Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is Narduzzi right? Should there be a NIL Salary Cap going forward?
Here's an article from our Pitt site, but curious on your guys thoughts.
Interesting, just imagine the cheating to get around the cap,
There absolutely should be an NIL cap.Is Narduzzi right? Should there be a NIL Salary Cap going forward?
Here's an article from our Pitt site, but curious on your guys thoughts.
Loading…
pittsburgh.rivals.com
That's actually been discussed this past week at media days and will be in play VERY soon.At some point there will be revenue sharing with the players like in the NFL.
And then the lawsuits will come from the non-revenue sports. Revenue sharing should not be open for debate. There is really no way to make the system work with revenues sharing. That will be the end of the college athletics.That's actually been discussed this past week at media days and will be in play VERY soon.
why not a collective bargaining agreement and n actual salary? That would level field considerably. Make the players actual employeesIs Narduzzi right? Should there be a NIL Salary Cap going forward?
Here's an article from our Pitt site, but curious on your guys thoughts.
Loading…
pittsburgh.rivals.com
There must be some sort of control mechanism. Otherwise, it’ll be the Wild West with every big (rich) school. They’ll be emulating George Steinbrenner…….and buying their team. The one(s) with the most money, get the championship teams.Is Narduzzi right? Should there be a NIL Salary Cap going forward?
Here's an article from our Pitt site, but curious on your guys thoughts.
Loading…
pittsburgh.rivals.com
if player had to sign a specific employment contract that would spell out in detail what they can and cannot do on and off field. Would control endorsement deals and take "pay for play" off the table. I have an employment contract spells out what outside compensation I can and cannot obtain, scope pf service, non compete, etc. Why not for the players?I don't believe a salary cap or a CBA will do anything to stop the thing most fans hate...pay for play. None of that stops a big bucks booster from paying a recruit $100K for a 10 minute autograph session. If it's addressed in a CBA, nobody could police it now that the toothpaste is out of the tube anyway.
I'm saying they're not going to go backward.if player had to sign a specific employment contract that would spell out in detail what they can and cannot do on and off field. Would control endorsement deals and take "pay for play" off the table. I have an employment contract spells out what outside compensation I can and cannot obtain, scope pf service, non compete, etc. Why not for the players?
why not a collective bargaining agreement and n actual salary? That would level field considerably. Make the players actual employees
'had to' ? Who is gonna force them to do so given the supreme court ruling, conference competition, the SEC-ification state of the NCAA. If each university has its own specific employment contract what would expect the contract language to specify from addicted to fraud programs like UF or Tennessee. Sports interests being more of a collection of various addictions pulling in all of directions more than a business makes me skeptical that much order will be achieved any time soon.if player had to sign a specific employment contract that would spell out in detail what they can and cannot do on and off field. Would control endorsement deals and take "pay for play" off the table. I have an employment contract spells out what outside compensation I can and cannot obtain, scope pf service, non compete, etc. Why not for the players?
like in the NFL contracts are standardized via a collective bargaining agreement.'had to' ? Who is gonna force them to do so given the supreme court ruling, conference competition, the SEC-ification state of the NCAA. If each university has its own specific employment contract what would expect the contract language to specify from addicted to fraud programs like UF or Tennessee. Sports interests being more of a collection of various addictions pulling in all of directions more than a business makes me skeptical that much order will be achieved any time soon.
My point was...like in the NFL contracts are standardized via a collective bargaining agreement.
My point is where is this NFL like organization in Div 1 college football? Nowhere. To get there the road will be a long one and it will have to be initiated by a players union. I don't see the collegiate administrators at any level band together...until forced to do so.like in the NFL contracts are standardized via a collective bargaining agreement.
Ya.. who is gonna enforce that, theNo. The problem is that NIL money being given to players today is NIL money masquerading as play for play/performance money or as recruiting incentive, which is supposed to be against the rules. NIL is supposed to be for players to use their personal fame and brand to do promotions and sign sponsorship deals on their own. That shouldn't be capped, if players can get that money more power to them and it shouldn't be up to the NCAA or schools to limit a player's potential. There needs to be control in place to limit the money to it's intended purpose and to put a stop to using it illegally. Of course that's easier said than done, which is one reason why the hard line positions of no money at all were in place before.