Trump gave order to 'make sure' Jan. 6 rally was 'safe event,' Pentagon memo shows

MaconNitt

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2016
2,722
3,174
1
ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY SEVEN MINUTES!!!! OMG!!!!

I love the desperation. It looks good on you clowns. TRUMP 2024!!! lol...
I'm not desperate. I'm enjoying watching Trumpers squirm, deflect, twist, justify and fail miserably 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: maypole

m.knox

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Aug 20, 2003
107,973
62,540
1
I'm not desperate. I'm enjoying watching Trumpers squirm, deflect, twist, justify and fail miserably 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

Evidently you are a big fan of McCarthyism and totalitarianism.

Do you really think people are squirming over this joke? Made for TV production? C'mon man..... See it for what it really is.
 

MaconNitt

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2016
2,722
3,174
1
Likewise, there are millions more not in your cult who aren't consumed with hatred for a duly elected president who actually did more for the American people than the toad currently in office.
Now would be a good time to pull out your favorite link to to drool over your hero. If my cult is calling out stupid posts and posters like you I will wear it as a badge of honor.

Not all who disagree with you are cultists. Trump leading an insurrection and Biden doing a lousy job can be correct at the same time. You just can't see the forest for the trees. Truly sad and pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fbh1 and maypole

m.knox

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Aug 20, 2003
107,973
62,540
1
Now would be a good time to pull out your favorite link to to drool over your hero. If my cult is calling out stupid posts and posters like you I will wear it as a badge of honor.

Not all who disagree with you are cultists. Trump leading an insurrection and Biden doing a lousy job can be correct at the same time. You just can't see the forest for the trees. Truly sad and pathetic.

You really aren't too bright are you? No one is drooling over Trump. However, if I may use you words, I certainly drooled over the results for Americans of ALL races, sexes, religions under Trump...... Honestly, you should have too.

Evidently you and I don't want the same for the American people. And that's what is truly sad and pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bourbon n blues

JR4PSU

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2002
40,865
12,127
1
SE PA
ya buts live in the woods

2 wrongs don't make it right

~~~~Obli cried foul when he got caught with his fingers in the cookie jar, said he saw MaconNitt have a cookie too. ~~~~ :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

REALLY? That's your justification for Trump doing nothing for 187 minutes? Trump did nothing because he enjoyed what was going on.
ooooo 187 minutes!! He didn't say anything for 187 minutes!!! Are you sure it wasn't 188? or 186? Man, if it was 188, that would be it. Party over. Sure indictment.
 

m.knox

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Aug 20, 2003
107,973
62,540
1

The January 6th Committee Has Hit Rock Bottom​


https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/07/22/the-january-6th-committee-has-hit-rock-bottom-n599641

The January 6th committee held another “primetime” hearing on Thursday evening, an event I was admittedly unaware of until I started seeing people comment on social media about it. These things are becoming less and less newsworthy, operating more as a coping mechanism for liberals, never seeming to actually move the ball forward.

Perhaps that’s because there’s no ball to actually move forward? The January 6th committee began with a promise to provide evidence of a “seven-step” plan by Donald Trump to organize and execute the unrest that day with the express purpose of overthrowing the government. The latest hearing, which my colleague Nick Arama touched on in the aftermath, didn’t even attempt to prove that theory.

What we got was more random emotional dredge tossed against the wall in hopes of getting people to think, “Man, this was really bad.” But again, the stated purpose of this committee, which is being paid for by taxpayer money, was to prove a seditious conspiracy. Instead, Rep. Liz Cheney and crew spent the evening talking about the stunning revelation that Josh Hawley jogged through a hallway.

That video was the most viral thing that came from the hearing. Journalists rushed to share it with snarky commentary. Case closed, I guess. Clearly, Josh Hawley jogging through a hallway shows that Donald Trump organized an insurrection. In actuality, it doesn’t show that at all, and the only purpose of the video is to try to embarrass Hawley for political gain, accusing him of fist-pumping at the “rioters” before tucking tail and running away.


Of course, there’s no context offered for why Hawley was jogging down the hall. Was he ordered to by Capitol Police? That seems likely given the situation, but such context is unimportant to the committee.

Another big “revelation” was a text message sent by Tim Murtaugh, a former Trump aide, accusing the then-president of not taking responsibility for riling up the protest crowd (Trump had spoken a mile away at a much larger protest before a splinter group of several hundred went to the Capitol). One MSNBC legal analyst called the text the “whole case.”

So let me get this straight. The “whole case” that Donald Trump organized and executed a coup is that one of his aides believed he “lit” the crowd that ultimately got out of control? That’s the whole case? Does Phang not realize what she’s admitting in stating that? Namely, that there is no case at all?

Never mind that Murtaugh was opining under the false impression that the crowd had killed a Capitol Police officer. Months later, despite the media pushing the lie without question, it was revealed that Brian Sicknick (the officer in question) died of a stroke a day later. The medical examiner found no evidence he was assaulted, bear sprayed, or otherwise given any injury that led to that condition.

Lastly, the committee played radio chatter and offered information that showed then-Vice President Mike Pence’s security detail was scared about the unfolding situation............
 

m.knox

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Aug 20, 2003
107,973
62,540
1
They would have already been there had the Capital Police and Nancy Pelosi accepted Trump's offer to them to have the National Gaurd deployed prior.

The most poignant moment last night was when they released the tape of Trump ordering the Secretary of Defense to ARREST Pence, bring him into custody, then roll in the tanks!!!!
 

Lion84

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2015
3,829
5,030
1
I'm not desperate. I'm enjoying watching Trumpers squirm, deflect, twist, justify and fail miserably 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
I guess it’s better for you than the complete dumpster fire this administration has become - the gang that couldn’t shoot straight doesn’t even begin to describe it - when your whole platform is to do the opposite of the last guy even when some of it worked is just asinine.
 

jferretti

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2001
4,012
1,523
1
Trump isn't the Capitol Police chief. I have no idea why the expectation is that he do something.

What did you do during those 187 minutes? Did you call the National Guard?

This is how dems form arguments. Make a fake rule then argue against it.

LdN
Ask McConnell, McCarthy and the other R Congressmen that question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maypole

m.knox

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Aug 20, 2003
107,973
62,540
1
  • Like
Reactions: bourbon n blues

Vic Vaselino

Well-Known Member
Nov 14, 2009
3,055
2,163
1
  • Like
Reactions: maypole

bourbon n blues

Well-Known Member
Nov 20, 2019
24,439
28,680
1
You guys are missing the reason they keep saying 187 minutes. 187 is the California Penal Code number for murder.
The number 187 (pronounced "one-eight-seven" or "one eighty-seven") is used as a synonym for the word "Murder." It refers to Section 187 of the California Penal Code, which defines the crime of murder.
Granted certain folk are too stupid to pick up on it but that’s damn well they say 187 minutes, not OVER 3 hours!!!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: IIVI

RoyalT12

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2020
6,395
4,765
1
It's in writing... lol... Cover your ears lefties......

https://justthenews.com/government/...t-jan-6-rally-make-sure-it-was-safe-event-dod

House Democrats' marquee summer show of primetime investigative hearings ended Thursday night where it began: unable or unwilling to answer essential questions about the Jan. 6 Capitol breach.

Chief among them: If Donald Trump wanted to incite violence that fateful day, as his critics suggest, then why did he order the Pentagon to have a large military force ready to quell a disturbance? And why did a Democrat-led Congress turn down the assistance of pop National Guard troops in the face of intelligence warnings about violence?

By their own admission, Democrats set up the hearings to evade such scrutiny. They declared any questions about what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew about the potential for Jan. 6 violence and when she knew it were off limits.

Secret Service agents were never called to testify in public about whether former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson's story about Trump trying to force his limousine to go to the Capitol were true. And questions about how those in charge of Capitol security responded to FBI and Homeland Security pre-event warnings about potential violence were never asked, much less answered.

Instead, the Jan. 6 committee put on hearsay testimony from Hutchinson and released partial transcripts or video snippets of testimony without allowing Republicans or Trump's own lawyers to cross-examine witnesses or challenge the narrative offered to the American public.

"It's the first time this has happened in my lifetime since McCarthyism, and it's despicable," said famed Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, a lifelong Democrat who voted for Joe Biden in 2020. "The idea that they would interview this witness and allow her to testify to hearsay about the president jumping toward the wheel, without first asking the eye- and ear- witnesses. I've never heard of a lawyer doing that in my 16 years of practicing law. ... It's not only unethical, it's not only unfair, it's bad lawyering.”
🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: maypole

RoyalT12

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2020
6,395
4,765
1

RoyalT12

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2020
6,395
4,765
1
  • Like
Reactions: maypole

m.knox

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Aug 20, 2003
107,973
62,540
1

MaconNitt

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2016
2,722
3,174
1
THREE HOURS!!! lmfao.... Look how desperate you clowns are... You know TRUMP 2024 is right around the corner.

Think of this way. It may help. That is, if you care about others.

It’s Official: Trump Unleashed A Middle-Class Boom That Benefited Women, Minorities Most​


https://issuesinsights.com/2020/09/...ss-boom-that-benefited-women-minorities-most/
You must be really desperate and running out of things to do to respond to a post from 5 days ago with your tired link.
 

m.knox

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Aug 20, 2003
107,973
62,540
1
The OP is some of Deacon Hermy's best gaslighting ever. Truly guffaw inducing. :cool:

You need to take a cue from Dershowitz....

"It's the first time this has happened in my lifetime since McCarthyism, and it's despicable," said famed Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, a lifelong Democrat who voted for Joe Biden in 2020. "The idea that they would interview this witness and allow her to testify to hearsay about the president jumping toward the wheel, without first asking the eye- and ear- witnesses. I've never heard of a lawyer doing that in my 16 years of practicing law. ... It's not only unethical, it's not only unfair, it's bad lawyering.”

Oh, and BTW, it IS in writing.....