ADVERTISEMENT

"How the college debt debate shifted with one big idea"

Actually the Art History degree is probably worth less than an around the world trip. At least the trip would provide some appreciation for other cultures. Also, the trip would only take a few months as opposed to 4 years.

My daughter graduated with high honors with a degree in psychology. It has been totally 100% useless to her. She lost 4 years of potential job earnings with no benefit whatsoever from the degree.

So she chose the wrong degree. Someone who wants to be a museum curator won't have wasted 4 years on an art degree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xdc8rmuek44eq
Here's an idea I heard a few years back that would never happen but is a fun one to think about imo.

Free tuition for you to attend college - but the college gets 1% (or some percentage) of your paycheck for the rest of your life.

It gives everyone some skin in the game and gets the government out of the loan business entirely. Colleges would potentially be more selective on who they admit, and also what programs they offer. You want 1% of a bunch of social workers' salaries, or 1% of petroleum engineers' salaries?

So like Shark Tank for your college education. Interesting.
 
I am, generally, against government regulation. However, if the government is the one providing the funding, guaranteeing it, and/or not permitting it to be forgiven through bankruptcy, then it should be regulating the institutions accepting it.

If a school doesnt want to have its tuition regulated, then don't accept students using federal funding. That's their choice. But if they do, then the government should regulate the tuitions it is paying for.

Agreed
 
The issue with that analogy is that aggressively taxing families worth $50M+ is not illegal or even immoral. They’ll be okay.
It is highly immoral and in a nation that professes equality under the law, should also be illegal.
 
Tuition at Penn State in 1988 was $3,000.

Yes. And an average starting salary for a 4-year degreed person was $25,000-30k.

Many things in 1988 were different than 2019, but it's all relative. Yes, we borrowed less, but we were paid less.
 
Would you borrow and repay a loan of $50,000 for a car worth $10,000?

Of course not. But the choices are not the same. Students are forced to choose between doing what they want with the rest of their life and incurring huge debts, or doing something they don't want and spending their life unsatisfied. And why is that what they're forced to do? Because they generations before them screwed up the system.

The correct analogy would be: Would you borrow and repay a loan of $50,000 for a car worth $10,000 if the only other alternative is you have ride a horse instead.
 
Yes. And an average starting salary for a 4-year degreed person was $25,000-30k.

Many things in 1988 were different than 2019, but it's all relative. Yes, we borrowed less, but we were paid less.

I have a mortgage and I really do not think it's fair for me to re-pay this mortgage. It costs me a lot of money each month to pay a mortgage payment and it requires me to maintain a job. I think it's only fair for the government to bail us all out of our mortgage payments.
 
It is highly immoral and in a nation that professes equality under the law, should also be illegal.

Give me a break if you don't think most $50M fortunes were amassed through plenty of inequality. I'm not talking about intentional, nefarious inequality, just inherent inequality. Our system is the best there is, but please spare me the idea every wealthy person just worked harder, and that's all that separates them from the corner drug dealer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xdc8rmuek44eq
Yes. And an average starting salary for a 4-year degreed person was $25,000-30k.

Many things in 1988 were different than 2019, but it's all relative. Yes, we borrowed less, but we were paid less.
And the average salary for a new graduate now is somewhere around $50,000, or almost double what it was then.

Yet, annual tuition today is more than $18,000 at Penn State - six times what it was then.
 
Yes. And an average starting salary for a 4-year degreed person was $25,000-30k.

Many things in 1988 were different than 2019, but it's all relative. Yes, we borrowed less, but we were paid less.

Come on, you didn't even try to be fair here.

The average starting salary in 1988 (adjusted for inflation) was $50,856. As of 2015, it was $50,219. So the starting salary has not changed, when adjusted for inflation. Meanwhile, tuition at a public institution, adjusted for inflation, went from $3,190 in '87-'88, to $9,970 in '17-'18 (at private schools, it went from $15,160 to $34,740). So salary didn't change, but tuition tripled. That debt only compounds then when interest is tripled. Hence the millions of students barely paying their interest, when in the past it would've been eliminating their principal with the same payments.

Sources:

https://www.naceweb.org/job-market/...-starting-salaries-for-new-college-graduates/

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/29/how-much-college-tuition-has-increased-from-1988-to-2018.html
 
This is not a right or left issue. The issue is the government basically took over the student loan business and also passed a law that prevented student loan debt from being dischargeable in bankruptcy. The schools don't care, non-profit/for-proft, public/private, they all see a treasure trove of willing and ease cash.

That is why the number of administrators at colleges have increased, the people who do not actually educate anyone. That is why colleges now have many fancy amenities and not the bare basics like dorms without air conditioning (hello Lyons Hall in the 80's).

That is why colleges are filled with students seeking degrees that will be very difficult to find a quality job with.

When student loan debt is not dischargeable in bankruptcy, the underwriting process that is used for most loan types is ignored...the result is you get kids borrowing 50 to 100K for degrees in things like psychology and fashion design. Good luck with that.

Colleges brag about the number of graduates who have either obtained fulltime employment or are in graduate school (with more student loans).

Make student loan debt dischargeable in bankruptcy and the problem is solved. People with large amounts of student loan debt could file for bankruptcy to get out from under the debt with all the consequences associated with bankruptcy. It will also prevent many frivolous student loans in the future. Of course colleges will no longer be able to count on that easy access to for naïve students which will result in many basically useless administrators losing their jobs...and bye-bye building more unnecessary buildings.

I agree with this. Part of what I do is private lending. I know if I make a bad loan, I will eat it, so I am careful. Wasteful colleges benefit from bad loans that cannot be discharged. Also, no good accrues to society in having 40 year-olds making $15 an hour being burdened with, say, $100000 of unpayable debt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lyons212
1. Yes tuition has skyrocketed
2. They dont understand how the interest affects their payments
3. The current kids do spend much more on social items than previous years.

I work with seniors going through this process every day. Its amazing how many of them have no idea how compound interest works, or their parents for that matter. I told them they could try getting a loan through a bank or credit union than pay the 5+% they get now.

I did a budget for a student assuming a 4 year state school college plan and job coming out at $3500/month pre tax, bring home was $2600. Estimated 50K in loans at 5% for 10 years was ~$530/month. Rent was $1000/month, insurance $200, utilities $250, etc. It didnt leave much room in a budget but it was amazing how easily they found money when you take apart their phone plan and their need for eating out 5 times a week, or drinking starbucks every day. Just the dunkin donuts/starbucks item kept an extra $50/week in their pockets. Driving a used car vs needing to buy a new one was another item. I couldn't believe how many kids had to have a new car or the newest IPhone or shoes,etc....
 
Give me a break if you don't think most $50M fortunes were amassed through plenty of inequality. I'm not talking about intentional, nefarious inequality, just inherent inequality. Our system is the best there is, but please spare me the idea every wealthy person just worked harder, and that's all that separates them from the corner drug dealer.
What difference does it make? You either believe in private property rights or you don't? You either believe in equality under the law or you don't. Please quit rationalizing institutional theft?
 
The discussion with @Kiber really illustrates the problem well.

In 1988, student graduates with $10k in debt, and an inflation adjusted salary of $50k. In five years, he pays back $15k, and he has paid off his loans and spends the next 10 years using the extra income he no longer has to pay on loans to buy a house, car, furniture, etc. He's now free to bitch at kids for being lazy in the future because he worked hard and paid it.

In 2018, student graduates with $30k in debt due to tripling of tuition costs, but still earns the same $50k. In five years, he pays back $15k. Except he was generating three times as much interest as the 1988 grad, so he still owes $23k. He pays another $15k the next 5 years, and still owes $12k. He pays another $15k the next 5 years to finally be debt free.

You don't see why this is a problem? You don't think that extra 10 years of having to make those payments causes delays in getting married, having children, buying houses, buying cars, etc? The things that make our economy go.

You don't think the generation running the public institutions and government that were spiking tuition and handing out the unregulated money, respectively, should be held responsible for correcting it? It should be the 18 year old who had to make a Sophie's choice because of those poor decisions of the prior generation?
 
Want free education. Then I say we should adopt a system like they have in some other countries (such as Israel) where everyone is also required to serve in military. I believe Israel has a mandatory 2-year military service term. Everyone graduating from HS has to serve 2 years. After their service, Israel then re-pays them for their service with free college education.

Make people EARN that free education. Make college 100% free for 4 years ----- you have 4 years to earn a 4 year degree ----- IF you want to get 100% of a 4 year degree paid for, then enlist for a 2-year term in the US Military.

With the increased participation in the military, they could allocate some of the resources to other areas such as disaster relief/recovery.

Pretty sure the military would hate this idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xdc8rmuek44eq
1. Yes tuition has skyrocketed
2. They dont understand how the interest affects their payments
3. The current kids do spend much more on social items than previous years.

I work with seniors going through this process every day. Its amazing how many of them have no idea how compound interest works, or their parents for that matter. I told them they could try getting a loan through a bank or credit union than pay the 5+% they get now.

I did a budget for a student assuming a 4 year state school college plan and job coming out at $3500/month pre tax, bring home was $2600. Estimated 50K in loans at 5% for 10 years was ~$530/month. Rent was $1000/month, insurance $200, utilities $250, etc. It didnt leave much room in a budget but it was amazing how easily they found money when you take apart their phone plan and their need for eating out 5 times a week, or drinking starbucks every day. Just the dunkin donuts/starbucks item kept an extra $50/week in their pockets. Driving a used car vs needing to buy a new one was another item. I couldn't believe how many kids had to have a new car or the newest IPhone or shoes,etc....
Yes, it is amazing what our spoiled consumer society now considers necessities: Pricey phones, cable TV, new cars, the latest technology, eating out, designer coffee, expensive parties, toys and footwear for kids, etc. (I think that is because of the boomers, who were brought up during the most prosperous time in US history, and raised their kids as if such times would continue forever.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PSUSignore
1. Yes tuition has skyrocketed
2. They dont understand how the interest affects their payments
3. The current kids do spend much more on social items than previous years.

I work with seniors going through this process every day. Its amazing how many of them have no idea how compound interest works, or their parents for that matter. I told them they could try getting a loan through a bank or credit union than pay the 5+% they get now.

I did a budget for a student assuming a 4 year state school college plan and job coming out at $3500/month pre tax, bring home was $2600. Estimated 50K in loans at 5% for 10 years was ~$530/month. Rent was $1000/month, insurance $200, utilities $250, etc. It didnt leave much room in a budget but it was amazing how easily they found money when you take apart their phone plan and their need for eating out 5 times a week, or drinking starbucks every day. Just the dunkin donuts/starbucks item kept an extra $50/week in their pockets. Driving a used car vs needing to buy a new one was another item. I couldn't believe how many kids had to have a new car or the newest IPhone or shoes,etc....

This is true, but even in the plan you came up with, that's a person who will not be looking to get married and have kids and buy a house or car during that 10 years. This is why the average age for getting married and having kids keeps going up. We can't afford it. Which hurts our economy, and will only continue to hurt it more going forward. Having to spend 10-15-20 years repaying loans is going to kill our growth in the future.
 
I have a mortgage and I really do not think it's fair for me to re-pay this mortgage. It costs me a lot of money each month to pay a mortgage payment and it requires me to maintain a job. I think it's only fair for the government to bail us all out of our mortgage payments.

Not a comparison in any way, but keep going if it makes you feel better.
 
Let's just say I'm not fond of a few million people (let me be clear, not all who have student loan debt fall into this group) who made worse decisions than myself and my family getting tens of thousands in windfall. It's rewarding a large number of the wrong people.

I still remember kids whose parents drove far nicer cars than us, had bigger homes than us, and had all the cool TVs, etc when I was a kid get more student aid than me because my parents saved at a much higher rate of their lower income. It sucked.

I think there will be some form of debt relief. But I'd rather see it come in the form of preferred tax status on student loan interest rather than outright forgiveness.

WORSE DECISIONS?

How much is an EE major in debt tpday compared to 1980? How much has entry pay increased since 1980? What about rent?

Give that some thought and get back to me.
 
Ahhhhh. I graduated in 1988. Back in 1988 the student loans also had high interest that kept compounding........... Amazingly myself, and many people from my generation found a way to get a freaking job and pay back our responsibility. It took me over 5 years, and it took me paying every spare penny I had, but I found a way to pay my loans back.

So... everything is equal like 1988? Rent? Pay?

What about those who graduated in 2008 through 2014? Is it THEIR fault they graduated during a depression?
 
Impossible.

Not the premise - just the idea of keeping left/right/wrong out of it!

Not sure how wiping away college debt takes care of inequality, it seems like vote pandering and a move toward socialism.

How would current 529 plans be addressed, etc?

Also - if everyone gets a college degree, then everyone has a college degree, and they become worthless.
I am skeptical about the proposed plan, but apparently many think society is a zero sum game when the fact is that a better society is good for all. The quality of a society is certainly not enhanced by encouraging inequality of opportunity and discouraging learning. The issue should be how to encourage all to fulfill their human potential. Of course, not everybody needs, wants or is qualified to get a degree. Your post and all the likes smack of a selfish "I got mine". (And you can have your 529 investments tax-free and keep any of the "socialistic" tax breaks you got on them - win-win.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wbcincy
I don't understand why student loans are being singled out for forgiveness. Those who need student loan forgiveness made a stupid financial decision. Why not be fair and forgive all stupid financial decisions? Why not pay off the $25K credit card balance of a 23 year old who bought 300 pairs of designer shoes? Why not pay off the loan for a kid who bought a $90K Corvette and now can't pay for it? What about the young couple who bought a $400K home and now can't make the mortgage payment? Why aren't these people entitled to loan forgiveness as much as those who made stupid student loan decisions? I don't understand the reasoning behind giving preferential treatment to stupid student loan decisions.

Well, if all things are equal, why can mortgages, auto loans and CC debt be discharged in bankruptcy but student loans can not?

Come on. Answer my question.
 
Great points, Mike. Why should we all take on the debts of people who voluntarily racked up huge student loan obligation? And for those who did rack up a lot of debt - but diligently paid it down - how would they feel about now bailing out people of their same age who chose to spend their income on cars and houses rather than paying down student debt?

Why should Millennials be responsible for the BABY BOOMER generation that DELIBERATELY caused the 2008 meltdown?

Why don't Baby Boomers pay their fvxking bills????
 
The discussion with @Kiber really illustrates the problem well.

In 1988, student graduates with $10k in debt, and an inflation adjusted salary of $50k. In five years, he pays back $15k, and he has paid off his loans and spends the next 10 years using the extra income he no longer has to pay on loans to buy a house, car, furniture, etc. He's now free to bitch at kids for being lazy in the future because he worked hard and paid it.

In 2018, student graduates with $30k in debt due to tripling of tuition costs, but still earns the same $50k. In five years, he pays back $15k. Except he was generating three times as much interest as the 1988 grad, so he still owes $23k. He pays another $15k the next 5 years, and still owes $12k. He pays another $15k the next 5 years to finally be debt free.

You don't see why this is a problem? You don't think that extra 10 years of having to make those payments causes delays in getting married, having children, buying houses, buying cars, etc? The things that make our economy go.

You don't think the generation running the public institutions and government that were spiking tuition and handing out the unregulated money, respectively, should be held responsible for correcting it? It should be the 18 year old who had to make a Sophie's choice because of those poor decisions of the prior generation?
It’s also a microcosm of the much larger problem that young people feel disproportionately: costs of living continue to rise in almost every aspect of life, student loans are higher, worker productivity continues to rise, profits continue to rise, and yet inflation-adjusted wages are the same as they were 30 years ago or are even lower than they were 30 years ago.

To a much larger point that I understand is unpopular here - if folks are wondering why young people today are further to the left economically than any generation in American history, this is a good snapshot as to why that could be.
 
Have not read one post talking about parents role in all of this. The Colleges and Universities are public enemy number one, but parenting is also a major issue. How many parents talk about college costs with their children prior to senior year when the student wants to attend a over-priced university to study "something?" There is nothing wrong with community college, commuter, or vocational schools when the student is uncertain of their path. Work ethic is more important than GPA. The curriculum is not preparing these students for real world. I am seeing this first-hand, when interviewing candidates. They major in the exact industry I serve and they have little to no knowledge - frightening. In fact, the dean openly said, "I don't know much about XXXX" - now I have to pay this kid to educate them?

Elizabeth Warren is another clueless politician that needs a reality check. CEO pay is a common talking point, what about the School administrators?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski
Of course not. But the choices are not the same. Students are forced to choose between doing what they want with the rest of their life and incurring huge debts, or doing something they don't want and spending their life unsatisfied. And why is that what they're forced to do? Because they generations before them screwed up the system.
If approved will the government be paying for just a bachelor degree or will they also be required to pay for Master's Law School, etc.? Why should some kids be forced into spending the rest of their lives unsatisfied with just a Bachelor's degree.
 
Of course not. But the choices are not the same. Students are forced to choose between doing what they want with the rest of their life and incurring huge debts, or doing something they don't want and spending their life unsatisfied. And why is that what they're forced to do? Because they generations before them screwed up the system.

The correct analogy would be: Would you borrow and repay a loan of $50,000 for a car worth $10,000 if the only other alternative is you have ride a horse instead.

Life isn't a picnic and most of us don't get to do what we want to do because we do what we have to do for ourselves and our family.

During WW2, my uncle chose to join the Army in 1944 because his other choice was to continue mining coal with a pick and shovel, mostly on his knees. He had sh1tty choices, made one, and lived life.

My heart bleeds for those poor students and how tough they had it. They were not forced to make that choice and it isn't because someone else screwed up the system, but rather because life isn't always fair or just or comfortable. Tough. This country guarantees opportunity, not success; and certainly not success at the expense of others that didn't make the same bad decisions as you might have.
 
If approved will the government be paying for just a bachelor degree or will they also be required to pay for Master's Law School, etc.?...
Of course. What value will a bachelor degree have once it is deemed a right and everybody has one?
 
So... everything is equal like 1988? Rent? Pay?

What about those who graduated in 2008 through 2014? Is it THEIR fault they graduated during a depression?

Is it my fault???? My taxes are going to be increased to pay for this .... is it my fault??

BTW - check out the economy in the late 80's. It was NOT good. I was willing take take on any job, and actually held two jobs just to pay off my loans. I took a first job as a Financial analyst in my field of study. The entry level salary for a Financial Advisor for Rollins was $32,000. It barely paid my living expenses. I worked an evening / weekend job for almost 2 years paying off my car & student loans. Every penny I earned on my 2nd job went towards those loans.....

.... Now, I am being told 30 years later that I have to pay off some a$$-holes student loans who simply don't want tp pay them off and would rather sit in their parents basement or hang out at a Starbucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski
Students are forced to choose between doing what they want with the rest of their life and incurring huge debts, or doing something they don't want and spending their life unsatisfied.
I wanted a house but that came with taking on massive debt. Renting apartments would leave me unsatisfied in life. Where is my help to eliminate my mortgage payments?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski
Of course. What value will a bachelor degree have once it is deemed a right and everybody has one?
"I got mine and I hope you can't get yours".
What's most discouraging to me is that every post here assumes that the ONLY value of education is to get a better job. Worse, most see it as just a ticket to be punched and consider any knowledge gained as irrelevant or incidental. While that is important, college grads should know that there are other benefits of education to society and the individual. I can only conclude that your education was lacking and your college tuition wasted - no wonder you are so misinformed and bitter.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KnightSlayer
Why should Millennials be responsible for the BABY BOOMER generation that DELIBERATELY caused the 2008 meltdown?

Why don't Baby Boomers pay their fvxking bills????

I didn't cause it and my two kids graduated debt free. Instead of buying a McMansion, my ex and I paid off our home during the first semester of our oldest child.

You blame a generation for everything, but not everybody in my generation made irresponsible choices, either in life or at the ballot box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski
Is it my fault???? My taxes are going to be increased to pay for this .... is it my fault??

BTW - check out the economy in the late 80's. It was NOT good. I was willing take take on any job, and actually held two jobs just to pay off my loans. I took a first job as a Financial analyst in my field of study. The entry level salary for a Financial Advisor for Rollins was $32,000. It barely paid my living expenses. I worked an evening / weekend job for almost 2 years paying off my car & student loans. Every penny I earned on my 2nd job went towards those loans.....

.... Now, I am being told 30 years later that I have to pay off some a$$-holes student loans who simply don't want tp pay them off and would rather sit in their parents basement or hang out at a Starbucks.

PROVE IT!

Why do Millennials inherit a $23 Trillion debt CAUSED by Baby Boomers with a colossal $71 Trillion (ahem) OFF BALANCE SHEET liabilities?

Come on, tough guy. Is this ALL you GOT? Kids living in their parents basements?

What about wage stagnation, OUT OF POCKET healthcare costs, sky rocket rent, ability to remain on parents healthcare coverage, etc...

YOU are responsible for this.

And, you owe me $1500 for sharing this with you today. I accept major CC, btw
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xdc8rmuek44eq
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT