ADVERTISEMENT

Jerry Sandusky case prompts colleges to more tightly monitor interaction with minors

step.eng69

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2012
12,660
14,697
1
North East PA, Backmountain area, age 72
JUST PASSING ALONG..
question: Does Penn State offer various activities similar to Clemson?
Wow, 10,000 kids, what could go wrong. My two grandkids were there several time for junior football camps.

Clemson works to improve its practices at summer camps after audit cites policy violations
Mollie R. Simon, The Greenville News Published 6:18 a.m. ET June 3, 2019 | Updated 7:18 a.m. ET June 3, 2019

Clemson University officials are working to "shore up" safety procedures at the summer camps on its campus after an audit identified policy violations that included incomplete background checks for camp staff members.

In 2018, more than 10,000 children attended camps and similar activities hosted at Clemson facilities, according to a report by the university, and at least that many are expected again this year as the season warms up this month. The camps cover programs from technology and life sciences to baseball and fishing and are held both on the main campus and at other sites such as the Clemson Outdoor Lab, South Carolina Botanical Garden and Camp Bob Cooper on Lake Marion.

Clemson's Pre-Collegiate Programs Office was established in 2012 following the discovery that former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky had sexually abused minors at Penn State. :confused: The office at Clemson, directed by Greg Linke, ensures that Clemson's camps follow the university's Protection of Minors policy.

Jerry Sandusky case prompts colleges to more tightly monitor interaction with minors
After the Sandusky incident, colleges realized they needed to get a better handle on all of the ways they interact with minors, Linke said, from hosting summer camps and extension programs to allowing high school students to work in professors' labs.

Each year, the Pre-Collegiate Programs Office and a sampling of its camps are audited by the university's Office of Internal Auditing to ensure that programs are complying with university policies. In 2018, the university reviewed 10 programs out of the 280 that were required to register with Linke's office.

The Greenville News and Independent Mail obtained the 2018 audit through an open records request. It showed a number of issues, including lack of background checks for some camp staffers, missing driving records checks for people transporting minors and lack of procedures to handle children's medications at one camp.

Two of the camps were hosted by Clemson sports coaches, the Monte Lee Baseball Camp and Michaela Franklin Volleyball Camp. Both had "major findings" on the audit.

NEWSLETTERS
Get the newsletter delivered to your inbox
We're sorry, but something went wrong

Please try again soon, or contact Customer Service at 1-800-736-7136.
Delivery:
Invalid email address
Thank you! You're almost signed up for
Keep an eye out for an email to confirm your newsletter registration.
More newsletters
"Numerous Clemson policy violations were identified regarding hiring practices related to background checks and annual disclosures by Clemson University Athletic Coaches," the audit said. "This is a recurring issue."

Each year, returning camp employees have to sign a disclosure statement that there is nothing new on their record and have to be checked against the National Sex Offender Registry. These disclosures were missing for staff at some of the athletic camps and other camps. At the Autonomous Boats for Ocean Conservation camp, which was also audited, 10 of the 12 staff members had not completed the disclosures. Three employees for the Monte Lee Baseball camp had not submitted disclosures.

Kyle Young, Clemson's associate athletic director, oversees compliance for the coaches' camps.

"They are considered major findings, and they are major from the standpoint that something major could happen if we don't shore up what we are doing in those areas but not because something bad has happened," Young said.

Young said the university is working on implementing a centralized system for managing background checks to solve some of the issues that were identified. Because each camp is run as a private business hosted at the university, it has proved challenging to get into compliance with the rules of the Pre-Collegiate Programs Office, Young said. Young said the coaches rent space from the university to hold their camps.

"There is definitely an expectation that employees have cleared a background-check process," said Young, whose own kids have attended multiple camps for different sports at Clemson. "The screening process is important. I believe we have shored it up. I don't anticipate any issues going forward."

Clemson sports camps aren't designed for babysitting, administrator says
During the 2017 audit, there were problems identified with making sure kids were picked up from camp by an approved adult, Young said. He said that finding led to positive change in 2018 and greater caution in pickup practices.

"A lot of time people send kids to camp to be babysat," Young said. "Our camps are not set up to babysit people. They are set up to teach people more about the sport which they play. When kid comes home, they will be tired, they will be worked, but they will be worked in a very safe and productive way."

Linke said Clemson has made additional changes outside of sports camps to ensure the safety of minors. For example, in the past they have allowed individual camps to train their staff in-house; now, they are centralizing that process to make sure everyone learns how to report issues of abuse and understands university policies on minors.

Additionally, while the camps held at the Clemson Outdoor Lab have always been accredited by the American Camp Association, the rest of the university's standalone camps are also becoming accredited, Linke said. He anticipates they will have that stamp of approval by the summer of 2020. The association sets standards for things such as counselor-to-camper ratios.

Although accreditation can provide one useful, outside stamp of approval, Linke also encourages parents to ask questions and do their own research on camps at Clemson and elsewhere.

"I think parents need to be mindful," Linke said. "They need to investigate. What do they do to keep your kids safe? Because they are not all the same."

More: Here's what you should ask before dropping off your child at summer camp
 
  • Like
Reactions: stormingnorm
JUST PASSING ALONG..
question: Does Penn State offer various activities similar to Clemson. Wow, 10,000 kids, what could go wrong.

Clemson works to improve its practices at summer camps after audit cites policy violations
Mollie R. Simon, The Greenville News Published 6:18 a.m. ET June 3, 2019 | Updated 7:18 a.m. ET June 3, 2019

Clemson University officials are working to "shore up" safety procedures at the summer camps on its campus after an audit identified policy violations that included incomplete background checks for camp staff members.

In 2018, more than 10,000 children attended camps and similar activities hosted at Clemson facilities, according to a report by the university, and at least that many are expected again this year as the season warms up this month. The camps cover programs from technology and life sciences to baseball and fishing and are held both on the main campus and at other sites such as the Clemson Outdoor Lab, South Carolina Botanical Garden and Camp Bob Cooper on Lake Marion.

Clemson's Pre-Collegiate Programs Office was established in 2012 following the discovery that former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky had sexually abused minors at Penn State. :confused: The office at Clemson, directed by Greg Linke, ensures that Clemson's camps follow the university's Protection of Minors policy.

Jerry Sandusky case prompts colleges to more tightly monitor interaction with minors
After the Sandusky incident, colleges realized they needed to get a better handle on all of the ways they interact with minors, Linke said, from hosting summer camps and extension programs to allowing high school students to work in professors' labs.

Each year, the Pre-Collegiate Programs Office and a sampling of its camps are audited by the university's Office of Internal Auditing to ensure that programs are complying with university policies. In 2018, the university reviewed 10 programs out of the 280 that were required to register with Linke's office.

The Greenville News and Independent Mail obtained the 2018 audit through an open records request. It showed a number of issues, including lack of background checks for some camp staffers, missing driving records checks for people transporting minors and lack of procedures to handle children's medications at one camp.

Two of the camps were hosted by Clemson sports coaches, the Monte Lee Baseball Camp and Michaela Franklin Volleyball Camp. Both had "major findings" on the audit.

NEWSLETTERS
Get the newsletter delivered to your inbox
We're sorry, but something went wrong

Please try again soon, or contact Customer Service at 1-800-736-7136.
Delivery:
Invalid email address
Thank you! You're almost signed up for
Keep an eye out for an email to confirm your newsletter registration.
More newsletters
"Numerous Clemson policy violations were identified regarding hiring practices related to background checks and annual disclosures by Clemson University Athletic Coaches," the audit said. "This is a recurring issue."

Each year, returning camp employees have to sign a disclosure statement that there is nothing new on their record and have to be checked against the National Sex Offender Registry. These disclosures were missing for staff at some of the athletic camps and other camps. At the Autonomous Boats for Ocean Conservation camp, which was also audited, 10 of the 12 staff members had not completed the disclosures. Three employees for the Monte Lee Baseball camp had not submitted disclosures.

Kyle Young, Clemson's associate athletic director, oversees compliance for the coaches' camps.

"They are considered major findings, and they are major from the standpoint that something major could happen if we don't shore up what we are doing in those areas but not because something bad has happened," Young said.

Young said the university is working on implementing a centralized system for managing background checks to solve some of the issues that were identified. Because each camp is run as a private business hosted at the university, it has proved challenging to get into compliance with the rules of the Pre-Collegiate Programs Office, Young said. Young said the coaches rent space from the university to hold their camps.

"There is definitely an expectation that employees have cleared a background-check process," said Young, whose own kids have attended multiple camps for different sports at Clemson. "The screening process is important. I believe we have shored it up. I don't anticipate any issues going forward."

Clemson sports camps aren't designed for babysitting, administrator says
During the 2017 audit, there were problems identified with making sure kids were picked up from camp by an approved adult, Young said. He said that finding led to positive change in 2018 and greater caution in pickup practices.

"A lot of time people send kids to camp to be babysat," Young said. "Our camps are not set up to babysit people. They are set up to teach people more about the sport which they play. When kid comes home, they will be tired, they will be worked, but they will be worked in a very safe and productive way."

Linke said Clemson has made additional changes outside of sports camps to ensure the safety of minors. For example, in the past they have allowed individual camps to train their staff in-house; now, they are centralizing that process to make sure everyone learns how to report issues of abuse and understands university policies on minors.

Additionally, while the camps held at the Clemson Outdoor Lab have always been accredited by the American Camp Association, the rest of the university's standalone camps are also becoming accredited, Linke said. He anticipates they will have that stamp of approval by the summer of 2020. The association sets standards for things such as counselor-to-camper ratios.

Although accreditation can provide one useful, outside stamp of approval, Linke also encourages parents to ask questions and do their own research on camps at Clemson and elsewhere.

"I think parents need to be mindful," Linke said. "They need to investigate. What do they do to keep your kids safe? Because they are not all the same."

More: Here's what you should ask before dropping off your child at summer camp


Better yet, they need to monitor which types of "charities" are vamping off the Universities. There was a pile of money to be made being associated with TSM, and our scurrilous BoT was in that up to their necks.

Shredder trucks anyone?
 
Celtic response to Boys' Club child sex scandal has been woeful and an insult to abuse survivors
Penn State failed time and again to do the right thing by Jerry Sandusky’s survivors and the club’s senior executives should perhaps examine that case and learn some lessons.

0_14720805.jpg


  • Everyone’s heard the old saying about turning a drama into a crisis.

Celtic yesterday took arguably the biggest crisis to have hit the club in its near 130-year history and turned it into an unmitigated catastrophe.

The club, one of the country’s biggest institutions, has lurched from mishap to calamity in its failure to deal with an increasingly bleak emerging picture of a culture of child abuse at the feeder Boys’ Club.

Celtic has the resources, the pull and the power to commission and act on a proper inquiry, conducted in public and led by a respected independent figure.

It is certainly warranted.

That a culture of historic abuse was allowed to pollute Celtic Boys’ Club over a period of decades has been proven beyond any doubt.

Celtic slammed over 'secret' child sex abuse probe as lawyer says it is insult to survivors
Four men connected to either the Boys’ Club or the club have now been convicted of criminal offences.

The fact that it needed a second criminal trial to get to the bottom of the evil perpetrated by one of these four disgraceful individuals, Jim Torbett, is further illustration of the need for the boil to be lanced.

Instead, Celtic’s response has been woeful.

Its expression of “deep regret that the incidents took place” while stressing that the club was “an entirely separate organisation” from the Boys’ Club in a statement following Torbett’s conviction fell badly short.

Following the conviction of former kitman Jim McCafferty last month, the club issued another statement this time expressing “regret and sorrow” to victims but which stopped short of making a full apology. It also made no mention of the three previous cases which resulted in the convictions of Torbett, Frank Cairney and Gerald King.

Neither did it cite the “investigation” which the club says has been running for two years and on which it briefed at least one news organisation on Friday.

This was a development, which regrettably, insults both the intelligence of the Scottish public and, more seriously, abuse survivors themselves.

In a letter sent to SNP MSP James Dornan, chief executive Peter Lawwell said the club was “constrained in what we can discuss owing to legal processes”.

A surprising claim given the number of statements issued on the matter over the past two years.

It is unclear what Lawwell could possibly mean by this – certainly there are no issues around the Contempt of Court Act as all known cases against former employees of the club and Boys’ Club have now been concluded.

Celtic FC hit back at MSP's 'unfair and misguided' attack over boy's club sex abuse scandal
Lawwell went on to say: “Some time ago our insurers appointed a wholly independent and experienced lawyer who is investigating and dealing with the matter on behalf of the club.”

That could be described as an “inquiry” by the club as it was in some quarters yesterday.

It also sounds a lot like the club investigating what its own liabilities might be.

We might never know because Celtic were not elaborating yesterday.

They have not identified the lawyer who was commissioned, said when he or she was hired, provided any clarity on the scope of the investigation nor imparted any of its initial findings. How an organisation of this size can fail to see the problem of an investigation into a crime – which relies on secrecy – itself being conducted in secret, is almost beyond belief.

Eight years ago, the American Football programme at Pennsylvania State University was hit by a sex abuse scandal following the conviction of a predatory coach Jerry Sandusky.

Penn State, one of the most respected sporting institutions in the US, failed time and again to do the right thing by Sandusky’s survivors.


The ensuing arguments ripped the university and the state apart, causing divisions that never healed.

It might be worth the club’s senior executives examining that case and learning some of the lessons.

The argument that Celtic is a different entity from the Boys’ Club should never be made again.

A drip feed of evidence proving the extreme closeness of the two organisations has left that claim empty and irrelevant.

It is not now too late for Celtic to commission and fund a real probe into why and how the bond of trust between young players, their parents and the club became so broken under previous regimes.

If this was genuinely independently-led and conducted in public, it could provide closure for victims and finally resolve a running sore for an organisation which means so much to so many.

In the meantime, the club should at the very least give an explanation of the exact terms of the current investigation.

Otherwise they risk the appearance of using ham-fisted, retrospective crisis management instead of the access-all-areas inquiry the survivors are due.

Read More
 
Penn State failed time and again to do the right thing by Jerry Sandusky’s survivors and the club’s senior executives should perhaps examine that case and learn some lessons.

Will the university ever try to push back against these types of ridiculous assertions? "Time and again"? Really? If even one person tried to ask these journalists for supposed facts regarding Penn State, they be at a total loss for words. They're still buying what the NCAA, Big Ten, Freeh and ESPN were selling in 2011 & 2012.
 
Ah yes, let's do more background checks so people have the same background checks that Sandusky already had

True, I do not believe Sandusky is guilty. But even if he is, the story should be how a guy who founded the largest children’s charity in PA, a charity that worked very closely with local law enforcement, child protection services, and other experts ended up getting away with serial child sex abuse for years. Absolutely no one is talking about that. Instead, they act like the other PSU football coaches were the people who probably “knew” and should have put a stop to it.
 
Narrative is set in stone. Will never change.

I disagree. Too many people know what actually happened for the truth to remain buried forever. This story still has legs imho. Spanier’s case is still unresolved. Gary Schultz’s probation is over in July and I think there is a good chance we will hear from Gary then. Sandusky has an appeal pending regarding his PCRA petition before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court as well as a resentencing hearing. If his appeal fails, he will then be able to file a habeus corpus petition at the federal level.

The truth will eventually become evident. I hope that it is sooner rather than later.
 
I disagree. Too many people know what actually happened for the truth to remain buried forever. This story still has legs imho. Spanier’s case is still unresolved. Gary Schultz’s probation is over in July and I think there is a good chance we will hear from Gary then. Sandusky has an appeal pending regarding his PCRA petition before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court as well as a resentencing hearing. If his appeal fails, he will then be able to file a habeus corpus petition at the federal level.

The truth will eventually become evident. I hope that it is sooner rather than later.

Doesn't matter who knows what. Broadly speaking no one cares about finding the truth, seeking information to change their POV. Example, Ray Lewis gets called a murderer on this board quite often despite readily available evidence courtesy of the trial, including acquittals for both defendants who actually went to trial. It's all out there but no one is going to let the facts change their opinion.

Sandusky's conviction could get thrown out, Freeh could release a statement and documentation showing the board of trustees requested he reach those conclusions and big picture, nothing would change. No one who thinks Ray Lewis is a murderer is open to changing that viewpoint, ditto for everyone who thinks Penn State/Joe orchestrated a cover up/didn't do enough/etc.
 
Doesn't matter who knows what. Broadly speaking no one cares about finding the truth, seeking information to change their POV. Example, Ray Lewis gets called a murderer on this board quite often despite readily available evidence courtesy of the trial, including acquittals for both defendants who actually went to trial. It's all out there but no one is going to let the facts change their opinion.

Sandusky's conviction could get thrown out, Freeh could release a statement and documentation showing the board of trustees requested he reach those conclusions and big picture, nothing would change. No one who thinks Ray Lewis is a murderer is open to changing that viewpoint, ditto for everyone who thinks Penn State/Joe orchestrated a cover up/didn't do enough/etc.

If there was a show on Netflix on "The Making of a Pedophile" similar to the making of a muderer, I believe the neddle of public opinion would change. All it would take is for a major media outlet to create a documentary on what actually happened.
 
If there was a show on Netflix on "The Making of a Pedophile" similar to the making of a muderer, I believe the neddle of public opinion would change. All it would take is for a major media outlet to create a documentary on what actually happened.

Agree to disagree. One, it'll never get made. Two, "Making of a Pedophile- Jerry Sandusky" would reinforce the viewpoint that Penn State harbored a pedo for decades, unless you're implying it would prove Sandusky was/is innocent, in which people would just call bullshit. Collectively, American's can't handle nuance. Not to get political but its the reason people can hear Mueller say, "if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.", on live television and take that as clearing him of wrongdoing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WHCANole
Agree to disagree. One, it'll never get made. Two, "Making of a Pedophile- Jerry Sandusky" would reinforce the viewpoint that Penn State harbored a pedo for decades, unless you're implying it would prove Sandusky was/is innocent, in which people would just call bullshit. Collectively, American's can't handle nuance. Not to get political but its the reason people can hear Mueller say, "if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.", on live television and take that as clearing him of wrongdoing.

People can call BS all they want. There is overwhelming evidence that demonstrates that Sandusky was railroaded. The facts are currently available that shows Sandusky is innocent of the charges that he was convicted of for those willing to take a look.

Read John Snedden's 110 page redacted federal investigation report (just the facts style) that resulted in Graham Sapnier's top-level security clearances getting renewed.


Read Ralph Cipriano's bigtrial blog that document what has happened at Penn State regarding this story.

http://www.ralphcipriano.com/stories/big-trial/

Read Mark Pendergrast's book "The Most Hated Man in America: Jerry Sandusky and the Rush to Judgment." Based on 76 customer reviews in has an average 4.7 out of 5 star rating.

https://www.amazon.com/Most-Hated-M...show_all_btm?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews

Read Frederick Crews, Professor Emeritus at Cal Berkley detailed review of Pendergrast's book.

https://www.skeptic.com/reading_roo...cxdNHHqzLh3KIkKjQeftGxtLCpWM-Gp1pEBylvQpJAxpg

Read the bombshell story that by Ralph Cipriano and John Ziegler that Newsweek spiked at the last minute.

http://www.framingpaterno.com/sites/default/files/sad_story_of_happy_valley.pdf

Read framingpaterno.com

Read the Alumni BOT's critical review of the Freeh Report

 
People can call BS all they want. There is overwhelming evidence that demonstrates that Sandusky was railroaded. The facts are currently available that shows Sandusky is innocent of the charges that he was convicted of for those willing to take a look.

Read John Snedden's 110 page redacted federal investigation report (just the facts style) that resulted in Graham Sapnier's top-level security clearances getting renewed.



Read Ralph Cipriano's bigtrial blog that document what has happened at Penn State regarding this story.

http://www.ralphcipriano.com/stories/big-trial/

Read Mark Pendergrast's book "The Most Hated Man in America: Jerry Sandusky and the Rush to Judgment." Based on 76 customer reviews in has an average 4.7 out of 5 star rating.

https://www.amazon.com/Most-Hated-M...show_all_btm?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews

Read Frederick Crews, Professor Emeritus at Cal Berkley detailed review of Pendergrast's book.

https://www.skeptic.com/reading_roo...cxdNHHqzLh3KIkKjQeftGxtLCpWM-Gp1pEBylvQpJAxpg

Read the bombshell story that by Ralph Cipriano and John Ziegler that Newsweek spiked at the last minute.

http://www.framingpaterno.com/sites/default/files/sad_story_of_happy_valley.pdf

Read framingpaterno.com

Read the Alumni BOT's critical review of the Freeh Report


There is overwhelming, far more straightforward evidence Ray Lewis isn't a murderer, yet he's called a murderer time and time again.
 
There is overwhelming, far more straightforward evidence Ray Lewis isn't a murderer, yet he's called a murderer time and time again.

99% of the public don't consider Ray Lewis a murderer. Yes, there are people who are set in their opinions no matter what the facts are. I would just love for the facts of the fiasco to become evident to the members of the general public who are willing to do a little research.
 
Last edited:
Not to get political but its the reason people can hear Mueller say, "if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.", on live television and take that as clearing him of wrongdoing.
Funny, I always thought the bar was set at “we’re confident (target of investigation) committed a crime” or nothing at all?

It was set there, in part, because you’re correct that people tend to believe what they’re comfortable with. Often that’s what they hear first.

FWIW, I’m guessing not much, you might want to checkout the track record of Mueller’s #1, Andrew Weissmann. His cases don’t age well.
 
This whole pile of shit was orchestrated for one reason....to get back at Spanier for calling out Corbutt.

Joe was collateral damage, which our BoT relished with gusto.
 
  • Like
Reactions: francofan
Proven science; the incidents of molestation drop in direct proportion to the absence of contact with politicians.
 
Funny, I always thought the bar was set at “we’re confident (target of investigation) committed a crime” or nothing at all?

That bar doesn't apply when you are prohibited from charging said target with a crime even if you are confident they committed one. But that's not what this thread is about.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT