- Dec 1, 2009
The mere fact that you posted the statement I bolded, above, demonstrates how much a waste of time it would be to engage with you on this subject. The Mueller Report DID state that there was evidence of collusion, but that there was not sufficient evidence of it to prove a criminal offense. Why? In no small part because of the stonewalling that Trump engaged in, using his powers as President.I have challenged you to name one or two basic facts justifying the FISA and you just duck and go on repeating false generalities. Go ahead cite some facts. Even the blatantly pro Dem prosecutors found ZERO collusion. Now it is coming out that the main sub source for Steele, Danchenko had Clinton ties which he lied about when going to the FBI. I know facts to you are yada, yada...
Here's a useful article on the subject. Feel free to read it and get back to me with your refutation of it.
Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.