I believe that's just their staff, not them.
Yeah I’m not buying either that Congress is just out on it’s ass like any other schmuck when it comes to health care.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe that's just their staff, not them.
Actually it is both members and staff and it is subsidized but not free but they are required to use ACA exchanges. Here is a link. I'm not a fan of snopes, but since you seem to want single payer I figured you would give it more credence than I do, and there are others.I believe that's just their staff, not them.
I wonder what the board thinks of Congressmen using taxpayer money to settle harassment claims? I also didn't know that they exempted themselves from the freedom of information act.
THIS ^^^^ is my takeaway from the John Conyers fiasco. It's still early, but it appears to me that Conyers is hiding behind the confidentiality agreement his accuser signed when her claim was settled. It's easy for him to "vigorously deny" her claims and insist he settled "only to avoid the rigors of protracted litigation" given he no doubt believes that the actual facts will never see the light of day.
Consider a few notable features of the current system, in which a Congressional "Compliance Office" attempts to mediate and resolve these sex harassment claims:
1. The Complainant is typically a subordinate of the alleged harasser, who is often a Congressman or Senator.
2. The alleged harasser is entitled to have his attorneys' fees paid by the taxpayers, but the complainant must shoulder her own attorneys' fees.
3. There is no procedure for isolating the complainant from the alleged harasser during the pendency of the complaint, which means she must typically continue to work for the alleged harasser, who is now pissed off.
4. Any funds paid to settle such claims come from the public fisc, not the alleged harasser personally.
5. The settlement invariably involves the complainant signing a confidentiality or non-disclosure agreement, meaning that the sorry details of the alleged harassment are unlikely to see the light of day.
It taxes credulity beyond any reasonable bounds to think that Conyers is the only Congressman or Senator to have settled sex harassment claims using this absurd procedure. I believe his case is just the first of many similar cases to come. I hope they clean this mess up, and clean House. Literally..
Illinois: Caught some of the National Dog Show (televised from Philadelphia) last Saturday. Thought of you when it came on. Can't recall where the Basset placed.Clean House....and the Senate!
Illinois: Caught some of the National Dog Show (televised from Philadelphia) last Saturday. Thought of you when it came on. Can't recall where the Basset placed.