ADVERTISEMENT

Conspiracy charge added against Penn State ex-administrators

step.eng69

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2012
12,660
14,697
1
North East PA, Backmountain area, age 72
More charges reintroduced to throw against the wall.

Conspiracy charge added against Penn State ex-administrators
MARK SCOLFORO, The Associated Press Published: February 23, 2017, 4:03 pm Updated: February 23, 2017, 4:12 pm


HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A Pennsylvania judge on Thursday allowed prosecutors to add a conspiracy charge against three former Penn State administrators, increasing their possible penalty if convicted of crimes for their handling of the Jerry Sandusky child molestation scandal.

Judge John Boccabella granted a request by the attorney general’s office to tack on a related conspiracy count to the charges of endangering the welfare of children.

Prosecutors said each felony count carries up to 7 years in prison and a $15,000 fine.

Jury selection is scheduled for March 20 in Harrisburg in the case of former university president Graham Spanier, former vice president Gary Schultz and former athletic director Tim Curley.

The defendants sought permission last week from Boccabella for an appeal that could delay the trial. The judge has not ruled on that request.

They argue Boccabella erred when he declined to dismiss the child-welfare charges, arguing the statute of limitations expired, the defendants did not provide direct care for children and they are charged with actions that occurred before the law was revised.

Earlier this month, the judge dismissed charges of failing to properly report suspected abuse, and last year the Superior Court threw out perjury, obstruction and conspiracy charges.

The three administrators fielded a complaint in 2001 from a graduate assistant who said he saw Sandusky, then retired as an assistant football coach, sexually abusing a boy in a team shower.

They did not report the matter to police or child welfare authorities, but did tell Sandusky he could no longer bring children to the campus and they notified his charity for children, The Second Mile.

Sandusky currently is serving a lengthy state prison term after being convicted in 2012 of 45 counts of sexual abuse of 10 boys.

Last week, a new judge appointed to preside over his appeals under the state’s Post-Conviction Relief Act scheduled a March 24 hearing at the courthouse near State College to “present and finalize the evidentiary portion” of the hearing.
 
This is a BS charge to increase pressure on defendants and elicit a plea bargain.
Not a lawyer but it could backfire with later suit for malicious prosecution.


This is a further attempt by the OAG to keep Baldwin off the stand which will destroy what little bullshit they have. Baldwin was tied to the other more serious charges that were dropped, to this latest farce, she is not attached.
 
These are not "more" charges. These are refiling specific conspiracy charges after the blanket conspiracy charges were dropped by the superior court.

I'm sure the superior court will drop these too, since the OAG is basically pissing on the superior court's decision.
 
More charges reintroduced to throw against the wall.

Conspiracy charge added against Penn State ex-administrators
MARK SCOLFORO, The Associated Press Published: February 23, 2017, 4:03 pm Updated: February 23, 2017, 4:12 pm


HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A Pennsylvania judge on Thursday allowed prosecutors to add a conspiracy charge against three former Penn State administrators, increasing their possible penalty if convicted of crimes for their handling of the Jerry Sandusky child molestation scandal.

Judge John Boccabella granted a request by the attorney general’s office to tack on a related conspiracy count to the charges of endangering the welfare of children.

Prosecutors said each felony count carries up to 7 years in prison and a $15,000 fine.

Jury selection is scheduled for March 20 in Harrisburg in the case of former university president Graham Spanier, former vice president Gary Schultz and former athletic director Tim Curley.

The defendants sought permission last week from Boccabella for an appeal that could delay the trial. The judge has not ruled on that request.

They argue Boccabella erred when he declined to dismiss the child-welfare charges, arguing the statute of limitations expired, the defendants did not provide direct care for children and they are charged with actions that occurred before the law was revised.

Earlier this month, the judge dismissed charges of failing to properly report suspected abuse, and last year the Superior Court threw out perjury, obstruction and conspiracy charges.

The three administrators fielded a complaint in 2001 from a graduate assistant who said he saw Sandusky, then retired as an assistant football coach, sexually abusing a boy in a team shower.

They did not report the matter to police or child welfare authorities, but did tell Sandusky he could no longer bring children to the campus and they notified his charity for children, The Second Mile.

Sandusky currently is serving a lengthy state prison term after being convicted in 2012 of 45 counts of sexual abuse of 10 boys.

Last week, a new judge appointed to preside over his appeals under the state’s Post-Conviction Relief Act scheduled a March 24 hearing at the courthouse near State College to “present and finalize the evidentiary portion” of the hearing.

Question for the lawyers on the board: Could this be a tactic to try to delay the trial? The longer they can keep C/S/S silent the better off OAG, the OGBOT, and TSM will be when and if the trial actually takes place.
 
These are not "more" charges. These are refiling specific conspiracy charges after the blanket conspiracy charges were dropped by the superior court.

I'm sure the superior court will drop these too, since the OAG is basically pissing on the superior court's decision.
More charges reintroduced to throw against the wall.
 
The very reason that the local idiots are on these threads is because they know that there will be no plea bargain, and if there is no plea bargain then the prosecutors will be forced to either lose at trial, or drop the charges entirely. They don't show up like they have done over the last week until desperation sets in.
 
Everything right now is done with one purpose....to delay this ever getting to trial. Neither side wants it to goto trial so the delays will not be fought. C/S/S lawyers are being paid by PSU, so they have no reason to get to trial quickly. Prosecution knows they have no case so they don't want to goto trial. Judge(s) are playing along as they recognize this is a hot button situation and don't want to get caught in the middle. Throw in whoever is orchestrating this whole thing of 'blaming' PSU as they obviously have influence, and they don't want this to goto trial as that way C/S/S finally get to speak. So nobody wants this to goto trial, so it will be delayed literally I think forever.
 
Didn't OAG offer a plea but it included C/S/S pleading guilty to one of the smaller charges?
 
These are not "more" charges. These are refiling specific conspiracy charges after the blanket conspiracy charges were dropped by the superior court.

I'm sure the superior court will drop these too, since the OAG is basically pissing on the superior court's decision.

Can someone explain this? If a higher court dropped certain charges, how can a lower court reinstate them?
 
I'm not convinced Spanier doesn't want this to go to trial. I think he certainly does. My gut tells me that C/S/S are tired of the "purgatory" that they have been forced to live in for the last 5+ years.

The other interesting bit that we peons haven't discussed, C/S/S know exactly who is behind all of the shenanigans they were intimately acquainted with each other for years prior to the sh!tstorm.

Well, it's finally about to go down and we will see who's left standing at the end of it.

Yes, I am sure that C/S/S want to talk and give an interview and tell their side of the story. But at the same time, they are free men living their lives right now. A huge amount of time has passed and they are smart enough to know that 99% of the damage is done. And going to trial still holds a feint hope for the prosecution that C/S/S lose and face jailtime. So in that sense, I think C/S/S are willing to wait it out now as the downside, however slim it is, is just too bad to not wait it out. And I don't blame them and I am sure that is exactly what they are being told by both their lawyers and loved ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: We Are . . .
More charges reintroduced to throw against the wall.

Conspiracy charge added against Penn State ex-administrators
MARK SCOLFORO, The Associated Press Published: February 23, 2017, 4:03 pm Updated: February 23, 2017, 4:12 pm


HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A Pennsylvania judge on Thursday allowed prosecutors to add a conspiracy charge against three former Penn State administrators, increasing their possible penalty if convicted of crimes for their handling of the Jerry Sandusky child molestation scandal.

Judge John Boccabella granted a request by the attorney general’s office to tack on a related conspiracy count to the charges of endangering the welfare of children.

Prosecutors said each felony count carries up to 7 years in prison and a $15,000 fine.

Jury selection is scheduled for March 20 in Harrisburg in the case of former university president Graham Spanier, former vice president Gary Schultz and former athletic director Tim Curley.

The defendants sought permission last week from Boccabella for an appeal that could delay the trial. The judge has not ruled on that request.

They argue Boccabella erred when he declined to dismiss the child-welfare charges, arguing the statute of limitations expired, the defendants did not provide direct care for children and they are charged with actions that occurred before the law was revised.

Earlier this month, the judge dismissed charges of failing to properly report suspected abuse, and last year the Superior Court threw out perjury, obstruction and conspiracy charges.

The three administrators fielded a complaint in 2001 from a graduate assistant who said he saw Sandusky, then retired as an assistant football coach, sexually abusing a boy in a team shower.

They did not report the matter to police or child welfare authorities, but did tell Sandusky he could no longer bring children to the campus and they notified his charity for children, The Second Mile.

Sandusky currently is serving a lengthy state prison term after being convicted in 2012 of 45 counts of sexual abuse of 10 boys.

Last week, a new judge appointed to preside over his appeals under the state’s Post-Conviction Relief Act scheduled a March 24 hearing at the courthouse near State College to “present and finalize the evidentiary portion” of the hearing.

Just more excellent "prosecuting" according LaJolla...."Constitutional due process rights"? Those things are over-rated - the world's a much better place when prosecutors ignore citizens basic rights and free to terrorize the populous to their own self-serving agendas....
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT