Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Believe it or not there was a poll around January of the primary year that showed him in the lead of the LT Gov nomination in the D party. There were many candidates and he may have been around 25%."Plaintiff Jay Paterno shall produce any pools or survey information regarding his run for political office or withdrawal from the race along with any documents concerning his favorability, popularity and status in the community ......"
LOL. That should be interesting.
"Plaintiff Jay Paterno shall produce any pools or survey information regarding his run for political office or withdrawal from the race along with any documents concerning his favorability, popularity and status in the community ......"
LOL. That should be interesting.
Of course, none of that is of any significant importance (so, JVP Jr says "I didn't have any polls done. Sorry").....but a douchebag like you just HAS TO get all masturbatory over it."Plaintiff Jay Paterno shall produce any pools or survey information regarding his run for political office or withdrawal from the race along with any documents concerning his favorability, popularity and status in the community ......"
LOL. That should be interesting.
Believe it or not there was a poll around January of the primary year that showed him in the lead of the LT Gov nomination in the D party. There were many candidates and he may have been around 25%.
Not sure about that Art. IIRC it appeared in the Patriot-News and I believe it would have been a media sponsored poll, most likely taken by some polling firm. My recollection the poll was viewed as reflecting Jay's name ID but not much else.Who commissioned the poll?
Of course, none of that is of any significant importance (so, JVP Jr says "I didn't have any polls done. Sorry").....but a douchebag like you just HAS TO get all masturbatory over it.
_____________________________________________________________
Of course, you make no mention of the fact that the Court struck done the inane request by Pepper Hamilton and PSU to label all the documents "Highly Confidential - Attorney's Eyes Only".
Nor that the Court told PSU that their attempt to "clawback" the previously forwarded documents is bogus.
Shocking!
Not sure about that Art. IIRC it appeared in the Patriot-News and I believe it would have been a media sponsored poll, most likely taken by some polling firm. My recollection the poll was viewed as reflecting Jay's name ID but not much else.
Impressive research skills michnitt!
Impressive research skills michnitt!
LOL.....and in classic (intentionally?) oblivious form.....NittWit fails to recognize that the poll was not some proprietary information, or some work commissioned by JVP Jr.
LMAO
Is even NittWit such a dunce that he REALLY thinks there is a disclosure issue over a third party poll......the results of which are published over the "interwebs" (including PennLive). Really?
What a douchenozzle.
at least he is consistently wrong, but always doubles down on his stupid.
Then you and Scott Paterno have a lot in common.(1) "Granted in part and Denied in Part." Pepper Hamilton/PSU still get to designate the documents appropriately over the next 30 days. If they don't do so, then they do ALL get a blanket classification as "Confidential."
(2) No biggie as refers to the "clawback." I doubt there is anything overly "shocking" in those documents anyway. I follow Scott Paterno on Twitter and haven't seen any reference to those documents. If there was something "shocking", I doubt in Scott's ability to control himself. Tweet, tweet, tweet.
(1) "Granted in part and Denied in Part." Pepper Hamilton/PSU still get to designate the documents appropriately over the next 30 days. If they don't do so, then they do ALL get a blanket classification as "Confidential."
(2) No biggie as refers to the "clawback." I doubt there is anything overly "shocking" in those documents anyway. I follow Scott Paterno on Twitter and haven't seen any reference to those documents. If there was something "shocking", I doubt in Scott's ability to control himself. Tweet, tweet, tweet.
Not sure about that Art. IIRC it appeared in the Patriot-News and I believe it would have been a media sponsored poll, most likely taken by some polling firm. My recollection the poll was viewed as reflecting Jay's name ID but not much else.
Always, like some of the time, right? I believe they mean the same thing.
Amazing thing to me if hold true were the dates listed .... this thing can easily go well into next summer yet by the looks of it. Man slow and steady wins the race. Have to be willing to be in it for the long haul to beat these crooks and weasels...