Risk benefit of the covid19 vaccines is NEGATIVE according to a new pre-print paper from Stanford, UCLA researchers. Other studies corroborate it

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
18,965
24,299
1
2020evidence.org

Abstract​

Introduction: In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We leveraged the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in phase III randomized trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods: Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on potential adverse events of special interest identified by the Brighton Collaboration.

Results: Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9). The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).

Discussion: The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.
==========================================================================
This paper corroborates the below one which also looked at the data from the "gold standard" double blind trials:

https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/u...nalyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf
(US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity/Mortality”)

This study also found the shots provide negative protection after a few months:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v2 (Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: after 3 months the shots provide negative protection, VAIDS)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: john4psu

maypole

Well-Known Member
May 9, 2022
1,133
448
1
Difficult to take this study seriously when it contains such whoppers as this: “There are people in the government. who desire to attack citizens with bioweapons…With the anthrax attack, conspirators were not apprehended because the investigation was prematurely ended …people at the top of the fbi sabotaged it.“ Also says covid was a bioweapons attack.
No wonder not peer reviewed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: knickslions