Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish him well; handwriting was on the wall that he would see less playing time here because of the emergence of underclassmen.
To a certain extent, I agree with you about linebackers (although I think this wouldn't be nearly as bad were it not for Reeder's transfer) - but I don't agree that we haven't recruited enough linemen. Here are all of the linemen we've signed over the past three cycles - and keep in mind that guys like Simmons could very well become a LB, and there were a number of guys like Givens who could have grown into a LB but grew into a DT instead:I think Lewis could have made an impact this year for PSU. The problem is if he stayed he would be taking minutes away from kids like Blacknall and that might have forced another transfer. Franklin is no doubt planning for the long run.
Too bad the recruiting has been unbalanced. Too many WRs and not enough linemen or linebackers.
To a certain extent, I agree with you about linebackers (although I think this wouldn't be nearly as bad were it not for Reeder's transfer) - but I don't agree that we haven't recruited enough linemen. Here are all of the linemen we've signed over the past three cycles - and keep in mind that guys like Simmons could very well become a LB, and there were a number of guys like Givens who could have grown into a LB but grew into a DT instead:
DL (4 on the field): Simmons, Jordan, Joseph, Chavis, Shelton, Thrift, Carter, Givens, Buchholz, Miller, Windsor, Brown, Barney (graduated), White
OL (5 on the field): McGovern, Menet, Fries, Gellerstedt, Bates, Jenkins, Palmer, Gonzales, Brosnan, Sorrell, Wright
LB (3 on the field): Toney, Brown, Cooper, Bowen, Cabinda, Reeder (transferred), Kelly (got in trouble)
WR (3-4 on the field): Darien, Polk, Thompkins, Johnson, Charles, Blacknall, Godwin
That seems like a very fair number of OL and DL over three cycles, and it seems like a reasonable number of WR. We just haven't seen many of them on the field yet because they're young or coming off their redshirts.
Good numbers. For my count, I don't really count Garrity as a scholarship player because his scholarship came through a one-year opening for his senior season, rather than being recruited as a scholarship WR. For the WR's, I would be very surprised if we run out with only 2 WR's outside of short-yardage situations on a regular basis. I strongly suspect from what I've watched of Moorhead's offense that our base personnel will be 1 RB, 1 TE, and 3 WR, with permutations coming from there.Pretty simple. With 85 scholarships, thats almost complete 4 teams (22 - 11 on offense and 11 on defense)
OL - need somewhere between 15 and 19 on scholarship, and there would normally be 8-12 upper classmen, given that many will redshirt. During the last 4 years we have not had the upper classmen OL talent to field a good OL.
DL - with 4 on the field need 7+ DE's and 7+ DT's. As has been discussed, we are fine at DE, but we are short now on upperclass DT's.
LB - With 3 on the field need 9-11 scholarship LB's, a number we have not had the last few years, and a number we won't get to unless CJF brings in a bunch with the 2017 class. We now have 6 scholarship LB's practicing this Spring and will have 8 this Fall counting Toney and Brown who some believe may grow out of being LB's)
WR - I have heard of no info to believe we will have 4 WR on the field. With 2-3 on the field we need 8+ WR's on the roster, which we have (8 this fall by my count, 9 if you count Gerity who is a walk on that I believe was granted a scholarship for his Sr year)
To a certain extent, I agree with you about linebackers (although I think this wouldn't be nearly as bad were it not for Reeder's transfer) - but I don't agree that we haven't recruited enough linemen. Here are all of the linemen we've signed over the past three cycles - and keep in mind that guys like Simmons could very well become a LB, and there were a number of guys like Givens who could have grown into a LB but grew into a DT instead:
DL (4 on the field): Simmons, Jordan, Joseph, Chavis, Shelton, Thrift, Carter, Givens, Buchholz, Miller, Windsor, Brown, Barney (graduated), White
OL (5 on the field): McGovern, Menet, Fries, Gellerstedt, Bates, Jenkins, Palmer, Gonzales, Brosnan, Sorrell, Wright
LB (3 on the field): Toney, Brown, Cooper, Bowen, Cabinda, Reeder (transferred), Kelly (got in trouble)
WR (3-4 on the field): Darien, Polk, Thompkins, Johnson, Charles, Blacknall, Godwin
That seems like a very fair number of OL and DL over three cycles, and it seems like a reasonable number of WR. We just haven't seen many of them on the field yet because they're young or coming off their redshirts.
I did this quickly so I might have missed some things so here goes:
2013, 2014, & 2015:
8 WRs: (Apke, Godwon, Balcknall, Thompkins, Hamilton, Charles, Johnson, Polk)
14 DBs: (Allen, Campbell, Haley, Oruwarie, Worley, Gaines, S. Smith, J. Smith, Robinson, Miller, Reid, Petrishen, Taylor, Monroe)
5 LBs: (Only 1 in 2013 Bell, Only 2 in 2014 Cabinda & Reeder, and only 3 in 2015 Bowen, Cooper, Kelly). Reeder & Kelly are now gone
5 DTs: (None in 2013, 2 in 2014 White, Barney, 3 in 2015 Carter, Windsor, Givens ). But this is misleading because Barney was only a 2 year JUCO transfer and Carter, Windsor, & Givens were DEs or LBs that needed to grow a lot to fill the DT position.
I see a huge imbalance. Too many WRs & DBs, not enough LBs and DTs. I'm not counting 2016 because those kids aren't ready to play. The damage was done in 2013-1015. I know we had scholarship limitations but all the more reason not to load too many at one position.
Just go to GOPSUSPORTS and look at the official roster. It does not include inoming frosh that will arrive this Fall (August) or the graduating/graduated seniors that are not practicing now. You can sort it on "POS", i.e. position, which allows you to quickly see where the staff now is playing each player.
For example, Apke has been playing DB for a year, played Safety last year as a true freshmen, and has a chance to win a starting Safety spot. No use categorizing him as a WR as when he got to campus and evaluated him, and moved him, that impacted the numbers and the priority positions recruiting wise going forward from there....
But as has been pointed out, having 6 scholarship LB's practicing in the Spring is a concern, especially with only 2 coming in (that were not natural LB's in H.S.) for the Fall. It would be great of 1 or 2 of the talented walk on LB (Johnson, Vranic,....) develops into a real prime time player....
Same with DT, from a recruiting stand point. But at DT the growth of some DE's into DT's looks to have made up for the lack of recruiting success. And the two JC DT's coming will also likely address the depth at DT. But J.C. players can't really be counted on a blue chip recruits even if they come in and play well, such as Barney who would have started on most teams, since they will only contribute for 2 years at the most and a blue chip recruit that is the real deal contributes as a freshman and likely starts at least 2 other years.....
I think it's worth pointing out that even if the recruiting services listed a guy like Apke as a WR, there's no indication that PSU was ever recruiting him as anything other than a S. It's similar to a guy like Toney, who is listed as a DE on the services when we've apparently recruited him from the beginning as a LB. Similarly, Carter was listed as an ATH but has been a DT pretty much from the day he stepped onto campus.I know that Apke moved to DB but that's immaterial to my analysis. That just means 6 DBs and 3 WRs in 2014 vs. only 2 LBs and 1 DT that year. No matter how you slice it we recruited way more WRs and DBs compared to LBs and DTs.
I'll root for the walkon LBs because I'm a PSU fan and I love the underdogs. But I'm not holding my breath that our walkon LBs can compete with OSU's 4* LBs.
Same with the DTs. Only one 4 year scholarship in 2013 and 2014. 2015 recruits normally wouldn't play until 2017. Our 2015 kids are undersized because they were originally recruited as DEs. We'are asking a lot to have them play meaningful minutes at DT in 2016.
I think it's worth pointing out that even if the recruiting services listed a guy like Apke as a WR, there's no indication that PSU was ever recruiting him as anything other than a S. It's similar to a guy like Toney, who is listed as a DE on the services when we've apparently recruited him from the beginning as a LB. Similarly, Carter was listed as an ATH but has been a DT pretty much from the day he stepped onto campus.
I know that Apke moved to DB but that's immaterial to my analysis. That just means 6 DBs and 3 WRs in 2014 vs. only 2 LBs and 1 DT that year. No matter how you slice it we recruited way more WRs and DBs compared to LBs and DTs.
I'll root for the walkon LBs because I'm a PSU fan and I love the underdogs. But I'm not holding my breath that our walkon LBs can compete with OSU's 4* LBs.
Same with the DTs. Only one 4 year scholarship in 2013 and 2014. 2015 recruits normally wouldn't play until 2017. Our 2015 kids are undersized because they were originally recruited as DEs. We'are asking a lot to have them play meaningful minutes at DT in 2016.
Over the years, how many freshmen have started on the offensive and defensive line. This is a sincere question.
Donovan Smith started as a redshirt freshman, I believe.
I actually think Geno is going to thrive in the BIG12 (with far fewer teams) because they Aren't tough and don't play. defense. If Geno is able to hook-up with a QB who targets him, he'll do well.you guys think he's gonna get much PT in Norman? What about the other transfers?
Very few on either the OL or DL at PSU. But Clemson started a true frosh on their OL last year on a team that went to the championship game.
But we tend to see more play on the DL as there are usually liberal substitutions on the DL and it is easier and more worthwhile to the team and player to play a true freshmen on the DL. On the DL a very good player can get some playing time / reps and contribute in spot duty, getting better as the season goes on and then being more ready to take on a larger role in the next year. But there are few substitutions on the OL unless they are made due to injury or poor performance so to burn a redshirt doesn't make sense in most cases. Also, on the DL a speedy, athletic player can make an impact before he has full, mature strength, whereas the OL requires more precise and developed technique as well as strength (in today's game) that usually only comes by multiple years in a college weight training program.