OT: Found this great Space Twitter account.
- Thread starter LionJim
- Start date
I went with 4, but for different reasons than in the link. Each row would have three consecutive numbers if you use 4.
And if you choose 4, then the top and bottom of each column add up to the middle of that column.
Why isn't the answer two (2)? Here's my logic...
The first column is represented by the numbers 3 and 5, which differ by 2
The third column is represented by the numbers 6 and 4 which differ by 2
The middle column is represented by the numbers 1 and 3 which would differ by the number 2 which conveniently fits into the middle square.
2 wins the square with a linking diagonal regardless if it's columnar subtraction or addition. My answer is wholly predicated on using "old math". What's the answer if the numbers 3 and 5 ....and 4 and 6 now don't differ by the quantity formerly known as 2? 🤷♂️
The first column is represented by the numbers 3 and 5, which differ by 2
The third column is represented by the numbers 6 and 4 which differ by 2
The middle column is represented by the numbers 1 and 3 which would differ by the number 2 which conveniently fits into the middle square.
2 wins the square with a linking diagonal regardless if it's columnar subtraction or addition. My answer is wholly predicated on using "old math". What's the answer if the numbers 3 and 5 ....and 4 and 6 now don't differ by the quantity formerly known as 2? 🤷♂️
Last edited:
Nope, it’s five. First column: three subtracted from five is two. Third column is two subtracted from six is four. Therefore one subtracted from five is three!
Please don’t tell NASA or they will bounce me outta the corps!In celebration of his 60th birthday, I offer this...
Latest posts
-
-
-
Football A look at Penn State's WR room post Lambert-Smith and Meiga departures- Latest: Dylan Callaghan-Croley
