Just the facts on the CoronaVirus

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Cellular Toxemia and 'Germs of Life'
by Saul Pressman

"The so-called 'bad' bacteria and viruses that modern medicine fights with its huge arsenal of pharmaceutical drugs are in reality the germs of life. These germs of life live in symbiosis with the nutritive medium that constitutes our body, allowing it to be built up and later decomposed, to be metamorphosed and recreated. These germs are pleomorphic shapeshifters who are controlled by the medium in which they live.

"Germs are not something separate, isolated, unfriendly and coming from without, but are rather the foundation for all life. Without germs, there is no life. Their number is infinite. Their function is varied. Germs can change shape, join together, separate again and return to their primordial condition. Viruses, bacteria and fungii are various developmental forms of germs. The nutritive medium on which the germs thrive determines the type of development they will undergo.

"Early in this century, Dr. Carl Edward Rosenow of the Mayo Biological Laboratories began a series of experiments in which he took distinctive bacterial strains from a number of disease sources and placed them in one culture of uniform media. In time, the distinctive strains all changed and became one uniform class. By repeatedly changing cultures, he could individually modify bacterial strains, making harmless ones 'pathogenic,' and in turn reverse the process. He concluded that the critical factor controlling the nature of the bacteria was the food and environment they lived on. These discoveries were first published in 1914 in the Journal of Infectious Diseases.

"Rosenow's work was corroborated and expanded upon about two decades later by Royal R. Rife, developer of the Universal Microscope, with a resolution of 150,000 power. This precision instrument made live bacteria and viruses visible.

"Rife showed that by altering the environment and food supply, friendly bacteria, such as colon bacillus, could be converted into the 'pathogenic' bacteria known as typhoid. Rife was able to observe that the viral agent associated with certain forms of cancer could in time be modified into harmless bacillus coli, and the process reversed. Rife stated that it was the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body that in actuality produced the disease. He believed that if the human body was perfectly balanced, it was susceptible to no disease.

"Virulence is an ecological problem -- that is, a problem of the state of internal cleanliness.

Immunity and Vaccinations

"It is known that children who cannot produce antibodies in their blood (agammaglobulinemia) nevertheless recover from diseases such as measles and still have long-term immunity. People with no antibodies have been found who are extremely resistant to diseases, while other people have developed diseases to which they already had high levels of antibodies.

"Official U.S. military records show that highly immunised personnel manifest a mortality rate from diptheria four times higher than of unvaccinated civilians.

"It is now clear that the body needs no 'help' of the sort provided by immunisation; that antibodies in the blood stream are not required to protect the body; and that immunisation can cause immune suppression, permanent nervous system damage and growth stunting. There is also strong evidence that immunisation can actually cause the diseases it was meant to prevent. This view has gained support from the writing of a report commissioned by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) from Dr. Raymond Obomsawin in 1992.

"In his detailed report, Dr. Obomsawin found that the idea of induced immunity was an illusion founded on:

Discredited scientific theories,
The refusal to examine contrary data,
The lack of proper follow-up assessment of immunised children,
Poor statistical methods.
"The positive impact of immunisation on public health has never, repeat NEVER, been substantiated in any unbiased study. Immunised people have repeatedly fallen ill to the disease they were supposedly vaccinated against and epidemics are statistically MORE numerous in more widely vaccinated groups (studies in Gambia, Brazil and Taiwan).

"Estimates by 'experts' on the degree and severity of adverse reactions have been woefully wrong and serious damage and even fatalities have gone unreported, preventing a true assessment of the value of immunisation.

"Repeatedly, statistics and reports have been manipulated in an attempt to show the effectiveness of vaccination. The best known case involves the famous Salk polio vaccine. This massive program is held up as a shining example of the effectiveness of vaccination, yet the statistical evidence shows that polio was on its natural cyclic downturn at the time of introduction of the vaccine in 1956. In one of the rare double blind tests ever done on a vaccine, the group receiving it had 200 cases of polio reported, while the control group had none. Polio disappeared in Europe in the mid-50s about the same time as in America, yet there was no program of mass-vaccination there.

"Some scientists are now postulating that full vaccination irreparably weakens the child's immune system. These same scientists theorise that mass inoculation is responsible for the widespread escalation of auto-immune, degenerative and allergic conditions amongst those subjected to vaccination as children. A further disturbing trend is the increasing coercion placed upon parents to force them to have their children subjected to this massive invasion of their bodies. The weight of state sanctions against parents is unconscionable, especially when the true dangers of immunisation have now been laid bare in this report.

"Now that we know that vaccination offers no protection against disease we are left with the question of what is disease, how to present it and how to treat it.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
COVID-19 - Inside The Mind of A Killer Virus

A virus so smart it will only attack people in non essential businesses and waits until a group is 5 or more.......and then it strikes. If there is a group of 5 it waits for the 6th to enter....and then the attack begins. If the government changes the group size to 10, the virus instantly changes its attack strategy as soon as the government announces the new group restrictions. A virus unable to attack in liquor stores but will definitely kill everyone at the gym. Imagine a virus so deadly that it can be killed with soap and water. Imagine a virus that can't jump 3 feet over glass at the grocery store but could kill everyone at the fitness club.....but will in no way kill anyone buying booze, smokes, weed or fast food. Imagine a virus that doesn't infect children but does infect old people because it can think and obviously can assess age before it strikes. Imagine a virus that can kill at less than 6 feet, not 7, not 8....6. Imagine a virus infecting everyone on TV but infecting no one you know personally......unless you're on Facebook and then someone you don't know, knows another person you don't know, who knows a friend of Aunt Betty, who had the virus. Imagine a virus so deadly, hospitals are laying off nurses and closing entire floors...just to stay open.

Imagine a virus that can come to the grocery store with you, on the bags you bring from home, but the same viruses don't come on the clothes you brought from home......because the virus only likes old grocery bags and not clothing. Imagine a virus that only rides on small hand held baskets at the grocery store but won't ride on the push carts....because its psychology isn't well understood. Imagine a virus so smart that it knows not to infect government officials as they're signing government legislation regarding the virus killing everyone instantly at distances closer than 6 feet. Imagine a virus understanding that it can only kill the public and not the politicians who huddle together shoulder to shoulder in front of the cameras. Kill the public and leave the people in government alone. This virus is beyond cunning, we all need to stay home because the virus can't drive to your house....because it's too busy waiting outside small businesses to kill everyone.

Imagine a virus that only infects non communist countries because it can see borders with its special glasses. This virus is really something.....the more free your country, the greater the infection rates. Imagine a virus that's supposed to be airborne but doesn't come out the sides of any mask because the mask is magic like that. The virus being so smart it knows to stay inside the mask and not leak out the sides of the mask with the rest of the air. And if the masks work at blocking the virus, why can't we go back to work wearing masks and if they don't work....why are we wearing them? Imagine a virus so smart that it will kill you instantly at the park, beach or on the bike path as you exercise (with no one else around you for miles) but will leave you alone at all essential businesses. This virus is very cooperative with government, sort of like the government is controlling it with ESP maybe. Imagine a virus so deadly and so lethal that the only way to protect yourself from it, is to inject it under your skin. If you inject the virus under your skin in the fall, everything will be right again. It's all so crazy you would think the entire thing was a massive sales pitch for a vaccine or just a clever way to remove our rights or something. Imagine a virus so deadly that the death rates during the outbreak are lower or the same as the 2 years prior. Now imagine a person who can't pick any of this out. They're not doing too good right now and they will fare even worse moving forward.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/09/990910080344.htm

ROCHESTER, MINN. -- Mayo Clinic researchers say they have found the cause of most chronic sinus infections -- an immune system response to fungus. They say this discovery opens the door to the first effective treatment for this problem, the most common chronic disease in the United States.

An estimated 37 million people in the United States suffer from chronic sinusitis, an inflammation of the membranes of the nose and sinus cavity. Its incidence has been increasing steadily over the last decade. Common symptoms are runny nose, nasal congestion, loss of smell and headaches. Frequently the chronic inflammation leads to polyps, small growths in the nasal passages which hinder breathing.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
https://summit.news/2020/05/15/biza...edicted-pandemic-with-globalists-as-saviours/

A strange comic book that was commissioned for publication by the European Union in 2012 eerily predicted almost exactly what has unfolded with the Covid-19 global pandemic. However, in this propaganda laced presentation of the outbreak, unelected globalist bureaucrats save the planet.

The comic book, titled ‘Infected’, was a production of the European Commission’s international cooperation and development arm. It was not intended for widespread public consumption, but instead to be distributed inside EU institutions. Only a few hundred of the comic books were made.

The EU’s description of the strange publication states that “While the story may be fictional, it is nevertheless intertwined with some factual information.”

The graphic novel depicts scientists inside a lab in China experimenting with deadly pathogens:
A wannabe hero time travels from the future, alerting authorities to the coming pandemic, and presents an antidote, before quickly becoming the target of opportunists who want to steal the cure and sell it to drug companies:

The story features the transmission of a novel virus from animals to humans in a crowded wet market:

“Indeed, imagine if you were infected in this market by a new contagious agent.” says the UN’s chief advisor on contagious diseases, adding “You probably wouldn’t even realise it until the end of the incubation period.”

The publication suggests that air travel would exacerbate the spread of the disease, with the character adding that “You’d have headed back to Europe, the US, Latin America, or Australia as planned via an international airport.”

The cartoon depicts the failure of a global health organisation to act quickly enough to stop a pandemic:
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
https://snooze2awaken.com/2020/04/0...nt-people-should-be-asking-about-coronavirus/

Below is a list of 26 questions that speak to the core beliefs fueling the fear-driven situation playing out before us.

These are questions about the core assumptions driving the “pandemic” narrative which are uniformly glossed over by the vast majority of news outlets and commentators—whether mainstream or alternative.

1. What is a PCR test and how does it work? What is the test actually looking for? How does the PCR test measure supposed viral load in a human and derive a positive/negative result?

2. Are there differing values for cutoff points in the PCR tests that purport to identify viruses such as corona? What are the implications if there are arbitrarily chosen cutoff points between different labs searching for “COVID-19?

3. What is the rate of false positives? How is this calculated, and why is it important that many people might be falsely diagnosed as “infected/infectious”?

4. Has the so-called virus been proved to be pathogenic? (In other words, can we prove it causes the symptoms the media and mainstream of medicine associate with it?)

5. Exactly where have virus particles been properly purified and definitively isolated proving a “virus” is present? (And if this was done, how did they show it was not endogenously produced?)

6. What is the definition of the “disease” and what are its symptoms? Are they unique or are they virtually indistinguishable from familiar conditions? What would this mean?

7. Is there a diagnostic or classification bias occurring where people are carelessly being “diagnosed” on the basis of common symptoms as having COVID-19 when they should not be?

8. What treatments are being used? Have they been tested objectively? How do we know they are safe? How do we know they are effective?

9. Just because there is an association between elevated levels of RNA and illness, does that therefore prove the RNA is from a virus?

10. What’s the definition of a “confirmed case”?

11. Are deaths being attributed to COVID-19 erroneously and padding the statistics? What if mortality rates are, overall, still low, as UK governments recently acknowledged on March 19 2020, when they deemed COVID-19 no longer considered to be a “high consequence infectious disease” (HCID) in the UK?

12. What exactly proves this is a “new disease”?

13. If the definition of the “new coronavirus” is open-ended and generic, what impact might this have on the playing out of this scenario?

14. Are healthy people being tested as a control against suspected carriers?

15. What proof is there that a sick person’s symptoms are really caused by the “virus“?

16. If cells produce their own endogenous viral fragments out of DNA and RNA, how are researchers distinguishing those endogenous “viruses“ from those they believe to have been “caught“ through external transmission? Can they even demonstrate any such material has been obtained externally as opposed to internally generated?

17. How is it possible to be infected/uninfected/infected on consecutive days, as some people have? What does this suggest about test reliability?

18. Does the quantity of RNA detected in a test indicate illness?

19. How is it proven that any RNA detected in a test comes from a virus and not other sources?

20. What evidence is there for proof of transmission of the “virus“?

21. Is there really a “pandemic“ or could this be a cover story and distraction strategy while other geopolitical and economic agendas are enacted?

22. If no one has been able to definitively demonstrate that a “virus“ (such as AIDS, SARS, corona) can be infectiously transmitted between people, do self-quarantine and social distancing rules make any sense? What is their true purpose?

23. If experiments have been done where sick people with “contagious“ conditions tried—with consent—to infect healthy people, and they all failed, what does this suggest about so-called “contagious viruses“? Should we really be afraid of each other?

24. If nurses in hospitals are admitting to some patients that they have no specific test for COVID-19 how can they diagnose anyone as “positive for COVID-19“? What exactly ARE they testing for?

25. Are telecommunications companies using the “pandemic“ to accelerate the 5G rollout while we are looking the other way?

26. To what extent is the nocebo effect contributing to the incidence of symptoms and overall mortality rates? Are people in some cases literally believing and stressing themselves into illness and death psychosomatically (hardly a new phenomenon)? Is part of what we are seeing the result of “medical voodoo”?
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Thanks for the original post by,Rosemary Moneé Freas-Hardesty

CDC quietly releases the numbers on SARS-COV2.

Where’s the coverage, media??

Press releases appear to only matter when they can cause a frenzy.

Just to update:

* Ro = 2.5. I’ve had this graphic for over a month. Why did it take so long for the CDC to release this same information to the public?? And why do so, so covertly?

* NOTHING to indicate it lives or spreads from surfaces (testing now completed via lab)

* NOTHING to indicate any transfer opportunities from an Asymptomatic Carrier

* NOTHING to indicate that you can be re-infected (testing now completed on the prior suspected reinfections showed the tests hit positive on dead virus because the tests couldn't distinguish live from dead at that time)

* The new death rate is .26% (0.0026). This includes people who died in hospices from existing disease, traumas and other causes of deaths who cultured positive post mortem or didn't culture at all but lives with someone who did.

As reference, the flu is 0.1-0.3%

Ro and SCFR by age and new links in this CDC page. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavir…/…/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

Explains what you’re looking at on the CDC page
https://www.conservativereview.com/…/horowitz-cdc-confirms…/

Further corroborates.
https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/

Surfaces
https://www.foxnews.com/…/cdc-now-says-coronavirus-does-not…

Asymptomatic carriers
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32405162/…
“...there has been no documented asymptomatic transmission.”
https://www.who.int/…/situa…/20200402-sitrep-73-covid-19.pdf

Reinfections
https://www.sciencenews.org/…/coronavirus-covid19-reinfecti…

Are you angry yet? We destroyed the economy over this. We tore apart friends and families over this. We attacked our fellow AMERICANS over this. THEY MANIPULATED OUR EMOTIONS over this.

For what? To make money. For a “treatment” with a cost of $1000 per dose that showed a measly 3.6% drop in fatality rate, and a reduction in ICU from 15 to a “whopping” 11 days as a standard of care (remdesivir)?

Despite ample data that another cheaper treatment at 60¢ per dose that works when given early and paired with zinc. Have you seen one hydroxychloroquine study that was done where they gave it at the onset of symptoms and paired it with zinc? No. You saw one where they gave it as a last ditch Hail Mary when it was already too late for antivirals to work, and no mention of zinc.

https://aapsonline.org/a-tale-of-two-drugs-money-vs-medica…/

Why? Nothing could interfere with the $750 BILLION they stand to gain from the “vakseen” for the entire planet.

Profits over science. Profits over LIVES and livelihoods!!

And to chip away at our freedoms.

Time to get angry at the SOURCE. And not each other. STAND TOGETHER and FIGHT for our constitutional LIBERTIES before it’s TOO LATE.

Let me be clear. The media (most of them) are the problem. But the SOURCE is the pharmaceutical interests that fund them, and threaten them, control them. The puppet masters need to be stopped.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

WeR0206

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2014
19,794
25,373
1
2020evidence.org
Thanks for the original post by,Rosemary Moneé Freas-Hardesty

CDC quietly releases the numbers on SARS-COV2.

Where’s the coverage, media??

Press releases appear to only matter when they can cause a frenzy.

Just to update:

* Ro = 2.5. I’ve had this graphic for over a month. Why did it take so long for the CDC to release this same information to the public?? And why do so, so covertly?

* NOTHING to indicate it lives or spreads from surfaces (testing now completed via lab)

* NOTHING to indicate any transfer opportunities from an Asymptomatic Carrier

* NOTHING to indicate that you can be re-infected (testing now completed on the prior suspected reinfections showed the tests hit positive on dead virus because the tests couldn't distinguish live from dead at that time)

* The new death rate is .26% (0.0026). This includes people who died in hospices from existing disease, traumas and other causes of deaths who cultured positive post mortem or didn't culture at all but lives with someone who did.

As reference, the flu is 0.1-0.3%

Ro and SCFR by age and new links in this CDC page. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavir…/…/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

Explains what you’re looking at on the CDC page
https://www.conservativereview.com/…/horowitz-cdc-confirms…/

Further corroborates.
https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/

Surfaces
https://www.foxnews.com/…/cdc-now-says-coronavirus-does-not…

Asymptomatic carriers
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32405162/…
“...there has been no documented asymptomatic transmission.”
https://www.who.int/…/situa…/20200402-sitrep-73-covid-19.pdf

Reinfections
https://www.sciencenews.org/…/coronavirus-covid19-reinfecti…

Are you angry yet? We destroyed the economy over this. We tore apart friends and families over this. We attacked our fellow AMERICANS over this. THEY MANIPULATED OUR EMOTIONS over this.

For what? To make money. For a “treatment” with a cost of $1000 per dose that showed a measly 3.6% drop in fatality rate, and a reduction in ICU from 15 to a “whopping” 11 days as a standard of care (remdesivir)?

Despite ample data that another cheaper treatment at 60¢ per dose that works when given early and paired with zinc. Have you seen one hydroxychloroquine study that was done where they gave it at the onset of symptoms and paired it with zinc? No. You saw one where they gave it as a last ditch Hail Mary when it was already too late for antivirals to work, and no mention of zinc.

https://aapsonline.org/a-tale-of-two-drugs-money-vs-medica…/

Why? Nothing could interfere with the $750 BILLION they stand to gain from the “vakseen” for the entire planet.

Profits over science. Profits over LIVES and livelihoods!!

And to chip away at our freedoms.

Time to get angry at the SOURCE. And not each other. STAND TOGETHER and FIGHT for our constitutional LIBERTIES before it’s TOO LATE.

Let me be clear. The media (most of them) are the problem. But the SOURCE is the pharmaceutical interests that fund them, and threaten them, control them. The puppet masters need to be stopped.
Good links, thanks for sharing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bplionfan

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
So you want to take a "covid" test and have a scarlet letter on you if you test positive? Make sure you know what the test really tests for
covidtest.jpg


geneticsequence.jpg
 
Last edited:

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
https://home.solari.com/deep-state-tactics-101-the-covid-injection-fraud-its-not-a-vaccine/
Of all the questions that I had, the one that I spent the most time researching and thinking about was why. Why was the medical establishment intentionally poisoning generations of children? Many of the writers who researched and wrote about vaccine injury and death assumed it was an aberration—resulting from the orthodoxy of a medical establishment that could not face or deal with its mistakes and liabilities. That never made sense to me. Writings by Forrest Maready, Jon Rappoport, Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Arthur Firstenberg have helped me understand the role of vaccines in the con man trick of saving money for insurance companies and the legally liable.

Here is one example of how the trick may play out. A toxin creates a disease. The toxin might be pesticides or industrial pollution or wireless technology radiation. The toxin damages millions of people and their communities. Companies or their insurance provider may be liable for civil or criminal violations. Then a virus is blamed. A "cure" is found in a "vaccine." The pesticide or other toxic exposure is halted just as the vaccine is introduced, and presto, the sickness goes away. The vaccine is declared a success, and the inventor is declared a hero. A potential financial catastrophe has been converted to a profit, including for investors and pension funds. As a portfolio strategist, I admit it has been a brilliant trick and likely has protected the insurance industry from the bankrupting losses it would experience if it had to fairly compensate the people and families destroyed.

Thanks to the work of Robert Kennedy and Mary Holland of Children's Health Defense, I now understand the enormous profits generated by so-called "vaccines" subsequent to the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and the creation of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program—a federal no-fault mechanism for compensating vaccine-related injuries or deaths by establishing a claim procedure involving the United States Court of Federal Claims and special masters. Call a drug or biotech cocktail a "vaccine," and pharmaceutical and biotech companies are free from any liabilities—the taxpayer pays. Unfortunately, this system has become an open invitation to make billions from "injectibles," particularly where government regulations and laws can be used to create a guaranteed market through mandates. As government agencies and legislators as well as the corporate media have developed various schemes to participate in the billions of profits, significant conflicts of interest have resulted.

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA or the PREP Act) became law in 2005, adding to corporate freedoms from liability. The Act "is a controversial tort liability shield intended to protect vaccine manufacturers from financial risk in the event of a declared public health emergency. The act specifically affords to drug makers immunity from potential financial liability for clinical trials of . . . vaccine at the discretion of the Executive branch of government. PREPA strengthens and consolidates the oversight of litigation against pharmaceutical companies under the purview of the secretary of Health and Human Services." (~ Wikipedia)

Over time, this has evolved to the engineering of epidemics—the medical version of false flags. In theory, these can be "psyops" or events engineered with chemical warfare, biowarfare, or wireless technology. If this sounds strange, dive into all the writings of the "Targeted Individuals."

I learned about this first-hand when I was litigating with the Department of Justice and was experiencing significant physical harassment. I tried to hire several security firms; they would check my references and then decline the work, saying it was too dangerous. The last one took pity and warned me not to worry about electronic weaponry, letting me know that my main problem would be low-grade biowarfare. This biowarfare expert predicted that the opposing team would drill holes in the wall of my house and inject the "invisible enemy." Sure enough, that is exactly what happened. I sold my house and left town. That journey began a long process of learning how poisoning and nonlethal weapons are used—whether to move people out of rent-controlled apartments, sicken the elderly to move them to more expensive government-subsidized housing, gangstalk political or business targets, or weaken or kill litigants—and the list goes on. Poisoning turned out to be a much more common tactic in the game of political and economic warfare in America than I had previously understood.

After I finished my litigation, I spent several years detoxing from heavy metal toxicity—including from lead, arsenic, and aluminum. As I drove around America, I realized it was not just me. Americans increasingly looked like a people struggling with high loads of heavy metals toxicity. In the process of significantly decreasing my unusually high levels of heavy metals, I learned what a difference the toxic load had made to my outlook, my energy, and my ability to handle complex information.

This brings me to the question of what exactly a vaccine is and what exactly is in the concoctions being injected into people today as well as the witches' brews currently under development.

In 2017, Italian researchers reviewed the ingredients of 44 types of so-called "vaccines." They discovered heavy metal debris and biological contamination in every human vaccine they tested. The researchers stated, "The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us." They then drew the obvious conclusion, namely, that because the micro- and nanocontaminants were "neither biocompatible nor biodegradable," they were "biopersistent" and could cause inflammatory effects right away—or later (http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf)

Aborted fetal tissue, animal tissue, aluminum, mercury, genetically altered materials—and what else?

Whatever the ingredients of vaccines have been to date, nothing is more bizarre and unsettling than the proposals of what might be included in them in the future. Strategies—already well-funded and well on the way—include brain-machine interface nanotechnology, digital identity tracking devices, and technology with an expiration date that can be managed and turned off remotely. One report indicates that the Danish government and U.S. Navy had been paying a tech company in Denmark to make an injectible chip that would be compatible with one of the leading cryptocurrencies.

I was recently reading Mary Holland's excellent 2012 review of U.S. vaccine court decisions ("Compulsory vaccination, the Constitution, and the hepatitis B mandate for infants and young children," Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics) and I froze and thought, "Why are we calling the injectibles that Bill Gates and his colleagues are promoting 'vaccines'? Are they really vaccines?"
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
https://allzara.com/rethinking-covid-19-mortality-statistics/
The science of collecting and analyzing numerical data is fundamental to understanding social phenomena. In the Coronavirus Era, researchers, physicians, administrators, and funding agencies aim to seek a consensus about the origins, pathogenic effects, effective treatments, and containment measures regarding a novel coronavirus – all of which require data predicated on morbidity and mortality statistics. Careful attention to the data is critical for understanding mortality figures while remaining mindful of the flaws and limitations attendant with any statistics.

Epidemics have complex causes from interacting with environmental factors. In our data-saturated world, now more than ever, we need to maintain a realistic sense of risks to our safety and health. Over the past six months, the CDC statistics and Johns Hopkins University tables have been used to convert complex health issues surrounding COVID-19 into better-understood numbers about death estimates and cases. Understanding may become distorted when numbers replace clear definitions. Numbers are not facts and should not be considered indisputable. The conscious choice of what figures to count or weigh does and should not convey precision or infallibility.

Descriptive statistics based on clear definitions must be accurate enough to arouse and mitigate concerns in a new epidemic. Statistical analysis warrants skepticism, diverse perspectives, and common sense. Vigorous debates over the accuracy or meaning of COVID-19 numbers should ultimately help to better explain medical and scientific truths.

COVID-19 Statistics

There are two fundamental points often ignored when referring to “the death toll from COVID-19.”

  • There is no evidence or proof offered by any scientist, pathologist, or virologist that confirms COVID-19 as the “cause” of death in the certification process.
  • An expanded definition of a “COVID-19 death” was enacted by the CDC on March 24th, to include probable cases. This conflates and clusters test results creating a source of both under and overestimation. “COVID-19 deaths are identified using a new ICD-10 code. When COVID-19 is reported as a cause of death or when it is listed as a ‘probable’ or ‘presumed’ cause, it is coded as UO7.1 This can include cases with or without laboratory confirmation.” [emphasis added]
All deaths of patients with a linkage to COVID-19 are now classified as “COVID-19 deaths regardless of cause or underlying health issues that could have contributed to loss of life.” - Dr. Deborah Birx

Today, deaths from coronary disease, diabetes, morbid obesity, or pneumonia may be linked or connected to a COVID-19 positive test result. The operative words “linked” or “connected” provide little explanation of how they’re related or indicate what the presumed link entails. As the Wall Street Journal noted, “tabulating deaths is tricky. Some states count probable deaths for cases where there weren’t test results available, but where the deceased had symptoms of the disease.”

Annual reports from the CDC/NIH confirm that Americans continue to die from the same top ten common causes. The leading causes of death are coronaries, cancers, accidents, lower respiratory diseases, stroke, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s. The mortality numbers remain consistently around 2.8 million per annum.

Our essay suggests a snapshot in time for Coronavirus deaths. For this investigation, we accept the CDC’s data from January 1st to May 5th as the standard, providing a date at which to engage the statistics, without future projections or shifting definitions.

Annual Mortality Statistics

Tracking mortality statistics for COVID-19 involves a moving target of guesses, projections, and revised definitions. Amidst an avalanche of expanding statistics, we need to put American deaths into perspective. On average, 7,700 deaths occur every day from all causes in the U.S. That amounts to 2.8 million deaths per annum. With no available data for 2019, the National Vital Statistics Survey (NVSS) estimates there were 25,000 more deaths in 2018 than in 2017, a statistically insignificant amount. The death rate in America stands consistently at 0.8% annually.

To make broad estimates, the CDC uses statistical models which it periodically revises. From 2013-2018, the CDC claims influenza annually caused 57,000 deaths [2] and sickened 42 million Americans. Fatal complications from the flu may include pneumonia, stroke, and heart attack. While the impact of the flu varies, the CDC estimates that influenza results in between 9 million and 49 million cases of illness and between 12,00 to 79,000 annual deaths per year. This enormous range is not unusual with CDC statistics, because not all flu cases are ever reported, and flu is not always listed on death certificates.

In its annual mortality tabulations, the CDC combines influenza and pneumonia into a single category. This category typically averages between 51,000 and 56,000 fatalities, making it the 8th leading cause of death per year from 2013-2017. An estimated 80,000 Americans died of influenza and its complications in the winter of 2018, the highest death toll in 40 years. But counting influenza cases is problematic.

The CDC was “not sure of the exact numbers because flu is not a reportable disease in most parts of the United States.” ( www.hopkinsmedicine.org.) Furthermore, influenza/pneumonia record-keeping is affected by the fluid dates that define the “flu season.” That may fluctuate from October to May or from December through February, depending on the year. For instance, the CDC estimates that “between October 1st, 2019, to April 4th, 2020, about 24,00 to 62,000 people died of influenza.”

The CDC indicates that for 2020 up to May 5th, (or 35% of the year), there have been 751,953 deaths from all causes (roughly 95-97% of the expected tally). Influenza deaths accounted for .07% of all deaths, a number consistent for every year from 2013 to 2018.

The CDC’s Provisional Death Count for COVID-19 (May 5, 2020), lists 5,910 influenza deaths; 39,910 COVID-19 deaths; 67,372 pneumonia deaths; and 17,683 deaths from pneumonia+COVID-19. The remarkably high spike seems to have occurred due primarily to the roughly 56,000 deaths for this period, 0.07 percent of all U.S. deaths to May 5th, 2020.

The standard definition of an emerging disease like COVID-19 appears surprisingly loose. A cluster of characteristic symptoms (flu-like, common cold-like, pneumonia-like), possible contact with a previous patient, and a test result of uncertain accuracy are all that’s needed. Researchers should be able to find a segment of genomic nucleic acid in patient samples, proven by DNA sequencing. That has not been done.

Scientists and medical researchers admit they do not know how COVID-19 kills, because to do so would require tissue samples from autopsies. The absence of that data hinders efforts to understand how the new Coronavirus allegedly wreaks havoc. As reported in Nature, “We need those tissues to determine what is killing patients affected by COVID-19. Is it pneumonia? Is it blood clots? Why do they develop kidney failure? We have no clue.”

“With COVID-19, the underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not.” [emphasis added]

The weekly death tolls now attributed to an expanded definition from March 21st to April 18th have climbed from 494 to 11,051. But the exemptions and redefinitions suggest that the numbers of deaths attributed to Coronavirus have been counted haphazardly and incorrectly.

[1] Damned Lies and Statistics, University of California Press, 2001, p. 160.

The co-author of this article, Charles Geshekter, Ph.D., is Emeritus Professor of History at California State University-Chico. He is a three-time Fulbright Scholar and a specialist in modern Somalia. He is currently examining the effects of COVID-19 on Somali communities.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
The pandemic pattern—how the illusion is built

by Jon Rappoport

May 29, 2020
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/05/29/the-pandemic-pattern-how-the-illusion-is-built/
This article is based on my study and investigation of so-called epidemics over the past 30 years.

In the case of COVID-19, I’ve written at least one piece covering, in detail, each main element of the illusion. Here, I’m laying out the pattern. It is the same for each fake epidemic.

ONE: A structure is in place to promote and launch the IDEA of an epidemic. World Health Organization, CDC, influential public health officials attached to governments around the world, etc.

TWO: There is a purported incident. An outbreak. The most obvious cause is intentionally overlooked. For example, horrendous air pollution, or the grotesque feces and urine pollution on a giant commercial pig factory-farm. Instead, the world is told a new virus has been found. Local researchers, if any, are augmented by researchers from CDC, WHO.

THREE: There is no air-tight chain of evidence explaining exactly how the purported new virus was discovered. From details released, there is no proof of discovery by convincing methods, no proper unified study of MANY supposed epidemic patients.

FOUR: But WHO/CDC tells the world this is an epidemic in the making, caused by the new virus. The promotion and propaganda/media apparatus moves into high gear. Ominous pronouncements.

FIVE: Diagnostic tests for the unproven new virus are rolled out. They spit out false “proof” of “infection” like coins from a jackpot slot machine.

SIX: Thus, all case numbers and death numbers, which are based on the tests, are rendered meaningless. And…they were already meaningless, because the supposed new virus “being tested for” was never properly discovered in the first place.

SEVEN: Nevertheless, these tests (plus useless eyeball diagnosis) are used to build official reports on case numbers. For the duration of the “epidemic,” reports keep coming, and escalating numbers are trumpeted. Within the basically meaningless structure of these reports, there is fiddling with totals, to make them even more impressive and frightening.

EIGHT: Real people are really getting sick and dying, but for the most part, they are people who are dying from traditional and long-standing conditions—flu-like illness, pneumonia, other lung infections, etc. These people are “re-packaged” under the new epidemic label—Swine Flu, COVID, etc. The official description of the “new epidemic disease”—the clinical symptoms—is sufficiently general to easily allow this re-packaging.

NINE: If there is new illness, it can be explained by causes having nothing to do with the purported new virus. For example, a toxic vaccine campaign. A highly destructive drug. Highly toxic pesticides.

TEN: Over time, the definition of the epidemic is arbitrarily widened to include more symptoms and clinical features, in order to inflate case numbers.

ELEVEN: Control of information about the “epidemic” is hardened at the top. The talking heads, from the press and public health agencies, know as much about actual science as rabbits know about drone strikes. But they are “in charge.” Dissident information is attacked and censored.

TWELVE: Medical drugs used to treat patients are toxic. If a vaccine is rolled out, it, too, is toxic. Illness and death resulting from these and other medical attacks are counted as “epidemic cases caused by the virus.”

THIRTEEN: ABOVE ALL OTHER ILLUSIONS, the main deception is: “the epidemic is one disease or syndrome caused by one germ.” This is sold with unceasing propaganda. Most people fall for it. They will even argue among themselves about which “it” is the single cause of the “it” disease. There is no “it” cause or disease.

FOURTEEN: The public is sold lie after lie about contagion and the “spread” of the “it.”

FIFTEEN: The public chants (as if no one has ever died before), “People are dying, it must be the virus.”

SIXTEEN: The virus fairy tale always functions as a cover story for government or corporate or medical crimes. It obscures and hides these crimes. For example, a large factory is spewing horrendous pollution into the ground and water of an area, and people are getting sick and dying? No, the cause is actually a new virus no one has ever seen before.

As I wrote at the outset of the COVID illusion, the only difference this time, in 2020, is the weight of the lies—because they led to the lockdowns and the economic devastation. This is West Nile, SARS, Swine Flu, Zika, writ large.

Needless to say, the persons and groups responsible for launching these illusion-operations must hide their crimes.

The criminals have their weapons, of course. Among their most powerful: control of the press, and arcane technical language which pretends to relevance. This language is so dense, the uninitiated stand no chance of penetrating it.

For instance, researchers can babble for hours about their vaunted diagnostic test, the PCR. However, the simple truth is, a crucial piece of the test has never been vetted. The test has never been tested in the real world outside the lab.

I have written about this extensively. Using a little guideline called SCIENCE, you would “test the test” by lining up, say, a thousand patients, some healthy, some sick from a supposed virus. Any virus. Tissue samples would be taken from each patient.

PCR mavens would run these samples through their equipment, reporting which patients show what they call high “viral load.”

This means: these particular patients have millions and millions of virus actively replicating in their bodies, and they will be unmistakably and visibly sick.

The PCR princes would then announce, “Patients 3,45,65,76,132…are all definitely sick.”

Now we un-blind the study and see what’s what and who’s who. Are these designated patients ill or are they running marathons? That’s called simple scientific method. Not technical gobbledygook.

This chunk of research has never been done. It never will be done. It’s too real. Too naked. Proponents of the PCR would have too much to lose, if their assessments of who are healthy and who are sick turned out to be absurdly wrong, and their arcane technical rhetoric about the PCR ended up being useless gibberish.

I include this illustration to indicate there are, indeed, ways of exposing professional liars, if you change the venue on them, if you use common sense, if you stand outside their self-appointed temples of mystical horseshit and observe what their lies look like when you boil them down to human terms…
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
http://www.falconblanco.com/health/ozone/ozdiseas.htm
The Cause of Disease

The human body is 2/3 water, 10% of it in the blood and 90% in the lymph. It toxins are allowed to build up in the system, the water gets 'dirty.' If the blood pH varies from 7.3 then the beneficial microbes that are necessary in the body begin to change their form, and disease results.

To maintain a clean system, it is necessary to have a proper diet, one that produces a blood pH that is neither too alkaline (bacteria problems) or too acid (cancer problems). And it is necessary to have sufficient oxygen in the system to allow cellular respiration to be efficient and allow complete oxidation, preventing the production of carbon monoxide which the body cannot expel.

Each cell burns sugar (carbohydrates) in oxygen to make its fuel. The carbon-hydrogen bond is cleaved, and the oxygen bonds with the hydrogen, forming H2O (water) and CO2 (carbon dioxide). If there is insufficient oxygen available, CO (carbon monoxide) is formed instead of CO2, excessive lactic acid is formed and the blood is made more acid. If this oxygen deprivation (hypoxia) continues long enough, the cell will no longer be able to sustain the process of oxidation and it will be forced to ferment its sugar anaerobically in order to survive. This process turns off the governor on cell replication and therefore wild growth can begin. Ungoverned cell growth is called cancer.

Circulation of clean, oxygen-carrying blood is a basic requirement for optimum health, and this can be achieved by bringing ozone into the body. The least expensive way of ding that would be to live on a mountain far from the cities and breathe deeply - - the recipe for an Eastern master.

Failing that, we can use an ozone generator to create ozone from pure oxygen and bring that into the body in any one of a dozen ways in order to oxidize toxins and oxygenate the cells. Ozone works at the basic level of all important bodily functions - respiration, digestion, assimilation, elimination and immunity. And this is the answer to the question of what we substitute for the worthless and dangerous vaccination programs.

It is imperative that the red blood cells be kept free-floating and unclumped, so that they can carry the proper amount of oxygen. Ingestion of ozone keeps red blood cells from clumping and therefore keeps circulation of the optimum level necessary for good health.

If people were to have reliable and inexpensive ozone generators in their homes, they could purify their water, their air and their bodies. If adequate nutrition and sanitation were maintained, diseases of all types could be prevented. The role of the hospital would be reduced to an extension of the emergency room for accident victims. The role of the pharmaceutical company with its noxious potions would disappear, and the level of general health would rise to new heights.
1. The susceptibility to disease arises from conditions within the cells of the body.
2. Micro-organisms are beneficial and life-sustaining if the body is kept clean from toxins.
3. The appearance and function of specific micro-organisms changes when the host organism is injured, either mechanically, biochemically, or emotionally.
4. Every disease is associated with a particular condition.
5. Micro-organisms become associated with disease only when the cells become toxified.
6. Disease arises from conditions of increased toxicity.
7. Preventing or curing disease consists of cleaning toxicity from the body in a way that does no harm.

What Causes Infection?

Healthy cells need oxygen. Most infections occur because of the invasion of anaerobes that do not thrive in an oxygen-rich environment. Deprivation of oxygen to the body, for example through polluted air, sedentary lifestyle or junk food diet which require a lot of oxygenation for elimination, encourages anaerobic microbes to proliferate. Over-growth of harmful microbes will lead to breakdown of enzymatic reactions., overload of metabolic wastes and ultimately cell death. Under similar anaerobic conditions, cells tend to mutate to more primitive life forms, turning from aerobic to anaerobic respiration for energy synthesis. Nobel prize winner Dr. Otto Warburg in 1923 demonstrated that the primary cause of cancer is the replacement of oxygen in the respiration chemistry of normal cells by the fermentation of sugar. The growth of cancer cells is a fermentation process which can be initiated only in the relative absence of oxygen. Ozone is one of nature's most powerful oxidants. It is used in water purification and sewage treatment and is now being applied medically in Europe to treat everything from wounds and colitis to cancer, stroke and AIDS. Yes, the same ozone in the atmospheric layer that is responsible for shielding off utra-violet light from the sun and oxidizing the pollutants in the air can be produced from medical oxygen via electrical discharge. It is administered as an ozone/oxygen (O3/O2) gas mixture.
According to the dosage and concentration range, medical ozone is a pharmaceutical agent that exerts specific properties and a well-defined range of efficacy.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
https://soilandhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/02/0201hyglibcat/020103toxemia/020103toxemia.PDF

DEFINITION of Toxemia and crises of Toxemia:—In the process of tissue building— metabolism—there is cell building— anabolism—and cell destruction—catabolism. The broken down tissue is toxic and in health—when nerve energy is normal—it is eliminated from the blood as fast as evolved. When nerve energy is dissipated from any cause—physical or mental excitement or bad habits—the body becomes enervated, when enervated, elimination is checked, causing a retention of toxin in the blood or Toxemia. This accumulation of toxin when once established will continue until nerve energy is restored by removing the causes. So-called disease is nature’s effort at eliminating the toxin from the blood. All so-called diseases are crises of Toxemia.

We hear of diet cures, dietitians, balanced rations, meat diets, vegetable diets, and other diets—chemically prepared foods of all kinds. The reading public is bewildered with hundreds of health magazines and thousands of health ideas. There are thousands writing on health who would not recognize it if they should meet it on the street. Fanaticism, bigotry, stupidity, and commercialism are the principal elements in the dietetic complex that is now belaboring the public.

Cures are what the people want, and cures are what doctors and cultists affect to make; but at most only relief is given.

The periodicity which characterizes all functional derangements of the body lends color to the claims of cure mongers that their remedy has cured their patients, when the truth is that the so-called disease “ran its course.” The truth is that the so-called disease was a toxemic crisis, and when the toxin was eliminated below the toleration point, the sickness passed—automatically health returned. But the disease was not cured; for the cause (enervating habits) is continued, toxin still accumulates, and in due course of time another crisis appears. Unless the cause of Toxemia is discovered and removed, crises will recur until functional derangements will give way to organic disease.

The entire profession is engaged in doctoring crises of Toxemia—curing (?) and curing (?) until overtaken with chronic disease of whatever organ was the seat of the toxin crises.

THERE ARE NO CURES
Nature returns to normal when enervating habits are given up. There are no cures in the sense generally understood. If one has a tobacco heart, what is the remedy? Stop the use of tobacco, of course. If the heart is worn out from shock, as we see it among gamblers, or among men who are plunging in the stock market, what will cure? Drugs? No! Removing the cause.

Every so-called disease is built within the mind and body by enervating habits. The food and dietetic insanity that constitutes the headliner on the medical stage just now is causing the people to demand a diet that will cure them of their peculiar maladies. The idea prevails that some peculiar diet will cure rheumatism or any other disease. Diet or food will not cure any disease.

A fast, rest in bed, and the giving-up of enervating habits, mental and physical, will allow nature to eliminate the accumulated toxin; then, if enervating habits are given up, and rational living habits adopted, health will come back to stay, if the one CURED will “stay put.” This applies to any so-called disease. Yes, it fits your disease—you who write to find out if the Tilden system of cure applies to your case. Yes; cannot you realize that law and order pervades the universe? And it is the same from nebula to stone, from stone to plant, from plant to animal, from animal to man, from man to mind, and from mind to super-mind—God. To use a blanket expression: Law and order pervades the universe, the same yesterday, today and forever, and is the same from star-dust to mind—from electron to mind. Toxemia explains how the universal law operates in health and disease. One disease is the same as another; one man the same as another; one flower the same as another; the carbon in bread, sugar, coal, and the diamond is the same. Yes, one disease can be cured (?) the same as another, unless the organ acted on by toxemic crises is destroyed.

For example: If wrong eating is persisted in, the acid fermentation first irritates the mucous membrane of the stomach; the irritation becomes inflammation, then ulceration, then thickening and hardening, which ends in cancer at last. The medical world is struggling to find the cause of cancer. It is the distal end of an inflammatory process whose proximal beginning may be any irritation.

The end is degeneration from a lack of oxygen and nutriment, and, in degenerating, the septic material enters the circulation, setting up chronic septic poisoning called cancer cachexia.

Disease is a common expression of universal enervation. An understanding of physiology and pathology necessitates a firm grip on evolution as expressed in biology; or reasoning will go astray occasionally.

Modern cures and immunization are vanity and vexation; they are founded on the foolish principle of reasoning from effect, is disease, to cause. The organ which is suffering from many crises of Toxemia is discovered—it may be ulcer of the stomach, then the ulcer is cut out; it may be gallstone, then the stone is cut out; it may be fibroid tumor of the womb, then the tumor or womb is cut out. The same may be said of other effects—the medical armament is turned loose on a lot of effects. This is accepted by the public mind as efficient treatment of disease, when in fact it is a stupid removing of effects. And that is not the worst of such blundering. The operators have not the slightest idea of the cause of the effects they so skillfully remove.

In other derangements the same lack of knowledge of cause prevails. In the treatment of deficiency diseases, the lacking element is supplied from the laboratory; but nothing is done in the line of restoring the organ to normality. Why? Because medical science has not discovered why organs fail to function properly; and until this discovery is made, scientific blundering will continue.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
93-page report said to have been commissioned by the German Ministry of the Interior and then leaked by a civil servant named "Stephen Kohn".

https://www.ichbinanderermeinung.de/Dokument93.pdf
If you cant read German..

Some highlights:
- The risk of Covid-19 was overestimated: probably at no time was the danger posed by the virus above the level of normality.
- Evidence shows the pandemic was a false alarm.
- People who died of/with coronavirus are essentially the same people who statistically would have died this year because they reached the end of their lives and their debilitated organisms were unable to respond to everyday adverse factors (including the approximately 150 types of virus currently circulating).
- During the first quarter of 2020 there were not more than 250.000 deaths of/with Covid-19 worldwide, compared to 1.5 million deaths [25.100 in Germany] attributed to the influenza epidemic of 2017/18.
- The lockdown has severely limited treatment for other and more serious health problems, leading to the premature death of many.
- Harmful economic, social and health consequences of the lockdown will be happening for a considerable time into the future.
- The coronavirus crisis has shown that the State is one of the greatest producers of fake news.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Dr Andy Kaufman - I'm excited to announce the premiere of a new film collaboration with Spacebusters (https://www.bitchute.com/channel/MKanl25dSUxl/) on the influence of adopting the Caduceus as the false symbol of medicine in the 20th century. I hope you will tune in the Friday at 3:30 pm EST when Spacebuster Steve and I will be in the live chat.

 
Last edited:

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
ANTIBODIES, ANOTHER FICTION IN THE LAND OF MAKE BELIEVE
http://whale.to/vaccines/antibody.html
I will now prove by scientific facts and logic that so-called antibodies which are said to call in white blood cells to attack viruses which also do not exist is a fallacy.

Antibodies by scientific definition are classified as proteins.

Proteins are my definition, molecules. A molecule by definition is two or more atoms that stick together.

I quote. “Proteins may be purified from other cellular components using a variety of techniques such as ultracentrifugation, electrophoresis and chromatography.

Chromatography, is a separation of a mixture.

Electrophoresis, the movement of electrically charged particles in a fluid under the influence of an electric field. The particles migrate toward the electrode of the opposite electric charge, often on a gel-coated slab or plate, sometimes in a fluid flowing down a paper. As a technique for analysis, electrophoresis is used to analyze and separate colloids (e.g.) proteins.”

And there it is in black and white. They use a centrifuge machine to separate the substance into particles and the electron microscope to visualize the particles. Then all they do is name the particle and say it’s alive. You don’t have to understand all this medical mumbo jumbo in order to understand there is nothing that is alive in the particles that have been separated. The virologist can take any product or substance and centrifuge it into particles. The next time you hear or read about particles (virus) you need to ask one question. What is the source of the material their using and how was it extracted and finally what instrument did they use to see it.

White blood cells, absolutely, they can be seen under a dark field microscope. Antibodies, show me just one circulating in the blood stream and attacking the so-called “live virus.” It will NEVER happen because it has never happened, because neither the virus or the anti-body exist, except in the mind of the lying virologist. All we the anti-vaxer need are the facts and some common sense with a tad of logic to expose these myths promoted by the vaccine sellers.

Here is just one example of your ‘virus.” Virus is defined as a poison, like in snake venom. The poison-virus) used to make vaccines is derived from the product of disease, like the pus from the arm of a person with small-pox. Guess what the poison (virus) is in making the flu vaccine.

If you said nasal discharge you are correct. The last I read the discharge (snot) sorry to be so explicit, but this tends to stick in the mind better and shows how depraved these virologist really are, the material comes from pigs. Pigs that are injected with other poisons that gives them the cold symptoms in the first place.
Jim O'Kelly
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
http://whale.to/vaccine/medical_diagnosis.html
NOVEMBER 23, 2010. These days, doctors often run antibody tests on patients to see if they have a particular disease.

What is an antibody test?

In the simplest terms, it is aimed at detecting a person's immune system responding to the presence of a specific germ.

A doctor suspects you have disease X, which is caused by virus Y. He takes a blood sample, and that sample is examined for the presence of antibodies which are specific to virus Y.

If you test positive for the presence of those antibodies, he says you have disease X.

However, there is a vaccine that is supposed to protect a person from disease X, and this vaccine does what?

IT PRODUCES ANTIBODIES SPECIFIC TO VIRUS Y.

In that case, you are said to be immune from virus Y.

That's right.

This is what is called a contradiction.

In the first instance, when your body naturally produces antibodies to virus Y, the doctor tells you you have disease X.

But if the vaccine produces those same antibodies, you're said to be immune to disease X.

In purely practical terms, this contradiction is good for business. Medical business. On the one hand, they diagnose more cases of a disease. On the other hand, using the same logic to obtain an opposite conclusion, they sell more vaccines.

Have fun with the contradiction. Chew it over. Maybe you'll decide we've humans have evolved to the point where we don't have to pay any attention to logic. Maybe not.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
https://cardstonmed.com/pleomorphism-the-cure-for-all-chronic-diseases.html
The Pleomorphic Page
What is it? and does it have something to do with all the Chronic Diseases?
VIDEOS 1/5 OF THE WAY DOWN THE PAGE,ALL THE SCIENCE ONTHE BOTTOM HALF OF THE PAGE

A Classic Pleomorph "Y" shape

213208642.jpg

Pleomorph on sterile medium vancouver
"Claude Bernard, argued that disease was caused by variations in the host’s internal milieu, or “terrain,”to which the microbes responded by changing form in order to survive. "According to this theory, the vitality of the host was the principal factor in disease. Relatively small
changes in the internal environment made the “terrain” attractive and hospitable to different types of invading organisms: a weak host not only “invited” invading organisms to take up residence, but
actually cultured them, inducing their changes into pathological forms. On his death bed Louis Pasteur admitted Bernard was right and the germ theory was wrong.

"A strong and vital host, on the other hand, was inhospitable and would keep pathological organisms and disease at bay. This is the Pleomorphic, terrain(PH) theory of disease."

Noun1.mycoplasma - any of a group of small parasitic bacteria that lack cell walls and can survive without oxygen or are anerobic which is never good for humans.Mycoplasma (mk-plzm) Any of a phylum of extremely small, parasitic bacteria that have a flexible cell membrane instead of a rigid cell wall, can assume a variety of shapes, and are capable of forming colonies. Too small to be seen with a light microscope, mycoplasmas are thought to be the smallest organisms capable of independent growth. They cause a number of important diseases.(mycoplasmosis)
Mycoplasmas of the genus Mycoplasma are dependent upon sterols such as cholesterol for growth and cause several types of pneumonia in humans and animals. Any of numerous parasitic, pathogenic microorganisms of the genus Mycoplasma that lack a true cell wall, and needing sterols such as cholesterol for growth.
a genus of ultramicroscopic organisms lacking rigid cell walls and considered to be the smallest free-living organisms. Some are saprophytes, some are parasites, and many are pathogens. One species is a cause of mycoplasma pneumonia, tracheobronchitis, pharyngitis, and bullous myringitis. Fungal sinusitis will require surgery to clean out the sinuses. Then, a relatively long course of a very strong antifungal medication called amphotericin B is given through a needle in the vein (intravenously).

Simple Pleomorphic Theory
Monomorphism vs Pleomorphism

"Bechamp described how in certain conditions microzymas could develop into bacteria within a cell and could, if the right conditions persisted, become pathological, so that infection could develop in the body without the acquisition of the germ from an outside source. These observations supported the belief of Professor Claude Bernard (1813-78), who contended that no matter where germs came from they presented a danger only if the body was in a run-down state due to a disturbed "milieu interieur."They penetrate and infect individual cells.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Criminal complaint against Prof. Christian Drosten
https://politikstube.com/anzeige-ge...qpukNB-WtFDPm0kWqJC36nWNEQwdlv5trf0sJIwhrmI68

From Dr. Stefan Lanka : “In order to end the corona crisis quickly, I reported Prof. Christian Drosten. Because of his actions that in direct consequence to the planned and implemented facts of the §7 (1) international criminal code (VStGB) "crimes against humanity", and other offenses: employment fraud, he pretends to work as a scientist, injured but laws of thought, the logic of virology and the clear rules of scientific work, and deception to benefit by spreading evidence that is false. ”

These facts alone prove that Prof. Drosten's globally effective claim that he had developed a reliable test for the supposedly new virus not only violates the laws of thought and logic of virology, but that he acted and continues to act with intent.

He did not accept my offer to him to carry out the control experiments that are mandatory in science in order to save his face.

To date, the prescribed control experiments have not been carried out or published. These experiments must and will be used to prove whether the short gene sequences, which are only mentally put together to form an alleged virus genome, actually originate from a virus or - as given here - are only typical components of the metabolism.

In order to avoid further damage to the body and soul of people and the economy, I ask you to use the linked text "Misinterpretation of virus part II. Beginning and end of the corona crisis" ( https://wissenschaffeplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschaffeplus -fehldeutung-virus-teil-2.pdf ) and if you can understand the reasoning, spread it. In this case, please send the text to those responsible at home and abroad, for example for information and to have it sent to various governments via their ambassadors.

If you receive constructive answers, please let me know.

The linked text "Misinterpretation of Virus, Part II. Beginning and End of the Corona Crisis" will be available in English and Spanish in two weeks. I will draw attention to this via newsletter.

Click here for the newsletter June 13, 2020

For the Wissenschaffplus team
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/do-masks-even-work-can-you-be-forced-wear-one-dr-kaufman-weighs
We are beginning to see more and more mask mandates being rolled out, which raises many questions. Does wearing a mask offer protection from the virus? Is wearing a mask for extended periods of time pose any risk to your health? Can the government or employers really make you wear a mask?

In this interview, Spiro is joined by Dr. Andrew Kaufman to discuss these issue in addition to another concerning aspect regarding mandated masks. Are we being conditioned to accept other mandates? If they can make you wear a mask, what will they make you do next? Mandatory testing? Mandatory vaccination?

Dr. Andrew Kaufman’s Website https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com

Department of Labor & OSHA https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standa...

Department of Labor & OSHA https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/covid-19/co...



Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...

A Cluster Randomised Trial of Cloth Masks Compared With Medical Masks in Healthcare Workers https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25903...

The Physiological Impact of Wearing an N95 Mask During Hemodialysis as a Precaution Against SARS in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340...

Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/m...
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
COVID-19 & The Infectious Myth w/ David Crowe
The world is now under the delusion of a deadly new virus that has emerged from wild bats in China. To date, the purification and characterization of the alleged RNA identifier for COVID-19 is embarrassingly flawed, replete with false positives and circumstantial at best. David Crowe is the host of The Infectious Myth and his paper, Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory, is a timely must-read. David will be discussing problems with testing for COVID-19 and why we can't necessarily believe what we hear when it comes to statistics on the situation with it. David has emerged as one of the most influential voices in uncovering the truth behind current pandemic fears through his brilliant research and insightful writing. As usual our discussion is in open-ended Alfacast fashion and not to be missed. Show links: https://www.theinfectiousmyth.com/ https://infectiousmyth.podbean.com/
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Dr Andy Kaufman was fact checked by Reuters. He destroys their fact check.
In this interview, Dr. Andrew Kaufman joins Spiro for a second time. The first time Dr. Kaufman joined Spiro, they talked about topics that apparently, nobody is allowed to talk about, if you dare question the official story that is. In the first interview the two discussed the coronavirus, they covered testing and they covered the vaccine. The video was quickly approaching 100k views but YouTube removed the video after only a couple days. This video will likely be taken down as well, because it does not conform to the establishment's narrative. Not only did YouTube remove the previous video, Reuters, which is a massive international news publication that news sites from all over the world obtain their talking points from, published a fact checking report attempting to debunk Dr. Kaufman's claims that the new COVID-19 DNA vaccine would genetically modify humans. In this must see report, Dr Kaufman responds to the Reuters ‘fact checking’ report. Dr. Andrew Kaufman: They Want To Genetically Modify Us With The COVID-19 Vaccine (Updated) https://www.activistpost.com/2020/05/... Doctor Andrew Kaufman Website https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com False claim: A COVID-19 vaccine will genetically modify humans https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fa... DNA, RNA and protein – the Central Dogma https://science-explained.com/theory/... The Emerging Role of DNA Vaccines https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/... Advancing Novel Experimental Gene-based COVID-19 Vaccine, AAVCOVID https://eye.hms.harvard.edu/news/harv... Adenovirus DNA Replication https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti... CRISPR-Cas9: Gene Drives https://wyss.harvard.edu/media-post/c... Antisperm Contraceptive Vaccines: Where we are and where we are going? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti... The HSD-hCG Vaccine Prevents Pregnancy in Women: Feasibility Study of a Reversible Safe Contraceptive Vaccine https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9083611/ Development of antifertility vaccine using sperm specific proteins https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti... State Bar Group Calls for 'Mandatory' COVID-19 Vaccinations, Regardless of Objections https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal... AstraZeneca CEO Soriot says fast-tracked COVID-19 shot will protect for just one year https://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccines... New COVID-19 restrictions will be needed for anti-vaxxers https://www.theage.com.au/national/vi... Colorado Bill Would Require “Re-Education” Classes for Parents Who Refuse Coronavirus Vaccine https://www.lifenews.com/2020/06/09/c... MLAs vote to drop notwithstanding clause from mandatory vaccination bill https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-br... Among Americans who say they wouldn't get vaccinated, 7 in 10 worry about safety https://www.foxbusiness.com/money/get... There appears to be a coronavirus vaccine on the horizon—but it’s a GMO and the FDA would need to approve testing https://geneticliteracyproject.org/20... GMO tomato as edible COVID vaccine? Mexican scientists work to make it a reality https://allianceforscience.cornell.ed...


SHOW LESS

 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
You Cannot Catch Bugs, Germs, Bacteria or Candida/Fungi

https://www.healingnaturallybybee.c...skER7OBl1lMB8hWn_PWRzTJFKJK3DtvB4q-NpyONhxUUQ

The following text disproves "The Germ Theory of Disease," as promoted by the medical industry today, which was initiated by Louis Pasteur in the early 1800s and it confirms that you cannot catch bugs, germs, bacteria or candida/fungi.


Louis Pasteur (1822 – 1895), Plagiarist, Impostor!
A plagiarist is someone who uses another person’s words or ideas as if they were his own.

An imposter is someone who attempts to deceive.

Louis Pasteur was a French microbiologist and chemist, born on December 27, 1822 in Dole, in the region of Jura, France. His discovery that most infectious diseases are caused by germs, known as "the germ theory of disease," became the foundation for the science of microbiology, and a cornerstone of modern medicine.

"Pasteur also developed ‘pasteurization’, which was named after him. Pasteurization is a process by which harmful microbes in perishable food products are destroyed using heat, without destroying the food." However, this is not true. Pasteurization does NOT kill ALL “supposedly” harmful microbes (harmful according to the medical industry) and it definitely DOES damage the food by destroying natural enzymes and nutrients.

However, Louis Pasteur was not an honest creditable individual. If you look back into the history of the medical profession and the various ideas regarding the cause of disease that were held by leading physicians before Pasteur first promulgated his notorious "germ theory", you will find convincing evidence that Pasteur discovered nothing, and that he deliberately appropriated, falsified and perverted another man’s work.

His true character and methods were brought to light by Miss Ethel Douglas Hume in her book "Pasteur or Béchamp" written in 1923, the title of which has since been changed to "Pasteur Exposed."

Another book by R.B. Pearson "Pasteur, Plagiarist, Impostor" was originally published in the 1940s, with a new edition entitled "The Dream and Lie of Louis Pasteur."

Interestingly enough Pasteur instructed his family never to release his lab notes. After his grandson died in 1975, they were finally released. Gerald Geison, a science historian, was among the first people to thoroughly review those notes.

In 1995, which was “ironically” proclaimed "The Year of Pasteur," Geison’s article was published in the New York Times proclaiming that Pasteur had lied about his research on vaccines and germs and that most of his ideas had been plagiarized from his contemporaries. His article, "Pasteur’s Deception" claimed that Pasteur was, in the end, a fraud.

It was Antoine Béchamp (1816-1908), a contemporary of Pasteur, who discovered the true nature of germs, bacteria, viruses, etc., and that they were pleomorphic (capable of changing from one type of organism to another). Later on another colleague of Pasteur’s colleague’s, Claude Bernard, described the "milieu" or environment that affected/caused those changes.

On his deathbed, Pasteur recanted, saying that Bernard [Claude Bernard] was right; "the Terrain is everything, the Germ is nothing!" However, since the "Germ Theory of Disease" is so profitable, the medical world has written off his final statements as the madness of a dying man. We should all be so mad!

Another problem with the germ theory of disease is discovered when we look at "Koch’s Postulates" [Dr. Robert Koch]:

Postulates means accepted statements of fact.

  1. The germ which causes a disease must be found in every case of the disease under the conditions which could explain the disease.
  2. The germ must not be found in other diseases or healthy people.
  3. The germ could be isolated and used to induce an experimental disease in animals which resembles (is like) the original disease in humans.
Pasteur never quite fulfilled all of thise rules. He was not able to find the germ in all cases of a disease and this is where his research became fraudulent. Additionally, many so-called pathogenic germs are often found in healthy people.

And finally, when Pasteur passed a germ from one animal to another to cause the disease, he did not pass the germ alone, but took some blood with it. Injecting toxic blood from one animal to another will guarantee the receiving animal becomes sick.


Antoine Béchamp’s Discoveries
Professor Antoine Béchamp, a French biologist (1816 – 1908), who was Pasteur’s contemporary (lived at the same time and they knew each other), developed and demonstrated a pleomorphic (many forms – see a more complete description below) theory – essentially that bacteria change form and are not the cause of, but the result of, disease, arising from tissues rather than from a germ of constant form. This has also been called the “cellular disease theory.”

Béchamp discovered that these micro-organisms (germs) feed upon the poisonous material which they find in the sick organism and prepare it for excretion. These tiny organisms are derived from still tinier organisms called microzyma.

These microzyma are present in the tissues and blood of all living organisms where they remain normally quiescent (quiet and not acting) and harmless. When the welfare of the human body is threatened by the presence of potentially harmful material, a transmutation (change) takes place [also called pleomorphism].

The microzyma changes into a bacterium or virus which immediately goes to work to rid the body of this harmful material. When the bacteria or viruses have completed their task of consuming the harmful material they automatically revert to the microzyma stage." –Béchamp. Sourced: Vaccination The "Hidden" Facts by Ian Sinclair, p62

Béchamp himself wrote: "I draw the conclusion that normal air never contains morbid microzymas, or what used to be called germs of diseases and are now called microbes; maintaining, in accord with the old medical aphorism (general truth) that diseases are born of us and in us, that no one has ever been able to communicate a characteristic disease of the nosological class [scientific classification of disease], such as anthrax, smallpox, typhoid fever, cholera, plague, tuberculosis, hydrophobia, syphilis, etc., by taking the germ in the air, but they are isolated from a patient, at some particular moment."

Béchamp’s academic record includes:

  • Master of Pharmacy
  • Doctor of Science
  • Doctor of Medicine
  • Professor of Medical Chemistry and Pharmacy at Montpellier
  • Fellow and Professor of Physics and Toxicology – Strasbourg Higher School of Pharmacy
  • Professor of Chemistry at Strasbourg
  • Professor of Biological Chemistry and Dean of Faculty of Medicine of Lille; etc., etc.
Pleomorphism versus Monomorphism
Pleo-morphism means many forms; many or more (pleo-), forms or bodies (morph-), capable of changing from one type of organism to another.

This is in contradistinction (distinction by contrast) to Mono-morphism which means one (mono-) body or form.

Modern medicine, bacteriology, is founded on the idea of Mono-morphism where once a germ is a particular germ it always stays that way. According to this way of thinking, a streptococcal germ is always a streptococcus. It only has one (mono-) form; it doesn’t change into anything else.

However, that is not true. Streptococcal germs and many other kinds of germs, bacteria and viruses can, and do, change into other forms, proven to occur by many eminent researchers since the early 1800s, including Gaston Naessens, Gunther Enderlein, Royal Rife, Antoine Béchamp, and others. Even modern medicine recognizes that bacteria, viruses change into stronger ones, becoming resistant to antibiotic drugs.

Pleomorphism is a concept discovered in the early 1800’s. It shows that germs, bacteria and viruses come from inside the body; from the "tiny dots" you can see in the blood with any microscope. These "tiny dots" of course are the colloids of life or protits.

Pleomorphism is a concept that today sounds very strange. What pleomorphism is however, cannot be denied as the vast amount of data that has been obtained over the last 180 years confirms what modern microbiologists are discovering, re-discovering today. As noted, many people have been involved in this debate for a long time.

Tiny microbes are "tiny dots" in our blood that change form into microorganisms that clean up the garbage, dead cells, toxins and the like. This is what bacteria, germs, and viruses are for. They change first into viruses, then into bacteria and finally into fungal forms. Each of these stages is progressively more hostile to surrounding tissue cells.

Germs, all micro-organisms, (viruses, bacteria, fungi and everything in-between) are the result, not the cause of disease!

Louis Pasteur was wrong! His idea of the bacterial cause of disease was wrong!

If "germs" are there as a result, not a cause, then to treat the resultant germs with antibiotics is in theory and in fact, wrong! This basic misconception about disease affects all aspects of medicine.

This is why this is a "new"… biology, even though it has been proved by many doctors and scientists starting in the early 1800s.

Béchamp stated, in an address before the Academy of Medicine on the 3rd of May, 1870, "that nothing is more obscure than the cause which presides over the development of diseases and their communicability.

But what we can affirm is that when we are sick, it is we who suffer, and that the suffering is a cruel reality. This is because the cause of our diseased condition is always within ourselves."

External causes contribute to the development of the affliction and hence of the disease only because they have brought about some material modification of the medium (our body, animals, and even soil) in which live the ultimate particles of the organized matter which constitutes us, namely, the microzymas.

These external causes, by a succession of changes brought about, and depending on a crowd of variables, bring about correlatively a further change, which then bears precisely upon the physiological and chemical status of the microzymas. The living being, filled with microzymas, carries in itself the elements essential for life, disease, death and destruction.

Note: Béchamp called these tiny microbes microzymas, while Gaston Naessens called them somatids, and Gunther Enderlein called them protits.


Antibiotics, Immunization or Improved Nutrition?
In 1973 Dr. D. Powles observed: "The major contributing factor toward improved health over the past 200 years has been improved nutrition. Nearly 90% of the total decline in the death rate in children between 1860 and 1965 due to whooping cough, scarlet fever, diphtheria and measles occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization against diphtheria" (Powles, 1973).

Epidemiologist Dr. G.T. Stewart made a similar statement which was reported in Lancet of May 18,1968; and prior to this Sir Robert McCarrison, the great English physician, wrote:

"Obsessed with the invisible microbe, virus, protozoa as all important excitants of disease, subservient to laboratory methods of diagnosis, hidebound by our system of nomenclature, we often forget the most fundamental of all rules for the physician, that the right kind of food (nutrition) is the most important single factor in the promotion of health and the wrong kind of food the most important single factor in the promotion of disease” (McCarrison, 1936).

In a personal communication (1974), Dr. Klenner made the following important observations: "Many here voice a silent view that the Salk and Sabin vaccine, being made of monkey kidney tissue, has been directly responsible for the major increase of leukemia in this country.

Your own Dr. Nossal from the Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia made the statement which was published in our Medical Tribune that, ‘Most killed vaccine in use today was not fit for a mouse.’ "

Elsewhere in the same communication Dr. Klenner astutely sums up some pertinent reasons for our inability to make successful viral vaccines as follows: "I am of the opinion that virus units have the potential of going from one type to another by just altering their protein coat.

We see chicken pox at Thanksgiving, mumps by Christmas, red measles in the spring and polio and what we now know was Coxsackie in the summer. When the red measles vaccine was given to the children in our community we immediately had an epidemic of sore throats and many of the older people demonstrated Koplik’s spots" (Klenner, 1974).

These viewpoints appear to constitute food for thought. Moreover, it is disappointing to observe the futility and ineffectiveness of many "flu" vaccines that have been accepted by an unwary public.

If we consider Béchamp’s thesis that viruses and bacteria can be extensions of enzymes ("microzymas"), that there are specific disease conditions rather than specific diseases, that the virus and the bacterium are the concomitants, not the antecedents of disease, is it not conceivable that these entities may become, by evolution and nutritional breakdown, the viruses and bacteria we are studying so intently? Is Klenner right? Was Béchamp right? Is this why we cannot make a successful vaccine?

Disease and Béchamp’s Hypothesis: A Final Consideration
A further search of the relevant literature produced the following: "S. Typhi has been isolated from surgical wounds and gall bladders of patients not known to be typhoid carriers" (Arch. Surg., 1972).

Showing the influence of orthodoxy the article then concludes that these patients are infection hazards. We wonder aloud how many "infection hazards" we would detect if we did a bacteriological survey upon all the passengers of a jumbo jet?

Surveys that we have participated in show that a large percentage of the sample may indeed "carry" so-called pathogens without any clinical symptoms of disease. Perhaps it is time we revised the word pathogen?

W. A. Altemeier describes the increase of mixed infections which he alleges are due to indiscreet use of antibiotics, which produces viral, fungal and L-forms which are much more difficult to control.

Altemeier then describes how the bacterial flora is ever changing and cites a case of septicemia: this commenced as a staphylococcal infection and then successively became pseudomonas, bacteroides. E. Coli. Enterobacter, aerogenes, anaerobic streptococci, serratia and finally proteus (Altemeier, 1975).

How many realize that the results of a culture and sensitivity collected from a patient the day before may have changed by the time the result is readable in the laboratory? In other words, yesterday’s tests may be today’s mistakes!

This behavior of the micro-organism might appear much less strange if we adopt more the viewpoint of Béchamp who described the microzymian endogenous (developing inside the body) evolution of micro-organisms some 100 years ago.

If a child develops measles, chicken pox, whooping cough, mumps, rubella or any of the other common childhood infections, it is not because of germs, but because of the accumulated toxic waste within the body, a condition known as Toxaemia.

Royal Raymond Rife’s Discoveries
One day, the name of Royal Raymond Rife may ascend to its rightful place as the giant of modern medical science. Until that time, his fabulous technology remains available only to the people who have the interest to seek it out.

While perfectly legal for veterinarians to use anything to save the lives of animals, Rife’s brilliant frequency therapy remains taboo to orthodox mainstream medicine because of the continuing threat it poses to the international pharmaceutical medical monopoly that controls the lives – and deaths – of the vast majority of the people on this planet.

Rife’s inventions include a heterodyning ultraviolet microscope, a microdissector, and a micromanipulator. When you thoroughly understand Rife’s achievements, you may well decide that he has the most gifted, versatile, scientific mind in human history.

The result of using a resonant wavelength is that micro-organisms which are invisible in white light suddenly become visible in a brilliant flash of light when they are exposed to the color frequency that resonates with their own distinct spectroscopic signature.

Rife was thus able to see these otherwise invisible organisms and watch them actively invading tissues cultures. Rife’s discovery enabled him to view organisms that no one else could see with ordinary microscopes.

By 1920, Rife had finished building the world’s first virus microscope. By 1933, he had perfected that technology and had constructed the incredibly complex Universal Microscope, which had nearly 6,000 different parts and was capable of magnifying objects 60,000 times their normal size.


With this incredible microscope, Rife became the first human being to actually see a live virus, and until quite recently, the Universal Microscope was the only one which was able view live viruses.

Modern electron microscopes instantly kill everything beneath them, viewing only the mummified remains and debris. What the Rife microscope can see is the bustling activity of living viruses as they change form to accommodate changes in environment, replicate rapidly in response to carcinogens, and transform normal cells into tumor cells.

But how was Rife able to accomplish this, in an age when electronics and medicine were still just evolving? Here are a few technical details to placate the skeptics…

Rife painstakingly identified the individual spectroscopic signature of each microbe, using a slit spectroscope attachment. Then, he slowly rotated block quartz prisms to focus light of a single wavelength upon the microorganism he was examining. This wavelength was selected because it resonated with the spectroscopic signature frequency of the microbe based on the now-established fact that every molecule oscillates at its own distinct frequency.

The atoms that come together to form a molecule are held together in that molecular configuration with a covalent energy bond which both emits and absorbs its own specific electromagnetic frequency. No two species of molecule have the same electromagnetic oscillations or energetic signature. Resonance amplifies light in the same way two ocean waves intensify each other when they merge together.

More than 75% of the organisms Rife could see with his Universal Microscope are only visible with ultra-violet light. But ultraviolet light is outside the range of human vision; it is ‘invisible’ to us. Rife’s brilliance allowed him to overcome this limitation by heterodyning, a technique which became popular in early radio broadcasting.

He illuminated the microbe (usually a virus or bacteria) with two different wavelengths of the same ultraviolet light frequency which resonated with the spectral signature of the microbe. These two wavelengths produced interference where they merged.

This interference was, in effect, a third, longer wave which fell into the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. This was how Rife made invisible microbes visible without killing them, a feat which today’s electron microscopes cannot duplicate.

By this time, Rife was so far ahead of his colleagues of the 1930’s(!), that they could not comprehend what he was doing without actually traveling to San Diego to Rife’s laboratory to look through his Virus Microscope for themselves. And many did exactly that.

One was Virginia Livingston. She eventually moved from New Jersey to Rife’s Point Loma (San Diego) neighborhood and became a frequent visitor to his lab. Virginia Livingston is now often given the credit for identifying the organism which causes human cancer, beginning with research papers she began publishing in 1948.

In reality, Royal Rife had identified the human cancer virus first…in 1920! Rife then made over 20,000 unsuccessful attempts to transform normal cells into tumor cells. He finally succeeded when he irradiated the cancer virus, passed it through a cell-catching ultra-fine porcelain filter, and injected it into lab animals.

Not content to prove this virus would cause one tumor, Rife then created 400 tumors in succession from the same culture. He documented everything with film, photographs, and meticulous records. He named the cancer virus ‘Cryptocides primordiales.’

Virginia Livingston, in her papers, renamed it Progenitor Cryptocides. Royal Rife was never even mentioned in her papers. In fact, Rife seldom got credit for his monumental discoveries. He was a quiet, unassuming scientist, dedicated to expanding his discoveries rather than to ambition, fame, and glory.

His distaste for medical politics (which he could afford to ignore thanks to generous trusts set up by private benefactors) left him at a disadvantage later, when powerful forces attacked him. Coupled with the influence of the pharmaceutical industry in purging his papers from medical journals, it is hardly surprising that few heave heard of Rife today.

Nevertheless, many scientists and doctors have since confirmed Rife’s discovery of the cancer virus and its pleomorphic nature, using darkfield techniques, the Naessens microscope, and laboratory experiments.

Rife also worked with the top scientists and doctors of his day who also confirmed or endorsed various areas of his work.

They included: E.C. Rosenow, Sr. (long-time Chief of Bacteriology, Mayo Clinic); Arthur Kendall (Director, Northwestern Medical School); Dr. George Dock (internationally-renowned); Alvin Foord (famous pathologist); Rufus Klein-Schmidt (President of USC); R.T. Hamer (Superintendent, Paradise Valley Sanitarium; Dr. Milbank Johnson (Director of the Southern California AMA); Whalen Morrison (Chief Surgeon, Santa Fe Railway); George Fischer (Children’s Hospital, N.Y.); Edward Kopps (Metabolic Clinic, La Jolla); Karl Meyer (Hooper Foundation, S.F.); M. Zite (Chicago University); and many others.

By increasing the intensity of a frequency which resonated naturally with these microbes, Rife increased their natural oscillations until they distorted and disintegrated from structural stresses. Rife called this frequency ‘the mortal oscillatory rate,’ or ‘MOR’, and it did no harm whatsoever to the surrounding tissues.

Today’s Rife instruments use harmonics of the frequencies shown on the display screen. The wavelength of the actual frequency shown (770hz, 880hz, etc.) is too long to do the job.

This principle can be illustrated by using an intense musical note to shatter a wine glass: the molecules of the glass are already oscillating at some harmonic (multiple) of that musical note; they are in resonance with it.

Because everything else has a different resonant frequency, nothing but the glass is destroyed. There are literally hundreds of trillions of different resonant frequencies, and every species and molecule has its very own.

It took Rife many years, working 48 hours at a time, until he discovered the frequencies which specifically destroyed herpes, polio, spinal meningitis, tetanus, influenza, and an immense number of other dangerous disease organisms.

In 1934, the University of Southern California appointed a Special Medical Research Committee to bring terminal cancer patients from Pasadena County Hospital to Rife’s San Diego Laboratory and clinic for treatment. The team included doctors and pathologists assigned to examine the patients – if still alive – in 90 days.

After the 90 days of treatment, the Committee concluded that 86.5% of the patients had been completely cured. The treatment was then adjusted and the remaining 13.5% of the patients also responded within the next four weeks. The total recovery rate using Rife’s technology was 100%.

On November 20, 1931, forty-four of the nation’s most respected medical authorities honored Royal Rife with a banquet billed as The End To All Diseases at the Pasadena estate of Dr. Milbank Johnson.

But by 1939, almost all of these distinguished doctors and scientists were denying that they had ever met Rife. What happened to make so many brilliant men have complete memory lapses?

It seems that news of Rife’s miracles with terminal patients had reached other ears. Remember our hypothetical question at the beginning of this report: What would happen if you discovered a cure for everything? You are now about to find out….

At first, a token attempt was made to buy out Rife. Morris Fishbein, who had acquired the entire stock of the American Medical Association by 1934, sent an attorney to Rife with ‘an offer you can’t refuse.’ Rife refused. We may never know the exact terms of this offer.

But we do know the terms of the offer Fishbein made to Harry Hoxsey for control of his herbal cancer remedy. Fishbein’s associates would receive all profits for nine years and Hoxey would receive nothing. Then, if they were satisfied that it worked, Hoxsey would begin to receive 10% of the profits.


Hoxsey decided that he would rather continue to make all the profits himself. When Hoxsey turned Fishbein down, Fishbein used his immensely powerful political connections to have Hoxsey arrested 125 times in a period of 16 months. The charges (based on practice without a license) were always thrown out of court, but the harassment drove Hoxsey insane.

But Fishbein must have realized that this strategy would backfire with Rife. First, Rife could not be arrested like Hoxsey for practising without a license. A trial on trumped-up charges would mean that testimony supporting Rife would be introduced by prominent medical authorities working with Rife.

And the defense would undoubtedly take the opportunity to introduce evidence such as the 1934 medical study done with USC. The last thing in the world that the pharmaceutical industry wanted was a public trial about a painless therapy that cured 100% of the terminal cancer patients and cost nothing to use but a little electricity. It might give people the idea that they didn’t need drugs.

And finally, Rife had spent decades accumulating meticulous evidence of his work, including film and stop-motion photographs. No, different tactics were needed…

The first incident was the gradual pilfering of components, photographs, film, and written records from Rife’s lab. The culprit was never caught.

Then, while Rife struggled to reproduce his missing data (in a day when photocopies and computers were not available), someone vandalized his precious virus microscopes. Pieces of the 5,682 piece Universal microscope were stolen.

Earlier, an arson fire had destroyed the multi-million dollar Burnett Lab in New Jersey, just as the scientists there were preparing to announce confirmation of Rife’s work. But the final blow came later, when police illegally confiscated the remainder of Rife’s 50 years of research.

Then in 1939, agents of a family which controlled the drug industry assisted Philip Hoyland in a frivolous lawsuit against his own partners in the Beam Ray Corporation. This was the only company manufacturing Rife’s frequency instruments (Rife was not a partner).

Hoyland lost, but his assisted legal assault had the desired effect: the company was bankrupted by legal expenses. And during the Great Depression, this meant that commercial production of Rife’s frequency instruments ceased completely.

And remember what a universal cure meant to hospitals and research foundations? Doctors who tried to defend Rife lost their foundations grants and hospital privileges.

On the other hand, big money was spent ensuring that doctors who had seen Rife’s therapy would forget what they saw. Almost no price was too much to suppress it. Remember that, today, treatment of a single cancer patient averages over $300,000. It’s BIG business.

Thus, Arthur Kendall, the Director of the Northwestern School of Medicine who worked with Rife on the cancer virus, accepted almost a quarter of a million dollars to suddenly ‘retire’ in Mexico. That was an exorbitant amount of money in the Depression.

Dr. George Dock, another prominent figure who collaborated with Rife, was silenced with an enormous grant, along with the highest honors the AMA could bestow. Between the carrots and the sticks, everyone except Dr. Couche and Dr. Milbank Johnson gave up Rife’s work and went back to prescribing drugs.

To finish the job, the medical journals, support almost entirely by drug company revenues and controlled by the AMA, refused to publish any paper by anyone on Rife’s therapy. Therefore, an entire generation of medical students graduated into practice without ever once hearing of Rife’s breakthroughs in medicine.

The magnitude of such an insane crime eclipses every mass murder in history. Cancer picks us off quietly…but by 1960 the casualties from this tiny virus exceeded the carnage of all the wars America ever fought. In 1989, it was estimated that 40% of us will experience cancer at some time in our lives.

In Rife’s lifetime, he had witnessed the progress of civilization from horse-and-buggy travel to jet planes. In that same time, he saw the epidemic of cancer increase from 1 in 24 Americans in 1905 to 1 in 3 in 1971 when Rife died.

He also witnessed the phenomenal growth of the American Cancer Society, the Salk Foundation, and many others collecting hundreds of millions of dollars for diseases that were cured long before in his own San Diego laboratories. In one period, 176,500 cancer drugs were submitted for approval.

Any that showed ‘favorable’ results in only one-sixth of one percent of the cases being studied could be licensed. Some of these drugs had a mortality rate of 14-17%.

When death came from the drug, not the cancer, the case was recorded as a ‘complete’ or ‘partial remission’ because the patient didn’t actually die from the cancer. In reality, it was a race to see which would kill the patient first: the drug or the disease.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
The best Dr Andy Kaufman video to date. As the interviewer says watch with open mind and you will learn.
Dr. Andrew Kaufman lost his job recently because he refused to conform to the ideas that he didn't think were true about COVID-19. I sit down with Dr. Kaufman to discuss his perspective on what he thinks is actually going on with this current pandemic...

Remember- As Dr. Kaufman says- Do your own research and go with the facts
CHAPTERS 0:00 // Intro 0:59 //
Who is Dr. Andrew Kaufman? 1:35 //
Masks cause separation and isolation 6:16 //
The truth about the tests and mortality rates 11:11 //
View on mandatory vaccines 16:15 //
The media dramatizing death 18:27 //
What’s REALLY going on in hospitals 24:54 //
Vaccines - The Transhumanist Agenda 29:35 //
Doctor’s insights to stay healthy 33:22 //
Why you should ask questions and do your research NOW 36:45 //
Message to skeptics 44:22 //
Why aren’t more doctors speaking up? 47:30 //
Conclusion: Love and Understanding
 

DingerzForDaze

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2019
12,757
5,069
1
The best Dr Andy Kaufman video to date. As the interviewer says watch with open mind and you will learn.
Dr. Andrew Kaufman lost his job recently because he refused to conform to the ideas that he didn't think were true about COVID-19. I sit down with Dr. Kaufman to discuss his perspective on what he thinks is actually going on with this current pandemic...

Remember- As Dr. Kaufman says- Do your own research and go with the facts
CHAPTERS 0:00 // Intro 0:59 //
Who is Dr. Andrew Kaufman? 1:35 //
Masks cause separation and isolation 6:16 //
The truth about the tests and mortality rates 11:11 //
View on mandatory vaccines 16:15 //
The media dramatizing death 18:27 //
What’s REALLY going on in hospitals 24:54 //
Vaccines - The Transhumanist Agenda 29:35 //
Doctor’s insights to stay healthy 33:22 //
Why you should ask questions and do your research NOW 36:45 //
Message to skeptics 44:22 //
Why aren’t more doctors speaking up? 47:30 //
Conclusion: Love and Understanding


You do know that every sane person realizes Dr. Andrew Kaufman is an insane person, right? I know you're not one of those sane people ... but citing Kaufman is no better than citing that toothless hillbilly who said he was abducted by aliens and probed so the aliens could figure out what made him so intelligent.
 

Latest posts