ADVERTISEMENT

Robert Kraft charged with Soliciting Prostitution

:confused:...Gotti = mob; Orchid Spa = HT = Aisan mob
So you are saying that because the FBI (apparently?) broke into Gotti HQ in NYC to plant bugs that the Martin County Sheriff's office also broke into Orchid spa to install video cameras? You may be correct, but I don't think we know that for sure. That's what I was asking (do we know for sure how the Sheriff got inside to install the cameras with the shop owners knowing).
 
I don't want to hijack the thread into a different direction, but if anyone is wondering why I've become sensitive to government overreach, it has nothing to do with the sex industry. I have never participated in, nor condoned, prostitution.

This fight (and my Libertarian leanings) against government overreach have been fueled by a situation within our health care system. The government's War on Drugs has created ridiculous problems for those in need of all sorts of controlled medications, even those which are rather benign. The result has been a huge reduction (and/or elimination) of legitimate access, and inconvenience that creates both excessive (sometimes unsafe) travel while at the same time greatly restricting travel.

I could cite many examples of unacceptable impacts on both doctors and patients. These are "unintended consequences" of a government that doesn't fully assess impacts when it comes up with new rules, be it on sex, drugs, gambling, or any other difficult, complex issue. To be clear, I am for regulation in many areas, sometimes for increased regulation (especially in the banking/finance/investment industry), but we can't be stupid about it. If you think most doctors feel the rules are appropriate you would be wrong, at least in my sampling.

The government has overstepped here. It hasn't reduced the nation's drug problem, and it's raised cost within legitimate circles. But hey, everyone has the right to insurance. Problems solved.

Now, back to our regular programming on the sex industry.
I do not doubt a bit of what you say, and to the extent it has caused you personal trouble I am sorry to hear it.

But I will say there was a long period of time when we ignored Purdue Pharma's dumping of oxycontin on our communities, then when we did enforce the law, it burned the legit pain patients badly, while the Oxy abusers just switched to heroin. Ignoring the explosion of opiate pain killer scripts is not exactly a war on drugs, bu8t it sure caused the problem you seem to be having now. That and pharmacists and docs who looked the other way as millions of hit of prescription opiates were deliver to towns of less than a thousand.

WV has a 1.6 million population. In about a 6 year period 700-800 million hits of opioids were delivered (legally) in the state. Over 400 pills per man woman and child. That was not the war on drugs that did that. That was unregulated American Industry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nittany Ned2
I do not doubt a bit of what you say, and to the extent it has caused you personal trouble I am sorry to hear it.

But I will say there was a long period of time when we ignored Purdue Pharma's dumping of oxycontin on our communities, then when we did enforce the law, it burned the legit pain patients badly, while the Oxy abusers just switched to heroin. Ignoring the explosion of opiate pain killer scripts is not exactly a war on drugs, bu8t it sure caused the problem you seem to be having now. That and pharmacists and docs who looked the other way as millions of hit of prescription opiates were deliver to towns of less than a thousand.

WV has a 1.6 million population. In about a 6 year period 700-800 million hits of opioids were delivered (legally) in the state. Over 400 pills per man woman and child. That was not the war on drugs that did that. That was unregulated American Industry.
Opiods are a huge problem. It is also a big problem when you actually need pain pills and can't get a pharmacy to fill a scrip because of enhanced regulations. When I broke my wrist, I had to drive myself to 4 or 5 different pharmacies until I found one who hadn't sold their allotment for the week (and they weren't permitted by law to call ahead for me to ask). That's not ideal.

Conversely, I had minor surgery after which I probably should have gotten 4 percosets and they gave me 30. That's a problem.
 
There is a long history all over the world of societies of all types treating Johns as though their criminal activity in support of Human Trafficking is embarrassing, but not really illegal. Meanwhile women are denounced as dangerous whores, even the ones who are not doing it willingly.

If you want to discourage and slow human trafficking, you have to take the money out of it. That money comes from Johns. I would support, if the facts showed it was so, a charge of accessory to human trafficking for Johns.

I'm surprised to hear that you think more criminal punishment is the way to handle this issue. If there is anything stronger than a drug users desire to get high is a person's desire to get off. Has there been a society in history that has been able to use the law to eliminate prostitution? The more punitive the law, the deeper and darker the sex trade. It seems to me that when a large black market exists for a product, it indicates that the laws of that society are not in sync with the people who make up that society.

Should a legal adult be able to offer sex to someone for money if that is what they choose to do?
If it was legal, would fewer people choose to engage in the black market illegal sex trade?
Would law enforcement have an easier time dealing with a smaller less lucrative illegal sex trade?
Would a prostitute be safer in the illegal or legal sex trade?
Would the customer be safer in the illegal or legal sex trade?
Is the current system of prohibition solving the problem?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSU2UNC
So you are saying that because the FBI (apparently?) broke into Gotti HQ in NYC to plant bugs that the Martin County Sheriff's office also broke into Orchid spa to install video cameras? You may be correct, but I don't think we know that for sure. That's what I was asking (do we know for sure how the Sheriff got inside to install the cameras with the shop owners knowing).
No PSU, I'm just throwing out a few suggestions that happened in other cases. I don't know if there are different, permissible surveillance levels that can be enacted by local police vs FBI. Hell, possibly one or a few of disgruntled masseurs decided to help the LE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSU2UNC
So you are saying that because the FBI (apparently?) broke into Gotti HQ in NYC to plant bugs that the Martin County Sheriff's office also broke into Orchid spa to install video cameras? You may be correct, but I don't think we know that for sure. That's what I was asking (do we know for sure how the Sheriff got inside to install the cameras with the shop owners knowing).
I think I read (accuracy?) where they faked news of a bomb threat and while on the premise installed the cameras. The same article also said this operation took something like six months. As one who is often skeptical of police tactics, I gotta wonder why, if they knew there were trafficking, they would let it go on for that amount of time. In other words was their motive to protect the women, or was it more to see how many big names they could trap in the web and create publicity for themselves.

P.S. "Morality" aside, they ought to consider just legalizing this sort of thing. Seems it would cut drastically into trafficking and would it also be subject to regulation, not to mention more taxes.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised to hear that you think more criminal punishment is the way to handle this issue. If there is anything stronger than a drug users desire to get high is a person's desire to get off. Has there been a society in history that has been able to use the law to eliminate prostitution? The more punitive the law, the deeper and darker the sex trade. It seems to me that when a large black market exists for a product, it indicates that the laws of that society are not in sync with the people who make up that society.

Should a legal adult be able to offer sex to someone for money if that is what they choose to do?
If it was legal, would fewer people choose to engage in the black market illegal sex trade?
Would law enforcement have an easier time dealing with a smaller less lucrative illegal sex trade?
Would a prostitute be safer in the illegal or legal sex trade?
Would the customer be safer in the illegal or legal sex trade?
Is the current system of prohibition solving the problem?
First of all the legal sex trade is not in this discussion. IF it were lawful, with proper oversight, the HT problem would be obviated at least in sex trade HT.

But as a practical matter we are not going to have a legal sex trade in this country other than in a few areas. So punishing the wrongdoers who provide all the money, if they knew or should have known that it was HT trade, seems like it might provoke a decline in their willingness to risk it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
I think I read (accuracy?) where they faked news of a bomb threat and while on the premise installed the cameras. The same article also said this operation took something like six months. As one who is often skeptical of police tactics, I gotta wonder why, if they knew there were trafficking, they would let it go on for that amount of time. In other words was their motive to protect the women, or was it more to see how many big names they could trap in the web and create publicity for themselves.

P.S. "Morality" aside, they ought to consider just legalizing this sort of thing. Seems it would cut drastically into trafficking and would it also be subject to regulation, not to mention more taxes.
Thanks for sharing the bomb threat info. I hadn't read that, and that is exactly what I was looking for.

My guess is that they had to keep the investigation going long enough to gather enough evidence to make the charges stick and it was probably more about that than catching high profile targets (I'm frankly surprised that Kraft went to this establishment).
 
I did not read through all the posts, but let me query this....

1. What if Kraft was found soliciting prostitutes in Amsterdam, or the Bunny Ranch, or Costa Rica, or any other place where prostitution is legal? Would there still be a morals clause that he would be forced to abide by?

2. What if he was smoking weed at Café 420 in Amsterdam? (It exists). Same question with moral clauses.
 
That is interesting...hadn’t read that report. I suppose it’s possible that they could’ve struck a plea deal with the owner in order to gather more evidence. Still, wouldn’t be surprised if some of the video was obtained via the search warrant.
It’s like going to the VIP room of a strip club. The girl will tell you it’s being recorded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
It’s like going to the VIP room of a strip club. The girl will tell you it’s being recorded.
My guess is that if the VIP room of a strip club is being recorded, nothing illegal is happening in there.
 
Robert Kraft
Chief Executive Officer of the New England Patriots
Description
Robert Kenneth Kraft is an American businessman. He is the chairman and chief executive officer of the Kraft Group, a diversified holding company with assets in paper and packaging, sports and entertainment, real estate development and a private equity portfolio. Wikipedia

Partner: Ricki Noel Lander (2012–) Trending
Born: June 5, 1941 (age 77 years), Brookline, MA

Height: 5′ 7″
Penis size: (fill in after tape is made public)
Net worth: 6.6 billion USD (2019)
Spouse: Myra Kraft (m. 1963–2011)
Children: Jonathan Kraft, Daniel A. Kraft, Joshua Kraft, David Kraft
 
Some back ground info about sex-trafficking in Florida that we may have forgotten

The story behind a Palm Beach sex offender’s remarkable deal...
Link: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article220097825.html

Acosta has never fully explained why he felt it was in the best interests of the underage girls — and their parents — for him to keep the agreement sealed. Or why the FBI investigation was closed even as, recently released documents show, the case was yielding more victims and evidence of a possible sex-trafficking conspiracy beyond Palm Beach.

“At the end of the day, based on the evidence, professionals within a prosecutor’s office decided that a plea that guarantees someone goes to jail, that guarantees he register [as a sex offender] generally and guarantees other outcomes, is a good thing,’’ Acosta said of his decision to not prosecute Epstein federally.

Marci Hamilton, a University of Pennsylvania law professor who is one of the nation’s leading advocates for reforming laws involving sex crimes against children, said what Acosta and other prosecutors did is similar to what the Catholic Church did to protect pedophile priests.

“The real crime with the Catholic priests was the way they covered it up and shielded the priests,’’ Hamilton said. “The orchestration of power by men only is protected as long as everybody agrees to keep it secret. This is a story the world needs to hear.’’
Only the best people was the promise. Can you imagine what the worst people he knows are like?:eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
I did not read through all the posts, but let me query this....

1. What if Kraft was found soliciting prostitutes in Amsterdam, or the Bunny Ranch, or Costa Rica, or any other place where prostitution is legal? Would there still be a morals clause that he would be forced to abide by?

2. What if he was smoking weed at Café 420 in Amsterdam? (It exists). Same question with moral clauses.


Well, legal and moral aren’t the same thing. ;)
 
Last edited:
So much from the Orange Bloviator about human/sex trafficking over the past 2 weeks, but nary a comment about that in relation to Kraft.

So many people (mostly Pat fans and males) have dismissed this as "what's the big deal"?

Or that Kraft didn't know about the human/sex trafficking part.

Which is bogus as he's not a stupid man (most of the time) and should know that most people in the sex industry are coerced into doing so and/or were victims of sexual abuse at a young age.

And that's doubly the case when the victims here are foreign women (in this case from China) who don't speak English, and esp. since Kraft has donated to a charity that helps victims of human/sex trafficking and that he and his wife have endowed the professorship of a Brandeis University professor who's specialty of study is human/sex trafficking.

Kraft likely knew that the chances were good that at least some of the women were trafficked, but like so many, were more focused on their own pleasure and willfully looked the other way.

As for why Kraft and other wealthy men (people who live around the areas of these "spas" in FL have reported seeing many luxury autos in the parking lot) would patronize these seedy spas; would not be surprised at all if has to do w/ the fetishization of Asian women (apparently, these spas were doing booming business).


He didn't bring the girl here. He's a John. You charge him what you do everybody else who gets caught.
NFL will fine and suspend him.

Johns are what keep the human/sex traffickers in business.


Maybe it is the True Detective in me, but something is not right to have such an extensive sting on a $59 Oriental Spa message parlor that featured happy endings for its clients. Jabone's like us are caught in those places, not Billionaire NFL owners who are supposedly not even the biggest names.

Something does not feel right here.

Plenty of high-end lux autos have been seen in the parking lots of those spas.


I don't want to defend Kraft's choice here, but how would he necessarily know that the women involved were there against their will?

Kraft isn't a stupid man and anyone who even has a rudimentary knowledge of the sex industry knows that human/sex trafficking plays a large role.

Plus, Kraft has contributed to a charity that helps trafficked victims and he and his late wife had endowed the professorship at Brandeis University where the professor's specialty is studying human/sex trafficking.
 
Just to be clear, while human trafficking is a big issue in these cases, it does not appear that there were any "Asian teens" involved. If you read the some of the documents, it appears that the women providing "massages" at the establishment where Kraft was busted were born in 1973, 1972 and 1960.

There are some other interesting details in this document for those interested:

https://ewscripps.brightspotcdn.com/74/98/64c708b942ac9a24ed0e40f57db0/hua-pc.pdf

See my post above. The women in question were in their 40s and 50s.

Aren't those the ages of the madams and not the victims?
 
Cops now saying evidence that the women lived at the spa started the investigation. Surveillance showed they had an exclusively male clientele. A little dumpster diving and web surfing and they were convinced.

Geez, guys, just go on PornHub for five minutes and then take a shower. Your good name is the most important thing you have.
 
I did not read through all the posts, but let me query this....

1. What if Kraft was found soliciting prostitutes in Amsterdam, or the Bunny Ranch, or Costa Rica, or any other place where prostitution is legal? Would there still be a morals clause that he would be forced to abide by?

2. What if he was smoking weed at Café 420 in Amsterdam? (It exists). Same question with moral clauses.
If you were worth $4+ billion, wouldn't you maybe just go to those places and skip the needless risk (and the sleaze- a strip mall in Florida, really?) I mean, at least use a high priced (and discreet) escort service. Stupid has it's price.
 
If you were worth $4+ billion, wouldn't you maybe just go to those places and skip the needless risk (and the sleaze- a strip mall in Florida, really?) I mean, at least use a high priced (and discreet) escort service. Stupid has it's price.

You can't assume logic and intelligence are always front of mind.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT