So they have Bama, who beat exactly one team that will be ranked next week. They have Georgia, who beat exactly one team that will be ranked next week. They have Auburn, who beat exactly one team that will be ranked next week.
I'm not impressed. Some of their ranked teams like #19 LSU have losses like Troy, oh and beat exactly one team that will be ranked next week. Then there is #24 S. Carolina who has not beaten even one ranked team this year and will lose to Clemson to be unranked next week.
Their conference is very likely to end up with 2 in the playoff but in actuality they are pretty weak. They will have only 3 or 4 ranked teams next week and they haven't beaten many ranked opponents.
The B1G will have 4 or 5 ranked teams next week (unlikely Mich beats OSU). But these teams have actually beat more ranked teams.
The B1g 12 and PAC 10 will each probably have 3 ranked teams.
This is all supposing that they don't start ranking 4 loss SEC teams which I suppose they could with the SEC bias.
I'm not impressed. Some of their ranked teams like #19 LSU have losses like Troy, oh and beat exactly one team that will be ranked next week. Then there is #24 S. Carolina who has not beaten even one ranked team this year and will lose to Clemson to be unranked next week.
Their conference is very likely to end up with 2 in the playoff but in actuality they are pretty weak. They will have only 3 or 4 ranked teams next week and they haven't beaten many ranked opponents.
The B1G will have 4 or 5 ranked teams next week (unlikely Mich beats OSU). But these teams have actually beat more ranked teams.
The B1g 12 and PAC 10 will each probably have 3 ranked teams.
This is all supposing that they don't start ranking 4 loss SEC teams which I suppose they could with the SEC bias.