So it was the right result, wrong rationale imo. Not intervening b/c the situation didn't warrant it would be reasonable. Not intervening b/c of a perceived chance of blowback, no bueno imo.I thought this matter was done, but I see these posts pop up, so I will respond.
If I saw a child get physically abused, I would step in. Since this was a grocery store, if some cans fell on a kid's head, I would have helped immediately.
But that is not what happened. The facts presented in my original post are the pertinent facts relative to the issue at hand. And I stand by my statement - I don't want to put myself in a position where I have to defend myself against some perception by others. It's a no win situation.
Fair enough. We disagree