OT: Riley Keough to play Sara Ganim
- Thread starter TenerHallTerror
- Start date
You don't think Ganim looks like her??????? Hint, Ganim's the one with the scarf.
Ganim's the negative cutter for the film.
You don't think Ganim looks like her??????? Hint, Ganim's the one with the scarf.
What a hideous monstrous face....
I hope the paternos have some recourse for the hatchet job this is going to be
Does anyone have any idea when this garbage is supposed to hit the screen?
You'd think this dumb b***h would have better things to do w/ her time right now than tweet out hollyweird news about her little barfly friend.
Who plays Blehar? Oh wait, he was a guy looking to find out the truth, this movie doesn't give a shit about that!
One played a whore on TV.
One played a whore to get on TV.
Seems apt.
BTW - Anyone still think this film is gonna' be a non-cluster****?
This is gonna' be another example of what happens - when you blame every imaginable entity for their unfair treatment - - - - but fail to lift a finger to reveal the "truth". (Cough......Curley......Cough.....Schultz....Cough.....Spanier....Cough....All of the "A9".....Cough)
Good news ... I'm being cast in the movie and they got Brad Pitt to portray me. The similarity is closer than this one!
Lots of folks.
From the broader perspective:
This will be EXACTLY the type of "coverage" one would expect - - - - when one refuses to speak a single word in their own defense, or a single word of opposition to those they feel are "telling lies".
To expect anything different would be absolutely illogical.
But I'm sure there will be hordes of folks "blaming the media", and decrying the "false narrative" (as if there is any alternative?)........ but nary a word wrt the promotion of the "false narrative"
Alas
Actually, shouldn't the film begin with the DPW's seminal Investigative CSA Complaint in regards to V1 and The Second Mile's work at Central Mountain High School.....and their handing over of their "Indicated Report of CSA" to PA Law Enforcement in the first months of 2009 with a request for prosecution? An "Indicated Report of CSA" that Attorney General Corrupt Corbutt received on 3/3/2009 and contained allegations that TSM was a fraudulent charity that was founded for the fraudulent purpose of sexually abusing children (an allegation the OAG would include in their trial allegations)??? Here is what Corbutt was handed on 3/3/2009 according to his own hand:
Shouldn't the quasi "documentary film" explore the mysterious issue of why the highest Law Enforcement Agency in PA that fellow State Agency, DPW, gave their above Investigated Complaint of CSA to have prosecuted, didn't even bother to knock on the door of TSM despite PA DPW telling the OAG that V1 had been accessed at Central Mountain High School, and this School District in general, for over 6 years via a fraudulent relationship between the DPW's County-Level Office, the Clinton County CYS Office, and The Second Mile???? Nobody's curious as to why the AG never investigated the Fraudulent Charity, founded for the purpose of sexually abusing children, that served as the "ways and means" of Sandusky's access according to none other than DPW themselves.......no investigation or even remote curiosity by the AG despite the DPW telling the AG, "It is believed that other minor males have been similarly assaulted through this connection.". Huh, WTF??? You're going to make a quasi documentary film about this tragedy and the "SWIGJ" that initiated it and you aren't even going to explore the fact that the PA AG completely blew-off the actual DPW Indicated Report of CSA and its FINDINGS that was handed to them for prosecution on 3/3/2009 including inexplicable statements by the AG-turned-Governor's own administration nearly 3 years later stating that the The Second Mile was "NEVER under Investigation" and was a wonderful organization??? Huh??? WTF??? - see excerpts below from hotlink provided:
And this link:
Wow, that's odd....
Note how Corbett and his administration lackeys attempt to cover-up this FACT with bold faced lies later on in the article...
A bald-faced lie by the Corbett Administration as even the article points out with cursory investigation of the statement....
This is a proven LIE by Corbett's own SWIGJ Application date 5/1/2009 summarizing what he received from DPW on 3/3/2009 via their "Indicated Complaint of CSA"....
Corbett's own SWIGJ Application, and this excerpt directly after this paragraph:
Demonstrate that the only party doing any "blatant lying" is Harley himself!!
Another bald-faced LIE by the Corbutt Administration - the AG knew from the very beginning in the first days of March 2009 what the DPW alleged TSM's "role" to be as UNQUESTIONABLLY proven by Corbutt's own SWIGJ Application.
Another bald-faced LIE from Corbutt's Administration - Noonan did not become involved with the case until January 2011, nearly two years after AG Corbutt received the DPW CSA Complaint with a request for prosecution, that Noonan became involved with "the case"!
I could source lots more articles, like THIS ONE - "Corbett's Approval of Second Mile Grant Debated", with Corrupt Corbett Administration member after Corrupt Corbutt Administration member telling bald-faced lies proven by his own 2009 SWIGJ Application relative to "what they knew, and when they knew it" and whether The Second Mile had ever been implicated for investigation by the DPW's seminal "Investigated and Indicated Complaint of CSA" given to AG Corbutt on 3/3/2009. So why is the Corbutt Administration doing so much lying on these topics and why are all these Corbutt Administration lackeys telling the exact same lies if they aren't signing from the same "Liars Hymnal" or "conspiring" to tell the same FRAUDULENT STORY? How can a quasi-documentary about this episode have no interest in these topics which is the true "conspiracy" of this entire sordid event, especially the bald-faced lie by the entire Corbutt Administration (as proven by Corbutt's own seminal 2009 SWIGJ Application) that The Second Mile was never implicated by DPW as a "fraudulent charity" founded for the fraudulent purpose of sexually abusing chlidren....and that it was the primary vehicle, the very "ways & means", by which Sandusky gained access to Public Programs with children including Public Schools and that many other past and present "VICTIMS" had likely been "similarly assaulted through this connection". How can a film on this "Investigation" and episode not look into the biggest liars in the whole affair - the AG-turned-Governor, Corbutt, and his administrations incessant lying regarding these topics???
Last edited:
Either that or it could open w/ AF giving us all the finger on a bed of cash at a casino hotel.
Seriously though, what does Sara Ganim have to do with Joe Paterno?
We all know how she was used in the whole second mile / Sandusky thing... but Joe Paterno played such a minor role in that, by properly reporting the hearsay of potential abuse by an ex-employee.
We all know how she was used in the whole second mile / Sandusky thing... but Joe Paterno played such a minor role in that, by properly reporting the hearsay of potential abuse by an ex-employee.
are they going to cover her first article about Joe, where he was praised by prosecutors for doing the right thing?
But I'm sure there will be hordes of folks "blaming the media", and decrying the "false narrative" (as if there is any alternative?)........ but nary a word wrt the promotion of the "false narrative"by those who claim to be "on our side".
Alas
Any suggestion about ways to promote the false narratives?
I would hope that Spanier, Curley, Schultz, and the Paterno family would do everything they could to identify how the media and the OAG got it wrong.
What do you think would be some of the better ways to get the word out and who would be the better messagers?
I think that the principals (Spanier, Curley, Schultz) as well as members of the Paterno family like Sue and/or Jay (but not Scott), Anthony Lubrano, and perhaps PS4RS could be good messagers.
I think that NCIS Special Agent John Snedden has been an effective messager and could be very effective going forward in promoting the false narratives.
To date, the media outlet that I believe has the best understanding of how and why the fiasco has occurred is Ralph Cipriano from bigtrial.net. However, it is only a blog and probably the most frustrating aspect of this whole ordeal to me has been the lack coverage/critical analysis of any of the bigger more established media outlets into the false narratives. It would be great if somebody could do a documentary perhaps along the line of the Netflix Making of a Murderer episodes.
It would be refreshing if the movie portrayed the truth of how she was used and bought off with a Pulitzer, and how how her "reporting" put more kids at risk... and she is now paying the price by spending the rest of her career in obscurity. Used and discarded, filled with regret.
Does Riley Keough have a big old hiney like the original intrepid investigative reporter of whom she will portray? It is, after all, her best asset, not to mention being her sole redeeming quality.
How about the fact that OAG "Special Investigator" Geoffrey Moulton, "Special Deputy Attorney", hired by Kane to specifically investigate AG Corbett's handling of the investigation - in fact, his ultimate report was titled, "REPORT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ON THE INVESTIGATION OF GERALD A. SANDUSKY - never asked a single question about all of this PROVEN LYING that the Corbutt Administration was doing relative to what they were FACTUALLY provided by the PA DPW in the first days of March 2009 as proven by none other than Corbutt's very own 2009 SWIGJ Application?!?! Not a single question from Moulton despite ALL of the Corrupt Corbutt Administration telling the EXACT same LIES that ran counter-factual and contradict what AG Corbett ACTUALLY received from the DPW in the first days of March 2009??? (again as factually proven by Corrupt Corbett's very own 2009 SWIGJ Application!!! Evidence of lying and perjury don't get much more definitive than that!!!). How precisely is it even possible for them to all be telling the EXACT SAME highly-detailed lies without a "conspiracy" - I suppose Occam's Razor suggests "coincidence" according to all the Madhatter defenders of Corbutt, Corruption and Tyranny Writ Large in general....all in the name of "politics" and the defense of their favorite corrupt scumbag political junta, because it is associated with the GOP.... where's the barf chum bucket?
The only explanation for Moulton's sham report that didn't ask a single difficult question of Corrupt Corbutt or his administration is that he was a "mole"....."a plant"....and had been "reached" - paid off with a some sort of hard and soft dollar arrangement by the Corrupt PA Government to publish his "Report" that doesn't even scratch the surface of the most troubling questions surrounding this matter and the AG-turned-Governor. IOW , "business as usual" for the MontCo-Hershey GOP Junta & Corruption Syndicate.
I would doubt it. I am guessing that there will be liberal use of artistic license and the movie as a whole will be a long way from the truth and will support the director's preconceived notion of what happened.
please, Riley Keough, never played a Whore on TV, she was an escort, big difference.One played a whore on TV.
One played a whore to get on TV.
Seems apt.
BTW - Anyone still think this film is gonna' be a non-cluster****?
This is gonna' be another example of what happens - when you blame every imaginable entity for their unfair treatment - - - - but fail to lift a finger to reveal the "truth". (Cough......Curley......Cough.....Schultz....Cough.....Spanier....Cough....All of the "A9".....Cough)
the only whore, as you pointed out, was Sara Ganim.
now the actor being cast as Corbett must be excited. since he gets a sex scene with Riley.
The issue isn't a "PR Campaign" issue....... its not a matter of "getting the word out"......its not a matter of not having messengers.....its a problem of no one providing a message (or, truly and even more dishearteningly, providing messages that only reinforce the "false narrative
)......the word IS out. And the "word" is that all of the actions of the folks in positions of standing have only confirmed that thing we like to call a "false narrative".
The issue is much more "real" than "PR".
You could take every positive from every elemental effort to date (from any group or individual).....package them all up together.......multiply by 10........
And the grand total impact of all of those efforts, would be dwarfed by:
Those 4 little words uttered by Curley and Schultz - - - - "I'm guilty, your Honor" .......... which cemented the "truth" - - - the "truth" being that they were CSA enablers, and we were all part of the warped culture.
If they - the folks directly accused - neither had, nor offered, even a single word of defense to such allegations, how can ANYONE be taken seriously for claiming it is a "false narrative"?
- Add in Spanier's REFUSAL to not only defend HIMSELF, but his simultaneous refusal to walk through an open door to exploring the larger issues.
- Add in the utter, abysmal, bewildering failure of the A9 to even proximate any level of responsible governance (most relevantly to this issue, their bed-shitting vav the "Freeh File Review"
)- And add in the leg-pissing politicos (a list as long as your arm)
Nothing can ever change that stuff. (the fact that so many supposed "truth seekers" will adamantly defend the damaging actions of many of those folks.....is just pathetic......and a mirror image of the distasteful "R' vs "D" myopia which pervades national politics, but that's a whole 'nuther issue)
Anyway:
Aside from a few folks who so many of the supposed "truth-seekers" largely love to hate (namely, folks advocating for a fresh look at the proceedings of the JS trial) there has not been a single person of standing who has actually stood up and defended that so-called "truth".
Not a one.
Cowards? Liars? Hypocrites? Idiots? IDK
The issue isn't a "PR Campaign" issue....... its not a matter of "getting the word out"......its not a matter of not having messengers.....its a problem of no one providing a message (or, truly and even more dishearteningly, providing messages that only reinforce the "false narrative
And the "word" is that all of the actions of the folks in positions of standing have only confirmed that thing we like to call a "false narrative".
The issue is much more "real" than "PR".
You could take every positive from every elemental effort to date (from any group or individual).....package them all up together.......multiply by 10........
And the grand total impact of all of those efforts, would be dwarfed by:
Those 4 little words uttered by Curley and Schultz - - - - "I'm guilty, your Honor" .......... which cemented the "truth" - - - the "truth" being that they were CSA enablers, and we were all part of the warped culture.
If they - the folks directly accused - neither had, nor offered, even a single word of defense to such allegations, how can ANYONE be taken seriously for claiming it is a "false narrative"?
- Add in Spanier's REFUSAL to not only defend HIMSELF, but his simultaneous refusal to walk through an open door to exploring the larger issues.
- Add in the utter, abysmal, bewildering failure of the A9 to even proximate any level of responsible governance (most relevantly to this issue, their bed-shitting vav the "Freeh File Review"
- And add in the leg-pissing politicos (a list as long as your arm)
Nothing can ever change that stuff. (the fact that so many supposed "truth seekers" will adamantly defend the damaging actions of many of those folks.....is just pathetic......and a mirror image of the distasteful "R' vs "D" myopia which pervades national politics, but that's a whole 'nuther issue)
Anyway:
Aside from a few folks who so many of the supposed "truth-seekers" largely love to hate (namely, folks advocating for a fresh look at the proceedings of the JS trial) there has not been a single person of standing who has actually stood up and defended that so-called "truth".
Not a one.
Cowards? Liars? Hypocrites? Idiots? IDK
More than likely they were in fear of the "Crime Syndicate" that was threatening them.....don't believe that's possible? Just read this excerpt from THIS ARTICLE:
Ask yourself, why was the humble family of Stan Bolton attacked and his mentally-handicapped son threatened with Indictment and incarceration of a major felony for his dad having made the following public statement to ESPN:
The Corrupt MontCo-Hershey GOP and Crime Syndicate's claim that Kathleen Kane was a corrupt bureaucrat from a "privileged background" is a load of crap highly typical of their "terror campaign" and "character assassination" campaigns via their Propaganda Arm - the PA Media. It is no small coincidence that they pulled the same disgusting bull$hit on the humble, honest and hard-working family of Stanley Bolton and his mentally-handicapped son for God's sake for having the audacity to TELL THE TRUTH about Mike McQueary's ACTUAL TESTIMONY to the 30th SWIGJ, which diametrically CONTRADICTS the fabricated lies told in the GOP Junta Crime Syndicate's intentionally fraudulent "33rd SWIGJ Presentment - Statement of Lies"! The corrupt, evil scumbags with the "silver spoons" in their mouths that are abusing their politically-granted powers (i.e., "public corruption") and terrorizing the public with their tyranny is the MontCo-Hershey Crime Syndicate and GOP Junta who carry their guns with a badge and are some of the most immoral, rot-infested scum this earth has ever seen!
Last edited:
There are so many nittany lion look alike logos that it probably wouldn't make a difference.
_____________________
This movie is only being shown on HBO, correct? Not a nation wide theater release?
President Hands Up will probably be on the red carpet w/ a stupid smile on his face.
Will there be "love scenes" between The real "Lois Lane" and her prosecutor friends?
A
anon_1eeb2b426hv3y
Guest
Do you think Hollywood casts people (women in particular) for accuracy of appearance? [rhetorical question, ugly casting would be more accurate but why would Hollywood want that?]
Hot girls cast in movies make money (so does dramatization of events). She's playing the role of Sarah Ganim. She doesn't have to look like Sarah Ganin to do that.
Viewers just need to be able to visualize SG when they look at her. White skin, brown hair, younger female, DONE.
A
anon_xdc8rmuek44eq
Guest
Just happy it's not someone I like - such as Alison Brie or Gillian Jacobs or Kristen Stewart.
Considering how those in charge have handled the situation to date, they are probably falling all over themselves to let them use the logo and portray PSU negatively.
Go figure, Corbutt's ex right-hand man at the OAG ends up getting a cushy job at PSU, just like Baldwin, after "doing his part" for the syndicate.... You can't make this $hit up, but the press has zero interest in any of it - go figure! See the link below:
Latest posts
-
-
Football Happy Valley United announces Retain The Roar NIL campaign
- Latest: NITTANYJGK
-
-
-