ADVERTISEMENT

Fatter? Coach Bielma or Coack Locksley?

PSU Soupy

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2008
3,255
5,016
1
My vote is Bielma.

Locksley 309 lbs vs Bielma at 325 lbs.

Agree or disagree?
 
Locksley lower body is impressive from a size and density perspective.
 
ZGDFKRM27FEHJFXNMBOUMMVOSY.jpg

I agree Coach Bielma >400 lbs.
 
Last edited:
Bielma looks like he has trouble getting enough air through his nose and mouth to inflate that big body.......
 
  • Like
Reactions: b&w1987
My vote is Bielma.

Locksley 309 lbs vs Bielma at 325 lbs.

Agree or disagree?

What’s nuts is they have jobs that require that they be on their feet quite a bit. They’re really packing in calories to accomplish what they have
 
What’s nuts is they have jobs that require that they be on their feet quite a bit. They’re really packing in calories to accomplish what they have
And one wouls assume tbey spend a l9t of non coaching time around the team facilities where they have free, world class, facilities at their beckon call.

During the broadcast they said that Bielma was raised on a pig farm 2 hours from Champaign....you are what you eat...just sayin'.
 
I thought Bielma looked like one of those polar bears from the old time Coke commercials - except in orange. LOL
 
I am sure they are doing the best that they can. Overeating is a coping mechanism. Hope they can find better solutions for dealing with stress, worry, anxiety, fear.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT