12:30. Not the Big 10.
that is exactly what you said. I am done with you. I took you off ignore but regret that decision. You simply talk in circles.That's not the same scenario--notice Michigan took action ON THEIR OWN PROGRAM
lol, you all have been talking all day about how much power the commish has, don't back track nowBecause one person isn't calling all of the shots. And the Big 10's attorneys are dotting their i's and crossing their t's.
hello, mcfly, who do you think leaked the timeframe?A reporter indicated 12:30. Not the Big 10.
Right and where do you think they got that information from?
Michigan took action on themselves to prevent the NCAA from actingthat is exactly what you said. I am done with you. I took you off ignore but regret that decision. You simply talk in circles.
hello, mcfly, who do you think leaked the timeframe?
Nor should you but there's no doubt that came from someone in the Big Ten. That person was clearly wrong but if this was as clear cut as so many thing there wouldn't be delays. The Big Ten is clearly concerned about what they wanted to do.Don't know. But don't believe everything a reporter says.
Nor should you but there's no doubt that came from someone in the Big Ten. That person was clearly wrong but if this was as clear cut as so many thing there wouldn't be delays. The Big Ten is clearly concerned about what they wanted to do.
A reporter indicated 12:30. Not the Big 10.
Again, what have I been wrong about? Name one thingDude. You've been wrong the since the start. Nobody believes you.
Suspension coming Monday. No, on Wednesday. Well, on Wednesday Michigan replied, so Thursday is suspension day. Make that Friday. By noon. Or 12:30. But certainly sometime in the afternoon. -Ish.
Wait, what?Don't know. But don't believe everything a reporter says.
Because the Big Ten keeps changing what they're going to doExactly. The reporters have been wrong since the start.
Exactly. The reporters have been wrong since the start.
So, you think reporters are just saying stuff and hoping they're correct? Reporters with known contacts in the Big Ten? That requires an "imagination" to comprehend the Big Ten is pivoting?In your mind, that's what happened. You have quite the imagination.
good take and very possible. UM self-imposed a suspension of hairball earlier in the year so why not again?Not my take.
The Big Ten was/is hoping they could bluff Michigan into self imposing an indefinite suspension and later, a two game suspension.
It's after 3 and they play tomorrow. This should be run IF anything happens today.
That silly game made PSU. Whatever crap we give Joe Pa for ignoring a pedophile, we cannot ignore the amazing work he did to build the institution. PSU went from a podunk nothing to a world class institution.I have to believe that if every school was culpable, they would NOT have made such an empassioned case to Petiti last week. Right? These people are smart enough to know that truth WILL be found out in all circumstances. If Bret Bielemi made those angry comments this week about Michigan videoing in person, then he has never sent a coach/staffer to another teams' games.
And Michigan has had a litany of "excuses"...none of which have been "we didn't do this." They are trying to pull back a cover (or at least the fear of doubt of a cover being pulled back) on other programs.
But I think they're bluffing. No one else has done it...or if a school or two HAS done it, it's not been to the elaborate extent of Michigan. I hope this whole thing blows up in their faces. Corruption straight up to the president's office...all for a silly game.
If true, and it does come down today, one has to assume it is very light or delayed. By delayed I mean a fine or a post-season event of some kind.
Not my take.
The Big Ten was/is hoping they could bluff Michigan into self imposing an indefinite suspension and later, a two game suspension.
He didn't "ignore a pedophile". In fact, he turned him into his boss (the AD) and the man in charge of campus security. He then did what the NCAA then, and now, tells coaches to do. Turn them into two people, your boss and someone outside the sports reporting virticle, and get the hell out of the way.That silly game made PSU. Whatever crap we give Joe Pa for ignoring a pedophile, we cannot ignore the amazing work he did to build the institution. PSU went from a podunk nothing to a world class institution.
Is that illegal or is the recording?I will mention one more thing that has happened in the last hour. UM has forwarded evidence of nine other schools arranging to have scouts go to games and gather info. That could be another reason why the Big10 is backing off. We can speculate if true or a complete fabrication. This guy has had the scoop on all Michigan rumors in the past. If Pettiti wishes to go forward he will have to deal with the MAD fallout. If this blows up the Big10, everyone will be angry because his primary job was to make money, not destroy the most lucrative and successful athletic conference in the country.
So you believe it's more logical that multiple reporters are just making stories up rather than the timeline continues to change?I believe there is misinformation in a lot of stories, including this one.
And yes, at times reporters speculate.
So you believe it's more logical that multiple reporters are just making stories up rather than the timeline continues to change?
Still waiting for what I was wrong about so far...
Find that quote. You confuse shouldn't with won't. And they didn't suspend him.Dude. You've been wrong about everything, including the fact that the Big 10 will punish Michigan before the completion of the NCAA investigation.
You also have more than 500 posts since last Friday...You seem quite motivated to protect your Michigan team. We will just call you a closet Michigan fan 🤣 🤣 🤣
A better question is that after 500 posts this week, what have you been right about???
Not surprising. I hate that uncharismatic bore, Scott Van Pelt. He used part of his Sportscenter commentary segment the other day to defend UM. He called it a minor issue and UM is "not a good program but a great program" . He disagreed with his other colleagues regarding their fervency on a punishment. S&ckass loser. Obviously trying to placate UM establishment since Thamel and Finebaum are all over Harbaugh.Hahaha, the espn headline right now is absurd. "Michigan CFB sign stealing scandal is (mostly) harmless. Michigan and their Haters should embrace it"
God, do I despise Espn and Michigan
Finebaum backed off and said the Big Ten needs to be carefulNot surprising. I hate that uncharismatic bore, Scott Van Pelt. He used part of his Sportscenter commentary segment the other day to defend UM. He called it a minor issue and UM is "not a good program but a great program" . He disagreed with his other colleagues regarding their fervency on a punishment. S&ckass loser. Obviously trying to placate UM establishment since Thamel and Finebaum are all over Harbaugh.
On first blush there is some merit in our resident Walmart Wolverines interpretation of the rule. Which I’m certain was derived by reading comments by UM centric oriented attorneys. I wonder if the other door greeters explained it to him? True, as explained by Walmart Wally, Big ten disciplinary action is supposed to happen “subsequent” to NCAA findings.This is what you are referring to^^^. It really isn't clear if a suspension, which happens all the time even in criminal matters, is consider a "penalty". For example, if Harbs was accused of participating in hazing, he could easily be suspended prior to the completion of the investigation if, for no other reason, to limit the damage. If he was NOT suspended and someone got injured, the legal liability would be great.
Let’s say UM is guilty of stealing signs. What do you think UMs and the B1Gs liability would be if PSU, Purdue and Rutgers sues them?
That is not what you are supposed to do. I know because I have to take the corporate training. If it is a felony I call law enforcement. For anything that is not tactical I bypass my boss and report to the dedicated hotline. Example, if I observe an ethics issue, I report to the ethics hotline. My manager is out of the loop until they decide. It is beyond insanity to not report a pedophile directly to the police. You don't report a felony to your superior and have them take care of it.He didn't "ignore a pedophile". In fact, he turned him into his boss (the AD) and the man in charge of campus security. He then did what the NCAA then, and now, tells coaches to do. Turn them into two people, your boss and someone outside the sports reporting virticle, and get the hell out of the way.
Hey dipsht..what happens if someone comes to you a day or two after incident occurs. They accuse your father. They are unsure what happened. You did not witness it. You calling 911 on pops? I thought not.That is not what you are supposed to do. I know because I have to take the corporate training. If it is a felony I call law enforcement. For anything that is not tactical I bypass my boss and report to the dedicated hotline. Example, if I observe an ethics issue, I report to the ethics hotline. My manager is out of the loop until they decide. It is beyond insanity to not report a pedophile directly to the police. You don't report a felony to your superior and have them take care of it.
This is ditto for the Boy Scouts. If I were to observe grooming there is no reporting to the scout master. It is 911 direct.
Joe didn’t see anything. It was reported to him a day later. What you write is what the witness is supposed to do. Not the witnesses boss who is asked for advice from an employee after seeing something done by someone not employed by the companyThat is not what you are supposed to do. I know because I have to take the corporate training. If it is a felony I call law enforcement. For anything that is not tactical I bypass my boss and report to the dedicated hotline. Example, if I observe an ethics issue, I report to the ethics hotline. My manager is out of the loop until they decide. It is beyond insanity to not report a pedophile directly to the police. You don't report a felony to your superior and have them take care of it.
This is ditto for the Boy Scouts. If I were to observe grooming there is no reporting to the scout master. It is 911 direct.
You might be the first person on this board that's ever tried to reply to every post, on every thread 🤣🤣🤣
If I was a Michigan fan wouldn't I be upset by the decision in some way?I have him on ignore and can only see his bullshit because you responded..... but this dipshit claims he's making all these asinine troll posts because he's a PSU fan, not a scUM troll.... [insert eyeroll]
You can't see what he posts unless you temporarily or permanently stop ignoring him. Which did you do?I have him on ignore and can only see his bullshit because you responded..... but this dipshit claims he's making all these asinine troll posts because he's a PSU fan, not a scUM troll.... [insert eyeroll]
Joe didn’t see anything. It was reported to him a day later. What you write is what the witness is supposed to do. Not the witnesses boss who is asked for advice from an employee after seeing something done by someone not employed by the company