Is the Dem-Media Party desperate enough to resurrect Hillary?

Jerry

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
4,438
9,341
1
Yes, that Hillary. The corrupt old hag from the original First Family of grifters who perfectly embody the Dem-Media Party's modern brand of soulless, cynical, empty politics. Gotta admit, there would be a certain symmetry to discarding one decrepit octogenarian in favor of another.

Recall the later Brezhnev years of the declining Soviet empire when they injected their leader with enough formaldehyde to keep him walking and talking long after he was technically dead. Until eventually nature would no longer be denied, and the man died...then the empire not long after.

Fast-forward 40 years to our own version of Brezhnev who presides over another declining empire...and damned if we don't see the same thing playing out. One indicator that a nation has lost its spiritual vitality is when its main candidates for leadership are pressing 80 years of age.

Anyway, the below paragraphs are excerpted from a piece (behind pay wall) written by two long-time Dem-Media operatives for the WSJ yesterday:

>>Several circumstances—President Biden’s low approval rating, doubts over his capacity to run for re-election at 82, Vice President Kamala Harris’s unpopularity, and the absence of another strong Democrat to lead the ticket in 2024—have created a leadership vacuum in the party, which Mrs. Clinton viably could fill.

She is already in an advantageous position to become the 2024 Democratic nominee. She is an experienced national figure who is younger than Mr. Biden and can offer a different approach from the disorganized and unpopular one the party is currently taking.

If Democrats lose control of Congress in 2022, Mrs. Clinton can use the party’s loss as a basis to run for president again, enabling her to claim the title of “change candidate.”

Based on her latest public statements, it’s clear that Mrs. Clinton not only recognizes her position as a potential front-runner but also is setting up a process to help her decide whether or not to run for president again. She recently warned of the electoral consequences in the 2022 midterms if the Democratic Party continues to align itself with its progressive wing and urged Democrats to reject far-left positions that isolate key segments of the electorate.<<




 
  • Like
Reactions: psuted and Sullivan

LionDeNittany

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
44,672
18,390
1
DFW, TX
Yes, that Hillary. The corrupt old hag from the original First Family of grifters who perfectly embody the Dem-Media Party's modern brand of soulless, cynical, empty politics. Gotta admit, there would be a certain symmetry to discarding one decrepit octogenarian in favor of another.

Recall the later Brezhnev years of the declining Soviet empire when they injected their leader with enough formaldehyde to keep him walking and talking long after he was technically dead. Until eventually nature would no longer be denied, and the man died...then the empire not long after.

Fast-forward 40 years to our own version of Brezhnev who presides over another declining empire...and damned if we don't see the same thing playing out. One indicator that a nation has lost its spiritual vitality is when its main candidates for leadership are pressing 80 years of age.

Anyway, the below paragraphs are excerpted from a piece (behind pay wall) written by two long-time Dem-Media operatives for the WSJ yesterday:

>>Several circumstances—President Biden’s low approval rating, doubts over his capacity to run for re-election at 82, Vice President Kamala Harris’s unpopularity, and the absence of another strong Democrat to lead the ticket in 2024—have created a leadership vacuum in the party, which Mrs. Clinton viably could fill.

She is already in an advantageous position to become the 2024 Democratic nominee. She is an experienced national figure who is younger than Mr. Biden and can offer a different approach from the disorganized and unpopular one the party is currently taking.

If Democrats lose control of Congress in 2022, Mrs. Clinton can use the party’s loss as a basis to run for president again, enabling her to claim the title of “change candidate.”

Based on her latest public statements, it’s clear that Mrs. Clinton not only recognizes her position as a potential front-runner but also is setting up a process to help her decide whether or not to run for president again. She recently warned of the electoral consequences in the 2022 midterms if the Democratic Party continues to align itself with its progressive wing and urged Democrats to reject far-left positions that isolate key segments of the electorate.<<

As I discussed at the time, her release of that acceptance/victory speech was the beginning of her running.

LdN
 

ram2020

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2013
4,156
5,984
1
She definitely is angling to run, she or Michelle O might be their only shot, and its not a good one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jerry

psuted

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Nov 26, 2010
26,377
21,047
1
Yes, that Hillary. The corrupt old hag from the original First Family of grifters who perfectly embody the Dem-Media Party's modern brand of soulless, cynical, empty politics. Gotta admit, there would be a certain symmetry to discarding one decrepit octogenarian in favor of another.

Recall the later Brezhnev years of the declining Soviet empire when they injected their leader with enough formaldehyde to keep him walking and talking long after he was technically dead. Until eventually nature would no longer be denied, and the man died...then the empire not long after.

Fast-forward 40 years to our own version of Brezhnev who presides over another declining empire...and damned if we don't see the same thing playing out. One indicator that a nation has lost its spiritual vitality is when its main candidates for leadership are pressing 80 years of age.

Anyway, the below paragraphs are excerpted from a piece (behind pay wall) written by two long-time Dem-Media operatives for the WSJ yesterday:

>>Several circumstances—President Biden’s low approval rating, doubts over his capacity to run for re-election at 82, Vice President Kamala Harris’s unpopularity, and the absence of another strong Democrat to lead the ticket in 2024—have created a leadership vacuum in the party, which Mrs. Clinton viably could fill.

She is already in an advantageous position to become the 2024 Democratic nominee. She is an experienced national figure who is younger than Mr. Biden and can offer a different approach from the disorganized and unpopular one the party is currently taking.

If Democrats lose control of Congress in 2022, Mrs. Clinton can use the party’s loss as a basis to run for president again, enabling her to claim the title of “change candidate.”

Based on her latest public statements, it’s clear that Mrs. Clinton not only recognizes her position as a potential front-runner but also is setting up a process to help her decide whether or not to run for president again. She recently warned of the electoral consequences in the 2022 midterms if the Democratic Party continues to align itself with its progressive wing and urged Democrats to reject far-left positions that isolate key segments of the electorate.<<

I sure hope they nominate that corrupt, deceitful, and dishonest lying bit*h.
 

john4psu

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2003
10,907
7,078
1
A suspected murderer, an epstein pedophile, a weinstein deviant, a corrupt politician, a liar, and a greedy woman makes her right at the top of the Democrats wish list.

People will vote for her because they were stupid enough to vote for a self-serving lifelong-lying pedophile politician that campaigned from his basement over someone that had the world at peace, and achieved perhaps the greatest economy in our nation's history with the lowest unemployment rate in more than 50 years before the plandemic.

Remember it doesn't matter who votes, what matters is who counts the votes.
 

Jerry

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
4,438
9,341
1
As I discussed at the time, her release of that acceptance/victory speech was the beginning of her running.

LdN

Ironically, that pathetic clip, which had people laughing out loud, exemplified the combination of privileged self-absorption and self-pity that she and her ilk are known for.

But as we know, today's libs don't do irony. And the only self thing they're lacking in is self-awareness.
 

Dzapper

Well-Known Member
May 5, 2019
3,129
4,837
1
Her popularity must be 34% or so.......probably the highest rating the Dems could find.....LOL......well hey, that beats the current dope's approval rating.....

Honestly, with the exception of KAMALA, I couldn't think of a "better" candidate they could run....