- Oct 26, 2015
The first step in proving innocence is to get a new trial. Any objective observer can see that Jerry's trial was inherently unfair and he absolutely deserves a new trial.You're right. It has nothing to do with Sandusky's guilt or innocence. My opinion on that is that Jerry deserves a fair trial. However, my focus in this saga has always been more on PSU, C/S/S and specifically Joe. Jerry doesn't have to be innocent for them to have been falsely accused.
I think it's long past time that PSU was held accountable for what "it" consciously did to Joe and the others. While I support Ziegler's efforts WRT Sandusky, I believe clearing Joe's name and correcting the narrative as it applies to PSU is low hanging fruit.
You are also absolutely correct that independent of Sandusky's guilt or innocence; Tim, Gary, Graham, and Joe were fasely accused. However, if Sandusky is innocent then it becomes cyrstal clear that these four indivduals, who up until then had led exemplary lives, were falsely accused.
This podcast with the detailed and comprehensive 19 episodes makes it cyrstal clear that Jerry, who up until then had led an exemplary life, was also fasely accused.