ADVERTISEMENT

I meant to post this on Wed, 12/19

Tom McAndrew

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
56,692
40,371
1
but with all the signing day activities, I neglected to do so.

I have a special place in my heart for Dec. 19. On that date, in 1777, Gen. George Washington, and his tattered band of Continental soldiers, marched into the area that was named Valley Forge. In the preceding weeks, Gen. Washington and his forces had tried to prevent the British from capturing Philadelphia. They had suffered a major defeat at the Battle of Brandywine, a stunning lost of men in the Paoli Massacre, and had nearly pulled off a win at the Battle of Germantown (which took place after the Continental Congress had abandoned Philadelphia, and the British had marched in to it), only to ultimately have to abandon the battlefield due to a combination of their disorganization, the complexity of Washington's battle plan, the British support that came out from Philadelphia, and the approaching darkness. The Battle of Germantown was, in essence, a draw. After Germantown, the two armies shadowed each other, fought several skirmishes, crossed and recrossed the Schuylkill River seeking to find weaknesses in each other's lines, etc. Eventually, with winter quickly approaching, and his army needing a place to set up winter quarters, Gen. Washington selected Valley Forge.

I could write endlessly on the experience at Valley Forge. However, I'm going to borrow the following essay, and post it here (with one minor comment by me).

"On December 19, 1777, when Washington's poorly fed, ill-equipped army, weary from long marches, staggered into Valley Forge, winds blew as the 12,000 Continentals prepared for winter's fury. Only about one in three of them had shoes, and many of their feet had left bloody footprints from the marching. Grounds for brigade encampments were selected, and defense lines were planned and begun.

The first properly constructed hut appeared in three days. One other hut, which required 80 logs, and whose timber had to be collected from miles away, went up in one week with the use of only one axe. These huts provided sufficient protection from the moderately cold, but mainly wet and damp conditions of a typical Pennsylvania winter of 1777–1778. By the beginning of February, construction of 2,000 huts were completed. They provided shelter, but did little to offset the critical shortages that continually plagued the army.

During the springtime, as the climate grew considerably warmer, Washington ordered the cutting of two windows into each hut. Mud was also chipped between the logs to improve ventilation.

Soldiers received inadequate supplies of meat and bread, some getting their only nourishment from "firecake," a tasteless mixture of flour and water. Occasionally, there would be "pepper hot soup," a black pepper-flavored tripe broth. However, due to the talents of Baker General Christopher Ludwig, the men at Valley Forge more often than not received freshly baked bread, about one pound daily. So severe were conditions at times that Washington despaired "that unless some great and capital change suddenly takes place...this Army must inevitably...starve, dissolve, or disperse, in order to obtain subsistence in the best manner they can."

Snow was limited, and small in amounts. The layer of snow was often too thin to be collected and melted into drinking water. Alternating freezing and melting of snow and ice made it impossible to keep dry and allowed for disease to fester.

Animals fared no better. General Henry Knox, Washington's Chief of Artillery, wrote that hundreds of horses either starved to death or died of exhaustion. By the end of the winter, about 700 horses had died. Washington appointed Nathanael Greene as Quartermaster General to take charge of the supplies, who found caches of food and clothing and hauled them there for the troops and horses.

Clothing, too, was wholly inadequate. Many wounded soldiers from previous battles died from exposure. Long marches had destroyed shoes. Blankets were scarce. Tattered garments were seldom replaced. At one point these shortages caused nearly 4,000 men to be listed as unfit for duty.

Undernourished and poorly clothed, living in crowded, damp quarters, the army was ravaged by sickness and disease. Typhoid, typhus, smallpox, dysentery, and pneumonia were among the numerous diseases that thrived in the camp during that winter. These diseases, along with malnutrition and exposure to the freezing temperatures and snow, contributed to the 2,500 soldiers that died by the end of the winter. Gouverneur Morris of New York later stated that the Continentals were a "skeleton of an army...in a naked, starving condition, out of health, out of spirits."

Soldiers deserted in "astonishing great numbers" as hardships at camp overcame their motivation and dedication to fight for the cause of liberty. General Varnum warned that the desperate lack of supplies would "force the army to mutiny."

Women who were relatives or wives of enlisted men alleviated some of the suffering by providing valuable services such as laundry and nursing that the army desperately needed. A group of people called Regimental Camp Followers also helped increase the morale of the soldiers and provided necessary support to the men.

Although Washington repeatedly petitioned for relief and supplies, the Continental Congress was unable to provide it and the soldiers continued to suffer. Finally, on January 24, 1778, five Congressmen came to Valley Forge to examine the conditions of the Continental Army. Washington greeted them imperatively, "Something must be done. Important alterations must be made." Washington also informed them that he wanted Congress to take control of the army supply system, pay for the supplies, and replenish them when necessities were scarce.

By the end of February, there were adequate supplies flowing throughout camp after Congress gave full support to monetarily funding the supply lines of the army, along with reorganizing the commissionary department (which controlled the gathering of the supplies for the army).

Increasing military efficiency, morale, and discipline were as vital to the army's well-being as its supply of food and arms. The army had been handicapped in battle because unit training was administered from a variety of field manuals, making coordinated battle movements awkward and difficult. The soldiers were trained, but not uniformly. The task of developing and carrying out an effective training program fell to Baron Friedrich von Steuben. This skilled Prussian drill master, who had recently arrived from Europe, tirelessly drilled the soldiers, improving their battle and formation techniques greatly.

Martha Washington, the wife of George Washington, arrived at the camp on February 10, 1778. She visited soldiers in the huts and in the camp hospital. Martha Washington also organized a sewing circle of women who knitted, crafted, and patched socks, shirts, and trousers. (My Comment: This is, unfortunately, a common myth that just keeps getting repeated. Martha did join George at Valley Forge, but there is no evidence that while there she organized or participated in any way in sewing or knitting for the Continental troops.)

Camp followers at Valley Forge consisted of the wives, children, mothers, and sisters of the soldiers. These camp followers often served as laundresses, cleaning and mending the uniforms of the soldiers. Washington understood a soldier would die quickly from disease if his uniform was dirty and threadbare. These women and children also provided the emotional support to the army, encouraging them to remain at camp and continue on training and soldiering during the winter months. Women were relegated to the back of the column when marching and were forbidden to ride on wagons. Camp followers faced the issues of disease along with the soldiers.

Because of the terrible conditions of the army during the winter of 1777, the American public, along with Congress, began to criticize Washington for his inability to advance the war effort. Washington himself was aware of an increasing impatience and criticism of his leadership. A few soldiers wanted to replace Washington with General Horatio Gates, who had won a decisive victory in the Battles of Saratoga. Some members of the Continental Congress complained that Washington had left the surrounding countryside unprotected by moving into the isolated area of Valley Forge. Washington replied furiously:

"I can assure those Gentlemen that it is a much easier and less distressing thing to draw remonstrances in a comfortable room by a good fire side than to occupy a cold bleak hill and sleep under frost and Snow without Cloaths or Blankets; however, although they seem to have little feeling for the naked, and distressed Soldier, I feel superabundantly for them, and from my Soul pity those miseries, [which], it is neither in my power to relieve or prevent."

In spite of Washington's inability to do much during the hardship at Valley Forge, anti-Washington movements arose. These soldiers worked "behind the curtains" to degrade Washington's reputation in hopes that this would enable Horatio Gates to replace George Washington as the commander of the Continental Army. This scheme is known today as the Conway Cabal.

While the Congressmen came to examine the conditions of the Continental army at Valley Forge, Washington announced that he knew the critics that were involved in the Conway Cabal. He addressed them by saying:

"Whenever the public gets dissatisfied with my service...I shall quit the helm...and retire to a private life."

This silenced his main critics, and Washington's announcement easily renewed his authority as the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army; his authority was never critically challenged for the rest of the decade.

After the horrendous winter, the Continental Army found out that France was going to aid their cause by sending military and monetary donations to the army. France had signed an alliance pact, on February 6, 1778 with the 13 colonies, after General Horatio Gates had led his army and won the decisive Battles of Saratoga. A celebration of French alliance was organized on May 6, 1778, at Valley Forge. The army repeatedly shouted, "Long live France! Long live the friendly powers! Long live the American States!"

Soon, word of the British departure from Philadelphia brought a frenzied activity to the ranks of the Continental Army. On June 19, 1778, exactly six months after the soldiers arrival at Valley Forge, the tested army marched away from Valley Forge and retook Philadelphia. They later charged in pursuit of the British, who were moving toward New York. The Battle of Monmouth, which occurred on June 28, 1778, resulted in an indecisive victory, though Congress and many newspapers treated it as an American victory (since the British retreated and left the battlefield first). This result demonstrated that the colonists were now able to withstand a strong British army after the intense training at Valley Forge under von Steuben, boosting morale and improving Washington's reputation as the Commander in Chief.

The winter at Valley Forge imbued into soldiers a strong will to persevere, endure, and later triumph over obstacles and bring independence to the United States. Washington always acknowledged that the perseverance gained by the soldiers at Valley Forge was what made the Continental Army bind together even stronger and eventually win the war."
 
The March to Valley Forge painted in 1883 by William Trego.

The_March_to_Valley_Forge_William_Trego.png
 
but with all the signing day activities, I neglected to do so.

I have a special place in my heart for Dec. 19. On that date, in 1777, Gen. George Washington, and his tattered band of Continental soldiers, marched into the area that was named Valley Forge. In the preceding weeks, Gen. Washington and his forces had tried to prevent the British from capturing Philadelphia. They had suffered a major defeat at the Battle of Brandywine, a stunning lost of men in the Paoli Massacre, and had nearly pulled off a win at the Battle of Germantown (which took place after the Continental Congress had abandoned Philadelphia, and the British had marched in to it), only to ultimately have to abandon the battlefield due to a combination of their disorganization, the complexity of Washington's battle plan, the British support that came out from Philadelphia, and the approaching darkness. The Battle of Germantown was, in essence, a draw. After Germantown, the two armies shadowed each other, fought several skirmishes, crossed and recrossed the Schuylkill River seeking to find weaknesses in each other's lines, etc. Eventually, with winter quickly approaching, and his army needing a place to set up winter quarters, Gen. Washington selected Valley Forge.

I could write endlessly on the experience at Valley Forge. However, I'm going to borrow the following essay, and post it here (with one minor comment by me).

"On December 19, 1777, when Washington's poorly fed, ill-equipped army, weary from long marches, staggered into Valley Forge, winds blew as the 12,000 Continentals prepared for winter's fury. Only about one in three of them had shoes, and many of their feet had left bloody footprints from the marching. Grounds for brigade encampments were selected, and defense lines were planned and begun.

The first properly constructed hut appeared in three days. One other hut, which required 80 logs, and whose timber had to be collected from miles away, went up in one week with the use of only one axe. These huts provided sufficient protection from the moderately cold, but mainly wet and damp conditions of a typical Pennsylvania winter of 1777–1778. By the beginning of February, construction of 2,000 huts were completed. They provided shelter, but did little to offset the critical shortages that continually plagued the army.

During the springtime, as the climate grew considerably warmer, Washington ordered the cutting of two windows into each hut. Mud was also chipped between the logs to improve ventilation.

Soldiers received inadequate supplies of meat and bread, some getting their only nourishment from "firecake," a tasteless mixture of flour and water. Occasionally, there would be "pepper hot soup," a black pepper-flavored tripe broth. However, due to the talents of Baker General Christopher Ludwig, the men at Valley Forge more often than not received freshly baked bread, about one pound daily. So severe were conditions at times that Washington despaired "that unless some great and capital change suddenly takes place...this Army must inevitably...starve, dissolve, or disperse, in order to obtain subsistence in the best manner they can."

Snow was limited, and small in amounts. The layer of snow was often too thin to be collected and melted into drinking water. Alternating freezing and melting of snow and ice made it impossible to keep dry and allowed for disease to fester.

Animals fared no better. General Henry Knox, Washington's Chief of Artillery, wrote that hundreds of horses either starved to death or died of exhaustion. By the end of the winter, about 700 horses had died. Washington appointed Nathanael Greene as Quartermaster General to take charge of the supplies, who found caches of food and clothing and hauled them there for the troops and horses.

Clothing, too, was wholly inadequate. Many wounded soldiers from previous battles died from exposure. Long marches had destroyed shoes. Blankets were scarce. Tattered garments were seldom replaced. At one point these shortages caused nearly 4,000 men to be listed as unfit for duty.

Undernourished and poorly clothed, living in crowded, damp quarters, the army was ravaged by sickness and disease. Typhoid, typhus, smallpox, dysentery, and pneumonia were among the numerous diseases that thrived in the camp during that winter. These diseases, along with malnutrition and exposure to the freezing temperatures and snow, contributed to the 2,500 soldiers that died by the end of the winter. Gouverneur Morris of New York later stated that the Continentals were a "skeleton of an army...in a naked, starving condition, out of health, out of spirits."

Soldiers deserted in "astonishing great numbers" as hardships at camp overcame their motivation and dedication to fight for the cause of liberty. General Varnum warned that the desperate lack of supplies would "force the army to mutiny."

Women who were relatives or wives of enlisted men alleviated some of the suffering by providing valuable services such as laundry and nursing that the army desperately needed. A group of people called Regimental Camp Followers also helped increase the morale of the soldiers and provided necessary support to the men.

Although Washington repeatedly petitioned for relief and supplies, the Continental Congress was unable to provide it and the soldiers continued to suffer. Finally, on January 24, 1778, five Congressmen came to Valley Forge to examine the conditions of the Continental Army. Washington greeted them imperatively, "Something must be done. Important alterations must be made." Washington also informed them that he wanted Congress to take control of the army supply system, pay for the supplies, and replenish them when necessities were scarce.

By the end of February, there were adequate supplies flowing throughout camp after Congress gave full support to monetarily funding the supply lines of the army, along with reorganizing the commissionary department (which controlled the gathering of the supplies for the army).

Increasing military efficiency, morale, and discipline were as vital to the army's well-being as its supply of food and arms. The army had been handicapped in battle because unit training was administered from a variety of field manuals, making coordinated battle movements awkward and difficult. The soldiers were trained, but not uniformly. The task of developing and carrying out an effective training program fell to Baron Friedrich von Steuben. This skilled Prussian drill master, who had recently arrived from Europe, tirelessly drilled the soldiers, improving their battle and formation techniques greatly.

Martha Washington, the wife of George Washington, arrived at the camp on February 10, 1778. She visited soldiers in the huts and in the camp hospital. Martha Washington also organized a sewing circle of women who knitted, crafted, and patched socks, shirts, and trousers. (My Comment: This is, unfortunately, a common myth that just keeps getting repeated. Martha did join George at Valley Forge, but there is no evidence that while there she organized or participated in any way in sewing or knitting for the Continental troops.)

Camp followers at Valley Forge consisted of the wives, children, mothers, and sisters of the soldiers. These camp followers often served as laundresses, cleaning and mending the uniforms of the soldiers. Washington understood a soldier would die quickly from disease if his uniform was dirty and threadbare. These women and children also provided the emotional support to the army, encouraging them to remain at camp and continue on training and soldiering during the winter months. Women were relegated to the back of the column when marching and were forbidden to ride on wagons. Camp followers faced the issues of disease along with the soldiers.

Because of the terrible conditions of the army during the winter of 1777, the American public, along with Congress, began to criticize Washington for his inability to advance the war effort. Washington himself was aware of an increasing impatience and criticism of his leadership. A few soldiers wanted to replace Washington with General Horatio Gates, who had won a decisive victory in the Battles of Saratoga. Some members of the Continental Congress complained that Washington had left the surrounding countryside unprotected by moving into the isolated area of Valley Forge. Washington replied furiously:

"I can assure those Gentlemen that it is a much easier and less distressing thing to draw remonstrances in a comfortable room by a good fire side than to occupy a cold bleak hill and sleep under frost and Snow without Cloaths or Blankets; however, although they seem to have little feeling for the naked, and distressed Soldier, I feel superabundantly for them, and from my Soul pity those miseries, [which], it is neither in my power to relieve or prevent."

In spite of Washington's inability to do much during the hardship at Valley Forge, anti-Washington movements arose. These soldiers worked "behind the curtains" to degrade Washington's reputation in hopes that this would enable Horatio Gates to replace George Washington as the commander of the Continental Army. This scheme is known today as the Conway Cabal.

While the Congressmen came to examine the conditions of the Continental army at Valley Forge, Washington announced that he knew the critics that were involved in the Conway Cabal. He addressed them by saying:

"Whenever the public gets dissatisfied with my service...I shall quit the helm...and retire to a private life."

This silenced his main critics, and Washington's announcement easily renewed his authority as the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army; his authority was never critically challenged for the rest of the decade.

After the horrendous winter, the Continental Army found out that France was going to aid their cause by sending military and monetary donations to the army. France had signed an alliance pact, on February 6, 1778 with the 13 colonies, after General Horatio Gates had led his army and won the decisive Battles of Saratoga. A celebration of French alliance was organized on May 6, 1778, at Valley Forge. The army repeatedly shouted, "Long live France! Long live the friendly powers! Long live the American States!"

Soon, word of the British departure from Philadelphia brought a frenzied activity to the ranks of the Continental Army. On June 19, 1778, exactly six months after the soldiers arrival at Valley Forge, the tested army marched away from Valley Forge and retook Philadelphia. They later charged in pursuit of the British, who were moving toward New York. The Battle of Monmouth, which occurred on June 28, 1778, resulted in an indecisive victory, though Congress and many newspapers treated it as an American victory (since the British retreated and left the battlefield first). This result demonstrated that the colonists were now able to withstand a strong British army after the intense training at Valley Forge under von Steuben, boosting morale and improving Washington's reputation as the Commander in Chief.

The winter at Valley Forge imbued into soldiers a strong will to persevere, endure, and later triumph over obstacles and bring independence to the United States. Washington always acknowledged that the perseverance gained by the soldiers at Valley Forge was what made the Continental Army bind together even stronger and eventually win the war."
Von Steuben was he straw foot hay foot? As a way to teach them to march
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
And 66 years later to the day, Dickens’ ‘A Christmas Caol’ was published ;).

that's true.

Dickens started writing A Christmas Carol in October of 1843. As you indicted, it was published on Dec. 19, 1843. The first printing, of 6,000 copies, sold out by Dec. 24, 1843. Very few novellas have been as popular, or endured as long, as A Christmas Carol.
 
but with all the signing day activities, I neglected to do so.

I have a special place in my heart for Dec. 19. On that date, in 1777, Gen. George Washington, and his tattered band of Continental soldiers, marched into the area that was named Valley Forge. In the preceding weeks, Gen. Washington and his forces had tried to prevent the British from capturing Philadelphia. They had suffered a major defeat at the Battle of Brandywine, a stunning lost of men in the Paoli Massacre, and had nearly pulled off a win at the Battle of Germantown (which took place after the Continental Congress had abandoned Philadelphia, and the British had marched in to it), only to ultimately have to abandon the battlefield due to a combination of their disorganization, the complexity of Washington's battle plan, the British support that came out from Philadelphia, and the approaching darkness. The Battle of Germantown was, in essence, a draw. After Germantown, the two armies shadowed each other, fought several skirmishes, crossed and recrossed the Schuylkill River seeking to find weaknesses in each other's lines, etc. Eventually, with winter quickly approaching, and his army needing a place to set up winter quarters, Gen. Washington selected Valley Forge.

I could write endlessly on the experience at Valley Forge. However, I'm going to borrow the following essay, and post it here (with one minor comment by me).

"On December 19, 1777, when Washington's poorly fed, ill-equipped army, weary from long marches, staggered into Valley Forge, winds blew as the 12,000 Continentals prepared for winter's fury. Only about one in three of them had shoes, and many of their feet had left bloody footprints from the marching. Grounds for brigade encampments were selected, and defense lines were planned and begun.

The first properly constructed hut appeared in three days. One other hut, which required 80 logs, and whose timber had to be collected from miles away, went up in one week with the use of only one axe. These huts provided sufficient protection from the moderately cold, but mainly wet and damp conditions of a typical Pennsylvania winter of 1777–1778. By the beginning of February, construction of 2,000 huts were completed. They provided shelter, but did little to offset the critical shortages that continually plagued the army.

During the springtime, as the climate grew considerably warmer, Washington ordered the cutting of two windows into each hut. Mud was also chipped between the logs to improve ventilation.

Soldiers received inadequate supplies of meat and bread, some getting their only nourishment from "firecake," a tasteless mixture of flour and water. Occasionally, there would be "pepper hot soup," a black pepper-flavored tripe broth. However, due to the talents of Baker General Christopher Ludwig, the men at Valley Forge more often than not received freshly baked bread, about one pound daily. So severe were conditions at times that Washington despaired "that unless some great and capital change suddenly takes place...this Army must inevitably...starve, dissolve, or disperse, in order to obtain subsistence in the best manner they can."

Snow was limited, and small in amounts. The layer of snow was often too thin to be collected and melted into drinking water. Alternating freezing and melting of snow and ice made it impossible to keep dry and allowed for disease to fester.

Animals fared no better. General Henry Knox, Washington's Chief of Artillery, wrote that hundreds of horses either starved to death or died of exhaustion. By the end of the winter, about 700 horses had died. Washington appointed Nathanael Greene as Quartermaster General to take charge of the supplies, who found caches of food and clothing and hauled them there for the troops and horses.

Clothing, too, was wholly inadequate. Many wounded soldiers from previous battles died from exposure. Long marches had destroyed shoes. Blankets were scarce. Tattered garments were seldom replaced. At one point these shortages caused nearly 4,000 men to be listed as unfit for duty.

Undernourished and poorly clothed, living in crowded, damp quarters, the army was ravaged by sickness and disease. Typhoid, typhus, smallpox, dysentery, and pneumonia were among the numerous diseases that thrived in the camp during that winter. These diseases, along with malnutrition and exposure to the freezing temperatures and snow, contributed to the 2,500 soldiers that died by the end of the winter. Gouverneur Morris of New York later stated that the Continentals were a "skeleton of an army...in a naked, starving condition, out of health, out of spirits."

Soldiers deserted in "astonishing great numbers" as hardships at camp overcame their motivation and dedication to fight for the cause of liberty. General Varnum warned that the desperate lack of supplies would "force the army to mutiny."

Women who were relatives or wives of enlisted men alleviated some of the suffering by providing valuable services such as laundry and nursing that the army desperately needed. A group of people called Regimental Camp Followers also helped increase the morale of the soldiers and provided necessary support to the men.

Although Washington repeatedly petitioned for relief and supplies, the Continental Congress was unable to provide it and the soldiers continued to suffer. Finally, on January 24, 1778, five Congressmen came to Valley Forge to examine the conditions of the Continental Army. Washington greeted them imperatively, "Something must be done. Important alterations must be made." Washington also informed them that he wanted Congress to take control of the army supply system, pay for the supplies, and replenish them when necessities were scarce.

By the end of February, there were adequate supplies flowing throughout camp after Congress gave full support to monetarily funding the supply lines of the army, along with reorganizing the commissionary department (which controlled the gathering of the supplies for the army).

Increasing military efficiency, morale, and discipline were as vital to the army's well-being as its supply of food and arms. The army had been handicapped in battle because unit training was administered from a variety of field manuals, making coordinated battle movements awkward and difficult. The soldiers were trained, but not uniformly. The task of developing and carrying out an effective training program fell to Baron Friedrich von Steuben. This skilled Prussian drill master, who had recently arrived from Europe, tirelessly drilled the soldiers, improving their battle and formation techniques greatly.

Martha Washington, the wife of George Washington, arrived at the camp on February 10, 1778. She visited soldiers in the huts and in the camp hospital. Martha Washington also organized a sewing circle of women who knitted, crafted, and patched socks, shirts, and trousers. (My Comment: This is, unfortunately, a common myth that just keeps getting repeated. Martha did join George at Valley Forge, but there is no evidence that while there she organized or participated in any way in sewing or knitting for the Continental troops.)

Camp followers at Valley Forge consisted of the wives, children, mothers, and sisters of the soldiers. These camp followers often served as laundresses, cleaning and mending the uniforms of the soldiers. Washington understood a soldier would die quickly from disease if his uniform was dirty and threadbare. These women and children also provided the emotional support to the army, encouraging them to remain at camp and continue on training and soldiering during the winter months. Women were relegated to the back of the column when marching and were forbidden to ride on wagons. Camp followers faced the issues of disease along with the soldiers.

Because of the terrible conditions of the army during the winter of 1777, the American public, along with Congress, began to criticize Washington for his inability to advance the war effort. Washington himself was aware of an increasing impatience and criticism of his leadership. A few soldiers wanted to replace Washington with General Horatio Gates, who had won a decisive victory in the Battles of Saratoga. Some members of the Continental Congress complained that Washington had left the surrounding countryside unprotected by moving into the isolated area of Valley Forge. Washington replied furiously:

"I can assure those Gentlemen that it is a much easier and less distressing thing to draw remonstrances in a comfortable room by a good fire side than to occupy a cold bleak hill and sleep under frost and Snow without Cloaths or Blankets; however, although they seem to have little feeling for the naked, and distressed Soldier, I feel superabundantly for them, and from my Soul pity those miseries, [which], it is neither in my power to relieve or prevent."

In spite of Washington's inability to do much during the hardship at Valley Forge, anti-Washington movements arose. These soldiers worked "behind the curtains" to degrade Washington's reputation in hopes that this would enable Horatio Gates to replace George Washington as the commander of the Continental Army. This scheme is known today as the Conway Cabal.

While the Congressmen came to examine the conditions of the Continental army at Valley Forge, Washington announced that he knew the critics that were involved in the Conway Cabal. He addressed them by saying:

"Whenever the public gets dissatisfied with my service...I shall quit the helm...and retire to a private life."

This silenced his main critics, and Washington's announcement easily renewed his authority as the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army; his authority was never critically challenged for the rest of the decade.

After the horrendous winter, the Continental Army found out that France was going to aid their cause by sending military and monetary donations to the army. France had signed an alliance pact, on February 6, 1778 with the 13 colonies, after General Horatio Gates had led his army and won the decisive Battles of Saratoga. A celebration of French alliance was organized on May 6, 1778, at Valley Forge. The army repeatedly shouted, "Long live France! Long live the friendly powers! Long live the American States!"

Soon, word of the British departure from Philadelphia brought a frenzied activity to the ranks of the Continental Army. On June 19, 1778, exactly six months after the soldiers arrival at Valley Forge, the tested army marched away from Valley Forge and retook Philadelphia. They later charged in pursuit of the British, who were moving toward New York. The Battle of Monmouth, which occurred on June 28, 1778, resulted in an indecisive victory, though Congress and many newspapers treated it as an American victory (since the British retreated and left the battlefield first). This result demonstrated that the colonists were now able to withstand a strong British army after the intense training at Valley Forge under von Steuben, boosting morale and improving Washington's reputation as the Commander in Chief.

The winter at Valley Forge imbued into soldiers a strong will to persevere, endure, and later triumph over obstacles and bring independence to the United States. Washington always acknowledged that the perseverance gained by the soldiers at Valley Forge was what made the Continental Army bind together even stronger and eventually win the war."
Did the sssistance from the French make the difference between loss and victory?
 
Last month, we took the grand kids on a trip to Disney. One of, if not the favorite attraction is The American Adventure at EPCOT. It traces the highs and some lows of our country and IMO, should be seen by every American who loves their country. This is the finale of the show and is very touching and inspirational.

 
Did the sssistance from the French make the difference between loss and victory?
In the timeframe that it took place, absolutely. Yorktown doesn't happen without the French fleet.
Final victory, however, I feel would have been inevitable.
As Paine wrote.... there is something very absurd in supposing a continent to be perpetually governed by an island.
 
Did the sssistance from the French make the difference between loss and victory?

Oui!
France provided substantial amounts of arms and munitions. I recall reading that 90% of our gunpowder came from France. They provided valuable military advice, naval support, reinforcements, and money. Without them we lose. Vive la France!
 
Did the assistance from the French make the difference between loss and victory?

Hell yes, it did! Especially at The Battle of Yorktown. You can view French mortars in the fields there (some were manufactured more than 100 years prior to that battle!). The French threat, especially at sea, prevented the British military from focusing their full might on the American uprising.
 
We saw the same when visiting Yorktown.

Tom, thank you for the retelling of the story of Valley Forge in such detail and passion.

One of my favorite remembrances doesn't occur until after the war is over. Earlier in Dec. the last British ship had sailed east into the distance and Gen. Washington asked his general officers to meet at Faunces Tavern in NYC to have a parting festivity. This would likely be the last time many of these men would see each other in this life, they had bonded over the long years of privation, war and difficulties.


As they came to a close of their time together the General spoke. He said he had to use spectacles to read his notes as his service to his country had taken a toll. This heightened the emotions already rising in the room.

He finished and asked each man to come to him and take his hand and speak a few words as he could not easily come to them. Henry Knox was first, he grasped the General's hand and overcome with emotion, embraced the General. No words were spoken but tears were shed. The same thing happened as each man approached the General, an embrace, tears and a parting. Not a word of farewell was spoken as they parted that day. I envision myself there and can't help but shed a tear thinking of the enormity of it all. The emotions that coursed through that room as those men who gave so much, had bonded so firmly over such hardship and danger now triumphant only to part.

We visited NYC and our son several years ago and requested a visit to Faunces Tavern right after our visit to the Ground Zero Memorial. We were allowed into the room where the farewell occurred and a guide gave a presentation. Unfortunately she spoke to everything but the farewell, why I don't know? There is more to the museum and you can grab a nice lunch there prior to the tour which because we were there on July 4th, cost only a dollar each, a treat from our future daughter in law.

Each of us is touched by every aspect of the War of Revolution but some more than others. The Faunces farewell will always touch my heart in a very special way.

Merry Christmas.
 
and I spilled some beer in this place, but I wasnt with George....
Middleton Tavern was host to a galaxy of the nation's most revered leaders during the period following the American Revolution. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin were numbered among its prominent patrons.

The Tavern was frequented by members of the Continental Congress meeting in the State House on such historic occasions as the resignation of General Washington's commission, December 23, 1783, the ratification of the Treaty of Paris ending the Revolutionary War in January 1784, and the Annapolis Convention which laid the groundwork for the Federal Constitution Convention held the following year in Philadelphia.

It is also probable that James Monroe, who knew Middleton as a Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, visited the Tavern after his election to the Presidency. When President Monroe was received in Annapolis for his stay from May 28-30, 1818, he was greeted by Annapolis Mayor John Randal, who, at the time, was the owner of the Tavern.

In addition, Middleton Tavern was the site of meetings of the Maryland Jockey Club and Free Masons, as well as the renowned Tuesday Club, whose membership was made up of some of the town's most distinguished wits, and which met for the purpose of drinking, smoking, gambling and comradeship.

The building was probably occupied as early as 1740. In 1750, Elizabeth Bennett sold the property to Horatio Middleton who operated the building as an "Inn for Seafaring Men." The nautical oriented Middleton also owned a ferry that linked Annapolis to the Eastern Shore of the Chesapeake Bay.

Following the death of Horatio Middleton, the Tavern was operated by his widow, Anne, and later by his son, Samuel Middleton, who also continued to operate the ferry boats as well as an overseas trade operation and ship construction business - all from the Tavern site.

The Tavern was an all important stopping place for early travelers using the ferries to cross the Bay, including George Washington; Tench Tilghman, on the way to Philadelphia with the message of Cornwallis' surrender at Yorktown; and Thomas Jefferson, whose records note that in 1783 he gave Samuel Middleton passage money to Rock Hall on the Eastern Shore.

In those days, Middleton's was much more than a tavern; it has been described as one of the early showplaces of Annapolis, with its gardens spreading form Prince George Street to the water's edge.

During the Revolution, the Tavern was operated by George Mann, but when the war ended, Samuel Middleton's son Gilbert, operated the business until the 1780's. The next owner was John Randall, a distinguished Revolutionary logistics officer who, prior to the war, was a builder and a partner to the renowned architect William Buckland, designer of Annapolis' Hammond-Harwood House.

Jerry Hardesty, the current owner of Middleton Tavern, bought the restaurant in 1968 from Cleo and Mary Apostol who had operated the Mandris Restaurant on the corner for thirty-five years. Hardesty restored the building inside and out and was responsible for changing the name back to the original Middleton Tavern.

In 1983, Middleton Tavern underwent remodeling and expansion, which resulted in the new Tavern and Oyster Bar. The greatly expanded and beautifully appointed upstairs dining rooms allow the Tavern to accommodate private parties, meetings and the heavy weekend crowds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom McAndrew
Each of us is touched by every aspect of the War of Revolution but some more than others. The Faunces farewell will always touch my heart in a very special way.

A very nice post, Carl.

I've been to Faunces Tavern several times. Their tours are OK, and I'd recommend casual history fans to visit Faunces Tavern and to take the tour. (You can even get a meal, or some libations, while there.) The problem you encountered with the tour guides at Faunces Tavern aren't all that uncommon at Rev War sites. There are a few exceptions, but at most of the Rev War sites I've visited, the tour guides either gave incomplete info, or gave inaccurate info, on the tour. I've had to learn to not challenge the guides during the tour, and just bite my tongue and not say a thing, or to try and engage them, privately, after the tour is over to correct them.

As for the timeline of the British departing NYC at the end of the war, I'm pretty sure that Nov. 25 (not early Dec.) was the date the last British boat/troops departed. Washington's Farewell, at Faunces Tavern, took place on Dec. 4, 1783. The most famous lines from Gen. Washington from the farewell are:

"With a heart full of love and gratitude I now take leave of you. I most devoutly wish that your latter days may be as prosperous and happy as your former ones have been glorious and honorable. I cannot come to each of you but shall feel obliged if each of you will come and take me by the hand."

By all accounts, it was a very emotional, and a very moving, event.

I'll have to check on whether Gen. Washington commented on his having to use spectacles during the farewell at Faunces Tavern. Washington had some vanity, and did not like to be seen by others wearing glassed. Perhaps the most famous incident of his using them in public, and commenting on the fact, was at the Newburgh Conspiracy, which took place on March 15, 1783. The officers knew that the war was essentially over -- they were just waiting on the peace negotiations/treaty to be completed -- but they were tired of not being paid, and had questions about their pensions. A meeting was called to organize a mutiny, with plans to march on Congress to secure their money. Washington became aware of the meeting, penned a speech, and appeared at the meeting and delivered the speech to the men. It's a nice speech, and can be easily found online. However, it did not have the effect on the officers that Gen. Washington was hoping. Washington usually had a backup plan, and at this meeting his backup plan was to read a note from a member of Congress explaining the difficulty Congress was having in raising funds for the troops. He had trouble seeing the note, and moved it further and further from his eyes in an attempt to be able to read it to the assembled officers. Finally, he reached into his pocket for his glasses (which shocked the assembled officers), and said, "Gentlemen, you will permit me to put on my spectacles, for I have not only grown grey but almost blind in the service of my country." This unplanned action and statement accomplished far more than did his speech. Reportedly, many of the officers teared up after this comment by their General. It also shifted the tide, as the officers decided to not commit mutiny, and to not march on Congress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LionJim
A very nice post, Carl.

I've been to Faunces Tavern several times. Their tours are OK, and I'd recommend casual history fans to visit Faunces Tavern and to take the tour. (You can even get a meal, or some libations, while there.) The problem you encountered with the tour guides at Faunces Tavern aren't all that uncommon at Rev War sites. There are a few exceptions, but at most of the Rev War sites I've visited, the tour guides either gave incomplete info, or gave inaccurate info, on the tour. I've had to learn to not challenge the guides during the tour, and just bite my tongue and not say a thing, or to try and engage them, privately, after the tour is over to correct them.

As for the timeline of the British departing NYC at the end of the war, I'm pretty sure that Nov. 25 (not early Dec.) was the date the last British boat/troops departed. Washington's Farewell, at Faunces Tavern, took place on Dec. 4, 1783. The most famous lines from Gen. Washington from the farewell are:

"With a heart full of love and gratitude I now take leave of you. I most devoutly wish that your latter days may be as prosperous and happy as your former ones have been glorious and honorable. I cannot come to each of you but shall feel obliged if each of you will come and take me by the hand."

By all accounts, it was a very emotional, and a very moving, event.

I'll have to check on whether Gen. Washington commented on his having to use spectacles during the farewell at Faunces Tavern. Washington had some vanity, and did not like to be seen by others wearing glassed. Perhaps the most famous incident of his using them in public, and commenting on the fact, was at the Newburgh Conspiracy, which took place on March 15, 1783. The officers knew that the war was essentially over -- they were just waiting on the peach negotiations/treaty to be completed -- but they were tired of not being paid, and questions about their pensions. A meeting was called to organize a mutiny, with plans to march on Congress to secure their money. Washington became aware of the meeting, penned a speech, and appeared at the meeting and delivered the speech to the men. It's a nice speech, and can be easily found online. However, it did not have the effect on the officers that Gen. Washington was hoping. Washington usually had a backup plan, and at this meeting his backup plan was to read a note from a member of Congress explaining the difficulty Congress was having in raising funds for the troops. He had trouble seeing the note, and moved it further and further from his eyes in an attempt to be able to read it to the assembled officers. Finally, he reached into his pocket for his glasses (which shocked the assembled officers), and said, "Gentlemen, you will permit me to put on my spectacles, for I have not only grown grey but almost blind in the service of my country." This unplanned action and statement accomplished far more than did his speech. Reportedly, many of the officers teared up after this comment by their General. It also shifted the tide, as the officers decided to not commit mutiny, and to not march on Congress.
Thanks Tom.

Yes, the spectacle comment was wrong, I conflated two events. Memory is slipping, used to be like a vault but not anymore.

Thanks also for inserting the Faunces quotes from the General, they really hit home to me.

I do not have your expertise in history but do share your passion. Really enjoyed your commentary about the tribulations at Valley Forge, its history and the solutions to the entire misery. Usually you don't hear about the solution, just the misery.

Again, thanks for the updates and corrections, appreciated. Merry Christmas to you sir. and thank you for all you do here.
 
I grew up not far from Washington's Crossing, so I always appreciate hearing about the Revolution. As I tell my friends here in Ohio--"to you, it's the history of our country, but to me it's local history".

Good stuff, @kgilbert78. I recall that you were in Roxborough/Manayunk, but do not remember you ever mentioning growing up near Washington's Crossing. I was out there recently, at the David Library of the American Revolution (an amazing resource for Rev War historians, enthusiasts, etc.).

While I rarely go to Rev War reenanctments any more, I always wanted to go to the Washington Crossing reenanctment. Alas, it takes place on Dec. 25th, from noon to 3, and I always have too many things going on with family on Christmas (which are far more important) to make it to the reenactment.
 
Good stuff, @kgilbert78. I recall that you were in Roxborough/Manayunk, but do not remember you ever mentioning growing up near Washington's Crossing. I was out there recently, at the David Library of the American Revolution (an amazing resource for Rev War historians, enthusiasts, etc.).

While I rarely go to Rev War reenanctments any more, I always wanted to go to the Washington Crossing reenanctment. Alas, it takes place on Dec. 25th, from noon to 3, and I always have too many things going on with family on Christmas (which are far more important) to make it to the reenactment.
My mom's family was from Roxborough/Manayunk. I grew up in Warminster. Given that my dad's family was an old New England family from Essex County, I have a few Revolutionary War ancestors (plus one on my mom's side I did not know about until a couple of years ago)--and a couple of Tories, from my Nova Scotian heritage. But anyone who has NE connections from that era has both.

Never went to the reenactment--but was often in the park with family and friends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom McAndrew
My mom's family was from Roxborough/Manayunk. I grew up in Warminster. Given that my dad's family was an old New England family from Essex County, I have a few Revolutionary War ancestors (plus one on my mom's side I did not know about until a couple of years ago)--and a couple of Tories, from my Nova Scotian heritage. But anyone who has NE connections from that era has both.

Never went to the reenactment--but was often in the park with family and friends.

Yeah, the New England experience during the Rev War was a tad more complicated than most Americans realize. I read a great book last year, The Martyr and the Traitor, by Virginia DeJohn Anderson, which offered a very compelling insight on what took place in Connecticut during the Rev War period. It could get rather ugly, with people being forced to choose a side to back in the early days of the war, even when they were rather ambivalent about the situation, and just were trying to survive. It was not uncommon for different members of the same family to be on opposite sides.

So you grew up in Warminster. A Tennent grad? An Arch. Wood grad?
 
I had two direct line ancestors that served in the Virginia Militia, on the "frontier" at that time. Their unit ended up at Yorktown but I have not record of them being there. I had heard about it many years ago and finally decided to attempt to join the SAR. After an exhaustive search of many records I was accepted. Their service was verified and I was pleased to find the stories were for the most part, true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom McAndrew
Yeah, the New England experience during the Rev War was a tad more complicated than most Americans realize. I read a great book last year, The Martyr and the Traitor, by Virginia DeJohn Anderson, which offered a very compelling insight on what took place in Connecticut during the Rev War period. It could get rather ugly, with people being forced to choose a side to back in the early days of the war, even when they were rather ambivalent about the situation, and just were trying to survive. It was not uncommon for different members of the same family to be on opposite sides.

So you grew up in Warminster. A Tennent grad? An Arch. Wood grad?
Panther... Supposedly there was a Revolutionary War graveyard from the Battle of the Crooked Billet behind the old HS, where some of the dead from that battle were buried. But I never got the chance to confirm it. But both the old and new HS are essentially gone (the office and auditorium of the old Tennent are part of the senior center, and the auditorium and gym of the new Tennent remained when they tore down the main building. I've never been in the new HS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom McAndrew
I had two direct line ancestors that served in the Virginia Militia, on the "frontier" at that time. Their unit ended up at Yorktown but I have not record of them being there. I had heard about it many years ago and finally decided to attempt to join the SAR. After an exhaustive search of many records I was accepted. Their service was verified and I was pleased to find the stories were for the most part, true.
I've thought about it. The paperwork can be a pain. Maybe after I retire. One of my ancestors, Jonathan Gilbert, has a DAR post named after him, and I'm descended from Capt Asa Prince who fought at Bunker Hill. There's also a John Flake from Bucks County on my mother's side--that one's really tough due to a lot of transliterations of names. That family name was also Fluke, Fluck, Pflug (that's likely the original German). And I'm sure there are others--when you are from an old Colonial family you are pretty much related to every one else from that era. It was unavoidable--not that many folks to marry, early on.

A branch of the Wheelock family went to Nova Scotia during the war, which is where my Tory ancestors came from. Some came back to the Lawrence, MA, area for jobs during the 1800s.
 
It is interesting you note the familiarity of many from yesteryear. During my research we discovered my wife and I are 5th cousins, three ways. Once on her mothers side and twice on her fathers side. Due to the difficulty of movement, lack of roads and long distance travel opportunities many marriages occurred among the locals and the intermixing did not become diluted until transportation and road access improved.

My ancestors wife was of the Studebaker line, yes, the auto line. Several of her family moved west and landed in South Bend, IN where they made wagons during the War Between the States which became an auto business in the early 1900's.

If you do attempt to join the SAR one word of advice. They require Birth and Death Certificates for your parents and grandparents along with a great deal of information on preceding generations back to your Patriot ancestor/'s. The problem when I did it was PA was in a slow down mode at those agencies and it took 10 months to receive either birth or death certificates, in roughly 2010 or 2011 as I remember. They delayed the applications and did not begin to work on them until a week before they were due. It was political and a protest about cut backs but the citizens were the people who were harmed, not the politicians which is typical.

Another amusing side note. When you phone the Dept. to inquire on your application status they give you a choice of two departments to route your call: Birth or Death. It sounds funny the first dozen times you hear it.
 
It is interesting you note the familiarity of many from yesteryear. During my research we discovered my wife and I are 5th cousins, three ways. Once on her mothers side and twice on her fathers side. Due to the difficulty of movement, lack of roads and long distance travel opportunities many marriages occurred among the locals and the intermixing did not become diluted until transportation and road access improved.

My ancestors wife was of the Studebaker line, yes, the auto line. Several of her family moved west and landed in South Bend, IN where they made wagons during the War Between the States which became an auto business in the early 1900's.

If you do attempt to join the SAR one word of advice. They require Birth and Death Certificates for your parents and grandparents along with a great deal of information on preceding generations back to your Patriot ancestor/'s. The problem when I did it was PA was in a slow down mode at those agencies and it took 10 months to receive either birth or death certificates, in roughly 2010 or 2011 as I remember. They delayed the applications and did not begin to work on them until a week before they were due. It was political and a protest about cut backs but the citizens were the people who were harmed, not the politicians which is typical.

Another amusing side note. When you phone the Dept. to inquire on your application status they give you a choice of two departments to route your call: Birth or Death. It sounds funny the first dozen times you hear it.
I expect that if we do the DNA thing for my wife, we'll find a connection on her mom's side (her dad was 100% Italian)--we had a hint of it back in the day when Ancestry used other trees to come up with famous folks you might be related to and an obscure Rhode Island Congresscritter popped up on both of our list. Could have been by marriage of course (i.e., me related to one parential side and her to the other).

I do have the death certs somewhere for my folks as I was in charge of inurnment.
 
FWIW, the Crossing reenactment was postponed this year (well, technically, last year) due to high water.

I understand Washington was going to postpone the crossing as well due to floating ice in the river, but he harkened back to an earlier day in 1753 when he nearly drowned in the icy waters of the Allegheny River near Pittsburgh and he told his soldiers "Push on men! If Pittsburgh didn't kill me this sure as hell won't" and they did. The rest, as they say, is history. :)

Crossing-the-Delaware.jpg



.
 
ADVERTISEMENT