Just the facts on the CoronaVirus

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Hundreds of links for your enjoyment
https://docs.google.com/document/d/...jSjwsDz7xo4AZBZELQjKgOm1Aew6egjtIqHk3wKhZ/pub

My position on the pandemic: an unproven claim of having discovered a new virus; diagnostic tests which are worthless, but open the door to the phony escalation of case numbers; the gathering and corralling of people who have DIFFERENT traditional diseases (and perhaps a few new non-viral conditions) under the meaningless umbrella term, “COVID-19” The pandemic was preplanned for many years, and it is playing out as a live drill.

Fact You cannot catch a virus, viruses are dead outside the body. They do not infect, they are activated in our body. You can catch a virus by injecting it into you.
https://videopress.com/v/9oO9pGlQ
https://videopress.com/v/bySC0KAv
https://abruptearthchanges.com/2017/11/17/dr-stefan-lanka-the-history-of-the-infection-theory/
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-only-thing-influenza-may-kill-germ-theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp5...EizHOmOxM69CRebHCdxO9g4eIOgpsb-Jtk6l4bCYknRy0
https://www.whatreallymakesyouill.com/germtheory.html
https://i.postimg.cc/FRP7xgD0/germs.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQKT5GsmGaU
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/
https://i.postimg.cc/5y1QnC7f/1918flu.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QNlrsiO-Fo&feature=youtu.be science
https://i.postimg.cc/Pxcd2ptP/virus2.jpg

Fact CoronaVirus is the common cold as defined by medical dictionary.
https://i.postimg.cc/k4JGKTmp/cold.jpg
https://postimg.cc/JH1zK3nj
https://i.postimg.cc/tTNXjqMr/commoncold.jpg
https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/04/17/covid-19-is-a-common-cold/

Fact Covid is shown to be just exosomes not some new novel virus
exosomes.jpg

https://revealingfraud.com/2020/04/health/my-summary-of-the-covid19-hoax/
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/covid-19-it-really-about-virus-videos
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/p...ss-species-messengers-and-beacons-epigenetics
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...allenges-the-discovery-of-the-covid-19-virus/
https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
conclusion.jpg

https://questioningcovid.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-NcxqeqSvU&feature=youtu.be
Find the Similarities, comparing Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) and Coronavirus
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895263/
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) including exosomes, are small membrane vesicles derived from multivesicular bodies or from the plasma membrane. Most, if not all, cell types release EVs that then enter the bodily fluids. These vesicles contain a subset of proteins, lipids and nucleic acids that are derived from the parent cell. It is postulated that EVs have important roles in intercellular communication, both locally and systemically, by transferring their contents, including protein, lipids and RNAs, between cells. EVs are involved in numerous physiological processes, and vesicles from both non-immune and immune cells have important roles in immune regulation.
https://i.postimg.cc/bwdXRPVB/extracellular-vesicles.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/K8W6qWdv/picofcoronavirus.jpg
https://www.cdc.gov/sars/lab/images.html

Fact Dr. in 1901 self-tested spread of small pox and failed to spread it.
smallpox.jpg

http://www.whale.to/a/rodermund.html
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/deane_b.html
https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/virus-trial.html

Fact Dr. will pay 5k for proof of positive test. Shouldn't it be easy to prove you have had a positive test?
5k.jpg


Fact The test is not testing specifically for Covid only 3 other common coronaviruses, and COVID19 is thus just assumed
We are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases..
https://www.globalresearch.ca/manuf...coronavirus-not-specifically-covid-19/5707781
In this article, I’ll present quotes from official sources about their own diagnostic test for the coronavirus. I’m talking about fatal flaws in the test. Because case numbers are based on those tests (or no tests at all), the whole “pandemic effect” has been created out of fake science.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...illusion-of-pandemic-through-diagnostic-test/
There supposedly are “asymptomatic carriers” and the disease is “quite deadly”.
Neither suppositions can be proven, and both can be disproven. Let’s start with “Asymptomatic carriers”. This is not a “truth”; these are just words. Are they true? These are supposedly well people, who supposedly are infected and thus, “test positive”. There are also “false positives”, who are well people who are supposedly not infected, who “test positive”. See, there is no distinction, and no way to tell which is which, because both are well people who test positive. There is no second test to take to distinguish between “well”, “positive”, infected vs “well”, “positive”, not infected.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/04/01/covid-its-not-one-thing-its-not-one-disease/
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/was-covid-19-test-meant-detect-virus

Fact There are no indications that this flu is fundamentally different from every other flu.
We know what happened in China, we know what happened in South Korea, we know what happened, or is happening, in Europe. There are no indications that anything is different from a regular flu. Maybe it’s a bit worse than other flus—could be? Well, I’m not paid by the government, so I’m entitled to actually do science. If the government, if there had been no intervention, the epidemic would have been over, like every other respiratory disease epidemic.
https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/04...kdown-social-distancing-doesnt-actually-work/
In this video, Dr. Wodarg explains how testing of this alleged new virus has been conducted in an invalid manner and all are getting on board with the myth, just like The Emperor's New Clothes.
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/
cvtest.jpg


Fact Fauci admits the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of severe seasonal influenza
Fauci said in his March 26, 2020, article written for The New England Journal of Medicine. the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”
https://www.libertynation.com/the-great-fauci-fake-out/
One of the buzz-stats doing the rounds says this novel virus is far more dangerous than influenza, does the science hold up?
https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/11/coronavirus-fact-check-3-covid19-is-20x-deadlier-than-the-flu/
35 Sources showing the COVID19 / corona virus is over hyped, and likely fraud. In China, the numbers of people who “have it” followed a perfect curve, which is statistically impossible, meaning, they “invented” the data on who has it. The curve of cases in China are “too perfect”. It means it was all a simulation. A hoax. Fraud.
https://revealingfraud.com/2020/03/...-corona-virus-is-over-hyped-and-likely-fraud/
Pence used this image chart in Press briefing. Notice mention of coronavirus removed
chart.jpg


Fact PCR test has not been determined to be accurate.
I said the test kits don’t work and are fraud. The CDC, FDA, the test kit maker, and Stanford epidemiologists say the kits suffer from false positives
https://revealingfraud.com/2020/04/...a-false-positive-and-an-asymptomatic-carrier/
https://www.buzzsprout.com/948676
https://i.postimg.cc/L8w2G5rP/pcrtest.jpg

Fact “Gold Standard” test has not been done
Two Vital experiments have not been done to determine accuracy of PCR test
The first experiment would confirm or deny the accuracy of the PCR diagnostic test. The experiment would reveal whether this widespread test for COVID-19 can actually predict illness in the real world, in humans, not in the lab.
This experiment has never been done. It should have been done before the PCR was ever permitted to make claims about THE QUANTIY OF VIRUS that is replicating in a patient’s body.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/04/10/covid-two-vital-experiments-that-have-never-been-done/
"Gold standard" can refer to the criteria by which scientific evidence is evaluated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_standard_(test)

Fact The test kits don’t provide results to base any certainty on.
The CDC and FDA both admit the COVID19 test kits suffer from false positives and false negatives. They just fail to tell you those rates. But others have revealed those rates. “the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%” and 85% false negative rate. The test kits don’t work. If the test kits don’t work, or are less reliable than a coin flip, then all the data on “who has it” is utterly meaningless and it’s all a total fraud and hoax. People are still dying, but from the same illness as always: the flu. So, what follows is only exact quotes from the articles, and links. Below are 15 sources giving commentary on the reliability of the COVID19 test kits in use.
https://revealingfraud.com/2020/03/health/test-kits-do-not-work/
“The current coronavirus disease, Covid-19, has been called a once-in-a-century pandemic,” he says. “But it may also be a once-in-a-century evidence fiasco,” with policymakers relying on “meaningless” statistics based on unreliable samples:
https://www.thecollegefix.com/stanf...t-coronavirus-crackdown-is-based-on-bad-data/
Now for the bad news. What is the test they claim to use to identify this new bug in a patient? The test is called PCR. This is the classic polymerase chain reaction test, invented in the 80s by Dr Kary Mullis. In 40 years, doctors have never come up with any test more accurate than this very flawed, theoretical estimate of microbial activity.
The test produces loads of false positives, often failing to measure anything at all.
No one is more critical of the test’s reliability than the inventor himself.
Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel prize for inventing PCR to detect HIV, [9] explains its limitations—why the PCR is not especially diagnostic, for HIV or for anything else:
“Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron. PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV.
“The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.” [1]
Can’t identify viruses? Then how do we know all these people have the same disease, let alone the same novel disease? This means that with all these people who have supposedly been PCR tested for COVID, there is still no conclusive diagnostic evidence that they have any coronaviruses at all. Let alone the same virus. According to the inventor of the primary diagnostic test.
https://thedoctorwithin.com/blog/2020/03/10/newsletter-march-2020/
cv.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/VsCrSKY9/pandemic.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction

Fact Covid is not one thing, its many diseases all combined together.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/04/01/covid-its-not-one-thing-its-not-one-disease/
tests.jpg


Fact 2012 Study by PudMed Trivalent Flu shots can cause positive detection of coronavirus
flushot.jpg

http://harvoa.org/flu/glaxo-ins.htm

Fact Chelating Agents are Antiviral
https://revealingfraud.com/2020/03/health/chelating-agents-are-antiviral/
https://revealingfraud.com/2020/04/silver-gold/genius-trump-intuitively-discovers-covid-19-cure/

Fact The CDC pledges “To base all public health decisions on the highest quality scientific data, openly and objectively derived.”
But Peter Doshi argues that in the case of influenza vaccinations and their marketing, this is not so
https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3037

Fact There is no clear proof what a positive antibody test means
Immunity certificates would be issued to people who test POSITIVE on an antibody test. Meaning: antibodies in a person’s body are a sign that he has gained immunity from the coronavirus.
“Cairns: ‘The big question is: Does a positive response for the antibodies mean that person is actively infected, or that they have been infected in the past [and are now immune]…?’”
In other words, when you penetrate an inch below the surface, you find there are even official/mainstream doubts, grave doubts about the meaning of a positive antibody test. It could mean IMMUNE or it could mean INFECTED.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/04/15/immunity-certificates-a-load-of-nonsense-and-a-covert-op/
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/04/14/passport-to-the-brave-new-world-the-vaccine/
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/04/05/covid-here-come-the-antibody-tests-quick-easy-and-insane/

Fact Baseless theories thrown out of animals transmitting the virus to humans
How did this virus suddenly jump to two species of snake and how would they transmit the virus?
Why are two unrelated species of snake (Chinese cobra and the many-banded krait) specified but no individual species of other animals such as hedgehogs or pangolins and couldn't there be other species of snakes - how many have they tested? If pangolins are critically endangered where are they transmitting the virus?
https://www.wired.com/story/wuhan-coronavirus-snake-flu-theory/

Fact GNM (German New Medicine). Verifies vaccines don’t work
https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/verifications.html
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-i/
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-ii-testing-for-a-virus/
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-iii-a-little-science/
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-iv-statistics-in-perspective/
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-v-the-agenda/
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-vi-what-is-wrong-with-this-picture/
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-vii-connecting-the-dots/

Fact The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) is launching a rush program to develop a vaccine against the China coronavirus.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...anet-is-the-guinea-pig-for-a-vast-experiment/

Fact 2009 W.H.O faked swine flu pandemic
https://www.forbes.com/2010/02/05/w...ontributors-michael-fumento.html#63e94b7048e8
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...scare-swine-flu-claims-Euro-health-chief.html
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...yl-attkisson-told-me-about-the-2009-pandemic/
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...credibility-of-the-world-health-organization/

Fact They have created a new name for the “virus” Comorbid
comorbid.jpg


Just the facts, CoronaVirus. Let’s now look at all of the practice drills, Cuomo and Pompeo admit this is a drill, the events leading show signs of preplanned “pandemic” coming when it did. You decide

Fact Gov Cuomo in press conference April 11th 2020 admits this is a preparation drill
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QifJjdUVmSTt/

Fact Pompeo in press conference admits we are in a live drill
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zq2WfRzj9zOw/
Pompeo.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/Y0W56jgD/Defend20.jpg

Fact Trump says worries about coronavirus are the new hoax
hoax.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/NfsYqXK7/hoax.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/mrYF8MHv/hoax.jpg

Fact 2015 Bill Gates talks about necessity of virus practice drills
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XuC44lwMqg3t/
https://i.postimg.cc/L6xVWL11/drill.jpg

Fact In October of 2019 Bill Gates and Johns Hopkins run a pandemic practice drill for coronavirus called Event 201.
Capture12.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/6Q0vsP43/Capture12.jpg
https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/11/06/event-201-health-security/
https://www.hopkins-cepar.org/on-alert/two-different-drills-with-two-different-goals
https://www.mededportal.org/publication/10823/
https://i.postimg.cc/vHVx8TxC/event.jpg

Fact Sept 2019, Wuhan China ran a pandemic practice drill for coronavirus
https://thefreedomarticles.com/chin...wledge-coronavirus-drill-30-days-wuhan-games/
https://i.postimg.cc/Wp0NGnpG/military-games.jpg

Fact Crimson Contagion was a simulation drill administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from January to August 2019 that tested the capacity of the U.S. federal government and twelve U.S. states to respond to a severe influenza pandemic originating in China.
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/loc...arned-of-pandemic-implications-in-us/2243832/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimson_Contagion

Fact November 15, 2019 CDC advertises for a quarantine jobs to be filled. This before any cv19 has been found. How can you know to hire for quarantine positions without prior knowledge? GS-9/11
https://nationalfile.com/cdc-posted...s-in-2019-months-before-coronavirus-pandemic/
cdcjob.jpg


Fact November 22, 2019 Bridgewater, the largest hedge fund in the world, fears the collapse of the world stock exchanges in March. For this reason, its founder, Ray Dalio, has just paid 1.5 billion dollars to sign insurance contracts ( "put options"). Gee he was right.. Prior knowledge?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/bridgewater-bets-big-on-market-drop-11574418601
https://i.postimg.cc/jjgPccMd/bet.jpg

Fact World Bank issued “pandemic bonds” in 2017 set to mature in July 2020
https://i.postimg.cc/Znx65hkK/bonds.jpg

Fact 2019 Bill Gates predicts 2020 will be a good year for vaccines
https://i.postimg.cc/PfK0HSW4/Gates.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/Xq7cC3Tq/gates.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/DwFKPfLy/gates.jpg

Fact 2018 Bill Gates predicts 33 million deaths possible due to coronavirus

Fact 2017 Fauci says Trump will definitely have a surprise infectious disease outbreak
Fauci.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/FHtktNDS/fauci.jpg
https://ghss.georgetown.edu/pandemicprep2017/#

Fact Fauci associated with Bill Gates Foundation
http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO15Apr2020.php
https://i.postimg.cc/FHtktNDS/fauci.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/KzmkPGst/fauci.jpg

Fact 2017 Military says coronavirus is coming
2017.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/bwszKPph/future.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/K8wZbW8g/evergreen.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/q7KpvGND/evergreen2.jpg

Fact 2017 in Italy A comics writer who could have picked any virus made a comic character called coronavirus? really?
https://archive.org/details/37AsterixAndTheChariotRace/page/n1/mode/2up

Fact 2014 Obama predicts pandemic possible in 5 years or maybe 10
https://i.postimg.cc/cJfstgq1/obama.jpg

Fact 2013 A movie made called CoronaVirus was made in Korea, predictive programming?
https://i.postimg.cc/dVC2fn9k/corona.jpg

Fact 2011 There was a movie released on 9-11 called Contagion which closely mirrors what is going on today. Predictive programming?
https://i.postimg.cc/br65RvyM/fear1.jpg
https://www.docdroid.net/IiRgjhf/corona-copy-pdf

Fact The name "coronavirus" is derived from Latin corona, meaning "crown".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona

Fact In 2011 Tom Hanks was in a movie called Larry Crown. In the movie he was called Lance Corona
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI2WJb5rchM&feature=youtu.be

Fact Tom Hanks who claims he had coronavirus said he was travelling with a corona typewriter
https://i.postimg.cc/QtWbQM3q/hanks.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/RCJx5p81/Hanks-tweet.jpg

Fact In her latest 2019 cd release Madonna has a picture of a corona typewriter on the cover
https://i.postimg.cc/VkrdfpDz/madonna.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/QNQzPMD3/madonna2.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/VkyLnFZn/predictive.jpg
Details of all the predictive programming leading up to today.
https://www.docdroid.net/IiRgjhf/corona-copy-pdf

Fact UK Gov’t tells people to “act” like they have the virus
https://i.postimg.cc/xTfRgtcQ/act.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/RFW8jXH0/Public-Notice.jpg

Fact 2010 The “Lock Step” scenario Rockefeller Foundation’ resembles pandemic plan
https://therulingclassobserver.com/2020/03/23/plandemic-planet-part-i/
https://youtu.be/wuOxG-rnj30
https://www.globalresearch.ca/all-s...-lock-step-deep-states-latest-bio-war/5702773
https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller Foundation.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZphK_CMUbKg&feature=youtu.be

Fact 2010 Project Camelot video where they mention how China will catch a “cold” https://www.facebook.com/frideborg.eddy/posts/2604346339888310

Fact 2008 End of Days book speaks of pneumonia like virus coming in around 2020
https://i.postimg.cc/FKMJxpzg/Endof-Days.jpg

Fact Nurses and Drs threatened if they speak to the press, why?
https://i.postimg.cc/50BNCY0n/nurses.jpg

Fact Medicare pays hospitals almost 3 times the normal rate if a patient is claimed to have CV
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...poses-medicare-payouts-for-covid-19-patients/

Fact Dr’s urged to fudge numbers for coronavirus deaths, why?
https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/10/watch-dr-scott-jensen-reveals-ridiculous-covid19-guidance/
https://youtu.be/a7ZGPDW4gGE

Fact News lied about video saying they were using footage from NY hospital and that wasn’t the case.
https://i.postimg.cc/ydHXpsLx/news.jpg
https://youtu.be/_J60fQr0GWo

Fact After CBS was caught, they said it was a mistake, but they did it again for a Philly hospital.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media...oadcasting-fake-hospital-footage-second-time/

Fact News video caught passing off dummies as real patients.
http://covid19.intelcaster.com/2020...o-fool-you-into-covid-19-fear-no-ifs-or-buts/
https://i.postimg.cc/hGHYnkZF/fake-media.jpg
https://youtu.be/CtNH3OBBmL4
https://i.postimg.cc/DzNW7GTx/mannequin.jpg

Fact Videos showing outrageous treatment for virus
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=5O5S44R54H3X
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3VIQfHIs0c

Fact Supposed youngest patient to die in UK was also found to have “died” 2 other times under different names
https://i.postimg.cc/xCQMjTgB/boydies3times.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/W37rdLHz/boydies.jpg

Fact Hospitals Nurses are so overwhelmed they have time to make dance videos
It’s odd that in a city as big as NYC, in the midst of a pandemic, a key hospital looks quiet and employees haven’t seen any victims”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mA9v69DpK7s
https://twitter.com/Spaz696969/status/1249668872455589891/photo/1

Fact Just in time for 2020 Pandemic…Netflix created series How to prevent Pandemic Outbreak
https://www.netflix.com/title/81026143

Fact A large number of headlines use symbolism with the numbers 11 and 33
https://videopress.com/v/RgNNyM37
http://itnt.news/1608/
https://youtu.be/TOLXBX_ICT0
https://gab.com/GrandeFormaggio/posts/103800119614011878
https://i.postimg.cc/66n5RwCP/number
https://i.postimg.cc/sgWhkbQh/numbers.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/QNR4cZ3B/numbers2.jpg
https://twitter.com/Acadiansheperd/status/1251665727049826306
https://videopress.com/v/RgNNyM37

Fact Masonic timeline for 7 year tribulation per their interpretation of end times started in 2015.
https://i.postimg.cc/4Nz7Rx1S/timeline.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/gcLL4DLd/Prophesy.jpg

Fact A convoy of coach buses in Wuhan don’t protect the drivers.
Buses carrying British nationals evacuated from Wuhan in buses showing a Whitehorse and name of bus is horseman which are terms used in Book of Revelation. As is the word crown.
https://i.postimg.cc/D0x80K9w/rev-6-2.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/4yJ53qr5/bus1.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/zDj7QDgP/bus2.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/nzWxgKq1/revelation8.jpg

Fact W.H.O tells us the greatest enemy is not the virus, it’s the fear
https://i.postimg.cc/1zPMxvwc/who-fear.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/BZDyRYS1/hidden.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/rpdk0Psj/quotes.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/qvgdCs7r/symbolism.jpg
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/can-you-trust-who-covid-19-pandemic-response
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/c...d-cdc-require-zero-virus-testing-covid-deaths
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/c...hs-not-accurate-no-virus-testing-only-suspest
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/f...ss-community-mask-wearing-doesnt-exist-who-ag

Fact President doesn’t need to wear mask, social distance or quarantine.
If this virus was what they are portraying the Presidents health would be most important.
no-masks.jpg


Fact Book Eyes of Darkness has amazing similarities to the pandemic today
https://i.postimg.cc/T1KzwWcB/corona.jpg

Fact Gov’t by law is allowed to use propaganda Smith Mundt act
https://i.postimg.cc/ZKHLkMfw/smith-mundt.jpg

Fact 6 corporations control all media
https://i.postimg.cc/xT7FNNyL/media.jpg
https://frideborg.uk/daily-oracle/plandemic-1-percent-sold-us-out-pachamama/

Fact How disinformation plays part of psy-op
https://i.postimg.cc/fWr4pjdF/psy-op.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/MHFVQpFt/critique.jpg

Fact Test is so bad, they say if you test negative, assume you have it.
test.jpg


Fact Card game from the 90’s predicted the events of today
https://t.co/O39YOsZWQN https://twitter.com/markhamowl/status/1249214042515922950?s=20

Fact “Tragedies” usually happen "coincidentally" with a "drill" preceding it or at same time.
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_falseflag27.htm
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/blog/coronavirus-hoax-jan-2020

Fact No more deaths than normal this year
According to the latest European monitoring report, overall mortality in all countries (including Italy) and in all age groups remains within or even below the normal range so far.
In other words, there are no more deaths this year, in Italy and anywhere else in Europe, than there were last year or any other year. In fact, there are fewer deaths this year.
https://www.euromomo.eu/index.html

Fact Dr’s who counter what is being put out in the media.
Expert scientists with differing viewpoints
https://i.postimg.cc/W3tLssQT/expertopinion1.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/VvbxbDfh/expertopinion2.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/ThMZjgh3/expertopinion3.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/7LZYT8pQ/expertopinion4.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/RF3SX1C7/expertopinion5.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/SQ9THYzr/expertopinion-6.jpg

Questioning Conventional Wisdom Dr. Jay Bhattacharya Dr. Jay Bhattacharya Stanford University.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UO3Wd5urg0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6MZy-2fcBw

Swiss Dr. Fully referenced facts about Covid-19, provided by experts in the field
https://swprs.org/corona-media-propaganda/
https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/

Fact God is in control. He has created our miraculous immune system and put your trust in Him
spirituallaw.jpg
 
Last edited:

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
The history of the infection theory.


smallpox.jpg

http://www.whale.to/a/rodermund.html

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/deane_b.html

On November 24, 2011, Dr. Lanka announced on his website that he would offer a prize of € 100,000 to anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus. The announcement read as follows: “The reward will be paid, if a scientific publication is presented, in which the existence of the measles virus is not only asserted, but also proven and in which, among other things, the diameter of the measles virus is determined.”

In January 2012, Dr. David Bardens took Dr. Lanka up on his pledge. He offered six papers on the subject and asked Dr. Lanka to transfer the € 100,000 to his bank account. Dr. Lanka refused to pay the money since in his opinion these publications did not provide adequate evidence. Subsequently, Dr. Bardens took Dr. Lanka to court.

Taken to trial, Dr. Stefan Lanka won as judge determined none could prove his theory to be false.
https://abruptearthchanges.com/2017/11/17/dr-stefan-lanka-the-history-of-the-infection-theory/

https://youtu.be/PWmRj1WWrSQ

The six publications are: https://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=2136&start=15
1.
Enders JF, Peebles TC. Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents from patients with measles. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Jun;86(2):277–286.
2.
Bech V, Magnus Pv. Studies on measles virus in monkey kidney tissue cultures. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1959; 42(1): 75–85
3.
Horikami SM, Moyer SA. Structure, Transcription, and Replication of Measles Virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995; 191: 35–50.
4.
Nakai M, Imagawa DT. Electron microscopy of measles virus replication. J Virol. 1969 Feb; 3(2): 187–97.
5.
Lund GA, Tyrell, DL, Bradley RD, Scraba DG. The molecular length of measles virus RNA and the structural organization of measles nucleocapsids. J Gen Virol. 1984 Sep;65 (Pt 9):1535–42.
6.
Daikoku E, Morita C, Kohno T, Sano K. Analysis of Morphology and Infectivity of Measles Virus Particles. Bulletin of the Osaka Medical College. 2007; 53(2): 107–14.

(text taken from https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/virus-trial.htm,) still missing the second and third articles that were submitted, only found their abstracts, while for the rest found the full article.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
$5K Reward for Proof of #Covid19 Diagnosis! Dr. Tim O'Shea: "The Coronavirus phenomenon is nothing more than the Re-Categorization of cases of the regular seasonal Flu. Try to disprove that hypothesis."


5k.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/covid-19-it-really-about-virus-videos
Sayer Ji, author of REGENERATE, discusses the controversy around the similarity between viruses and extracellular vesicles called exosomes, as well as the possibility that what appears to be contagion-based viral infectivity may also be understood as a xenohormetic response to toxicant or EMF-associated cell damage

Cited or relevant articles, videos, and research papers include:


  1. Let's Get Real About This So-Called "Plan-Demic"
  2. Why Everything You Learned About Viruses is WRONG
  3. Plant-Derived Exosomes as Cross-Species Messengers and Beacons of Epigenetics
  4. VIDEO: Coronavirus Fear, Germ Theory, Exosomes, and Resiliency
  5. VIDEO: Andrew Kaufman on Exosomes, Coronavirus and Germ Theory
  6. Amazing Food Science Discovery: Edible Plants 'Talk' To Animal Cells, Promote Healing
  7. Exosome studies on Greenmedinfo (110 abstracts)
  8. How the Microbiome Undermines the Ego, Vaccine Policy and Patriarchy
  9. The GMO Agenda Takes a Menacing Leap Forward with RNAi Corn
  10. No Sex Required: Body Cells Transfer Genetic Info Directly Into Sperm Cells, Amazing Study Finds
  11. The Dark and Light Side of Food As Information Dietary RNAs
  12. COVID-19 Related Articles
  13. Exogenous exosomes from mice with acetaminophen-induced liver injury promote toxicity in the recipient hepatocytes and mice. Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 30;8(1):16070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34309-7. Cho YE
  14. HIV As Trojan Exosome: Immunological Paradox Explained? Front Immunol. 2017; 8: 1715.Published online 2017 Dec 1. James E. K. Hildreth
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Please never get the flu shot or have anyone inject you with vaccinations...
http://harvoa.org/flu/glaxo-ins.htm

FLULAVAL Vaccine “Package Insert”

Warning: Not Demonstrated to Decrease Influenza,
Not Safety Tested in Pregnant Women and Children,
Associated with Serious Diseases

by Jim West
Update 1/25/2019 harvoa.org


The Glaxo vaccine “package insert” is Glaxo's disclaimer. It is the “fine print” in each vaccine box, that protects Glaxo from the justice system, should it ever decide to bring justice, in case Glaxo doesn't funnel some of its profits to the government, such as, fines administered during investigations. Glaxo's drugs are promoted by those who have less liability, i.e., the non-experts, the journalists, salesmen, news-entertainment media, and doctors following protocol, etc. These people, who promote and dispense vaccines to the public, rarely mention the package insert.

Doctors, journalists and patients should read the insert, as it clearly admits that Flulaval doesn't function as advertised to decrease influenza. Its phrase, “not adequately demonstrated to decrease influenza”, means exactly that, yet, the phrase as spun, implies some success, rather than failure. Their use of the phrase “decrease influenza” is oddly vague.

We can only presume it means to decrease the chance of acquiring flu in the individual or to decrease the incidence of flu in the population. Bottom line: It is not actually a vaccine.

Can a potentially deadly drug be sold as a vaccine while claiming it hasn't been demonstrated to be a vaccine? Of course! Two explanatory parallels bring vaccines down to earth.

Car Sales Parallel: A car salesman could say that a poisoned lump of feces he is selling (called a “car”) has not been adequately demonstrated to be a car, though laboratory tests (in test tubes) have shown a crucial similarity, i.e., both are mobile. Then with the influence of billions of dollars paid to lobbyists-journalists-advertisers, and by concealing the facts (the manufacturer's package insert) -- he sells you the lump-o-feces at the price of a car, despite this 'car' known to be associated with serious diseases. He sells this “car” blessed by society, car experts, law, and government agencies. Though the manufacturer of the car claims it may be spontaneously deadly or disabling, many government agencies even enforce ownership, saying the car is mandatory.

House Sales Parallel: Would you buy a so-called house for your family when the sales agent tells you he doubts the house is actually a house? That it might disable or kill you? Would you buy the house without any documentation? On merely the word of a stranger with an apparently valid certificate hanging on his wall, who has conflicts of interest with the product he is selling?

Yes -- “you” probably would! If there were enough propaganda surrounding the sale to make you feel wise or intimidated.

Most people buy vaccines for themselves and their children with no knowledge beyond superficial advertising, thinking they are protecting themselves and their community from an invisible “virus” of which they have no knowledge. This is all one more tragic human joke. Over 1.8 billion dollars have been paid out for vaccine damage through the VICP program, and those payments go only to those a) whose doctor is willing to rat out on himself rather than sweep it under the rug or pass the problem off, b) who have survived the medical and judicial gauntlet, c) who know that vaccine damage is possible, and d) who have even heard of VICP or VAERS. Corruption is serious among vaccine manufacturers. Example: Merck Pharmaceuticals paid 4 billion dollars to the US government to bring a halt to ongoing investigations.

And you trust them to inject you with something even they claim is a hazard!? Bafflement.

Vaccines are sold by hyping a fear, that disease epidemics are supposedly so dangerous we should risk ourselves with hazardous vaccines via their corrupt manufacturer-distribution system. However, infectious disease paradigms are easily deflated. See critiques of the most studied viruses, poliovirus and HIV. In addition to the fear gambit, advertisers appeal to people's sense of community responsibility with the guilt gambit, if they refrain from buying medical products.

Close Read
The Glaxo Insert, UCM112909_NEWPI(FluLaval)2.pdf, 6/2013, is no longer online. I have download it, however, and pages 1 and 6 are presented here with highlights and commentary.

Insert Page 1
Glaxo writes, “[N]o controlled trials demonstrate a decrease in influenza”. The only evidence that this product provides immunity are laboratory studies that elicit a technical “immune response” for a limited time in a filtered clear blood component (“sera”) in a test tube. Sera cannot represent the human immune system. The vaccine is potentially dangerous to pregnant women, nursing women, and children, as “safety has not been established”. This is confirmed later in the document with the admission that the so-called vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity and causation of birth defects.

This insert advises that your doctor report adverse reactions, first, to the manufacturer. Yet both the doctor and the manufacturer are biased, i.e., have an interest in protecting themselves, their reputations and assets, from the liabilities Glaxo describes in its insert. In effect, the doctor is motivated to send you home with more hazardous and diversionary placations and treatments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Go out to your local buffet and lick the serving ladles. Put your money where your mouth is. Thank you.

http://www.whale.to/a/rodermund.html

Dr. Rodermund
Dangers of smallpox/Case mortality


See: Infectiousness of smallpox Dangers of smallpox/Case mortality

DR. RODERMUND'S EXPERIMENT (source)

On Monday, Jan. 21, 1901, about 11.30 A. M., I entered the residence of Mr.___ , where Miss Stark was confined with the smallpox.

As I entered the house Mr.__ jumped from his chair and said: "We are not allowed to let anyone enter this house."

"Never mind' I said, "I am not anybody, so perhaps you have made no mistake."

I then stated that I came to see the smallpox patient.

"There she is," he said, pointing towards a young woman, in a far corner of the room. Mrs___ sat by the window sewing, while a child about two years old ran about the room.

"Are you not afraid of taking smallpox from the girl?" I asked.

"No," replied the mother, "we are not afraid."

"But the doctors say this disease is very contagious; are they not very careless and negligent in not keeping this patient away from the rest of the family? This is a genuine case of smallpox, just see the large pustules full of pus. Of course I know you can't take the disease from another."

Then to show them that this was true, I broke open several of the large pustules on her face and arms and took the pus out of them and smeared it all over my face, hands, beard and clothes, and at the same time remarked that I would now go home to dinner.

I mentioned nothing of the affair to my family during the meal and went directly to my office without telling anyone. The first person who came in the office was an old friend, Rev. T., who has a parish at North Milwaukee. We shook hands heartily ; in fact, I had entirely forgotten that I was covered with smallpox poison. I presented him with one of my books and, according to our scientific and wilful deceivers of the public, I must have covered the book and gentleman with smallpox germs, and he in return must have exposed many people in Appleton, those he met on the train, and finally his whole congregation. The germs on the book, I suppose, are still enjoying themselves in the spiritual home of the reverend gentleman.

During the same afternoon I touched the faces of several persons in my office while treating their eyes and fitting glasses. From 4 to 6 and from 8 to 10 o'clock the same afternoon I was at the Business Men's Club, where I mingled and played cards with the members.

In the evening the conversation drifted to the smallpox case I had visited in the morning. After discussing the subject for a while, one of them asked me if I would visit a smallpox patient and then go home to my family. I quietly remarked that I would just as soon do it as visit a patient with a common cold.

Finally, Mr. Dickinson, cashier in one of our banks, remarked rather sarcastically: "Now, doctor, what's the use of talking such nonsense, you would no more think of visiting a smallpox patient and then go home and sleep with your family than you would go home and shoot one of your children. You are too sensible for that."

The reader can imagine the state of my mind at that time, as none of them had an inkling that I was at that very time covered with smallpox pus, and that the cards we were playing with were being loaded with this poison. Still, I never once mentioned my visit to them. Further, I would never have gone to the club-rooms if I had had the least idea that my actions would ever be known, as I knew the sentiment of these gentlemen and I also had too much respect for them and myself, to impose upon their feelings, even if I did know that their belief was a foolish superstition. I have done similar acts dozens of times during the past fifteen years and have in each instance watched the results and not the slightest harm has ever been done to anyone.

To return to our subject, after leaving the club-rooms that evening I went home, slept with my family, and the next morning took the train to Green Bay, without washing my hands or face, and wearing the same clothes. I took breakfast at Green Bay and then went to the store of Mr. M__ , who had engaged me to fit glasses for his customers on that day. I handled the faces of twenty-seven persons during the day, besides those I exposed on the streets and in the train when on my way home.

The next morning (Wednesday) I washed my hands and face, the first time since they had been smeared with pus 46 1/2 hours before. When I arrived at my office I found several reporters waiting to ascertain if the report were true that I had visited the smallpox patient and had smeared myself with pus. In the beginning I neither affirmed nor denied the accusation, because I did not want it known, but upon inquiry I learned that one of the neighbors had seen me come out of the house and asked the health officer if the family had changed doctors, as she had seen Dr. Rodermund come out of the house on Monday.

Consequently there was nothing for me to do save tell the exact truth, which I did. The newspapers, however, mixed untruth with the truth in such a way as to mislead the public. Among other things they stated that I had personally bragged of what I had done, when they knew that I never intended it to become known to the world until the people were ready to consider such revolutionary truths for their own benefit.

I was allowed my freedom about the city all day Wednesday, but on Thursday, the fourth day, I was quarantined and a guard of policemen stationed around the house. The people had been so aroused by the health officer, doctors, city officials, and the newspapers, that one of the policemen told me that it was a good thing I was protected by a strong guard, otherwise my life was in danger.

Saturday I broke quarantine in spite of five policemen, drove forty miles to Waupaca, took the train for Chicago, from there went to Terre Haute, Ind., and on my way back home was arrested in Milwaukee and held for four days in the pest house. This is a brief outline of the whole episode which created such a sensation.

The sanctimonious frauds and deceivers of the public (doctors) tried in every way, shape and manner, to trace a case of smallpox to my actions, but with no avail. Even after I had exposed 50,000 people, and rubbed my pus-covered hands over thirty-seven faces, they could find nothing against me. In the near future I will publish a few similar incidents which have happened to me the past years, and which are far more interesting than this one.

Why is not one out of the thousands of these medical scoundrels, murderers, and deceivers, ever turned up to win the prize which reads as follows:
One thousand dollars will be given to anyone who can prove that disease is contagious; also ten dollars for each day it takes him to prove it.

The doctors know that by superstition the people can best be held. Then, I want to ask you, are not the people more to blame than the doctors ?

More than half the public do not believe in contagion, but they lack the courage to say so. Discussion and argument will never change the present conditions. They never settle a question where a powerful body of men have law and money of their side. A powerful public sentiment, combined with true knowledge, is the only remedy. As long as you drowse in your old superstitions, these murderers will continue to ruin your constitutions for the money there is in it.

Does any sane man believe that God created such laws which, if disobeyed at any time by one person, would spread a loathsome disease over a whole nation? This superstition is a blasphemy upon Almighty justice. — Dr. Rodermund in The Searchlight 1901
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Measles Virus put to the test. Dr. Stefan Lanka wins in court…
https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/virus-trial.html

Since the early 1990s, German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka has been at the forefront of challenging the medical theory stating that viruses are the cause of infectious diseases such as hepatitis, AIDS, the flu, polio, herpes, or measles. Caroline Markolin has presented Dr. Lanka’s activities in her lecture video “Virus Mania” in great details (watch Part 2 of the recordings on this website – starting at 08:08).

Based on his studies in virology, Dr. Lanka discovered that viruses are vital components of simple life-forms that do not exist in complex organisms such as humans, animals, or plants. His research shows that the viruses believed to cause “viral infections” are in reality ordinary cell particles that have been misinterpreted as constituents of the viruses in question. Dr. Lanka also determined that viruses don’t have a destructive effect on the host, as commonly believed. These findings are in full accordance with the discoveries of Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer who demonstrated already in the 1980s that contrary to the standard theory, microbes do not harm the organism but play instead a supportive role during the healing process of diseases (see Fourth Biological Law of the New Medicine).

The “measles virus trial” between Dr. Stefan Lanka and German medical doctor David Bardens has by now received international attention (see the 2015 reports in CTV News Canada and BBC News). The court case has not only heated up the ongoing “virus debate”. It also fuelled the discussion about the justification of childhood vaccination and of vaccinations in general.

Here is a brief overview of the court proceedings:

On November 24, 2011, Dr. Lanka announced on his website that he would offer a prize of € 100,000 to anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus. The announcement read as follows: “The reward will be paid, if a scientific publication is presented, in which the existence of the measles virus is not only asserted, but also proven and in which, among other things, the diameter of the measles virus is determined.”

In January 2012, Dr. David Bardens took Dr. Lanka up on his pledge. He offered six papers on the subject and asked Dr. Lanka to transfer the € 100,000 to his bank account.

The six publications are:

1. Enders JF, Peebles TC. Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents from patients with measles. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Jun;86(2):277–286.

2. Bech V, Magnus Pv. Studies on measles virus in monkey kidney tissue cultures. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1959; 42(1): 75–85

3. Horikami SM, Moyer SA. Structure, Transcription, and Replication of Measles Virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995; 191: 35–50.

4. Nakai M, Imagawa DT. Electron microscopy of measles virus replication. J Virol. 1969 Feb; 3(2): 187–97.

5. Lund GA, Tyrell, DL, Bradley RD, Scraba DG. The molecular length of measles virus RNA and the structural organization of measles nucleocapsids. J Gen Virol. 1984 Sep;65 (Pt 9):1535–42.

6. Daikoku E, Morita C, Kohno T, Sano K. Analysis of Morphology and Infectivity of Measles Virus Particles. Bulletin of the Osaka Medical College. 2007; 53(2): 107–14.


Dr. Lanka refused to pay the money since in his opinion these publications did not provide adequate evidence. Subsequently, Dr. Bardens took Dr. Lanka to court.

On March 12, 2015, the District Court Ravensburg in southern Germany ruled that the criteria of the advertisement had been fulfilled ordering Dr. Lanka to pay up. Dr. Lanka appealed the ruling.

On February 16, 2016, the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) re-evaluated the first ruling, judging that Dr. Bardens did not meet the criteria since he failed to provide proof for the existence of the measles virus presented in one publication, as asked by Dr. Lanka in his announcement. Therefore, Dr. Lanka does not have to pay the prize money.

On January 16, 2017, the First Civil Senate of the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) confirmed the ruling of the OLG Stuttgart.

Critics of the judicial verdict argue that Dr. Lanka’s victory is solely based on how he had formulated the offer of reward, namely to pay the € 100,000 for the presentation of a single publication of evidence (which Dr. Bardens was unable to provide). This argument, however, distracts the attention from the essential points.
According to the minutes of the court proceedings (page 7/ first paragraph), Andreas Podbielski, head of the Department of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene at the University Hospital in Rostock, who was one of the appointed experts at the trial, stated that even though the existence of the measles virus could be concluded from the summary of the six papers submitted by Dr. Bardens, none of the authors had conducted any controlled experiments in accordance with internationally defined rules and principles of good scientific practice (see also the method of “indirect evidence”). Professor Podbielski considers this lack of control experiments explicitly as a “methodological weakness” of these publications, which are after all the relevant studies on the subject (there are no other publications trying to attempt to prove the existence of the “measles virus”). Thus, at this point, a publication about the existence of the measles virus that stands the test of good science has yet to be delivered.
Furthermore, at the trial it was noted that contrary to its legal remit as per § 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG) the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the highest German authority in the field of infectious diseases, has failed to perform tests for the alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on the measles virus, however, refuses to hand over or publish the results.

Dr. Lanka: “With the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.”
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
conclusion.jpg

pcrtest.jpg


A Vital Paper: David Crowe challenges the discovery of the COVID-19 virus
Apr24 by Jon Rappoport

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...allenges-the-discovery-of-the-covid-19-virus/
by Jon Rappoport

April 24, 2020


Canadian author and independent researcher, David Crowe, has spent several decades analyzing and torpedoing SPECIFICS of conventional medical research. At the deepest level.

I’m talking about, for example, the mainstream claims of discovering new viruses.

Crowe doesn’t lay on vague brushstrokes. He goes to the core of fabrications and exposes them, chapter and verse.

His new paper, which he continues to update and expand, is: “Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory”.

Here I quote from the section of his paper where he takes up the question of discovery—have researchers actually found a new virus which they assert is the cause of a new pandemic, COVID-19?

At the end of this article, I list the published papers Crowe refers to by number, as he takes apart the very basis of the COVID illusion.

David Crowe: “Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with pneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is believed to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are believed to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this”:

“’we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood’” [2]

“But, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41 cases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, ‘41 patients…confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV’.”

“Another paper quietly admitted that”:

“’our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates’” [1]

“Koch’s postulates, first stated by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the late 1800s, can simply be stated as”:

“* Purify the pathogen (e.g. virus) from many cases with a particular illness.
* Expose susceptible animals (obviously not humans) to the pathogen.
* Verify that the same illness is produced.
* Some add that you should also re-purify the pathogen, just to be sure that it really is creating the illness.”

“Famous virologist Thomas Rivers stated in a 1936 speech, ‘It is obvious that Koch’s postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases’. That was a long time ago, but the same problem still continues. None of the papers referenced in this article have even attempted to purify the virus. And the word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it means nothing (e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is ‘isolation’).”

“Reference [1] did publish electron [microscope] micrographs, but it can clearly be seen in the lesser magnified photo, that the particles believed to be coronavirus are not purified as the quantity of material that is cellular is much greater. The paper notes that the photos are from ‘human airway epithelial cells’. Also consider that the photo included in the article will certainly be the ‘best’ photo, i.e. the one with the greatest number of particles. Lab technicians may be encouraged to spend hours to look around to find the most photogenic image, the one that most looks like pure virus.”

“There is no way to tell that the RNA being used in the new coronavirus PCR test is found in those particles seen under the electron micrograph. There is no connection between the test, and the particles, and no proof that the particles are viral.”

“A similar situation was revealed in March 1997 concerning HIV, when two papers published in the same issue of the journal ‘Virology’ revealed that the vast majority of what had previously been called ‘pure HIV’ was impurities that were clearly not HIV, and the mixture also included microvesicles that look very similar to HIV under an electron microscope, but are of cellular origin.” [5][6]

References:

1. Zhu N et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 14.
* https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

2. Huang C et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet.2020 Jan 24.
* https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext

3. Chan J F-W et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. Lancet. 2020 Jan 24.
* https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30154-9/fulltext

4. Rivers TM. Viruses and Koch’s Postulates. J Bacteriol. 1937 Jan; 33(1): 1-12.
* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545348/

5. Gluschankof P et al. Cell membrane vesicles are a major contaminant of gradient-enriched human immunodeficiency virus type-1 preparations. Virology. 1997 Mar 31; 230(1): 125- 133.
* http://davidcrowe.ca/SciHealthEnv/papers/277-Microvesicles-Gluschankof.pdf

6. Bess JW et al. Microvesicles Are a Source of Contaminating Cellular Proteins Found in Purified HIV-1 Preparations. Virology. 1997 Mar 31; 230(1): 134- 44.
* http://davidcrowe.ca/SciHealthEnv/papers/278

—end of Crowe article excerpt—

In a half-sane world, David Crowe’s analysis would provoke an open honest discussion and debate among all sorts of scientists and researchers, and the repressed truth would tumble out and be confirmed.

Of course, we do not live in that world.

Instead, we have mistake-prone researchers and outright liars welcomed into the hallowed pages of medical journals. They are enabled by editors who look the other way.

The consequences, of course, aren’t merely academic.

A planet can be placed on lockdown.

Do I really need to say this at this late date—without the discovery of an actual disease-causing virus, the whole “pandemic” falls apart. The whole “spreading virus” assertion falls apart.
 

DingerzForDaze

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2019
12,757
5,069
1
Can anyone boil bplionfan's psychotic ramblings down into a 3-4 sentence blurb summarizing his main points, so I have something else to laugh about this morning? Thanks.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
VIRUS MANIA - by Torsten Engelbrecht and Claus Kohnlein (2007)
https://www.biohealthworksinstitute.com ... ia_pdf.pdf
"We are not witnessing viral epidemics; we are witnessing epidemics of fear. And both the media and the pharmaceutical industry carry most of the responsibility for amplifying fears, fears that happen, incidentally, to always ignite fantastically profitable business. Research hypotheses covering these areas of virus research are practically never scientifically verified with appropriate controls. Instead, they are established by "consensus." This is then rapidly reshaped into a dogma, efficiently perpetuated in a quasi-religious manner by the media, including ensuring that research funding is restricted to projects supporting the dogma, excluding research into alternative hypotheses. An important tool to keep dissenting voices out of the debate is censorship at various levels ranging from the popular media to scientific publications".

Vaccination Proved Useless And Dangerous - by Trung Nguyen (2018)
https://archive.org/details/3.Vaccinati ... s/mode/2up

"Vaccination Proved Useless And Dangerous" is the 1st book in the "History of Vaccination" series.

The 25 books in the “History of Vaccination” series shed light on the history of vaccines through the eyes of doctors, scientists, and historical data. They answer the pressing question, “Are vaccines safe and effective?”
The 25 books in the “History of Vaccination” series are:

1) The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccination
Eleanor McBean, PhD, ND
1957

2) A Century of Vaccination and What It Teaches
William Scott Tebb, MA, MD, DPH
1898

3) Vaccination: Proved Useless and Dangerous
From 45 Years of Registration Statistics
Alfred R. Wallace, LLD DUBL., DCL OXON., FRS, etc.
1885

4) Vaccination: Its Fallacies and Evils
Robert A. Gunn, MD
1882

5) Compulsory Vaccination: The Crime Against the School Child
Chas. M. (Charles Michael) Higgins
1915

6) The Truth about Vaccination and Immunization
Lily Loat, secretary of the National Anti-Vaccination League of London
1951

7) Leicester: Sanitation versus Vaccination
Its Vital Statistics Compared with Those of Other Towns, the Army, Navy, Japan, and England and Wales
By J.T. Biggs, J.P.
1912

8) The Vaccination Question
Arthur Wollaston Hutton, MA
1895

9) Vaccination a Delusion: Its Penal Enforcement a Crime
Alfred Russel Wallace, LLD DUBL., DCL OXON., FRS, etc.
1898

10) Vaccination a Curse and Menace to Personal Liberty
With Statistics Showing Its Dangers and Criminality
James Martin Peebles, MD, MA, PhD
Tenth Edition, 1913

11) Dr. C.G.G. Nittinger’s Evils of Vaccination
C. Charles Schieferdecker, MD
1856

12) The Vaccination Question in the Light of Modern Experience
An Appeal for Reconsideration
C. Killick Millard, M.D., D.Sc.
1914

13) Jenner and Vaccination: A Strange Chapter of Medical History
Charles Creighton, MD
1889

14) The Horrors of Vaccination: Exposed and Illustrated
Charles M. Higgins
1919

15) Vaccination: The Story of a Great Delusion
William White
1885

16) Vital Statistics in the United States, 1940-1960
Robert D. Grove, Alice M. Hetzel
US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
1968

17) The Mandatory Vaccination Plan
National Immunization Policy Council
1977

18) The Fraud of Vaccination
Walter Hadwen, JP., MD, LRCP., MRCS, LSA
From "Truth," January 3, 1923

19) Vaccination a Curse
C.W. Amerige, MD
1895

20) Vaccination a Medical Fallacy
Alexander Wilder, MD
1879

21) The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur
Originally Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter
R.B. Pearson
1942

22) The Vaccination Problem
Joseph Swan
1936

23) The Fallacy of Vaccination
John Pitcairn, President of the Anti-Vaccination League of America
1911

24) The Case Against Vaccination
Walter Hadwen, JP, MD, LRCP, MRCS, LSA
1896

25) A Catalogue of Anti-Vaccination Literature
The London Society for the Abolition of Compulsory Vaccination
114 Victoria Street, Westminster
1882, 2018
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Find the Similarities, comparing Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) and Coronavirus

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350779/
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) including exosomes, are small membrane vesicles derived from multivesicular bodies or from the plasma membrane. Most, if not all, cell types release EVs that then enter the bodily fluids. These vesicles contain a subset of proteins, lipids and nucleic acids that are derived from the parent cell. It is postulated that EVs have important roles in intercellular communication, both locally and systemically, by transferring their contents, including protein, lipids and RNAs, between cells. EVs are involved in numerous physiological processes, and vesicles from both non-immune and immune cells have important roles in immune regulation.
Images of Extracellular Vesicles, see especially C and D:
JEV-2-21494-g002.jpg

Full article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895263/

Coronavirus:
coronavirus2.gif

More pictures: https://www.cdc.gov/sars/lab/images.html
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Clinicians, Researchers, & Health Experts from Around the World Interrogating the Mainstream Narrative Around the Pandemic
We believe this crisis represents a world-changing opportunity to expose and transform antiquated ideologies that restrict health freedom. Germ theory is a scientifically bankrupt paradigm based in warfare models of pathogenic invasion. This theory has been leveraged as an instrument for geopolitical and social control – largely in the form of a vaccination agenda – to subdue the populace through coerced and forced bodily penetration and associated disability, mortality, and surveillance. As a result, conventional Western medicine functions as a sort of religion based on consensus assumptions and dogmatic medical monotheistic posturing. At its core, this approach is not salugenic or scientific and thus violates its stated ethical parameters around informed consent, beneficence, and an uncompromised evidence base.

We believe that citizens should be free to exercise their natural right to practice medicine as they see fit – in retention both of bodily sovereignty and civil liberties. To that end, we orient ourselves around the foundational premises that the body is inherently wise, that symptoms are meaningful, and that radical healing is eminently possible when we align with the earth and honor our place in the natural world.

https://questioningcovid.com/
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

LafayetteBear

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2009
48,120
21,477
1
Can anyone boil bplionfan's psychotic ramblings down into a 3-4 sentence blurb summarizing his main points, so I have something else to laugh about this morning? Thanks.
Dingerz: I had almost forgotten about this wingnut bplion. He and maybe poor dead Boris are the only two guys who have posted more crazy wackjob
Stuff than WeR. And that is saying a lot.

Every time bp puts finger(s?) to keyboard, preposterously dumb statements flow forth. Consider the following statement from near the beginning of the tome he wrote to commence this thread:

“Fact [sic] You cannot catch a virus, virus’ [sic] are dead. can [sic] only be caught by injecting it into your bloodstream.”

Who knew?!! And here I somehow managed to forget about all of the colds I got via injection. Silly me. Those injections must have been the handiwork of aliens, done while I was asleep. Or else it was Hillary. Right, bp?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bplionfan

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Dingerz: I had almost forgotten about this wingnut bplion. He and maybe poor dead Boris are the only two guys who have posted more crazy wackjob
Stuff than WeR. And that is saying a lot.

Every time bp puts finger(s?) to keyboard, preposterously dumb statements flow forth. Consider the following statement from near the beginning of the tome he wrote to commence this thread:

“Fact [sic] You cannot catch a virus, virus’ [sic] are dead. can [sic] only be caught by injecting it into your bloodstream.”

Who knew?!! And here I somehow managed to forget about all of the colds I got via injection. Silly me. Those injections must have been the handiwork of aliens, done while I was asleep. Or else it was Hillary. Right, bp?

LB, nice to hear from you, its been a while. Politics play no part in what is going on. I do not follow politics anyways. Thanks for the compliment with the name calling. When that is all others have, you know you are on the right track. I am sure you can feel better about yourself now. Praise God that I don't think like the world. I loved it when I was called a pedo enabler, and a cultist when I supported the truth about Joe Paterno. I knew I was right. https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/just-the-facts-about-joe-paterno.147223/

Yea, I too used to think I could "catch" a cold or some other "virus" but I have provided much info in this post that shows I was wrong. I have learned a lot through researching about viruses that which I had no clue about and had preconceived opinions about. Have a blessed day.
 

LaJolla Lion

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
47,384
28,051
1
Cumberland line
You have to love that some people can find some obscure folks in twitter land and convince themselves that they are now experts on something. It's the old Holiday Inn express come to life.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
The Germ Theory: A Deadly Fallacy https://www.whatreallymakesyouill.com/germtheory.html
The vast majority of people around the world believe that the healthcare system promoted by the agencies responsible for public health, especially the WHO, is firmly based on ‘sound science’. This system, known as ‘modern medicine’, is perceived to represent an ‘elite’ branch of science, which suggests that any other approach to healthcare and healing must be pseudoscience or quackery. Nothing could be further from the truth.
This elitist attitude is inculcated into medical students during their training, as experienced by Dr Carolyn Dean, who explains in her book entitled Death by Modern Medicine that,
“In fact, we were told many times that if we didn’t learn it in medical school it must be quackery.”
In his book entitled Confessions of a Medical Heretic, Dr Robert Mendelsohn MD indicates that belief in medical ‘authority’ is misplaced. He expands on his discussion of the problems with ‘modern medicine’ by reference to similarities between beliefs, religion and ‘modern medicine’. He describes the medical establishment as ‘the church of modern medicine’ and justifies this description with the statement that,
“Modern medicine can’t survive without our faith, because modern medicine is neither an art nor a science; it’s a religion...Just ask ‘why’ enough times and sooner or later you’ll reach the chasm of faith.”
It will undoubtedly be a shock for people to discover that ‘modern medicine’ is not firmly established from the basis of true ‘science’. Laboratory experimentation is certainly used within modern medicine, but it would be a mistake to equate such experiments with ‘science’; as Dr Peter Duesberg explains in his book entitled Inventing the AIDS Virus,
“The transition from small to big to mega-science has created an establishment of skilled technicians but mediocre scientists, who have abandoned real scientific interpretation and who even equate their experiments with science itself.”
True science is a process; it is a process that involves the study of different aspects of the world in order to expand the level of human knowledge; it also entails the creation of hypotheses and theories to explain the various phenomena observed during the course of those scientific investigations. As the various studies progress and the body of knowledge increases, they may reveal new information or they may expose anomalies and contradictions within existing hypotheses and theories. In such instances, it is essential for scientists, in whichever field they study, to reassess those hypotheses and theories in the light of the new findings; a process that may necessitate revisions or adaptations to be made to prevailing theories. It may even be necessary to abandon a theory if it is shown to be unsupported by empirical evidence.
One of the main theories on which ‘modern medicine’ is based is the ‘germ theory’; a theory that claims microorganisms, especially bacteria and viruses, invade and infect the body, thereby causing disease. This theory, which is usually attributed to Louis Pasteur in the early 1860s, underpins a large and very significant proportion of medical practices; without it, most of modern medicine becomes redundant, which explains why the medical establishment refuses to recognise its fatal flaws. The retention of the theory is not unequivocal proof that it has been fully established and represents truth. In fact, the research we conducted for our book, What Really Makes You Ill? Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong, led us to discover that there is no evidence to support the assertions of the medical establishment with respect to the ‘germ theory’. The term ‘medical establishment’ refers to all of the people, organisations, industries, and academic and research institutions that practise, research, teach, promote and otherwise support the system of modern medicine.
It is a fundamental principle that the burden of proof lies with those who propose a theory. Yet in the case of the ‘germ theory’ that ‘proof’ does not exist; there is no original scientific evidence that definitively proves that any ‘germ’ causes any specific infectious disease. Although this statement will be regarded as highly controversial and even outrageous, its veracity can be demonstrated.
There are a number of sources that provide a corroboration of the assertion that the ‘germ theory’ lacks any original scientific proof. One of these sources is Dr M.L. Leverson MD, who, in May 1911, gave a lecture in London in which he discussed his investigations that had led him to the conclusion that,
“The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of these unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infectious and contagious disorders are caused by germs.”
Dr M Beddow Bayly also exposed the lack of any scientific basis for the ‘germ theory’; in his 1928 article published in the journal London Medical World, he states that,
“I am prepared to maintain with scientifically established facts, that in no single instance has it been conclusively proved that any microorganism is the specific cause of a disease.”
It is clear that evidence to support the ‘germ theory’ remained conspicuous by its absence many decades after it had been proposed by Louis Pasteur. However, the situation has not been rectified; the germ theory of disease remains unproven with overwhelming evidence to demonstrate that it also remains a fallacy.
Despite the authoritative nature of the assertions of the medical establishment that ‘germs’ cause disease, there are no explanations for the mechanisms by which microorganisms produce the wide variety of symptoms in varying degrees of intensity that are claimed to occur when a person becomes ‘infected’. This represents an immense knowledge gap, although not the only one we discovered.
It is claimed that ‘germs’ multiply within the cells of the host and that this can precipitate an excess level of ‘cell death’ that is said to be an indicator of disease. It is commonly assumed that it is the ‘germ’ that caused the cell to die; but this is a mistaken assumption. There are genuine reasons that cells die after they have been subjected to the preparation procedures used in laboratory experiments; as explained by Torsten Engelbrecht and Dr Claus Köhnlein MD in their book entitled Virus Mania,
“This phenomenon is particularly virulent in bacterial and viral research (and in the whole pharmaceutical development of medicines altogether) where laboratory experiments on tissue samples which are tormented with a variety of often highly reactive chemicals allow few conclusions about reality. And yet, conclusions are constantly drawn – and then passed straight on to the production of medications and vaccines.”
This explanation exposes the fundamental error in conducting laboratory research without an adequate understanding of the living organism that is the human body, as they further state,
“Another important question must be raised: even when a supposed virus does kill cells in a test-tube (in vitro) ... can we safely conclude that these findings can be carried over to a living organism (in vivo)?”
The assumption that a particular ‘germ’ causes a particular ‘infection’ is solely based on the claim that certain antibodies have sometimes been found in samples extracted from some people exhibiting certain symptoms; in other words, there appears to be a correlation between symptoms and antibodies.
However, antibodies, which are proteins, are described as particles that neutralise ‘pathogens’ and help clear them from the body, which means that they are defined solely within the context of the ‘germ theory’. But this explanation is highly problematic. A strong and fully functioning immune system is claimed to be able to destroy all invaders; ‘infectious agents’ should not therefore be found within the body of a person with a strong immune system. Yet so-called ‘pathogenic’ microorganisms have been found in the bodies of healthy people. One explanation for this situation is that some pathogens can exist in the body in a ‘dormant’ state. But a strong immune system should not permit the presence of any pathogen, even in a ‘dormant’ state.
In an interview conducted in 2005 for the online German newspaper Faktuell, Dr Stefan Lanka referred to his studies in molecular biology and made the bold claim that,
“In the course of my studies, I and others have not been able to find proof of the existence of disease-causing viruses anywhere.”
At the time of writing, in April 2020, the world is reported to be in the grip of a ‘deadly’ pandemic caused by a virus. But as this article and our book clearly reveal, there is no evidence to substantiate such claims.
The core purpose of this article, which cannot be over-emphasised, is to show that people are being made to fear something that has never been proven to cause harm. It is for this reason that we urge everyone reading this to understand that the ‘germ theory’ has no basis in real science. It is now time for truth to prevail and for the ‘germ theory’ to be recognised as a deadly fallacy that needs to be banished to the dustbin of history.
April 19th 2020
References:
DEAN, C. - Death by Modern Medicine
DUESBERG, P. - Inventing The AIDS Virus
ENGELBRECHT, T & Köhnlein, C. - Virus Mania
LESTER, D. & Parker D. - What Really Makes You Ill? Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong
MENDELSOHN, R. - Confessions of A Medical Heretic

Dr ML Leverson MD May 1911 lecture - http://www.whale.to/vaccine/shea1.html#Hume_
M Beddow Bayly MD MRCS LRCP, 1936 booklet - The Case Against Vaccination
Dr Stefan Lanka – 2005 Interview in Faktuell - http://www.whale.to/b/lanka.html
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
COVID: two vital experiments that have never been done
Apr29 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/04/29/covid-two-vital-experiments-have-never-been-done/


Why not? Because they would expose this vicious farce, the criminals perpetuating it, and end the lockdowns.

by Jon Rappoport

April 29, 2020

I’m republishing this article, because more people are becoming aware there is something wrong—very wrong—with the “science” at the bottom of this fake epidemic.

For example, Dr. Thomas Cowan, in his recent popular video, described my proposal for a true procedure that would determine whether a new virus actually exists. If he contacts me, I have more ammunition for him.

All right, let’s jump in—

The claim of having discovered a new virus (COVID-19) is wrong (unproven).

And the claim that the main diagnostic test (the PCR) can determine whether a person is sick or is going to get sick is also wrong (unproven).

What seems to be true in the lab is not sufficient in the real world.

The first experiment would confirm or deny the accuracy of the PCR diagnostic test. The experiment would reveal whether this widespread test for COVID-19 can actually predict illness in the real world, in humans, not in the lab.

This experiment has never been done. It should have been done before the PCR was ever permitted to make claims about THE QUANTIY OF VIRUS that is replicating in a patient’s body.

Quantity is vital, because, in order to even begin talking about whether a virus can cause disease, millions and millions of virus must be actively replicating in a patient’s body.

Here is the experiment. Assemble a group of 500 volunteers, some sick, some healthy. Take tissue samples from them, and give the samples to PCR technicians. The technicians will never see or know who the 500 volunteers are.

The techs run these samples through the PCR. For each sample, they report which virus they found, and how much of it they found.

“In patients 34, 57, 83, 165, and 433, we found a great deal of the following disease-causing viruses.”

Now we un-blind those specific patients. By the test results, they should all be sick. Are they? Aren’t they? Then we would know. We would know how accurate and relevant the test is in the real world.

Of course, this is not the end of the experiment. The same samples should have been given to a whole other set of PCR techs to run. Did they come up with the same results the first set of PR techs did?

Several new groups of 500 patients each should be enlisted, and still more sets of lab techs should repeat the experiment, ending up with confirmation or rejection of the initial findings. This is the way the scientific method is supposed to work.

In the absence of this experiment, the quantitative PCR must be looked at as a rogue hypothesis that should never have been foisted on the public in the first place. It should never be used as the basis for determining case numbers of any disease.

In the “COVID-19 crisis,” all case numbers derived from the PCR should be thrown out.

The second vital experiment concerns the discovery of a new virus—in this case, COVID-19.

First of all, there is no lab procedure that can climb inside the human body in real time and record the active replication of millions of virus. The closest you can come involves the use of electron microscopy.

Suspecting the existence of a new disease-causing virus, researchers should line up, at the very least, several hundred people who seem to have the new disease. Tissue samples should be taken from them. Using correct steps of isolating-purifying-centrifuging these samples, specimens of the results should be examined and photographed under the electron microscope.

In every one of the several hundred photos, do the researchers see many identical particles of a virus they’ve never seen before; and do the researchers see that these many particles are the same from photo to photo?

If so, and if more than one group of researchers independently carrying out this procedure on the patients’ tissue samples achieves the same result…then, this is as close as you can come to saying you’ve discovered a new disease-causing virus.

Other researchers with other large groups of patients should attempt to replicate the above findings.

This vital experiment has never been done in the case of COVID-19. Not even close. Therefore, researchers can’t make a true claim to have discovered a new disease-causing virus.

In the absence of the two vital experiments I’ve described in this article, all you’re left with, concerning a single “COVID-19” pandemic and a single new cause, are: anecdote, rumor, gossip, conjecture, speculation, bad science, and lies.

Plus the horrendous damage from all the consequences of lockdowns based on those lies.

It’s essential to realize where the burden of proof rests. The scientists who claim to have discovered a new epidemic virus, and the scientists who claim their PCR can determine whether a person is sick or is going to get sick—THEY are making the assertions. THEY have to supply the proof.

“Oh, but it could be a virus, and the virus could be killing lots of people…” People saying this are caught in the trap, the COULD-BE trap. Yes, it could be a purple cow giving birth to a calf on Mars, who is then flown to China, where it infects seven bats in a dark alley in Wuhan, after which several people eat the bats…

If COULD-BE were science, the planet would remain locked down until there were no humans left.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
If this were anything more than a hoax, use your critical thinking skils...The top leaders in gov't aren't complying, ask yourself why...
nomasks.jpg


hoax.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
DR ANDREW KAUFMAN - UNMASKING THE LIES AROUND COVID-19: FACTS VS FICTION OF THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC
BANNED DR ANDREW KAUFMAN BLEW MY MIND WITH HIS SCIENCE - UNCENSORED ON OUR DIGITAL FREEDOM PLATFORM




 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206

LaJolla Lion

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
47,384
28,051
1
Cumberland line
Yeah those 100 year old studies are great proof. Morons that still don't think this is real are the problem with this country. They need to pretend it's fake somehow....but we know where they get these stupid ideas.
 

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
Yeah those 100 year old studies are great proof. Morons that still don't think this is real are the problem with this country. They need to pretend it's fake somehow....but we know where they get these stupid ideas.

Ha ha, good one. So why isn't a test 100 years ago good enough for you?
Oh its only recent info you want, ok...
https://abruptearthchanges.com/2017/11/17/dr-stefan-lanka-the-history-of-the-infection-theory/
My name is Stefan Lanka, I am a biologist and virologist. I discovered the first virus, which was in the ocean. That’s how I became involved in this matter. First, I recognized that this virus doesn’t cause any harm. Secondly, the Austrian professor Fritz Pol alerted me to the fact, that something was wrong with the entire AIDS affair and the virus might not even exist at all. I checked this and realized, that was indeed the case. I thought this couldn’t be and I remained silent for half a year, for I assumed, I misunderstand something. I couldn’t imagine that the entire world would go along with this.
https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/virus-trial.html
Dr. Lanka: “With the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.”


What other kind of proof are you looking for. All provided in this thread.
Are you looking for the gov't to come out and say this is a hoax, oh wait we already had Trump do that.
Are you looking for others in gov't come out and reveal what is going on? Well we did, we also had Pompeo come out and say this is a drill which lines up with Trump calling it the cv hoax. So is Pompeo lying. They come right out and tell you openly what the truth is, but the programmed just ignore things put right in their face.
So if 1 gov't person wasn't enough telling you this is a drill, do you need to have a 2nd have come out and say the same thing. Ok, Cuomo comes out and says we are in a drill also.

You are just like the story from the Bible The Rich man and Lazarus.
19 “There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. 20 At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores 21 and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores. 22 “The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 In hell, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. 24 So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’ 25 “But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. 26 And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’ 27 “He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father’s house, 28 for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’ 29 “Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’ 30 “‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’ 31 “He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’ “
 
Last edited:

bplionfan

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2014
2,023
1,372
1
I have posted many Dr. Kaufman videos above. LaJolla, can you watch this 6 minute video and tell me where the Dr is wrong? Or are you saying that you are a chimp. :)

chimp.jpg


 
Last edited:

Latest posts