The point is 100+ times assaulted as a teenager and no evidence, and no one close to him believes him, and don't even get started on the mother. It is so apparent that he is lying. And he's considered the most credible!? Then there's the middle finger on the bed of cash.
The point is his specific argument, comparing consensual sex to sexual abuse, is moronic. It can't be argued otherwise.
You can think there should be evidence, but what he did is go a step further and make an absurd argument that has no basis in reality. He often does this and you guys ignore it. It clearly shows what a poor grasp he has on the realities of sexual abuse.
This is the same guy that attacks Jim Clemente, an expert on the subject, and claims he knows better. Why? Because Clemente told him ways to get a pedophile to confess and the great John Ziegler didn't get a confession. Oh well then, if he couldn't get him to confess he must be innocent.
Have you ever considered that Ziegler was at a tremendous disadvantage? He was there looking for information to clear Joe Paterno. That was his real motivation. Just like all those boys that were looking for a father figure Jerry exploited his weakness. Jerry knew as long as Ziegler got what he was really there for he would leave satisfied. So the "out of touch guy who loved young people" played perfectly.
Go look at the unaired portion of Sandusky's NBC interview. He basically confesses because he's presented with questions that demand an explanation. How the hell did Bob Costas manage to get more out of Sandusky in 20 minutes over the phone? Because he's a professional that knows how to get answers.
As far as credibility, Ziegler is the one attacking, stalking, trespassing, and interviewing anyone who has something
negative to say about AF or his family.
You can't judge AF's behavior but give Ziegler a pass. He crossed the line a long time ago and inserted himself into the story. He's responsible for actions that he judges as proof he's right (FB pic you referenced). It's a joke.
